經(jīng)濟(jì)新聞的批評(píng)性語(yǔ)篇分析【摘要】批評(píng)語(yǔ)言學(xué)又叫批評(píng)性話語(yǔ)分析、批評(píng)性語(yǔ)言意識(shí)或批評(píng)性語(yǔ)言研究,是1979年由Fowler、Hodge、Kress、Trew等人在《語(yǔ)言與控制》一書(shū)中提出的。作為現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)言學(xué)研究的一個(gè)新興分支,批評(píng)性話語(yǔ)分析吸收了語(yǔ)言學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)、心理學(xué)、傳播學(xué)的科研成果,它旨在通過(guò)對(duì)大眾語(yǔ)篇的分析,揭示和闡明語(yǔ)言、權(quán)勢(shì)和意識(shí)形態(tài)三者之間的辯證關(guān)系。批評(píng)性話語(yǔ)分析有它獨(dú)特的語(yǔ)言觀：語(yǔ)篇是一種社會(huì)實(shí)踐,受社會(huì)因素制約并影響社會(huì)實(shí)踐；語(yǔ)篇的生成和傳播是與社會(huì)實(shí)踐相互作用的產(chǎn)物。Fairclough曾質(zhì)疑過(guò)語(yǔ)言學(xué)的實(shí)證主義觀點(diǎn),由于其過(guò)多強(qiáng)調(diào)事實(shí)的客觀性；過(guò)多關(guān)注“是什么”問(wèn)題,而忽視“為什么”和“怎么樣”的問(wèn)題。為此,批評(píng)性語(yǔ)言學(xué)家致力于在社會(huì)歷史語(yǔ)境中回答“為什么”和“怎么樣”的問(wèn)題。盡管批評(píng)性話語(yǔ)分析是一個(gè)相對(duì)新興的學(xué)科,但是它的哲學(xué)根基可以通過(guò)Althusser和Gramsci的觀點(diǎn),追溯到馬克思主義。Althusser和Gramsci認(rèn)為,意識(shí)形態(tài)在當(dāng)代社會(huì)中的重要性體現(xiàn)在——它可以維持并加強(qiáng)社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)之間的關(guān)系。這種觀點(diǎn)對(duì)社會(huì)學(xué)研究者有著極其深遠(yuǎn)的影響。批評(píng)性話語(yǔ)分析主要是針對(duì)大眾語(yǔ)篇和其它非文學(xué)語(yǔ)篇,...

更多還原【Abstract】Criticallinguisticsisalsodefinedascriticaldiscourseanalysis(CDA),criticallanguageawareness(CLA)andcriticallanguagestudy(CLS),whichwasfirstputforwardbyagroupofscholarsincludingFowler,Hodge,Kress,Trewandsoonin1979inthebookLanguageandControl.Asanewbranchofmodernlinguisticresearch,CDAassimilatingtheresultsofscientificresearchinlinguistics,sociology,psychologyandmassmedia,aimstoexploreandarticulatethedialecticalrelationshipbet...

更多還原【關(guān)鍵詞】批評(píng)性語(yǔ)篇分析；人民幣匯率改革；三維話語(yǔ)分析模式；系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)法；意識(shí)形態(tài)；

【Keywords】CDA；China’sExchangeRateReform；Three-dimensionalModel；SystemicFunctionalGrammar；Ideology；ABSTRACT2-5摘要7-12ChapterOneIntroduction12-171.1BackgroundoftheThesis12-131.2PurposeoftheThesis13-141.3SignificanceoftheThesis14-151.4OutlineoftheThesis15-17ChapterTwoLiteratureReview17-292.1TheBirthandDevelopmentofCDA17-182.2DefinitionofCDAandKeyTermsofCDA18-222.2.1Critical19-202.2.2LanguageasDiscourse20-212.2.3Power212.2.4Ideology21-222.3CriticalStudiesoftheNewsAbroad22-272.3.1RogerFowler232.3.2TeunA.vanDijk23-252.3.3NormanFairclough25-272.4RelevantStudiesatHome27-29ChapterThreeTheoreticalFramework29-513.1RelationsbetweenCDAandSFG29-313.2Halliday'sSystemicFunctionalGrammar31-393.2.1TheIdeationalFunction31-363.2.2TheInterpersonalFunction36-383.2.3TheTextualFunction38-393.3Fairclough'sThree-dimensionalModel39-493.3.1Description43-443.3.2Interpretation44-483.3.3Explanation48-493.4TheSuggestedAnalyticalModelforCDAonEconomicNews49-51ChapterFourContrastiveAnalysisofNewsSamples51-884.1DataCollection51-544.2DescriptionStage—LinguisticFeatures54-794.2.1Transitivity54-624.2.2Classification62-714.2.3Transformation71-764.2.4Modality76-794.3InterpretiveStage-IntertexualFeatures79-844.3.1ReportingModes79-814.3.2NewsSource81-824.3.3ReportingVerb82-844.4ExplanativeStage-SocialandCulturalFeatures84-88ChapterFiveConclusion88-925.1FindingsandLimitationsofthePresentThesis88-895.2ImplicationsofthePresentThesis89-915.2.1ImplicationforNewsDiscou