版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
Trustin
Artificial
Intelligence
Aglobalstudy
2023
.au
KPMG.com.au
Citation
Gillespie,N.,Lockey,S.,Curtis,C.,Pool,J.,&
Akbari,A.(2023).TrustinArti?cialIntelligence:
AGlobalStudy.TheUniversityofQueensland
andKPMGAustralia.doi:
10.14264/00d3c94
UniversityofQueenslandResearchers
ProfessorNicoleGillespie,DrSteveLockey,
DrCaitlinCurtisandDrJavadPool.
TheUniversityofQueenslandteamledthe
design,conduct,analysisandreportingof
thisresearch.
KPMGAdvisors
JamesMabbott,RitaFentenervanVlissingen,
JessicaWyndham,andRichardBoele.
Acknowledgements
Wearegratefulfortheinsightfulinput,expertise
andfeedbackonthisresearchprovidedby
DrAliAkbari,DrIanOpperman,RossanaBianchi,
ProfessorShaziaSadiq,MikeRichmond,and
DrMortezaNamvar,andmembersofthe
Trust,EthicsandGovernanceAllianceatThe
UniversityofQueensland,particularlyDrNatalie
Smith,AssociateProfessorMartinEdwards,
DrShannonColvilleandAlexMacdade.
Funding
ThisresearchwassupportedbyanAustralian
GovernmentResearchSupportPackagegrant
providedtoTheUniversityofQueenslandAI
Collaboratory,andbytheKPMGChairinTrust
grant(ID2018001776).
AcknowledgementofCountry
TheUniversityofQueensland(UQ)
acknowledgestheTraditionalOwnersandtheir
custodianshipofthelands.Wepayourrespects
totheirAncestorsandtheirdescendants,who
continueculturalandspiritualconnections
toCountry.Werecognisetheirvaluable
contributionstoAustralianandglobalsociety.
?2023TheUniversityofQueenslandABN:63942912684CRICOSProviderNo:00025B.
?2023KPMG,anAustralianpartnershipandamember?rmoftheKPMGglobalorganisationofindependentmember?rmsaf?liatedwithKPMGInternationalLimited,aprivateEnglishcompanylimitedbyguarantee.Allrightsreserved.TheKPMGnameandlogoaretrademarksusedunderlicensebytheindependentmember?rmsoftheKPMGglobalorganisation.
LiabilitylimitedbyaschemeapprovedunderProfessionalStandardsLegislation.
Contents
Executivesummary02
Introduction07
Howweconductedtheresearch08
1.TowhatextentdopeopletrustAIsystems?11
2.Howdopeopleperceivethebene?tsandrisksofAI?22
3.Whoistrustedtodevelop,useandgovernAI?29
4.Whatdopeopleexpectofthemanagement,governance
andregulationofAI?34
5.HowdopeoplefeelaboutAIatwork?43
6.HowwelldopeopleunderstandAI?53
7.WhatarethekeydriversoftrustinandacceptanceofAI?60
8.HowhavetrustandattitudestowardsAIchangedovertime?66
Conclusionandimplications70
Appendix1:Methodandstatisticalnotes73
Appendix2:Countrysamples75
Appendix3:Keyindicatorsforeachcountry7
7
?2023TheUniversityofQueenslandABN:63942912684CRICOSProviderNo:00025B.
?2023KPMG,anAustralianpartnershipandamember?rmoftheKPMGglobalorganisationofindependentmember?rmsaf?liatedwithKPMGInternationalLimited,aprivateEnglishcompanylimitedbyguarantee.Allrightsreserved.TheKPMGnameandlogoaretrademarksusedunderlicensebytheindependentmember?rmsoftheKPMGglobalorganisation.
LiabilitylimitedbyaschemeapprovedunderProfessionalStandardsLegislation.
TRUSTINARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE2
Executive
summary
Arti?cialIntelligence(AI)hasbecomeaubiquitouspartofeverydaylifeandwork.AIisenablingrapidinnovationthatistransformingthewayworkisdoneandhowservicesaredelivered.Forexample,generativeAItoolssuchasChatGPTarehavingaprofoundimpact.Giventhemanypotentialandrealisedbene?tsforpeople,organisationsandsociety,investmentinAIcontinuestogrowacrossallsectors
1
,withorganisationsleveragingAIcapabilitiestoimprovepredictions,optimiseproductsandservices,augmentinnovation,enhanceproductivityandef?ciency,andlowercosts,amongstotherbene?cialapplications.
However,theuseofAIalsoposesrisksandchallenges,raisingconcernsaboutwhetherAIsystems(inclusiveofdata,algorithmsandapplications)areworthyoftrust.Theseconcernshavebeenfuelledbyhighpro?lecasesofAIusethatwerebiased,discriminatory,manipulative,unlawful,orviolatedhumanrights.Realisingthebene?tsAIoffersandthereturnoninvestmentinthesetechnologiesrequiresmaintainingthepublic’strust:peopleneedtobecon?dentAIisbeingdevelopedandusedinaresponsibleandtrustworthymanner.SustainedacceptanceandadoptionofAIinsocietyarefoundedonthistrust.
Thisresearchisthe?rsttotakeadeepdiveexaminationintothepublic’strustandattitudestowardstheuseofAI,andexpectationsofthemanagementandgovernanceofAIacrosstheglobe.
Wesurveyedover17,000peoplefrom17countriescoveringallglobalregions:Australia,Brazil,Canada,China,Estonia,Finland,France,Germany,India,Israel,Japan,theNetherlands,Singapore,SouthAfrica,SouthKorea,theUnitedKingdom(UK),andtheUnitedStatesofAmerica(USA).ThesecountriesareleadersinAIactivityandreadinesswithintheirregion.Eachcountrysampleisnationallyrepresentativeofthepopulationbasedonage,gender,andregionaldistribution.
WeaskedsurveyrespondentsabouttrustandattitudestowardsAIsystemsingeneral,aswellasAIuseinthecontextoffourapplicationdomainswhereAIisrapidlybeingdeployedandlikelytoimpactmanypeople:inhealthcare,publicsafetyandsecurity,humanresourcesandconsumerrecommenderapplications.
Theresearchprovidescomprehensive,timely,globalinsightsintothepublic’strustandacceptanceofAIsystems,includingwhoistrustedtodevelop,useandgovernAI,theperceivedbene?tsandrisksofAIuse,communityexpectationsofthedevelopment,regulationandgovernanceofAI,andhoworganisationscansupporttrustintheirAIuse.ItalsoshedslightonhowpeoplefeelabouttheuseofAIatwork,currentunderstandingandawarenessofAI,andthekeydriversoftrustinAIsystems.WealsoexplorechangesintrustandattitudestoAIovertime.
Next,wesummarisethekey?ndings.
?2023TheUniversityofQueenslandABN:63942912684CRICOSProviderNo:00025B.
?2023KPMG,anAustralianpartnershipandamember?rmoftheKPMGglobalorganisationofindependentmember?rmsaf?liatedwithKPMGInternationalLimited,aprivateEnglishcompanylimitedbyguarantee.Allrightsreserved.TheKPMGnameandlogoaretrademarksusedunderlicensebytheindependentmember?rmsoftheKPMGglobalorganisation.
LiabilitylimitedbyaschemeapprovedunderProfessionalStandardsLegislation.
TRUSTINARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE3
MostpeoplearewaryabouttrustingAIsystemsandhavelowormoderateacceptanceofAI:however,trustandacceptancedependontheAIapplication
Acrosscountries,threeoutof?vepeople(61%)arewaryabouttrustingAIsystems,reportingeitherambivalenceoranunwillingnesstotrust.TrustisparticularlylowinFinlandandJapan,wherelessthanaquarterofpeoplereporttrustingAI.Incontrast,peopleintheemergingeconomiesofBrazil,India,ChinaandSouthAfrica(BICS
2
)havethehighestlevelsoftrust,withthemajorityofpeopletrustingAIsystems.
