版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
課時(shí)作業(yè)(十九)Ⅰ.閱讀理解[2023·新課標(biāo)I卷]On
March
7,
1907,
the
English
statistician
Francis
Galton
published
a
paper
which
illustrated
what
has
come
to
be
known
as
the
“wisdom
of
crowds”
effect.
The
experiment
of
estimation
he
conducted
showed
that
in
some
cases,
the
average
of
a
large
number
of
independent
estimates
could
be
quite
accurate.This
effect
capitalizes
on
the
fact
that
when
people
make
errors,
those
errors
aren’t
always
the
same.
Some
people
will
tend
to
overestimate,
and
some
to
underestimate.
When
enough
of
these
errors
are
averaged
together,
they
cancel
each
other
out,
resulting
in
a
more
accurate
estimate.
If
people
are
similar
and
tend
to
make
the
same
errors,
then
their
errors
won’t
cancel
each
other
out.
In
more
technical
terms,
the
wisdom
of
crowds
requires
that
people’s
estimates
be
independent.
If
for
whatever
reasons,
people’s
errors
become
correlated
or
dependent,
the
accuracy
of
the
estimate
will
go
down.But
a
new
study
led
by
Joaquin
Navajas
offered
an
interesting
twist(轉(zhuǎn)折)
on
this
classic
phenomenon.
The
key
finding
of
the
study
was
that
when
crowds
were
further
divided
into
smaller
groups
that
were
allowed
to
have
a
discussion,
the
averages
from
these
groups
were
more
accurate
than
those
from
an
equal
number
of
independent
individuals.
For
instance,
the
average
obtained
from
the
estimates
of
four
discussion
groups
of
five
was
significantly
more
accurate
than
the
average
obtained
from
20
independent
individuals.In
a
follow-up
study
with
100
university
students,
the
researchers
tried
to
get
a
better
sense
of
what
the
group
members
actually
did
in
their
discussion.
Did
they
tend
to
go
with
those
most
confident
about
their
estimates?
Did
they
follow
those
least
willing
to
change
their
minds?
This
happened
some
of
the
time,
but
it
wasn’t
the
dominant
response.
Most
frequently,
the
groups
reported
that
they
“shared
arguments
and
reasoned
together”.
Somehow,
these
arguments
and
reasoning
resulted
in
a
global
reduction
in
error.
Although
the
studies
led
by
Navajas
have
limitations
and
many
questions
remain,
the
potential
implications
for
group
discussion
and
decision-making
are
enormous.(
B
)1.What
is
Paragraph
2
of
the
text
mainly
about?A.The
methods
of
estimation.B.The
underlying
logic
of
the
effect.C.The
causes
of
people’s
errors.D.The
design
of
Galton’s
experiment.B(
D
)2.
Navajas’
study
found
that
the
average
accuracy
could
increase
even
if
.A.the
crowds
were
relatively
smallB.there
were
occasional
underestimatesC.individuals
did
not
communicateD.estimates
were
not
fully
independentD(
C
)3.
What
did
the
follow-up
study
focus
on?A.The
size
of
the
groups.B.The
dominant
members.C.The
discussion
process.D.The
individual
estimates.C(
D
)4.
What
is
the
author’s
attitude
towards
Navajas’
studies?A.Unclear.B.Dismissive.C.Doubtful.D.Approving.DⅡ.閱讀填空A.Changing
the
way
you
provide
a
service.B.In
short,innovation
is
key
to
increasing
profits.C.Not
all
innovation
will
bring
success
to
our
businesses.D.Responding
to
customer
demands
by
changing
what
is
on
offer.E.Innovating
constantly
in
order
to
keep
your
business
on
the
right
track.F.There
is
a
risk
that
your
competitors
might
take
away
some
of
your
customers.G.It
is
important
to
consider
how
the
technology
can
improve
our
products
or
services.
In
order
for
a
business
to
survive
in
today’s
world,
it
is
important
that
we
regularly
review
what
we
are
doing
and
how
we
are
doing
it.By
considering
new
ideas
and
new
ways
of
doing
things,we
can
improve
our
products
or
services,increase
sales,reduce
costs
and
make
our
processes
more
effective
and
efficient.
1
?BUsing
the
latest
technology
to
improve
your
products
or
services.When
we
think
of
innovation,we
often
think
of
new
technologies.While
they
might
be
impressive,
we
should
not
use
new
technologies
just
because
they
are
available.
