1、-. z量刑論文：量刑程序規(guī)化改革探析【中文摘要】量刑程序規(guī)化改革旨在推進(jìn)量刑公開(kāi),規(guī)量刑程序,實(shí)現(xiàn)量刑公正。在整個(gè)量刑程序規(guī)化改革進(jìn)程中,其改革本身亦是一項(xiàng)系統(tǒng)工程,成為社會(huì)關(guān)注的熱點(diǎn)和學(xué)者討論的焦點(diǎn)。同時(shí),如何通過(guò)改革,實(shí)現(xiàn)量刑公正與高效,成為司法實(shí)踐的難點(diǎn)。鑒于我國(guó)量刑程序規(guī)化改革的路徑主要是理論與實(shí)踐密切互動(dòng)和相互升化的過(guò)程,本文主要結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐,將視野從完善量刑程序擴(kuò)展到規(guī)量刑程序規(guī)化改革進(jìn)程,從司法實(shí)務(wù)的視角探視改革中存在的問(wèn)題,以期對(duì)促進(jìn)我國(guó)量刑程序規(guī)化改革有所裨益。文章包括三個(gè)局部:第一局部是量刑程序規(guī)化改革概述,文章首先考察了我國(guó)量刑程序規(guī)化改革的時(shí)間進(jìn)程和上下聯(lián)動(dòng)、注重實(shí)踐

2、、深度研討的改革現(xiàn)狀,并結(jié)合實(shí)踐分析改革取得的初步成效,即量刑程序已根本覆蓋到刑事訴訟活動(dòng)的各環(huán)節(jié),通過(guò)量刑透明初步實(shí)現(xiàn)量刑幅度根本均衡,量刑結(jié)果根本公正。文章認(rèn)為,鑒于量刑程序規(guī)化改革的所有環(huán)節(jié)均離不開(kāi)量刑程序主體的直接參與,量刑程序規(guī)化改革的邏輯起點(diǎn)和整個(gè)改革進(jìn)程均隱含著對(duì)量刑程序功能的追求與實(shí)現(xiàn),文章對(duì)二者進(jìn)展了初步論證,為下文提出量刑程序規(guī)化改革建議奠定根底。第二局部主要從實(shí)務(wù)的視角,對(duì)量刑程序規(guī)化改革的現(xiàn)狀和存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)展分析,為完善量刑程序規(guī)化改革作深入鋪墊。文章在調(diào)研根底上歸納的改革現(xiàn)狀主要是,量刑程序全面納入庭審,根本實(shí)現(xiàn)定罪程序與量刑程序相對(duì)分立。但對(duì)于被告人不認(rèn)罪的量刑程序

3、和被告人不同意量刑建議的簡(jiǎn)易程序量刑程序,是改革的困境。文章基于兼顧量刑效率與量刑公正的理念,結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐提出一定程序性構(gòu)建。同時(shí),量刑程序規(guī)化改革離不開(kāi)政法各家的協(xié)調(diào)配合,文章總結(jié)出在改革進(jìn)程中目前政法各家溝通協(xié)調(diào)的主要方式,并注意到改革進(jìn)程中加強(qiáng)學(xué)習(xí)與調(diào)研的重要性。各地司法機(jī)關(guān)還通過(guò)制定?量刑程序規(guī)化改革實(shí)施細(xì)則?等做法,深入推進(jìn)量刑程序規(guī)化改革工作。改革進(jìn)程中,在法官進(jìn)展單獨(dú)量刑階段,如何提高透明度與可控性,成為理論的盲點(diǎn)和實(shí)踐的難點(diǎn)。文章通過(guò)調(diào)查和提煉審判實(shí)踐中對(duì)承辦人撰寫(xiě)審理報(bào)告、合議庭評(píng)議等環(huán)節(jié)的一些規(guī)性做法,初步實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)法官自由心證的有效監(jiān)視。上述對(duì)量刑程序的規(guī)最終實(shí)現(xiàn)量刑公正,但

4、如何讓當(dāng)事人理解和承受公正的結(jié)果成為實(shí)踐的難點(diǎn),一些法院通過(guò)加強(qiáng)法律釋明與判后答疑有效消除當(dāng)事人的抵觸情緒,值得借鑒。最后,文章完全基于實(shí)證調(diào)研,歸納出在目前量刑程序規(guī)化改革中還存在的量刑建議權(quán)發(fā)表缺乏、量刑辯護(hù)不能充分發(fā)揮、量刑證據(jù)制度缺失等六點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。第三局部結(jié)合我國(guó)量刑程序規(guī)化改革存在的問(wèn)題,站在司法實(shí)務(wù)角度,結(jié)合相關(guān)訴訟理論,提出有針對(duì)性的系統(tǒng)改革建議。文章認(rèn)為,量刑程序的全面推進(jìn)需要政法各家積極參與,參與的過(guò)程應(yīng)是將自身職能充分發(fā)揮,并逐步建立相互配合、相互催促銜接機(jī)制的過(guò)程。需要配合的主體還有刑事訴訟當(dāng)事人,即所有量刑主體,只有明確他們的權(quán)利義務(wù),方能更好的保護(hù)權(quán)利,更好的讓推卸義務(wù)