PeoplehavemorefaithinAIsystemstoproduceaccurateandreliableoutputandprovidehelpfulservices,andaremorescepticalaboutthesafety,securityandfairnessofAIsystemsandtheextenttowhichtheyupholdprivacyrights.
TrustinAIsystemsiscontextualanddependsonthespeci?capplicationorusecase.Oftheapplicationsweexamined,peoplearegenerallylesstrustingandacceptingofAIuseinhumanresources(i.e.foraidinghiringandpromotiondecisions),andmoretrustingofAIuseinhealthcare(i.e.foraidingmedicaldiagnosisandtreatment)wherethereisadirectbene?ttothem.Peoplearegenerallymorewillingtorelyon,thanshareinformationwithAIsystems,particularlyrecommendersystems(i.e.forpersonalisingnews,socialmedia,andproductrecommendations)andsecurityapplications(i.e.foraidingpublicsafetyandsecuritydecisions).
ManypeoplefeelambivalentabouttheuseofAI,reportingoptimismorexcitementontheonehand,whilesimultaneouslyreportingworryorfear.Overall,two-thirdsofpeoplefeeloptimisticabouttheuseofAI,whileabouthalffeelworried.Whileoptimismandexcitementaredominantemotionsinmanycountries,particularlytheBICScountries,fearandworryaredominantemotionsforpeopleinAustralia,Canada,France,andJapan,withpeopleinFrancethemostfearful,worried,andoutragedaboutAI.
Peoplerecognisethemanybene?tsofAI,butonlyhalfbelievethebene?tsoutweightherisks
People’swarinessandambivalencetowardsAIcanbepartlyexplainedbytheirmixedviewsofthebene?tsandrisks.Mostpeople(85%)believeAIresultsinarangeofbene?ts,andthinkthat‘process’bene?tssuchasimprovedef?ciency,innovation,effectiveness,resourceutilisationandreducedcosts,aregreaterthanthe‘people’bene?tsofenhancingdecision-makingandimprovingoutcomesforpeople.
However,onaverage,onlyoneintwopeoplebelievethebene?tsofAIoutweightherisks.PeopleinthewesterncountriesandJapanareparticularlyunconvincedthatthebene?tsoutweightherisks.Incontrast,themajorityofpeopleintheBICScountriesandSingaporebelievethebene?tsoutweightherisks.
PeopleperceivetherisksofAIinasimilarway
acrosscountries,withcybersecurityratedasthe
topriskglobally
WhiletherearedifferencesinhowtheAIbene?t-risk
ratioisviewed,thereisconsiderableconsistencyacross
countriesinthewaytherisksofAIareperceived.
Justunderthree-quarters(73%)ofpeopleacrosstheglobereportfeelingconcernedaboutthepotentialrisksofAI.Theserisksincludecybersecurityandprivacybreaches,manipulationandharmfuluse,lossofjobsanddeskilling,systemfailure,theerosionofhumanrights,andinaccurateorbiasedoutcomes.
Inallcountries,peopleratedcybersecurityrisksastheirtoponeortwoconcerns,andbiasasthelowestconcern.JoblossduetoautomationisalsoatopconcerninIndiaandSouthAfrica,andsystemfailureranksasatopconcerninJapan,potentiallyre?ectingtheirrelativeheavydependenceonsmarttechnology.
These?ndingsreinforcethecriticalimportanceofprotectingpeople’sdataandprivacytosecureandpreservetrust,andsupportingglobalapproachesandinternationalstandardsformanagingandmitigatingAIrisksacrosscountries.
