版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Evolution,notInvolution
April2024
Aboutthesurvey
Inthefourthquarterof2023,wesurveyed2,449autobuyersin19majorcitiesacrossChinarepresentingarangeofdemographicattributes,
includingfirst-tier,second-tier,third-tier,andfourth-tiercities,as
wellasNorth,Northeast,East,CentralandSouth,Southwest,and
NorthwestChina.Thereportdividedrespondentsbyage,gender,
income,purchasingexperience,andcurrentvehicletype.Basedonthedecision-makingprocessduringcarpurchasing,thissurveyprovides
deepanalysisofconsumerattitudes,vehiclepreferences,purchasinghabits,drivingexperiences,andafter-salesneeds.
Authors
MingyuGuan,Beijing
ThomasFang,ShanghaiBillPeng,HongKong
TonyZhou,Shanghai
Coverimage:@GettyImages
IIMcKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Executivesummary
TherapiddevelopmentinelectrificationandsmartificationoftheChinaautoindustryisundeniablyshapingandtransformingthepreferencesofautoconsumersinChina.
Reciprocally,theevolvingpreferencesandbehaviorsofChineseconsumersareexertinga
profoundinfluenceontheChinaautoindustry,compellingittoembraceelectrificationand
smartificationwithacceleratinginvestmentsinthesetwoareas.SuchmutualinfluenceisnotonlypivotalforthefutureoftheChineseautoindustrybutalsopoisedtoprofoundlyimpactthetechnologydevelopment,businessmodels,andcompetitivelandscapeoftheglobalautoindustryinthenextfivetotenyears.
TogaindeeperinsightsintotheevolvingpreferencesofChineseautoconsumers,McKinseyrecentlyconductedthelatestroundofitsannualChinaAutoConsumerSurvey.Basedontheresponses,wehaveidentifiedthefollowingsixkeyfindings.
1.Consumersarecontinuingthetrendoftradingup
TheChinaautomarketcontinuestointroducevariouscompetitivenewmodelsofsmartEVs,graduallyincreasingtheattractivenesstoconsumersandshiftingtheirattention
towardmid-andhigh-pricedmodels.Meanwhile,escalatingpricecompetition’simpact
onconsumerdecisionmakingremainslimited,with80percentofrespondentsindicatingthatpricecompetitionhasn’tacceleratedtheirvehiclepurchasedecisions.
2.PerceptionsofEVandICEbrandsarediverging
MultinationalOEMsnolongercommandpremiumprices,andtheirbrandhalosarealmostgone,atrendespeciallyevidentintheEVindustry.Meanwhile,ownersoftraditional
premiumMNCbrandsareswitchingtopremiumChineseEVbrands—atrendflowingalmostentirelyinonedirection.
3.EVpenetrationisrisingfast,withahiddenconcernofcharginganxiety
EVconsumersmakingpurchasingdecisionsareincreasinglyconsideringthe
performanceofthevehiclesthemselves,ratherthanregulatoryincentivessuchasfreelicenseplates.Also,theacceptanceofEVsbyChineseconsumershasseenitsfirst-everdeclineasEVcharginginfrastructureisdeployedslowlyinsomeareas.Thesituation
highlightstheextremeimportanceofoptimizingcharginginfrastructuretosupportthesustaineddevelopmentoftheEVsector.
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20241
4.Direct-to-consumers(DTC)modeliswinningconsumertrusts,thankstoitshightransparencyacrosscustomerjourney
PremiumChineseEVbrandshaveadoptedomnichanneldirect-to-consumer(DTC)
models,whichhaveachievedremarkablecustomersatisfaction.Eveninafter-sales
maintenance,wherethepreviousyear’ssurveyfoundaperformancegapwithtraditionalOEMs,premiumChineseEVbrandsarecatchingup.
5.Autonomousdriving(AD)enjoysgreatpopularity,butchanceofmonetizationiscomingunderpressure
ConsumerdemandforADsolutionscontinuestoincrease.However,thefree-software
strategyoftoptechnology-orientedOEMshasmadeconsumerslesswillingtopayforADtechnologies.Amongthosewillingtopay,theamounttheyarewillingtopayhasdeclined.
