版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
LeadershipVisionfor
2024Top
3Strategic
Priorities
forHeads
of
ERM?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.
Thispresentation,
includingallsupporting
materials,
isproprietary
toGartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates
and
isfor
the
soleinternal
use
of
the
intended
recipients.
Because
this
presentation
maycontain
information
that
isconfidential,
proprietary
or
otherwise
legally
protected,
itmay
not
be
further
copied,distributed
or
publicly
displayed
without
the
express
written
permission
of
Gartner,
Inc.
oritsaffiliates.Leadership
Vision
for
Heads
of
EnterpriseRisk
Management(ERM)in
2024Newtechnologiesandtheriseof
AI,
privacy
concerns,regulatory
requirements,
environmentalrisks,andKeyquestions
addressed:geopolitical,
economicandsocial
changeare
shaping
howthe
bestorganizationswillmanageenterpriseriskin2024.What
arethe
majortrends
affecting
headsofERM?What
challenges
areheadsof
ERMfacingintheyear
ahead?Inthiscontext,
thetopprioritiesfor
headsof
ERMin2024should
be:?
HowcanERM
increase
confidence
inenterpriseriskassessments??
HowcanERM
enhance
itsvaluetocorporate
strategy??
HowcanERM
help
the
organizationrespondto
the
risksof
generative
AI?What
actionsshouldheadsofERM
andtheirteamstaketosucceed?Headsof
ERMcanusethisresearchtostay
aheadofmajortrends
and
lead
theirteams
toward
asuccessfulfuture.RESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION2?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.2024PotentialEnterprise
Risk
Tr
endsFramework
FromGartner
Future
Lab’s
TPESTRE
Projectand
Associated,
PotentialRisks?
Generative
AI
disruptionsandimpactsTechnologicalPolitical?
Datamodel
degradation?
State-sponsored
malware?
Renationalization
of
international
trade?
Geopoliticalconflict?
Political
fractionalizationandgovernment
dysfunction?
Interest
rate
uncertaintyEconomic?
Persistence
of
inflationary
andlabormarket
challenges?
Pricebubbles?
Social
polarization?
Retirement
wave?
Declining
productivitySocial/CulturalTrust/Ethics?
Expectationsfor
actiononcontroversial
issues?
AI
privacyconcerns?
AI-drivenmisinformation?
Anti-trust
targeting
technology
providers?
Fragmentation
of
data
governance
regulations?
Cybersecurity
disclosureandgovernance
requirementsRegulatory/Legal?
Environmental,
social
andgovernance
(ESG)
risks?
Extreme
weathereventsEnvironmental?
Degraded
watersupplies,
soil,airandother
natural
resourcesSource:GartnerRESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION3?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.Focus
Areas
for
theHead
of
ERM
in2024ThreeChallengesRequiring
Head
ofERMLeadership123Increasing
Confidencein
Risk
AssessmentsImproving
StrategyExecutionManaging
Generative
AI
RiskOnly
27%
ofheads
ofERMsay
thatsenior,
executiveand
board
decisionmakers
consistently
take
the
actionsrecommended
in
risk
assessments.44%of
chief
strategy
officers
reportthat
their
organizations
are
behind
onmeeting
strategic
objectives.60%of
IT
leaders
say
theirorganizations
already
use
generativeAI
solutions
beyond
ChatGPT,and
28%say
their
organizations
plan
to
usethem
by2024.Key
Questions
forHeadsofERMin
2024Howcan
ERMincrease
confidence
inenterprise
risk
assessments?Howcan
ERMenhance
its
valuetocorporate
strategy?Howcan
ERMhelp
the
organizationrespond
to
the
risks
of
generative
AI?n=126,
140,
200Source:
2023
Gartner
EnterpriseRisk
Management’s
Risk
Assessment
Survey,
2022
GartnerStrategy
Adaptive
Planning
Survey,
2023
Gartner
PeerCommunity
Generative
AISurveyRESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION4?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.Tr
end:
IncreasedExecutive
Focus
onRiskExpectedChangeinRisk
Appetite,
2023-24Perception
That
ERCEscalation
HasIncreasedPercentage
of
Nonexecutive
Board
MembersPercentage
of
Risk
AssessmentLeader
Agreement:
“WeEscalate
Risks
tothe
ExecutiveRisk
Committee
MoreOften
Now
Than2019”15%Stay
theSame34%SlightlyIncrease42%Disagree54%or
StronglyAgree21%DecreaseDisagreeor
StronglyAgree5%SignificantlyIncrease5%25%SomewhatIncreaseNeither
Agreenor
Disagreen=281;
nonexecutive
board
of
directorsn=159;
risk
assessments
leader,
facilitator
orparticipant,excluding
don't
knowPleaseindicateyour
levelof
agreement
withthe
following
statements
on
risk
assessments
nowin2022
comparedtoin2019:
We
escalaterisks
tothe
Executive
Risk
Committee
more
often
now.Source:2022
Gartner
Risk
Assessments
inaVolatileWorld
SurveyHowisthenonexecutive
board’s
risk
appetite
(willingnesstoacceptrisk
inpursuitof
corporate
objectives)expectedtochange
for
2023-2024
todrive
your
organization’s
growth?Source:
2023
Gartner
BoardOfDirectorsSurvey
onBusinessStrategy
inanUncertainWorldNote:
Percentages
may
not
add
upto100%
due
torounding.RESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION5?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.Challenge:
Confidencein
Risk
AssessmentsMissing
Critical
InputsMissing
AnalysisOnly...Only...51%of
headsof
ERMare
confident
they
captured
allkeyenterprise
risks
duringthe
riskassessmentprocess.19%of
ERMdepartments
include
risk
interdependencyintheirriskassessments.37%of
headsof
ERMare
confident
they
captured
allkeyrisk
drivers
in
theirriskassessments.26%of
ERMdepartments
report
onrootcauses
of
riskexposures.n=126;
ERM
leaders
ormanagersn=70;
ERMleaders
ormanagersQ1.
Towhat
extent
are
you
confident
that
you
captured
allof
thekeyenterprise
risks
inyour
risk
assessment?Q1.What
risk
ratingcriteriado
you
useinenterprise
risk
assessment?
Selectallthat
apply.Q2.
Howconfident
areyou
that
your
risk
assessment
captures
critical
elements/risk
driversrelated
tothe
enterpriserisks
Q2.
Which
of
the
following
selectionsareincluded
inyour
executive-level
risk
reports?
Selectallthat
apply.listed
intherisk
assessment?Source:2023
Gartner
EnterpriseRisk
Management’s
Risk
Assessment
SurveySource:
TheERMBudget
&
Efficiency
Benchmark
as
of
20
May
2023
isatwo-year
benchmarkcovering
ERMdepartmentsubmissions
from
2021
through
20
May
2023.
The
data
represented
was
collectedfrom134
ERMdepartmentsRESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION6?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.Action:
IncreaseQuality
of
Risk
AssessmentsFive
Tactics
To
Improve
theQuality
ofRisk
Assessments123Leverage
Technologyto
Improve
Synthesisof
RiskInformationFacilitate
ExchangeamongRisk
Owners
andExecutivesTarget
Anchoring
BiasandComplacencyFacilitate
exchanges
of
viewpointsamong
executivesand
risk
ownersonareas
of
apparent
disagreement.Challenge
risk
ownersto
account
forhow
their
risk
responses
have
evolvedwith
new
risk
information.UseGRCand
other
tools
to
synthesizerisk-relevant
data
and
the
outputs
ofother
teams’
analyses.45Analyze
andReport
onLinked
RiskDrivers
andInterdependenciesQuantify
Risk
Assessment
toClarify
Returns
onInvestmentsRiskManagement
ScoreAnalyzeand
report
onrootcauses
and
linked
root
causes
withinterdependency
analysis.Helpstakeholders
understand
themagnitude
of
potential,
risk-relatedlosses
and
the
valueof
risk
responseswith
quantification.Discover
opportunities
toincrease
thequality
of
risk
assessments
with
theGartner
Risk
Management
