江蘇省知識產(chǎn)權十大典型案件2022年江蘇省知識產(chǎn)權十大典型案件序言2022年，黨的二十大勝利召開，擘畫大部署。在江蘇省委、省政府的正確領導件3258件，罰沒款6978.16萬元；省版權和行動，查辦侵權盜版案件584起，涉案2億林草種苗案件41件，罰沒款78.31萬元；南貨物數(shù)量62.12萬件。在司法保護方面，全全省檢察機關共辦理各類知識產(chǎn)權案件778件；公安部門組織“昆侖2022”等行動，在第23個世界知識產(chǎn)權日來臨之際，現(xiàn)將2022年江蘇省知識產(chǎn)權十大典型2023年4月PAGE04PAGE04 administrativelawenforc“BlueWeb”and“CleanWeb”inbatchesofinfring“Kunlun2022”launchedbythepublicwereinvestigatedthroughoutthcomplexcasedetails,d NanjingHencerPhOficeandBayerIntellDecisiononPatentTechnologyCo.,Ltd.,LuX CaseofCopyrightInfringement CaseofCopyrightInfringement有限公司、德祿家具(南通)有限公司等侵害商標權及RaumplusBesitz-undEntw(Taicang)FumitureTechnologyCo.,Ltd.v.DeluFumiture(Shanghai)Co.,LFumiure(Nantong)Co.,Ltd.WinnerMedicalCo,Ltd.v.SuzhouWinnerMedicalCo,XangWeienv.LiXXgangandCusuDstidTanhDisputeoverCopyrightJengsuChangfengMedcalhndistyCo,tde tions"WinterGames(ParalympicWinterGames)inCrosPAGE08PAGEPAGE08/II案情介紹II拜耳知識產(chǎn)權有限責任公司(以下簡稱拜耳公司)系“取代的噁唑烷酮和其在血液凝固領域中的應用”的發(fā)明專利權利人。被訴侵權的南京恒生制藥有限公司(以下簡稱恒生公司)在其官/I處理結果也沒有事實表明其僅向準備申請注冊利伐沙班產(chǎn)品的特定企業(yè)進行了宣傳，不符合藥品和醫(yī)療實施不屬于藥品和醫(yī)療器械行政審批例外情形的許諾銷售行為，可能導致不特定對象推遲向?qū)１景甘巧婕皩＠˙olar例外條款適用的典型案例，對Bolar例外條款作了細化解釋，明確了適用條件以及許諾銷售行為不屬于專利法關于藥品和醫(yī)療器械行政審批的侵權免責情形 衡專利權人和仿制藥企之間的利益，既要保障社會公眾在專利權屆滿后及時獲得價格低廉的藥NanjingHencerPharmaceuticalCo.,Ltd.v.NanjingCaseofPropertyOfficeandBayerIntellectualCaseofDisputeoverAdministrativeDecisionondisplayed“RivaroxabanTablets”and“RivaroxabanTabletAPls”onitsotrademarkofHencer.BelievingthattheaforeOficerenderedanadministrativedecisdecision,asitbelievedthatitsdisplayoftheproduTherefore,HencerfiledanadministrativeactionwithtPAGE10PAGE10unspecificobjects,andcanbeeitherthroughitswebsiteandexhibitions,constitutinganofferforsale.Ajudgemewhetherexemptionsfromadministraforexemptionsfromadministrativeexaminationandapprovapprovalofdrugsandmedicaldevicesareimport”fortheapplicationforadministrativeexamtowhichexemptionsfromadminisclaimsofHencer.Later,Hencerfiledanappealagainstthefirst-instSupremeCourtmadeasecondinstancejudgment,rulingthattheoriginaljudgmentshallconditionsoftheBolarexceptionandthefactthatexedonotapplytoanofferfothepatentlawonexemptPAGE12PAGEPAGE12/II…·案情介紹…IIIIII…處理結果…CaseofInfringementonTr XX XXaccordingtowhichioftheproduction,receipt,distribution,use,reproduction,extraction,pressecretsstored,processedandtransmittedbythecomputertechnology,andtakPAGE14PAGEPAGE142011,SiXXlujoinedHuikeasnon-disclosureandnon-competeagreemZhonggongconstantlyrecrudesigndrawingsofatmospheconfidentialitymeasuresinthethemobileharddiskcontainingtcontinuouslyprovidedLuXXchangoByusingtheaforesaidsecret/IOutcomeThecourtheldthatZhonggongobinseriousviolationofconfidentialityobligations,whichconstituofthedefendantentity'sanThiscaseisatypicaltradesecrets,andmodified“bringingsijudicialinterpretationonhowtodetermine“seriousviolation”andviolation".Thejudgmentheldthatsignificantlossescausedtovictim(s)importantfactortomeasurethe“sercommittedacrimeofinfringeaflagrantviolation.Thecourt'sdecisionreflectsentitybecameademonstPAGE16PAGE15PAGE16 