6.Consumersareawareoflow-carbonvehiclesbutlesswillingtopayapremiumforthem
Nearly70percentofChineseconsumersareawareoflow-carbonvehiclesandwillingtopayextraforthem,butboththewillingnesstopayandtheamounttheywouldpayhavedeclined.
Weseetheindustryevolving,notinvoluting,underpressure.GuidedbyChineseconsumers,theEVsector’sgrowthatfullspeedisnowaninevitabletrend,andnewconsumer
preferencesandbehaviorsareemerginganddeveloping.However,thefundamental
commercialbehaviorsareconstant:meetdiverseconsumerneedsandcreatereasonableeconomicvalue.
2McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
1
Consumersare
continuingthetrendoftradingup
Keyinsights:
—TradingupcontinuestobepopularamongChineseconsumers,andthemarketshareofpremiumvehiclescontinuestogrow
—Meanwhile,theshareofconsumerswhosaytheywouldliketotradedownhasdroppedsignificantlycomparedwiththeresultsofthesurveyconductedayearearlier
—TheintensepricecompetitionthathasbeenoccurringinChinahashadalimitedimpactonstimulatingconsumption
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20243
Thedesiretotradeupisboostingsalesofpremiumvehicles
Overthepastfewyears,moreandmoreChineseconsumershavebeenupgradingtheirvehicles.Asaresult,themarketshareofpremiummodelsincreasedfrom10percentofpassengervehiclesin2016to23percentin2023(Exhibit1).
Exhibit1
InChina,thepremiumsegmentofpassengervehiclescontinuestopostdouble-digitgrowthin2023
PassengervehiclessalesinChinabysegments
millionunitsGrowthCAGR
XX%EVpenetrationrateinsegment2016~20222023vs.2022
2.6%
-3.9%
None
Premium
11.2%
19.4%
Premium1
100%=2323222120212022-1.9%6.1%
90%
89%
87%
85%
81%
80%
14%
79%
26%
77%
33%
23%
37%
20%
16%
21%
25%
19%
15%
11%
13%
10%
2017201820192020
2016
202120222023
1.Premiumcardefinition:premiumbrandsbasedonconsumerperception,includingtraditionalpremiumbrandsandemergingpremiumEVbrands.
Source:ChinaNewCarInsuranceRegistrationDatabaseMcKinsey&Company
Accordingtotheresultsofourlatestsurvey,Chineseconsumersmaintainastrongdesiretoupgradeintheirnextcarpurchase,particularlythosewhoseexistingcarispricedbelowRMB200,000(Exhibit2).
—MostlikelytotradeuparethosewhoseexistingcarispricedbelowRMB100,000:morethan70percentsaytheyintendtotradeupwhentheypurchasetheirnextcar;
—Over50percentofcarownerswhoseexistingcarispricedatRMB100,000toRMB150,000saytheywilltradeup;
—Nearly50percentofrespondentswhoseexistingcarispricedatRMB150,000toRMB200,000saytheywilldoso;
—ForthepricesegmentaboveRMB200,000,themostcommonchoiceamongconsumersistostaywheretheyare.Inthatsegment,premiumsmart-EVmodelswithgreatvalueformoneyarecontinuallybeingintroducedtothemarket.Theseattractrelevantconsumer
groups,inspiringtheirrationalthinkinginsteadofconstantlypursuingmodelswithahigherprice.
4McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Exhibit2
Chineseconsumers’desiretoupgradetheirvehicleremainsstrong
Budgetforthenextcarvs.priceofcarcurrentlyowned
%ofrespondents
Budgetforthenextcar,
RMBthousands
StayinthesamerangePrefertotradeup.PrefertopaylessHighest%group
<100
100-150
150-200
200-300
Priceofcarcurrently
owned,
RMBthousands
300-400
>400
<100
100-150
150-200
200-300
300-400
>400
<100
100-150
150-200
200-300
300-400
>400
43%
57%
0%
0%
0%
0%
12%
34%
52%
2%
0%
0%
0%
16%
37%
44%
3%
0%
0%
0%
21%
47%
32%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
57%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
90%
<100
100-150
150-200
200-300
300-400
>400
27%
67%
6%
1%
1%
0%
0%
46%
52%
2%
0%
0%
0%
1%
54%
45%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
81%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
68%
29%
0%
0%
0%
1%
7%
92%
2022
2023
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey(2023&24)McKinsey&Company
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20245
Theshareofconsumersseekingadowngradehasfallensignificantly
Inlastyear’sreport1,manyconsumersineachpricesegmentsaidtheyplannedtopurchasetheirnextcarinalower-pricesegment.However,inthelatestsurvey,amuchsmallershareofrespondentsexpressedthesameintention(Exhibit3).AmongthecarownerswhoseexistingcarispricedatRMB150,000orless,theshareseekingalowerpricedecreasedtozerofrom12percentin2022.InthesegmentofRMB150,000toRMB400,000,theshareofthose
intendingtopaylessdroppedfromabout20percentin2022toabout2percentin2023.
Exhibit3
Theshareofconsumersplanningtodowngradeissignificantlylowerin2023thanin2022
Consumersexpectingto“downgrade”bypriceofcarcurrentlyowned
%ofrespondents,RMBthousands
20222023
20
16
12
10
8
0
1
2
3
21
100-150150-200200-300300-400>400
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey(2023&24)McKinsey&Company
Twofactorsseemlikelytohavecontributedtothesignificantdecreaseoftheshareofthosewhotendtodowngrade:
—Consumersshowrelativelystrongerenthusiasmandconfidencefornew-carpurchasesinthepost-pandemicera.
—ChinaautomakerscontinuetointroducehighlycompetitivenewmodelsofsmartEVs.
In2023,morethan40newEVmodelswerelaunchedinthepricesegmentaboveRMB200,000alone,andalmostallmodelswereequippedwithfeaturessuchascomfort,
infotainmentfunctions,autonomousdriving(AD),smartcockpit,andultra-fastcharging.Asthesenewmodels’attractivenesstoconsumersgraduallyincreases,consumersshifttheirattentiontomodelsinhigher-pricesegmentsorstayinthesamepricesegmentoftheirexistingvehicleinsteadofseekingalower-pricedvehicle.
1ThomasFang,MingyuGuan,BillPeng,andTonyZhou,“McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2023,”July2023.
6McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
PricecompetitionthathasbeenoccurringinChinahashadalimitedimpactonstimulatingconsumption
CompetitionbasedonpriceisgraduallyintensifyingintheChinaautomarket.Withmind-blowinghigh-techfunctions(forexample,cityareanavigation-on-autopilot,advanced
smartvoiceassistant,electricsuctiondoors,800Varchitecture,ultra-fastcharging,andair
suspension)atattractiveprices,thenewlylaunchedmodelskeeprefreshingconsumers’priceperceptions.Didtheintensifyingpricecompetitionstimulatethedesiretopurchaseanew
car,ordiditsimplyhelpcreateagroupofconsumerswhowanttowaitonthesidelines?
Oursurveyaskedconsumershowthepricecompetitionhasaffectedtheirdecisionaboutpurchasinganewcar.Theresponsessuggestthatthattheimpactwaslimited:
—Thelargestshareofconsumers(64.1percent)saytheyareneutral,meaningthepricecompetitiondoesnotaffecttheirpurchasedecision(Exhibit4).
—Another16.4percentsaytheimpactisnegative―thatis,thepricecompetitionwillinhibitordelaytheirpurchase.
—Theremaining19.4percentexpressapositiveimpact,meaningthepricecompetitionhasboostedoracceleratedtheirpurchasedecisions.
Exhibit4
Pricecompetitionhaslimitedimpactonconsumers,withmorethan80percentofconsumersreportnopositiveroleforpricecompetitionintheirpurchase
decisions
‘Doesthepricecompetitionmakeapositiveornegativeimpacttoyournewcarpurchasedecision?’