5、者切實(shí)履行應(yīng)盡的職責(zé),從而真正起到監(jiān)視與制衡的作用。在此根底上,還應(yīng)科學(xué)設(shè)置主體之間的相互關(guān)系與運(yùn)作步驟,促進(jìn)量刑程序全面公開(kāi),確保量刑信息全部收集、量刑情節(jié)全面展示、量刑辯護(hù)全方位有效對(duì)抗,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)量刑活動(dòng)在下進(jìn)展,有利于增強(qiáng)量刑活動(dòng)的可操作性、監(jiān)視力度和司法公信力。量刑過(guò)程應(yīng)是依據(jù)法律并主要圍繞證據(jù)進(jìn)展交鋒的過(guò)程,但量刑證據(jù)制度的缺乏已成為量刑程序規(guī)化改革的掣肘,應(yīng)進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)量刑證據(jù)責(zé)任、量刑證據(jù)調(diào)查、量刑證據(jù)交換等相關(guān)配套制度的健立與完善。最后,文章認(rèn)為,任何改革行為,改革方向的錯(cuò)誤均會(huì)造成難以彌補(bǔ)的損失。鑒于此,文章結(jié)合實(shí)踐與相關(guān)理論,歸納了量刑程序規(guī)化改革的根本原則和形式,以利于量刑

6、程序規(guī)化改革方向正確,*開(kāi)展?！居⑽恼縎tandardization reform of Sentencing Procedure aims at promoting Sentencing public, making Sentencing Procedure standard, and achieving Sentencing fairness. Reform is a system work in the whole Procedure of the sentencing standardization, which bees a concern holding point in th

7、e society and a discussion focus in the scholar. Meanwhile, it is a difficulty that how to achieve Sentencing fairness and efficiency by the reform in the Judicature practice. Owing to the way of the Sentencing reform is mainly the process of theory and practice close interaction and mutual liters,

8、and this article will put View from the plete sentencing Procedure to regulate reform of the sentencing Procedure, so find the e*isting problems in the reform from the perspective of Judicature practice that it is beneficial to promote the standardization reform of Sentencing in our country. The art

9、icle mainly includes three parts.Part one is the brief introduction about the standard reforms of the criminal Sentencing. The paper focuses over the history, the connections with the practical and the situation analysis bing with the primary achievements which are the all covers in the criminal pro

10、cedure, the opening procedure to the basic balance and the basic fair. The author considers that the all details of the Sentencing procedures cannot work without the participation of the parts and the logic root or the goals should be demonstrated by the following words as the base of the standard r

11、eforms of the criminal Sentencing.Part two is the analysis about the current situation and the problems in the Sentencing procedure from the judicial practices as the prelude for the reforms discussion. The paper concludes the situation that the Sentencing procedure works in the whole proceeding to

12、realize the separation of the judgment and Sentencing based the researches. But the as the accused denied guilty or the disagreement with the Sentencing suggests, it would be the reforms dilemma. So the paper pus forwards the procedural suggests as the idea of the efficient and the justice. At the s

13、ame time, the reforms would be cooperate with the all the judicial parts and the connections to focus over the learning and studies. As the Regulations of the Sentencing Reforms, the works would be continued. In the proceeding, how to make it open and control would be the blind and the hard issue. S

14、o the author makes the basic supervision by the reports and discussion by the judges. Finally, the paper concludes the following si* problems as the poor e*pressions and advocating, the missing of the proofs based over the studies in these reforms.Part three makes some certain suggestions bing with

15、the standard reform and the relative litigation theories. The author considers that the Sentencing procedure reform should be taken parts by all the judicial departments which could make the procedure best functions and establish the cooperation system. And second, it also demands the parts in the c

16、ase to certain their rights and duties to better protections and the responsibilities to reach the balance and supervision. Upon the level, the designers should set the relationship properly to promote the open procedure and to ensure the collection of the whole information to the defending, which c

17、ould be the practical, the trustful and the fairly supervising. The proceeding of Sentencing would work based on the rules and the disadvantages of the standard procedure had been the puzzle for the proof system, which should put more attention over the investigations and the changes of the proof as

18、 the perfection of the relative regulations. At last, the author said, any wrong direction and actions would be the terrible lose. So the practical and theoretical connection makes the basic principles and forms that are beneficial to the correct way and healthy development for the standard reform o

19、f criminal Sentencing.【關(guān)鍵詞】量刑 量刑程序 量刑公正 改革【英文關(guān)鍵詞】Sentencing Sentencing Procedure Sentencing fairness Reform【備注】索購(gòu)全文在線加好友：1.399.3.8848 同時(shí)提供論文一對(duì)一寫(xiě)作指導(dǎo)和論文發(fā)表委托效勞【目錄】量刑程序規(guī)化改革探析摘要6-8Abstract8-9引言12-13一、量刑程序規(guī)化改革概述13-20一 量刑程序規(guī)化改革進(jìn)程13-141. 量刑程序規(guī)化改革的根本現(xiàn)狀13-142. 量刑程序規(guī)化改革的初步成效14二 量刑程序主體14-181. 檢察機(jī)關(guān)量刑建議和監(jiān)視權(quán)14-162. 被告人及辯護(hù)人量刑辯護(hù)權(quán)16-173. 被害方量刑參與權(quán)17-184. 法官居中裁量和最終裁判權(quán)18三 量刑程序功能18-201. 量刑信息最大化展示192. 量刑