ThereisstrongglobalendorsementfortheprinciplesoftrustworthyAI:trustiscontingentonupholdingandassuringtheseprinciplesareinplace
Our?ndingsrevealstrongglobalpublicsupportfortheprinciplesandrelatedpracticesorganisationsdeployingAIsystemsareexpectedtoupholdinordertobetrusted.EachoftheTrustworthyAIprinciplesoriginallyproposedbytheEuropeanCommission
3
areviewedashighlyimportantfortrustacrossall17countries,withdataprivacy,securityandgovernanceviewedasmostimportantinallcountries.ThisdemonstratesthatpeopleexpectorganisationsdeployingAIsystemstoupholdhighstandardsof:
–dataprivacy,securityandgovernance
–technicalperformance,accuracyandrobustness
–fairness,non-discriminationanddiversity
–humanagencyandoversight
–transparencyandexplainability
–accountabilityandcontestability
–riskandimpactmitigation
–AIliteracysupport
?2023TheUniversityofQueenslandABN:63942912684CRICOSProviderNo:00025B..
?2023KPMG,anAustralianpartnershipandamember?rmoftheKPMGglobalorganisationofindependentmember?rmsaf?liatedwithKPMGInternationalLimited,aprivateEnglishcompanylimitedbyguarantee.Allrightsreserved.TheKPMGnameandlogoaretrademarksusedunderlicensebytheindependentmember?rmsoftheKPMGglobalorganisation.
LiabilitylimitedbyaschemeapprovedunderProfessionalStandardsLegislation.
TRUSTINARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE4
PeopleexpecttheseprinciplestobeinplaceforeachoftheAIuseapplicationsweexamined(e.g.,HumanResources,Healthcare,Security,Recommender,andAIsystemsingeneral),suggestingtheiruniversalapplication.ThisstrongpublicendorsementprovidesablueprintfordevelopingandusingAIinawaythatsupportstrustacrosstheglobe.
OrganisationscandirectlybuildtrustandconsumerwillingnesstouseAIsystemsbysupportingandimplementingassurancemechanismsthathelppeoplefeelcon?denttheseprinciplesarebeingupheld.ThreeoutoffourpeoplewouldbemorewillingtotrustanAIsystemwhenassurancemechanismsareinplacethatsignalethicalandresponsibleuse,suchasmonitoringsystemaccuracyandreliability,independentAIethicsreviews,AIethicscerti?cations,adheringtostandards,andAIcodesofconduct.Thesemechanismsareparticularlyimportantgiventhecurrentrelianceonindustryregulationandgovernanceinmanyjurisdictions.
Peoplearemostcon?dentinuniversitiesanddefenceorganisationstodevelop,useandgovernAIandleastcon?dentingovernmentandcommercialorganisations
Peoplehavethemostcon?denceintheirnationaluniversitiesandresearchinstitutions,aswellastheirdefenceorganisations,todevelop,useandgovernAIinthebestinterestofthepublic(76–82%con?dent).Incontrast,theyhavetheleastcon?denceingovernmentsandcommercialorganisationstodothis.Athirdofpeoplelackcon?denceingovernmentandcommercialorganisationstodevelop,useandregulateAI.ThisisproblematicgiventheincreasingscopewithwhichgovernmentsandcommercialorganisationsareusingAI,andthepublic’sexpectationthattheseentitieswillresponsiblygovernandregulateitsuse.AnimplicationisthatgovernmentandbusinesscanpartnerwithmoretrustedentitiesintheuseandgovernanceofAI.
Therearesigni?cantdifferencesacrosscountriesinpeople’strustoftheirgovernmenttouseandgovern
AI,withabouthalfofpeoplelackingcon?denceintheirgovernmentinSouthAfrica,Japan,theUKandtheUSA,whereasthemajorityinChina,IndiaandSingaporehavehighcon?denceintheirgovernment.Thispatternmirrorspeople’sgeneraltrustintheirgovernments:wefoundastrongassociationbetweenpeople’sgeneraltrustingovernment,commercialorganisationsandotherinstitutionsandtheircon?denceintheseentitiestouseandgovernAI.These?ndingssuggestthattakingactiontostrengthentrustininstitutionsgenerallyisanimportantfoundationfortrustinspeci?cAIactivities.