Consumerattitudestowardsthepricecompetition
%ofrespondents
64.1
Neutral:Hasno
impacton
purchasedecision
Negative:Makesmemorehesitanttomakepurchasedecision
16.4
Positive:
19.4
Triggersoraccelerates
Total
purchasedecision
100.0
80.5%
ofconsumers
reportingnopositiveimpactfromprice
competitionon
purchasedecision
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey(2023&24)McKinsey&Company
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20247
Theproportionofrespondentssayingtheimpactispositiveisaboutthreepercentage
pointshigherthanthepercentagereportinganegativeimpact.Asaresult,pricecompetitionappearstohavestimulatedtheoverallChinacarmarket,butonlyslightly.Inaddition,the
segmentsreportinganeutralornegativeimpacttotalmorethan80percentofrespondents,meaningmostpeoplesurveyedobservenopositiveroleofpricecompetitionintheirpurchasedecisions.Theevidencepointstoalimitedoverallimpactofcompetingonprice.
Theimpactofpricecompetitionvariesaccordingtothepriceofrespondents’currently
ownedcars.Inthelow-pricesegment,moreconsumersciteanegativeimpactthanapositiveone,andinthemiddle-pricesegment,thedifferencebetweenpositiveandnegativeimpactisonly3.1percentagepoints(Exhibit5).Thenetimpact(positiveminusnegative)isgreatestforthepricesegmentaboveRMB300,000,at4.4percentagepoints.Weinterpretthistomeanthatconsumersinthelowandmediumpricesegments,facingastretchofpricecompetition,aremorelikelytoexpectfurtheraggressivepricecuts,sotheyadoptawait-and-seeattitude.Consumersinthehigh-pricesegmenthavestrongerpurchasingpowerandcanrespond
morepositivelytofavorableprices.
Exhibit5
Pricecompetitionhavelimitednetimpactforvolumesegmentconsumers,andmayevenresultinlosses
‘Doesthepricecompetitionmakeapositiveornegativeimpacttoyournewcarpurchasedecision?’
Consumerattitudestowardsthepricecompetition(bypriceofcarcurrentlyowned)
%ofrespondents
100%
Neutral:Hasnoimpactonpurchasedecision
Negative:Makesmemorehesitanttomakepurchasedecision
Positive:Triggersoracceleratespurchasedecision
Netimpactcausedby
pricecompetition,positiveviewsminusnegative
views,percentagepoints
57.6%
61.6%
71.8%
21.9%
17.6%
11.9%
20.5%
20.8%
16.3%
<100100~300>300Priceofcar
currently
owned,RMBthousands
-1.4%3.1%4.4%
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
8McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
2
PerceptionsofEVandICEbrands
arediverging
Keyinsights:
—Consumers’brandperceptionshavesignificantlydiverged:theirinitialconsiderationsetdiffersaccordingtothebrandortypeofcartheyown
—WhilepremiumChineseEVbrandshavesuccessfullyattractedconsumerswith
theircompetitiveedgeinsmartification,manyownersoftraditionalpremiumMNCbrandsareswitchingtopremiumChineseEVbrands
—Consumers’perceptionsofChinesecarbrandshavegreatlyimprovedalongbothtraditionalandemergingevaluationdimensions,whilethebrandhalooftraditionalmultinationalcompany(MNC)playersisincreasinglychallenged
—NearlyhalfofChineseconsumersarereluctanttopayhighpremiumsforMNCbrands,andtheproportionisincreasing
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20249
Consumers’brandperceptionshavesignificantlydiverged;theirinitialconsiderationsetdiffers
accordingtothebrandortypeofcartheyown
CompetitioninChina’spassengervehiclemarketisgettingmoreandmoreintense.Several
leadingnewEVbrandsaregainingconsiderabletraction,whilesomeweak,oldbrandsare
phasedout.Overthepastthreeyears,16newbrandshaveenteredtheautosector,eachwithamarketsharegreaterthan0.1percent.Inthemeantime,sevenoldbrandshavegradually
vanishedfromthesightofconsumers(Exhibit6).