呂某龍等侵犯冬奧會吉祥物“冰墩墩”著作權案/I/處理結果IIII分析點評…IIIIInFebruary,2022,thepublicsecurityofficersofYangzhouandotherplacesthgenuineproductsonthXXinWuxiandsoldthemonlinJiangsusimultaneously,inanefforttocrackdownonthewholeillegalindustrialc “producing-wholesaling-selling”counterfeit“BingDwenDwen”sandpackagingmaterials.ItwasfoundthatZhaoXX,LPAGE18PAGEPAGE18ofthepatentowner,avoidedadvers //I案情介紹PAGE20PAGEPAGE20/I分析點評…IINetEase(Hangzhou)NetworkCo.,Ltd.(hereiendof2018,thedefendantsDuanXXming,WangXXbin,WuXXlaiconspiredtojointlydevelopa“privateserver”ofthe“JourneDuanXXming,WangXXbin,HuangJia,HaoXX,HuangYiandWuXXlaijointlypurchasedthecharacters,maps,petsandothermonlineandsentthemtothedefendantChenXXthedevelopment,maintenanceandupgradeofthe“privateserver”gaillegalprofits,knowinggeneralagentofthegamewhoInordertomakeillegalprofits,thedefendanLiXXxuan,ZhangXX,QinXX,LiuXXxianandLuXXboservthedefendantLiuXXjietopromotethothers'workswithoutthepermissionofthecopyrightowner,operatedthe“privateserver”gametothepubsentencedtoafixed-termimprisonmentdefendantswithminorviolationweregrantedareprieve.AfterthefirstinstancPAGE22PAGEPAGE22gamecodes,buttheyuspatentedgame,withsubstantiallyidenticaldynseriousviolation.Theprincipalcriminalwassentencedtoafofmorethanfouryears,andotherdefendantswererespectivelygivpunishments,reflectingpropertycrimesthro德祿家具(南通)有限公司(以下簡稱德祿南通公司),約定合資企業(yè)在PAGE24PAGEPAGE24/I分析點評…IIFurniture(Shanghai)Co.,Ltd.,DeluFurniture(Nantong)Co.,Ltd. Competitionontheirfurnitureproducts,shippingordestorefrontsignboards,exhibitionhallsandbiddingdocumentbrandsashigh-endcustom-madefurnitherelatedwordssuchas“德祿(Delu)”Thetrademarks“德祿(Delu)”and“raumplus”wereregisteredwitandDelu(Taicang)Furnitu(hereinafterreferredtoas“DeluNantong”)basedontheagretheterminationofjointventurerelationsjointventures.However,DeluShanghaiIIOutcomedefendantentitiescontiprojectsbyusingthetrademarksandtradenamesof“德祿(Deunfaircompetition.InPAGE26PAGEPAGE26the"obstructionofevidence"rule.InviewofthefactthatcompensationandtheconditionsandconsiderationsforapplicaandsupportedtheclaimfpropertyrightsofChineseandabroad,effectivelypromotedtheconstructioandmarket-orientedbusinessenvironment,a穩(wěn)健醫(yī)療用品股份有限公司與蘇州穩(wěn)健醫(yī)療用品有限公司、蘇PAGE28PAGEPAGE28公司損失及維權合理費用人民幣1021655元。