PeopleexpectAItoberegulatedwithsomeformofexternal,independentoversight,butviewcurrentregulationsandsafeguardsasinadequate
Thelargemajorityofpeople(71%)expectAItoberegulated.WiththeexceptionofIndia,themajorityinallothercountriesseeregulationasnecessary.This?ndingcorroboratespriorsurveys
4
indicatingstrongdesireforregulationofAIandisnotsurprisinggivenmostpeople(61%)believethelong-termimpactofAIonsocietyisuncertainandunpredictable.
Peoplearebroadlysupportiveofmultipleformsofregulation,includingregulationbygovernmentandexistingregulators,adedicatedindependentAIregulator,andco-regulationandindustryregulation,withgeneralagreementoftheneedforsomeformofexternal,independentoversight.
DespitethestrongexpectationsofAIregulation,onlytwoin?vepeoplebelievecurrentregulations,lawsandsafeguardsaresuf?cienttomakeAIusesafe.Thisalignswithprevioussurveys
5
showingpublicdissatisfactionwiththeregulationofAI,andisproblematicgiventhestrongrelationshipbetweencurrentsafeguardsandtrustinAIdemonstratedbyourmodelling.ThishighlightstheimportanceofstrengtheningandcommunicatingtheregulatoryandlegalframeworkgoverningAIanddataprivacy.
Thereare,however,substantialcountrydifferences,withpeopleinIndiaandChinamostlikelytobelieveappropriatesafeguardsareinplace(74–80%agree)followedbyBrazilandSingapore(52–53%).Incontrast,peopleinJapanandSouthKoreaaretheleastconvinced(13–17%agree)asarethemajorityofpeopleinwesterncountries.ThesedifferencesintheperceivedadequacyofregulationsmaypartlyexplainthehighertrustandacceptanceofAIamongpeopleintheBICScountries.
MostpeoplearecomfortablewiththeuseofAIto
augmentworkandinformmanagerialdecision-
making,butwanthumanstoretaincontrol
MostpeoplearecomfortablewiththeuseofAIatworktoaugmentandautomatetasks,butarelesscomfortablewhenAIisfocusedonthemasemployees,forexampleforHRandpeoplemanagement(e.g.tomonitorandevaluateemployees,andsupportrecruitment).Onaverage,halfthepeoplearewillingtotrustAIatwork,forexamplebyrelyingontheoutputitprovides.PeopleinAustralia,Canada,FranceandGermanyaretheleastcomfortablewiththeuseofAIatwork,whilethoseintheBICScountriesandSingaporearethemostcomfortable.
?2023TheUniversityofQueenslandABN:63942912684CRICOSProviderNo:00025B.
?2023KPMG,anAustralianpartnershipandamember?rmoftheKPMGglobalorganisationofindependentmember?rmsaf?liatedwithKPMGInternationalLimited,aprivateEnglishcompanylimitedbyguarantee.Allrightsreserved.TheKPMGnameandlogoaretrademarksusedunderlicensebytheindependentmember?rmsoftheKPMGglobalorganisation.
LiabilitylimitedbyaschemeapprovedunderProfessionalStandardsLegislation.
TRUSTINARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE5
MostpeopleviewAIuseinmanagerialdecision-makingasacceptable,andactuallypreferAIinvolvementtosolehumandecision-making.However,thepreferredoptioniseithera25%-75%or50%-50%AI-humancollaboration,withhumansretainingmoreorequalcontrol.ThisindicatesaclearpreferenceforAItobeusedasadecisionaid,andalackofsupportforfullyautomatedAIdecision-makingatwork.
WhileabouthalfbelieveAIwillenhancetheircompetenceandautonomyatwork,lessthanoneinthreepeoplebelieveAIwillcreatemorejobsthanitwilleliminate.However,mostmanagersbelievetheopposite–thatAIwillcreatejobs.Thisre?ectsabroadertrendofmanagersbeingmorecomfortable,trustingandsupportiveofAIuseatworkthanotheremployees,withmanualworkerstheleastcomfortableandtrustingofAIatwork.GivenmanagersaretypicallythedriversofAIadoptioninorganisations,thesedifferingviewsmaycausetensionsintheimplementationofAIatwork.