Scorediagnostic.Source:GartnerRESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION7?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.Tr
end:
Urgency
Around
MeetingStrategicObjectives
at
End-of-Strategy
CyclesLength
of
Corporate
StrategiesChief
Strategy
Officers’
Perception
ofProgress
onPercentage
of
RespondentsStrategic
Objectives9%Less
than2
YearsPercentage
of
Respondents25%Ahead
ofSchedule43%BehindSchedule48%5
Yearsor
Longer43%3to
4Years32%On
Trackn=75chiefstrategyofficers
orequivalentsQ.Thepercentage
of
strategyfunctions
withstrategicplans
spanning
each
time
horizon
to“What
isthetimehorizon
of
yourorganization's
strategicplan?”Source:
Gartner
Strategy
Budget
&Efficiency
BenchmarkNote:
The
StrategyBudget
&Efficiency
isatwo-year
rollingbenchmark.Datarepresented
here
was
gatheredon
18October
2022n=140
chiefstrategyofficersorequivalentsQ.Howwould
you
characterize
your
organization’s
progress
inmeeting
the
strategicobjectivesit’s
currentlypursuing?Source:
2022
Gartner
StrategyAdaptive
Planning
SurveyNote:
Percentages
may
not
add
upto100%
due
torounding.RESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION8?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.Challenge:
Entering
theStrategy
ConversationBusiness
Leader
Consultation
of
ERMinStrategic
PivotsStrategic
Pivot
Performance
Gap
andERMConsultationPercentageof
Business
LeadersPercentageof
Business
Leaders
WhoReport
TheirOrganizations
Achieved
Intended
ObjectivesinStrategicPivots70%35%0%62%41%ConsultedERM43%59%Didnot
ConsultERMDidnot
consultERMConsulted
ERMn=250
leaders
ormanagers
inlinesof
business
orcorporate
functionsQ.What
action
did
you
takethat
involved
therisk
and
assurancefunctions:Iconsulted
my
organization’s
ERMteam.n=250
leaders
ormanagers
inlinesof
business
orcorporate
functionsQ.What
actionsdidyou
takethatinvolved
therisk
and
assurancefunctions:Iconsulted
my
organization’s
ERMteam.
State
youragreement
with
thefollowing
statements
about
thepivot,
inretrospect:The
pivot
fullyachieved
itsSource:2021
Gartner
ResiliencePanelSurveyintended
objectives.Source:2021
Gartner
ResiliencePanelSurveyRESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION9?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.Action:
Context-Appropriate
Strategy
Inter
ventionTactics
for
ERMIntervention
inCorporate
Strategy
Depending
onStakeholder
Expectations
for
ERMInvolvement?
Leverage
risk
liaison
network
to
source
potential
executionMore
expectation
forERMinvolvement
instrategypitfalls.Conduct
StrategicScenario
Analysis?
Discover
lowor
divergent
confidence
instrategicinitiative
success
withrisk
workshops.?
Identify
dependencies
common
to
underperforming
strategicinitiatives.Identify
Solutions
forStrategicUnderperformance?
Determining
potential
strategy
trade-offs
inthe
contextof
risk
appetite
during
strategic
pivots.?
Alter
risk
reporting
to
focus
on
risks
to
strategicinitiatives
and
projects.Align
Risk
ReportingtoStrategy
Needs?
Report
onstrategic
initiative
ownerassumptionsLess
expectation
for
ERMinvolvement
in
strategyand
concerns.Source:GartnerRESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION10
?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.Tr
end:
IncreasedGenerative
AI(GenAI)ExposureOrganizational
Usage
ofGenAI
Beyond
OpenAI’s
ChatGPTPercentage
ofIT
LeadersAdopted
or
Planning
to
Adopt
GenAI
BeyondChatGPT
in2023Not
Adopted
and
NoPlans
to
Adopt
in202312%No,We
AreNot
Currentlyand
We
Have
No
Plans
toDoso
ThisYear12%Yes,
Extensively27%No,but
WePlanto
ThisYear48%Yes,
to
aLimited
Extentn=200
ITleaders
(CIO,VPof
IT,director
of
IT,manager
of
IT)Q.