情聯(lián)防聯(lián)控機制醫(yī)療物資保障組、團中央青年志愿者行動指導中心、湖北省疫情防控指揮部等展的典型案例。WinnerMedicalCo.,Ltd.v.SuzhouWinnerMedicalCo.,Ltd.,Foundedin2000,WinnerMediCo.,Ltd.(hereinafterreferredtoas“SuzhouWinner”,fouCo.,Ltd.(hereinafterreferredtoas“HWinnerbelievedthattheafobusinessactivitiesasWinner,whichreflecteresultedinconfusionandmisundersandunfaircompetition.SuzhouWinnerandHangweiweretheabsolutecontrollingshareholdcompaniesworkedtogethertocommitajointinfringement.Hence,HuaXXandname,andcommittedtrademarkinfrinstatementstothemarketsupervisionauthority,whichseriPAGE30PAGEPAGE30greatlydamagedthegoolongtimespan,andrefusedtosubmitevidencesuchasfinancialbooksasrHangweiandHuaXX,thecourtappliinfringementthatcanbeascertained,andappliedstathatcannotbeascertained.Winnerisawell-knownmanufacturertrademarkandtradenamearewoftheStateCouncil'sdamagesoffourtimes,increasedtheamountofcompensation,determinedpmaterialsmarket,andrealizedtheintPAGE32PAGEPAGE32UStudio:CaseofDisputeoverCopyrighCartoonSocietyandanationalfirst-classartisinthenameof“Weithe14thShengongAwardfoundthatthejadecarvingworkhassimilaroverallstructurewiXiangWeirenclaimedthatthechCity,JiangsuProvince,requestingThefirst-instancejudgmentrenderedbytreproductionofXiangWeiren'spainting,butanoftheoriginalpainting,theoriginalicarvingworkbasedonotherPAGE34PAGEPAGE34copyrightownerandthepaymentofcompensationmayconstituteaninfringementofthecopyrightofthepainting.However,itisofgreareproductionortherightofadaptionisinfringedincludesvariouscomplicatedprocessescarving,finecarvingadaption.Thejudgmentofthiscaseupholdsthephconstitutesinnovativeexplitigationdisputesinthidevelopmentoftrad 技術有限公司等3家江蘇企業(yè)在內(nèi)6家中國企業(yè)被列名被告。之后于2021年12月6日將中國PAGE36PAGEPAGE36根據(jù)美國《1930年關稅法》(TariffAfocusofdisputeinthiscaseafterexpertdiscussion:theformulatedthe“three-step”responsestrategy,namely,patinvolvedtoseekcountermeasuresandfilerJiangsuChangfengMedicalIndustry“Section337Investigations”O(jiān)nJuly9,2021,Copanltalia(ITC)for“Section337Investigations”on“CertainOnOctober28,2022,ITCmadeafinaldet/AnalysisandCoPAGE38PAGEPAGE38missedtheopportunityduetoabsence,andseveraldinthiscase.Themainworkincludes:1.Communicatothelawsuit;2.Holding“experiencesharing”meetings,organizingpubontheenterprises,settinguparesponse南通海關查獲跨境電商侵犯2022北京冬奧會(冬殘奧會)特·案情介紹I了海關總署公告2021年第62號備案保護的2022北京冬奧會PAGE40PAGEPAGE40 /ICaseBriefImanuallyinspectedthegoods.Afterunpackingandinspection,253keychainsbearingtheAfterverification,theParalympicWinterGames(hereinafterrepermission.Upontherequestofthecopyrightowner,N14oftheRegulationsonthforfeited253keychainsand612keyringsinfrGames,arethespiritualwealthoftheOlympPAGE42PAGEPAGE42Symbolsandraisingthepubliexclusiverights