Aminorityofpeopleinwesterncountries,JapanandSouthKoreareportthattheiremployingorganisationinvestsinAIadoption,recogniseseffortstointegrateAI,orsupportstheresponsibleuseofAI.ThisstandsincontrasttoamajorityofpeopleintheBICScountriesandSingapore.
PeoplewanttolearnmoreaboutAIbutcurrentlyhavelowunderstanding
While82%ofpeopleareawareofAI,oneintwopeoplereportfeelingtheydonotunderstandAIorwhenandhowitisused.UnderstandingofAIishighestinChina,India,SouthKorea,andSingapore.Twooutof?vepeopleareunawarethatAIenablescommonapplicationstheyuse.Forexample,eventhough87%ofpeopleusesocialmedia,45%donotknowAIisusedinsocialmedia.
PeoplewhobetterunderstandAIaremorelikelytotrustandacceptit,andperceivegreaterbene?tsofAIuse.ThissuggestsunderstandingAIsetsafoundationfortrust.Mostpeopleacrossallcountries(82%)wanttoknowmoreaboutAI.Consideredtogether,these?ndingssuggestastrongneedandappetiteforpubliceducationonAI.
Youngergenerations,theuniversityeducatedandmanagersaremoretrusting,acceptingandgenerallyholdmorepositiveattitudestowardsAI
Youngergenerations,theuniversityeducated,andmanagersshowaconsistentanddistinctlymorepositiveorientationtowardsAIacrossthe?ndings,comparedtooldergenerations,thosewithoutauniversityeducationandnon-managers.TheyaremoretrustingandacceptingofAIsystems,includingtheiruseatwork,andaremorelikelytofeelpositiveaboutAIandreportusingit.
TheyhavegreaterknowledgeofAIandarebetterabletoidentifywhenAIisused,andhavegreaterinterestinlearningaboutAI.Theyperceivemorebene?tsofAI,butremainthesameasothergroupsintheirperceptionsoftherisksofAI.TheyaremorelikelytobelieveAIwillcreatejobs,butalsomoreawarethatAIcanperformkeyaspectsoftheirwork.Theyaremorecon?dentinentitiestodevelop,useandgovernAI,andmorelikelytobelievethatcurrentsafeguardsaresuf?cienttomakeAIusesafe.ItisnoteworthythatweseeveryfewmeaningfuldifferencesacrossgenderintrustandattitudestowardsAI.
Therearestarkdifferencesintrustandattitudesacrosscountries:peopleintheemergingeconomiesofBrazil,India,China,andSouthAfricaaremoretrustingandacceptingofAIandhavemorepositiveattitudestowardsAI
Akeyinsightfromthesurveyisthestarkdifferencesintrust,attitudesanduseofAIbetweenpeopleintheemergingeconomiesofBrazil,India,ChinaandSouthAfricaandthoseinothercountries.
PeopleintheemergingeconomiesaremoretrustingandacceptingofAIandholdmorepositivefeelingsandattitudestowardsAIthanpeopleinothercountries.Thesedifferencesheldevenwhencontrollingfortheeffectsofageandeducation.Singaporefollowedthispositiveorientationonseveralindicators,particularlycomfort,trustandfamiliaritywiththeuseofAIatwork,adequacyofcurrentAIregulationandgovernance,con?denceincompaniestouseandgovernAI,andthebeliefthatAIwillcreatejobs.
Ourdatasuggeststhatthishightrustisnotblindtotherisks.PeopleinBICScountriesandSingaporedidnotperceivetherisksofAI,ortheuncertainimpactofAIonsociety,anylowerthanpeopleinothercountries.NordidtheydifferfromothercountriesontheimportanceoftheprinciplesandpracticesrequiredtoensureAIistrustworthy.Rather,akeydifferentiatoristhatmostpeopleintheBICScountriesandSingaporebelievethebene?tsofAIoutweightherisks,whereasaminorityofpeopleinwesterncountries,suchasAustralia,Canada,France,Netherlands,theUKandUSA,holdthisview.