2
?
Companies
that
produce
cars,
household
appliances,
etc.often
have
a
large
R&D(研發(fā))
department
to
work
on
making
their
products
better.G
3
By
listening
to
customer
feedback,
we
can
get
their
opinions
on
how
we
are
doing
and
find
out
about
what
it
is
that
they
want.We
also
need
to
be
aware
of
changes
in
customer
demands
and
keep
up
with
the
times.DOffering
a
new
product
or
service
to
reach
new
customers.
4
Innovation
sometimes
means
developing
a
new
product
that
targets
a
different
group
of
customers.Although
video
games
were
often
played
by
boys,in
2006,a
video
games
giant
introduced
a
new
game,successfully
targeting
girls
and
older
customers.F
5
By
looking
at
the
changes
to
the
customer’s
lifestyle
and
needs,we
sometimes
realize
that
there
might
be
better
ways
to
serve
them.Customers
who
do
not
have
a
lot
of
time
might
prefer
to
have
their
food
or
their
shopping
delivered
to
their
homes,or
they
like
to
do
their
banking
online.AⅢ.語(yǔ)法填空Chen
Wei,a
Chinese
military’s
top
biomedical
expert,
received
the
honorary
title
“People’s
Hero”
1.
her
contribution
to
biomedical
research
and
vaccine
development.for
One
of
Chen
Wei’s
qualities
that
people
have
praised
is
the
2.
(speed)
way
she
does
things.She
walks,talks
and
eats
very
fast
so
that
she
can
use
the
time
3.
(save)
to
battle
the
enemies
of
public
health.For
nearly
three
decades,
the
dedicated
scientist
has
been
at
the
front
line
fighting
some
of
the
world’s
most
dangerous
viruses,4.
(include)
Ebola,SARS
and
MERS.
speedy
saved
including
After
graduating
from
Tsinghua
University,Chen
5.
(enter)
the
Academy
of
Military
Medical
Sciences.Chen
said
she
still
remembered
the
6.
(sad)
she
felt
when
the
first
experiment
failed.“The
incident
taught
me
to
be
of
grea
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025年物聯(lián)網(wǎng)設(shè)備管理平臺(tái)可行性研究報(bào)告
- 2026屆四川省德陽(yáng)市高中高三上學(xué)期第一次診斷考試歷史試題(含答案)
- 2025年現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)科技示范園區(qū)建設(shè)可行性研究報(bào)告
- 2025年青少年體育產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展可行性研究報(bào)告
- 2025年半導(dǎo)體產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈發(fā)展項(xiàng)目可行性研究報(bào)告
- 2025年綠色食品供應(yīng)鏈透明度提升可行性研究報(bào)告
- 2025年生態(tài)公園建設(shè)與維護(hù)項(xiàng)目可行性研究報(bào)告
- 2026年三亞航空旅游職業(yè)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握新殬I(yè)適應(yīng)性測(cè)試題庫(kù)附答案詳解
- 2026年鐵嶺衛(wèi)生職業(yè)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握新殬I(yè)適應(yīng)性考試題庫(kù)附答案詳解
- 2026年淮南聯(lián)合大學(xué)單招職業(yè)技能測(cè)試題庫(kù)及答案詳解一套
- 2025四川產(chǎn)業(yè)振興基金投資集團(tuán)有限公司應(yīng)屆畢業(yè)生招聘9人筆試歷年難易錯(cuò)考點(diǎn)試卷帶答案解析2套試卷
- 《建筑設(shè)計(jì)》課程教案(2025-2026學(xué)年)
- 軟裝工程質(zhì)量管理方案有哪些
- 海水墻面防水施工方案設(shè)計(jì)
- 路面攤鋪安全培訓(xùn)內(nèi)容課件
- 水箱安裝施工質(zhì)量管理方案
- 2025年國(guó)企人力資源管理崗招聘考試專業(yè)卷(含崗位說(shuō)明書(shū))解析與答案
- 光伏電廠防火安全培訓(xùn)課件
- 小學(xué)數(shù)學(xué)單位換算表(高清可打?。?/a>
- 千縣工程縣醫(yī)院微創(chuàng)介入中心綜合能力建設(shè)評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
- 交通事故處理講解
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論