Is
your
organization
currentlyemployinggenerative
AIsolutions
beyond
ChatGPTforany
specific
application?Source:
2023
Gartner
PeerCommunity
Generative
AISurveyRESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION11
?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.Challenge:
The
Complexity
of
GenAI
RiskIntendedandUnintendedConsequencesof
GenAI
UsageNew,
smaller
competitors,
enabled
by
GenAI,
enteringand
disrupting
industriesIntendedDesignated
UseMisuseMass
production
ofmisinformation
and
deepfakesAIhallucinations
leading
to
incorrect
decision
makingMass
unemployment
of
creators
ofcontent
and
codeAccidentsFrom
UseGenAIStructural
Effectson
SocietyMisaligned,Power-Seeking
AImodelsPower-seeking
AI
model
with
goals
not
aligned
with
humanityUnintendedSource:GartnerRESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION12
?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.Action:
Fr
ame
GenAI
Risk-Opportunity
DecisionRisks
IntroducedbyGenAIBenefits
IntroducedbyGenAIDesignated
UseGreater
Leadership
CapabilitiesIncreases
the
insights
and
foresightleaders
can
have
across
verticalsRisks
and
disruptions
introducedfrom
the
intended
use
of
thetechnologyMarketPenetrationFinancialEfficiencyMisuseEnhanced
Employee
ProductivityTeams
can
focus
less
onroteactivities
and
more
onstrategicallyvaluableactivitiesMarketGrowthOrganizational
WorkforcePriorities
StrategyRisks
and
disruptions
introducedfrom
the
abuse
of
the
technologyResilience
andOperationalReadinessDigitalTransformationAccidentsFromUseDeeper
FunctionalRisks
and
disruptions
introducedfrom
employee
or
user
errorsUnderstandingInsights
previously
out
ofreachdue
to
analytical
or
data
hurdlesbecome
less
soSource:GartnerRESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION13
?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.RecommendedActionsIncrease
qualityofrisk
assessments:
Increase
executive
confidence
inenterprise
risk
assessments
by
provoking
more
stakeholder
participation,synthesizing
riskdata
and
analyses
fromother
functions
and
increasingthe
depth
ofanalysis.Improve
strategy
execution:
Determine
themost
organizational
context-appropriate
means
forERM
toadvise
strategic
initiative
owners
on
riskstofinalizing
completion
ofstrategic
objectives,
using
existing
expectations
forERM
involvement
incorporate
strategy
as
astarting
point.Manage
generativeAIrisks:
Framethe
fullgenerative
AIrisk-opportunitytrade-offs
forstakeholders
bymapping
generative
AIriskinterdependenciestoenterprise
risksand
comparing
risksand
opportunities
inriskreporting.RESTRICTED
DISTRIBUTION14
?2023
Gartner,
Inc.
and/or
itsaffiliates.
All
rights
reserved.Gar
tnerfor
Legal,
Risk
andCompliance
LeadersAddressing
Heads’
of
ERMMission-CriticalPrioritiesKey
Areas
ofCoverage
andExpertise:Risk
Identification
and
AssessmentEmergingRisksRisk
Technology
and
AnalyticsRisk
CoordinationERMFunctionalManagementERMFrameworks
&PoliciesThird
Party
&Supply
ChainRisksRisk
GovernanceRisk
CultureRisk
Response
StrategiesRisk
Mitigation
and
MonitoringRisk
ReportingRisk
andStrategyRisk
AppetiteContinue
the
conv
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025-2030中國銀杏內(nèi)酯市場營銷模式及渠道分析研究報告版
- 2025至2030中國廚電產(chǎn)品高端化轉(zhuǎn)型與渠道變革研究報告
- 二十大安全課件
- 2026年石光中學教育(集團)實中校區(qū)招聘編外合同教師備考題庫及參考答案詳解一套
- 2026年招聘廣州南沙人力資源發(fā)展有限公司招聘編外工作人員備考題庫政府編外帶答案詳解
- 2026年未央?yún)^(qū)大明宮社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)中心招聘備考題庫及完整答案詳解1套
- 2026年西南計算機有限責任公司招聘21人備考題庫及答案詳解1套
- 2025至2030中國醫(yī)藥制造行業(yè)政策環(huán)境與市場前景研究報告
- 2025至2030中國口腔醫(yī)療連鎖機構(gòu)擴張速度及人才短缺分析研究報告
- 中國核工業(yè)二三建設(shè)有限公司2025年核級焊接技術(shù)校園招聘備考題庫及一套參考答案詳解
- 券商投行部述職報告
- 金風-綠電新政下風電資產(chǎn)產(chǎn)銷一體新范式
- 2026屆湖南長沙一中高一生物第一學期期末學業(yè)質(zhì)量監(jiān)測試題含解析
- PDLC薄膜性能的研究
- 一級2026年注冊建筑師之設(shè)計前期與場地設(shè)計考試題庫300道附參考答案【黃金題型】
- 三方協(xié)議書就業(yè)協(xié)議書
- 排水管網(wǎng)疏通與養(yǎng)護技術(shù)方案
- 肝內(nèi)膽管惡性腫瘤護理查房
- 2025-2026學年浙教版(2023)初中信息科技七年級上冊教學計劃及進度表
- 昆明醫(yī)科大學海源學院《高等數(shù)學下》2024-2025學年第一學期期末試卷
- 中國特發(fā)性面神經(jīng)麻痹(面癱)治療指南(2022)解讀
評論
0/150
提交評論