藥學專業(yè)英語視聽說教程 課件 下篇 lecture 5 New drug application and drug approval_第1頁
藥學專業(yè)英語視聽說教程 課件 下篇 lecture 5 New drug application and drug approval_第2頁
藥學專業(yè)英語視聽說教程 課件 下篇 lecture 5 New drug application and drug approval_第3頁
藥學專業(yè)英語視聽說教程 課件 下篇 lecture 5 New drug application and drug approval_第4頁
藥學專業(yè)英語視聽說教程 課件 下篇 lecture 5 New drug application and drug approval_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩30頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

Lecture5Newdrugapplicationanddrugapprovalinformedconsentstrengthgenericdrugthalidomidemislabelingsponsordesignationcompliancerevokeadulteration1.FDA’scurrentresponsibilities—reviewing____________________________________________;—inspecting____________________________________________;—monitoring___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________;—issuing__________________________________________________________________________________________________.individualapplicationstomarketspecificdrugsmanufacturingfacilitiesItalsomonitorsadvertisements,websitesandotherpromotionalmaterialsbydrugdevicecompaniesotherhelpfulinformationtotheindustryimportsofoverseas,esp.foodanddrugproducts.summariesofdrugapprovaldataforthepublicandprovides2.FDAprotectsthepublichealthby—reviewing____________________________________________;—takingappropriateactionon_____________________________;—ensuring_____________________________________________;—participating__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.—servingas________________________________________________________________________________________________.theclinicalresearchthemarketofregulatedproductshumandrugsaresafeandeffectiveharmonizingregulatoryrequirementsacrossbordersthroughtheappropriateprocesswithrepresentativesinothercountriestoreducetheburdenofregulation,anddeliverymarketplaceacriticalguidepostforinnovationinhealthcareunmetbiologicslife-threateningpreliminarymagnitudesurrogateoncologydiagnosisMakeacomparisonbetweenthefourexpeditedapprovalpathways.()1.Regulatorsrequirethreecategoriesofregulatorysubmissions,INDA,NDAorBLA,andANDAbeforeclinicaltrialscanbestarted.()2.INDAisarequestfromaclinicaltrialsponsortotheFDA,inwhichprotocolsofanimalpharmacologyandtoxicologystudies,manufacturinginformationandinvestigatorinformationaretypicallyincluded.()3.NDAistheformalprocessbywhichadrugsponsorseeksFDAapprovalformarketinganewpharmaceuticalintheUnitedStates.TFT()4.Genericdrugapplicationsaretermedabbreviatedbecausesomestepshavebeensimplified,likepreclinicalstudiesandclinicalstudies.()5.Thegenericdrugproductisanalternativetotheinnovatordrugproductitreferencesiningredients,dosageform,strength,routeofadministration,quality,performancecharacteristicsandintendeduse.FFTrytobrieflydescribethedifferencesbetweenNDAprocessandANDAprocess.1.Howaregenericdrugsthesameasbrand-namedrugs?Theyhavethesameactiveingredient.TheFDArequiresgenericdrugmanufacturerstomanufacturegenericdrugsandmeetthesamestandardsasbrand-namedrugs.Theyhaveequalquality,safety,andeffectiveness.2.Howdogenericsdifferfrombrand-namedrugs?Theymaylookdifferent.TheFDAallowsthemtohavedifferentinactiveingredients,likethebinders,theflavoring.Thecolorsofthemmightbedifferent.Thepackagingofthegenericdrugsisdifferentinlabeling.3.Whyaregenericdrugscheaperthanbrand-namedrugs?