Exhibit6
CompetitioninChinapassengervehiclemarketisintensifyingasnewbrandscatchupandoldbrandsarephasedout
MajorbrandsintheChineseautomarket1
BrandswithMS>2%BrandswithMS0.5%-2%BrandswithMS0.1%-0.5%
1670
60
61
4
16
12
18
13
7
7brandsallwithmarketshare
(MS)of0.1%-0.5%in2020
Among16new
brands,4brandshaveanMSof
0.5%-2%in2023;12brandshave
anMSof0.1%-0.5%in2023
20
20
16
34
28
26
201520BrandsphasedoutNewbrands2023
1.Onlyincludethebrandswithmarketshareover0.1%,whichoverallaccountforover99%ofChinatotalPVmarket.Source:ChinaNewCarInsuranceRegistrationDatabase
McKinsey&Company
Assignificantchangestakeplaceinthebrandlandscape,howwillconsumerperceptionsofindividualbrandsevolve?Respondents’answerstoseveralsurveyquestionsshedsomelightonthisquestion.
10McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Whenconsumersconsiderpurchasingacar,theydevelopaninitialconsiderationset(ICS),
collectmoreinformationabouteachbrandinthatICS,andthenmakepurchasedecisions.
Accordingtoourprevioussurveys,aconsumer’sICScontainsjustafewbrands—twotothreeonaverage—andthebrandpurchased,regardlessofpowertraintype,usuallycomesfrom
theirICS(Exhibit7).Itisnoteworthythatwhiletheaveragenumberofbrandsinconsumers’ICSisroughlyunchanged,thelikelihoodofthefinalpurchasecomingfromthatsetofbrandshasincreasedconsiderably.Inotherwords,consumers’purchasedecisionsaregettingmorefocused.OEMscanbenefitfromthistrendbyworkingmoreactivelytoputtheirbrandsintoconsumers’ICSandcaptureagreatermindsharewhenconsumersdevelopanintentionto
purchaseacar.
Exhibit7
Although#ofoptionalbrandsincreases,ChineseconsumerscontinuetokeepashallowICS(initialconsiderationset)
ICStypicallyonlyincludes2-3brands......85%offinaldecisionsarefromICS
NumberofbrandsinICS,#ofbrands
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.8
201921222023
%finaltransactionswithinICS
20222023
85%
87%
79%
77%
ICEonwersEVowners
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurveyacrosstheyearsMcKinsey&Company
Amorein-depthanalysisofthedatashowsthatICSmixesvaryfordifferentgroupsof
consumers.Forexample,consumerswhopurchasedamassbrandvehicleoverthepastsixmonthsdifferintheirconsiderationofMNCversusChinesemassbrands(Exhibit8):
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202411
Exhibit8
ConsumersinthemassbrandsegmentshowdifferentconsiderationinICS(initialconsiderationset)
ICSmixofdifferentgroupsofcustomerswhopurchasedanewcarinthepast6months
%orrespondents
Atleast1traditionalmassMNCbrandinICS
Atleast1traditionalmassChinesebrandinICS
TraditionalmassMNCbrandbuyers
98%
48%
Traditionalmass
ChineseICEbuyers
53%
96%
TraditionalmassChineseEVbuyers
48%
95%
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
—AmongrespondentswhopurchasedtraditionalmassMNCbrands,traditionalmassMNCbrandsappearinnearly100percentofrespondents’ICSs,butChinesemassbrandsarepresentinonlyabout50percent.
—AmongthosewhopurchasedtraditionalmassChinesebrands,theoppositeholds:traditionalmassMNCbrandsappearinonlyabout50percentofrespondents’ICSs,whereastraditionalmassChinesebrandsappearinnearly100percent.
12McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Inthisexample,thedifferencesinICSmixbetweenthedifferentgroupsofmassbrand
vehicleownerstendstobeconsistentwithrespondents’highlydivergentbrandperceptions,includingtheirawarenessofChineseandMNCbrands(Exhibit9):
—FortherespondentswhoowntraditionalmassMNCbrands,thetopfivemostrecognizedmassbrandsareallMNCbrands.
—TheownersoftraditionalmassChinesebrandsincludetwoChinesebrandsintheir
choicesofthetopfivemostrecognizedmassbrands.Also,theyaremuchlesslikelytorecognizetop-rankingMNCbrandsthantheownersofMNCmassbrandsare.