ThehighertrustandmorepositiveattitudesintheBICScountriesislikelyduetothegreaterbene?tsaffordedbytechnologicaladvancesanddeploymentinemergingeconomiesandtheincreasinglyimportanteconomicroleofAItechnologiesinthesecountries.
?2023TheUniversityofQueenslandABN:63942912684CRICOSProviderNo:00025B..
?2023KPMG,anAustralianpartnershipandamember?rmoftheKPMGglobalorganisationofindependentmember?rmsaf?liatedwithKPMGInternationalLimited,aprivateEnglishcompanylimitedbyguarantee.Allrightsreserved.TheKPMGnameandlogoaretrademarksusedunderlicensebytheindependentmember?rmsoftheKPMGglobalorganisation.
LiabilitylimitedbyaschemeapprovedunderProfessionalStandardsLegislation.
TRUSTINARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE6
Thismayencourageagrowthmindsetthatmotivatesacceptanceanduseoftechnologyasameanstoaccelerateeconomicprogress,prosperity,andqualityoflife.AnimplicationisthatthesecountriesmaybeuniquelypositionedtorapidlyaccelerateinnovationandtechnologicaladvantagethroughAI.Itisnotable,however,thatoninternationalrankingsthesecountriesranklowongovernanceandregulationframeworkstoensuretheethicalandresponsibleuseofAIcomparedtowesterncountries.
6
AIawareness,understandingandtrustinAIhasincreasedovertime,butinstitutionalsafeguardscontinuetolag
Wehadtheopportunitytoexaminehowtrustands
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2026年浙江大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院附屬第一醫(yī)院臺州醫(yī)院(籌)招聘高層次衛(wèi)技人員68人筆試模擬試題及答案解析
- 吉水縣園區(qū)開發(fā)建設(shè)有限公司及下屬子公司2026年第一批面向社會公開招聘筆試備考題庫及答案解析
- 2025年河北省定向招錄選調(diào)生備考題庫附答案
- 2025廣東清遠市清新區(qū)公益性崗位招聘14人備考題庫附答案
- 2025年度河北工程大學(xué)附屬醫(yī)院公開招聘工作人員考試模擬卷附答案
- 2025廣東云浮市新興縣人民法院招聘勞動合同制審判輔助人員2人考試參考題庫附答案
- 2025年甘肅省張掖市金源電力工程有限責(zé)任公司供電服務(wù)分公司員工招聘備考題庫附答案
- 2025年河北秦皇島市北戴河醫(yī)院選聘事業(yè)單位工作人員15名備考題庫附答案
- 2025年湖南長沙市雨花區(qū)育新第二小學(xué)秋教師招聘考試模擬卷附答案
- 2026浙江溫州市廣播電視監(jiān)測中心招聘編外合同制人員1人筆試參考題庫及答案解析
- 殯儀館鮮花采購?fù)稑?biāo)方案
- 中小學(xué)生意外傷害防范
- 動靜脈瘺課件
- 企業(yè)ESG審計體系構(gòu)建-洞察及研究
- 2025年信用報告征信報告詳版?zhèn)€人版模板樣板(可編輯)
- 急診科心肌梗死搶救流程
- 藥品生產(chǎn)培訓(xùn)課件
- 《先張法預(yù)應(yīng)力混凝土實心方樁技術(shù)規(guī)程》
- 貴州省縣中新學(xué)校計劃項目2024-2025學(xué)年高一上學(xué)期期中聯(lián)考地理試題(解析版)
- 【2025年】天翼云解決方案架構(gòu)師認(rèn)證考試筆試卷庫下(多選、判斷題)含答案
- 絞吸船清淤施工方案
評論
0/150
提交評論