----Thedirectmanufacturingcostsarejustasmallpartofthecostofdevelopingadrug.Alotofmoneyisspentonnewdrugresearchanddevelopment,marketingandadvertising.----FDAgivesmanufacturers20yearsofpatentprotectiontorecouptheircostsofdevelopment.Oncethat20yearspass,otherdrugcompaniesmanufacturegenericdrugs.Andthenthecostforthegenericsismuchcheaper.4.Shouldpatientsbetakinggenericmedicationiftheyfindoutthatit’scheaperthanthebrandnamedrugs?Itdepends.Generally,theanswerisyes.Ifthegenericisequivalentforthepatientsasthebrand-namedrug,theyareencouragedtogetgenericstosavemoneyandkeeptheirhealthcostdown.Ifthegenericisnot,patientsarenotrecommendedtoswapthebranddrugstheyaretaking.1.Howwassulfanilamidedeveloped?Sulfanilamidewasdevelopedfromanearlierdrugcalledprontosil,whichwasactuallydevelopedbythedyeindustry.Furtherresearchshowedthatprontosilhadtwoparts:onewasthedye,andtheotherwastheantibiotic.Theantibiotichalfwassulfanilamide,whichresearchersfoundcouldbeusedonitsown.2.Pleasediscusstheprocessofsulfanilamideelixirdisaster.DiscoveryofProntosilGerhardDomagkdiscoversprontosil,adrugwithavividredcolordevelopedbythedyeindustry.DevelopmentofSulfanilamideResearchersfindthatprontosilhastwoparts:oneisthedye,andtheotheristheantibioticsulfanilamide,thelatterisidentifiedasapotentialstandaloneantibiotic.FormulationofElixirMassengillcompanyuseddiethyleneglycoltoformulatesulfanilamideintoanelixirandmarketedthenewproductwithoutanysafetytesting.ConsumptionandDeathPatientsconsumedthesulfanilamideelixirasprescribedbytheirhealthcareprovidersandstaredexperiencingsevereadversereactions,includingdeath,duetothepresenceofthetoxicsolvent.InvestigationandRecallofProductAninvestigationislaunchedtodeterminethecauseoftheadversereactionsandtheelixirwasrecalledfromthemarket.3.Itwasthesolventofthesulfanilamideelixir,diethyleneglycol,thattriggeredthetragedy.Pleasemakeacommentontheresponsibilitythatthepharmaceuticalcompany,theFDA,andthelegislaturesshouldtake.PharmaceuticalCompany:Thepharmaceuticalcompanybearsasignificantresponsibilityinthiscase.Theywereresponsibleforformulatingthesulfanilamideelixirandselectingthesolvent,diethyleneglycol.Theyshouldhaveconductedthoroughtestingtoensurethesafetyandefficacyoftheirproductbeforereleasingittothemarket.Theuseofdiethyleneglycolasasolvent,despiteitsknowntoxicity,indicatesalackofproperresearchandregardforpatientsafety.Thecompanyshouldhavebeenawareofthepotentialrisksassociatedwiththissolventandtakenstepstoavoidusingitortoensurethatitwasusedinasafemanner.FDA:TheFDA,astheregulatorybodyresponsibleforoverseeingthesafetyandefficacyofdrugsintheUnitedStates,alsohasaresponsibilityinthiscase.WhiletheFDAdidnotdirectlyapprovethesulfanilamideelixir,theywereresponsibleforsettingstandardsandguidelinesfordrugmanufacturingandtesting.Theagencyshouldhavehadstricterregulationsinplacetopreventtheuseoftoxicsolventsinmedications.Additionally,theFDAshouldhaveconductedmorerigorousinspectionsandauditsofpharmaceuticalcompaniestoensurecompliancewithsafetystandards.Legislatures:Legislaturesplayacrucialroleinsettingthelegalframeworkfordrugregulationandsafety.Theyshouldenactlawsthatprovideclearguidelinesandpenaltiesfornon-compliancewithsafetystandards.Inthiscase,thelegislaturecouldhaveimposedstricterpenaltiesforusingunsafesolventsinmedicationsandprovidedmorefundingforregulatorybodiestoconductinspectionsandaudits.Additionally,theycouldhaveencouragedpublicawarenesscampaignstoeducateconsumersaboutthepotentialrisksassociatedwithcertainmedications.FTTFTF1.WhydidtheFDAstillapproveAduhelm(aducanumab)despitethedisagreementovertheeffectivenessofthedrug?WhatdidtheFDAbaseitsapprovalon?TheFDAstillapprovedAduhelm(aducanumab)becauseitattacksakeyproteininAlzheimer'sdisease,amyloid,whichclumpsintoplaquesinthebrainsofpatientswithAlzheimer's.TheFDAacknowledgedthattherewasnotclearevidenceofclinicalbenefitandsomemurkinessintheevidenceregardingwhetherthedrugwouldactuallyhelppatientsslowdowntheirmemoryandthinkingproblems.FDAbaseditsapprovalonthesuggestionthatthedrugmightoffersomebenefitforpatientsymptomsandtheneedfornewtreatmentsforAlzheimer's,giventhatthelasttreatmentcameonthemarket18yearsago.Additionally,theFDArequiredthecompanytoconductanotherclinicaltrial,andiftheresultsofthattrialdonotshowbenefit,theFDAmightrevoketheapproval.2.WhatarethebenefitsandrisksofAduhelm?ThebenefitsofAduhelm,basedonthetrialsconducted,arerelativelyuncertainandmild.Onlyoneofthetrialsshowedanypotentialbenefit,andeventhen,theimprovementwasquiteslight.However,itisworthnotingthatthedrugisintendedtotargettheamyloidprotein,whichisbelievedtoplayaroleinthebiologyofAlzheimer'sdisease.RegardingtherisksofAduhelm,therearesomeseriousconcerns.Thedrughasbeenshowntocausebrainswellingandbrainbleedinginabout40%ofpatientsinthetrials,althoughmostofthesecasesdidnotproduceanysymptoms.However,asignificantnumberofpatientsdidexperiencesymptoms,andabout6%hadtoquitthetrialsduetothesesideeffects.Asaresult,anyonetakingAduhelmwillneedtoundergoregularbrainMRIstomonitorforpotentialcomplications.3.AlthoughAduhelmgainedtheapprovalfromtheFDA,theeffectivenessseemsnotsoclear.So,whatisFDA’sroleinthisprocess?----Inthisprocess,theFDA'sroleistoevaluatethesafety,efficacy,andoverallbenefit-riskprofileofthedrugbasedontheavailablescientificevidenceandclinicaltrialdata.TheFDAconsiderstheseriousnessofthedisease,theunmetmedicalneed,andthepotentialbenefitsthedrugmayoffertopatients.----Inthiscase,despitetheuncertaineffectivenessandthehistoryoffailedanti-amyloiddrugs,theFDAmayhavedecidedtoapproveAduhelmbasedonitshintofbenefitanditsabilitytotargetthekeyproteinimplicatedinAlzheimer'sdisease.----However,itisimportanttonotethattheFDA'sapprovaldoesnotguaranteethedrug'seffectivenessorsafetyinallpatients,andongoingmonitoringandresearcharenecessarytofurtherassessitsbenefitsandrisks4.ThereisgreatcontroversyovertheapprovalofthisnewAlzheimer’sdrug,Aduhelm.Doyouthinksuchadrugshouldbeapproved?Pleasemakeacommentonit.SupportingArguments----AddressinganUnmetMedicalNeedAlzheimer'sdiseaseisadevastatingconditionthataffectsmillionsofpeopleworldwideandhasasignificantimpactonpatientsandtheirfamilies.Thereisapressingneedfornewtreatmentsthatcanslowtheprogressionofthediseaseandimprovethequalityoflifeforpatients.AduhelmrepresentsapotentialbreakthroughinAlzheimer'streatmentbytargetingtheamyloidprotein,whichisimplicatedinthediseaseprocess.----PotentialforClinicalBenefit:AlthoughtheevidenceforAduhelm'seffectivenessisnotconclusive,someclinicaltrialshaveshownahintofbenefitinreducingcognitivedeclin

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論