Exhibit9
Asimilarperception-divergeishappeningtomasssegmentICEconsumers’brandrecognition
Top5mostrecognizedICEbrands(mass)bydifferentgroupsofcustomers
%ofrespondents
TraditionalmassChinesebrand
TraditionalmassMNCbrandowners
MassGermanbrand
60
MassJapanesebrand
32
MassJapanesebrand
31
MassUSbrand
22
MassUSbrand
16
TraditionalmassChinesebrandowners
MassGermanbrand
32
MassJapanesebrand
18
MassJapanesebrand
16
MassChinesebrand
12
MassChinesebrand
12
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202413
SimilardifferencesinICSmixanddivergenceofbrandperceptionsaremoreevidentinthesurveyresultscollectedfrompremiumbrandowners:
—AmongrespondentswhopurchasedthreemajorpremiumGermanbrands,the
appearancerateofthesethreebrandsintheirICSisnearly100percentforICEvehicleownersandnearly90percentforEVowners(Exhibit10).Incontrast,fewpremium
ChineseEVbrandswereintheseconsumers’ICS:almostzeroforICEvehiclebuyersandlessthanone-thirdforEVbuyers.
—Incontrast,consumerswhopurchasedpremiumChineseEVbrandsrarelyincludethe
threepremiumGermanbrands(appearancerateof14percent).Andfortheseowners,theICSappearancerateofpremiumChineseEVbrandsis91percent.
Exhibit10
Consumersinthepremiumvehiclesegmentalsoshowsignificantly-differentconsiderationinICS
ICSmixofdifferentgroupsofcustomerswhopurchasedanewcarinthepast6months
%orrespondents
Atleast1premium
GermanbrandinICS
Atleast1
premiumChineseEVbrandinICS
ICEbuyersof3majorpremiumGermanbrands1
96%
3%
EVbuyersof3majorpremiumGermanbrands1
89%
30%
PremiumChineseEVbuyers2
14%
91%
1.Incl.buyersof3majorpremiumGermanbrands.2.Incl.buyersof6premiumChineseEVbrands.
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024
McKinsey&Company
14McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
ThedistinctdifferencesinICSmixbetweenpremiumsegmentownersarealsoconsistentwiththeirdivergentbrandperceptions(Exhibit11):
—Respondents,whenaskedtoidentifythebrandstheyconsider“premium”,regardlessofpowertraintype,mentiononlytraditionalMNCbrandsknownfortheirICEvehicles.
—WhenaskedtofocusonpremiumEVbrands,respondentsmostoftenmentionthree
emergingEVbrands(thatis,brandsthatsellonlyEVmodels).ThetoppositionisoccupiedbyanAmericanEVbrand,followedbytwoChineseEVbrands.ThethreepremiumGermanbrandsofferingbothEVandICEvehiclesrankfourth,fifthandseventh.
Exhibit11
ThehugedifferenceinICS-mixamongdifferentvehiclegroupsiscausedbyconsumers’divergingperceptionsonpremiumbetweenICEvs.EV
Top10brandsviewedas“premiumbrand(regardlessofpowertraintype)”
amongconsumers
%ofrespondents
50
23
13
69
63
53
20
17
17
14
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
German
German
German
German
Italybrand
British
USbrand
British
British
Japanese
brand
brand
brand
brand
brand
brand
brand
brand
Top10brandsviewedas“premiumEVbrand"amongconsumers
%ofrespondents
EVbrands50
42
34
29
26
24
20
17
1616
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Chinese
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
USEV
Chinese
Chinese
German
German
EVbrand
German
Chinese
Chinese
Chinese
brand
EVbrand
EVbrand
brand
brand
brand
EVbrand
EVbrand
EVbrand
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
EventheconsumerswhoownamajorpremiumGermanbrandrankthesethreeGermanbrandsbehindtheAmericanEVbrandandtwoChineseEVbrands(Exhibit12).
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202415
Exhibit12
Evenownersofthe3majorGermanbrandownersconsiderEVbrandsmorepremiumintheEVdomain
Top10brandsviewedas“premiumEVbrand"among3majorGermanbrandowners
%ofrespondents
44
3535
3131
EVbrands
28
23
21
1414
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Chinese
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
USEV
Chinese
Chinese
German
German
EVbrand
German
Chinese
Korean
Japanese
brand
EVbrand
EVbrand
brand
brand
brand
EVbrand
brand
brand
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
Throughfurtherresearch,wefoundthatselectioncriteriadifferamongownersofpremiumvehiclesbearingdifferentbrands.RespondentswhoownpremiumChineseEVindicate
thattheychosepremiumChineseEVbrandsprimarilybecausesuchbrandswieldtechnicaladvantagesinAD,smartcockpit,andoriginalEVplatforms(Exhibit13).
Interestingly,whenownersoftraditionalpremiumMNCEVwereaskedsimilarquestions,
theyoftenidentifyabrand-relatedreasonasthekeyconsiderationfortheirdecision.SuchresponsesincludesapreferenceforthetraditionalpremiumMNCbrandsandalackof
confidenceinpremiumChineseEVbrands(Exhibit14).
16McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Exhibit13
SmartfeaturesarecorereasonsconsumersgiventobuyEVfrompremiumChineseEVbrands
ReasonsforbuyingEVfrompremiumChineseEVbrands,vstraditionalpremiumMNCbrands
%ofrespondents1
SmartificationfeaturesBranding
BetterADperformance
BettersmartcockpitperformanceAttractiveexteriordesign
NativeEVplatform
Biggerspace&comfort
Convenientaftersalesservice
BetterOTA(over-the-airupdate)capability
Technologytoaddressrangeanxiety(e.g.batteryswapping,REEV2)
BrandingoftraditionalpremiumMNCbrandsmeaninglesstome
Betterdrivingperformance
62
51
51
47
43
40
42
39
39
65
1.Incl.ownersof6premiumChineseEVbrands.
2.Rangeextendedelectricvehicle.
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202417
Exhibit14
…whilethetraditionalpremiumEVbuyersaretriggeredbybrandingeffects
ReasonsforbuyingEVfromtraditionalpremiumMNCbrands,vspremiumChineseEVbrands
%ofrespondents1
Branding
Trustonquality
Attractiveexteriordesign
EVplayersmaygobankruptcy
Attractivepriceduetodiscounts
Owningatraditionalpremiu
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- (新教材)2026年滬科版七年級(jí)上冊(cè)數(shù)學(xué) 1.2 數(shù)軸、相反數(shù)和絕對(duì)值 課件
- 2025年便攜式制氧機(jī)維保合同協(xié)議
- 2025年制造業(yè)數(shù)字化轉(zhuǎn)型組織架構(gòu)
- 水溫傳感器題庫(kù)及答案
- 2026 年中職酒店服務(wù)與管理(客房服務(wù))試題及答案
- 導(dǎo)數(shù)大題題庫(kù)及答案
- 基于“證據(jù)推理與模型認(rèn)知”核心素養(yǎng)培養(yǎng)現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查的教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì)研究
- 冷戰(zhàn)課件教學(xué)
- 2025年河北省公需課學(xué)習(xí)-高等學(xué)校境外辦學(xué)指南
- 2025年員工安全知識(shí)測(cè)試試題庫(kù)附答案
- (2026.01.01施行)《生態(tài)環(huán)境監(jiān)測(cè)條例》解讀與實(shí)施指南課件
- 2025天津大學(xué)管理崗位集中招聘15人考試筆試備考題庫(kù)及答案解析
- 學(xué)堂在線 批判性思維-方法和實(shí)踐 章節(jié)測(cè)試答案
- petrel操作指南精講
- 高效能人士提高辦事效率七個(gè)習(xí)慣學(xué)員
- VTE風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估與預(yù)防措施
- 2019國(guó)家安全知識(shí)競(jìng)賽試題試題及答案大全(共471題)
- 高中英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法專項(xiàng) 詞性轉(zhuǎn)換(構(gòu)詞法)練習(xí)試題高考例句
- 合成生物學(xué)與基因回路課件
- 智慧樹(shù)知到《走進(jìn)故宮》2019期末考試答案
- 樂(lè)隊(duì)指揮教案
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論