版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
Author: KimSoskinmunicationStylesReviewer: DianneLedingham LizRamos CarthaO’Hare KaraGruver
CanYouUseThisModule?HowmunicationWorksmunicationandPerceptionStylesintheWorkplacemunicatingatBainUnderstandingYourIndividualStyleManagingmunicationatBainAgendaFormunicationtobeeffective,thelistenermustreceivethemessagethespeakertransmitsinthewaythespeakerintendsmunicationbreaksdownifthelistenerandthespeakerdonotsharethesamemunicationstylewhatistransmittedisnotwhatisreceivedYoucanincreaseyoureffectivenessinmunicatingby:understandingyourlistener’smunicationstyleexpandingyourabilitytomunicateinyourlistener’sstyleUnderstandingyouraudienceiskeyforsuccessfulmunicationOverviewCanYouUseThisModule?HowmunicationWorksmunicationandPerceptionStylesintheWorkplacemunicatingatBainUnderstandingYourIndividualStyleManagingmunicationatBainAgendaAudience
municators:anyonewhowantstoincreasemunicationeffectivenessindividualsexperiencingdifficultymunicatinginBain’spredominantstyleManagers:anyonewhomanagesamunicatorThismoduleisdesignedfortwoaudiencesCanIUseThisModule?UnderstandimpactofmunicationstyleonperformanceIdentifytheelementsofmunicationstylesRecognizetheprimarymunicationstyleatBaincharacteristicsvalueAssessyourmunicationstrengths/weaknessesinBainenvironmentIdentifymeanstobuildskillspersonalinternal/externalresourcesTherearefiveobjectivesformunicators:CanIUseThisModule?(Objectives:municators)ClarifytheimpactofmunicationstyleontheperceptionofperformanceAddressstyleconcernsduringappraisal/coachingsessionsDescribeBain’sprimarystylecharacteristicsandvalueAssessindividual’sstylecharacteristicsinBainenvironmentProvidealternativestoincreaseeffectivenessTherearesixobjectivesformanagers:CanIUseThisModule?(Objectives:Managers)Prepareextensively,meticulously--andthensaynothing?Wait--andwaitandwait--forsomeonetoaskyouropinion?Orforapauseinthediscussiontomakeyourpoint?Makesurewhateveryousayis110%accurateorelsesaynothingatall?Feellikeit’sawarinsteadofacaseteammeeting?Ifyouanswer“yes”toanyofthefollowingquestions,thismodulewillbeusefultoyouasamunicator:Listenincredulouslyassomeoneelsetakescreditforyourideas?Findyourselfinterruptedconstantly?Presentsolid,well-thoughtoutideasonlytohavethemattacked?Dreadthatyouwillbeaskedsomethingyoudon’tknow?Atcaseteammeetings,doyou:CanIUseThisModule?Ifyouanswer“yes”toanyofthefollowingquestions,thismodulewillbeusefultoyouasamunicator:Atcaseteammeetings,doyou:Marvelattheconfidenceofyourteammembers?(Particularlythosewhoweresignificantlylesspreparedthanyou)Knowifyoucouldjusttalktoyourmanagerone-on-onethenyoucouldexplainyourself?“Youhavetospeakupmore”“Youshouldbemoredirect”“Youjustdon’tseemconfident”“Don’tworryifyourideasareperfect,justgetsomethingoutthere”“Haveyouthoughtaboutsigningupforamunicationworkshop?”Inperformancereviews,doyouhear:CanIUseThisModule?“Youhavetospeakupmore”“Youshouldbemoredirect”“Youjustdon’tseemconfident”“Don’tworryaboutwhetheryourideasareperfect,justgetthemoutthere”Ifyouareplanningtogiveanyofthefollowingadviceinanuingcoachingmeeting,thismoduleisimportantforyouasamanager:“I’mnotsureyou’rereadytoworkwiththeclient”“I’mnotsureyou’rereadytobepromoted”“I’mnotsureaboutyourfutureatBain”CanIUseThisModule?CanYouUseThisModule?HowmunicationWorksmunicationandPerceptionStylesintheWorkplacemunicatingatBainUnderstandingYourIndividualStyleManagingmunicationatBainAgendamunication:
“Totransmitinformation,thought,orfeelingsothatitissatisfactorilyreceivedorunderstood”municationissuccessfulonlywhenwhatyouhavetransmittedisreceivedProcessOfmunicationIntention:TransmitMessageReceiveIntention:TransmitMessageReceiveSuccessful:Unsuccessful:ProcessOfmunicationmunicationoperatesontwolevels:message:information,thoughtorfeelingexpressedthroughwordsMetamessage:informationabouttheinteractionrelationship,attitude,activity,atmosphereexpressedthroughlanguageusagevoiceandbodydegreeofdirectnessmunicationistransmittedontwolevels:messageandthemetamessage.Bothmustbeinterpretedaccuratelyforinteractiontobesuccessful.HowmunicationHappensMetamessagesprovidethekeytointerpretingtheconversation.Metamessageidentifiesactivityandatmosphereofinteractionargumentorchat inquiryorchallengeIdentifiesspeaker’sassumptionofrelationshipwithlistenersuperior/subordinatepeerfriend/adversaryIsconveyedthroughwordusage,bodylanguage,directnesshumorousorserioushostileorcollaborativeUnderstandingMetamessagesWordsLanguageusage:Form:Function:ChoiceandbinationofwordsStatement,questions,exclamationmand,inquiry,apology,pliment,etc.BehaviorsVoice:Body:Tone,inflection,pace,pauses,volume,durationPosture,movement,gestures,facialexpressions,eyecontactDegreeofdirectnessDegreetowhichmeaningisliteralorsubjecttointerpretationMetamessageisabinationofwordsandbehavior.Tointerpretmetamessage,consider:HowMetamessagesProvideInformationDirectnessindicateswhetherwhatyousayiswhatyoumeanessentialponentofmetamessagethemoreindirectthemunication,themoreneedforinterpretationgreateropportunityformisunderstandingFundamentalelementofmunicationusevariessignificantlywithinstylesandwithinculturesDirectnessisindicatedthroughwordchoice,voice,and/orbodylanguageThemoreindirectamunication,themorelikelyitwillbemisinterpretedEffectofIndirectnessDegreeofdirectnessaffectsthemeaningofthemessageWhatYouSayWhatYouMeanDirectCouldyouturnuptheheat?§
Couldyouturnuptheheat?IndirectIsitcoldinhere?§
Couldyouturnuptheheat?§
What’sthetemperaturehereparedtosomewhereelse?§
Isthewindowopen?DirectBringmetheclientlist.§
Bringmetheclientlist.IndirectDowehavetheclientlist?§
Bringmetheclientlist.§
Whyisn’ttheclientlistonmydesk?§
Istheclientlistdoneyet?DegreeofDirectness:ExamplesIntention:TransmitInterpretReceiveorMessageideas,thoughts,feelingsexpressedwordsMetamessageinformationabouttheinteractionexpressedinlanguageusage,behaviorsandlevelofdirectnessUnderstandingmunication“CanIHelpYou?”Thesamewordshavedifferentmeaningswhenbinedwithdifferentbehaviors.Successfulmunicationdependsonaccurateinterpretationofwordsandbehaviors.SmileDirecteyecontactSoothingtoneLeanstowardspeakerOpenpostureFrownNoeyecontactImpatienttoneTurnedfromspeakerTapsfingersondeskSmirkRollseyesupwardChallengingtoneLeansbackinchairArmscrossedoverchestMetamessageExamplesPossiblebinationsoflanguageandbehavioraredizzyingneed“shorthand”processforinterpretingmetamessagemunicationstylesprovidesprocesspatternsofautomatic,ritualizedbehaviorsprovidepredictableprocessformunicationallowsquickinterpretationmessagecontentrelationshipbetweenparticipantsactivityatmospheremunicationstyleisthe“l(fā)ogic”weusetomakesenseofinteractionsProcessofmunicationStyleconsistsofautomatic,ritualizedpatternsofinteraction“Hi,howareyou?”“Fine,thanks.Andyou?“Fine.”“MayIhelpyou?”“Nothanks,I’mjustlooking.”“LetmeknowifIcanhelp.”TheinitialstatementsignalsthebeginningoftheritualThefollowingstepspletethesharedpatternUnderstandingStyle:ExampleRitualizedpatternsforgreetingpeopleyouknow:Differentcultureshavedifferentpatternsofinteraction.Theymakesenseintheculture,butnotoutsideofit.UnitedStates:“Howareyou?”“Fine.Howareyou”“Fine,thanks”Philippines“Whereareyougoing?”“Overthere”France“Bonjour”“Bonjour”ApaniedbyhandshakeUnderstandingStyle:ExampleOurmunicationstyleisourcharacteristicspeakingpattern.StyleallowsustoconsistentlypredictandrespondtometamessageofmunicationStyleisbasedonculturallylearnedsignalsusetoconveyandinterpretmeaningnegotiaterelationshipsevaluateoneanotheraspeopleIndividualstyleisinfluencedby:ethnicitygenderclassgeographicregionfamilymunitynormsageacademicbackgroundUnderstandingStyleOurownstyleisinvisibletouswetakeitforgrantedWeassumeeveryoneusesthesamestylewedoexpectmunicationwillbepredictableStyleconfigureshowwemunicate,butweareunawareofit
UnderstandingStyle
municationismostsuccessfulwhenstylesmatchmessageandmetamessageaccuratelyinterpretedbothpartiesaresatisfiedHowever,differentpeopleusedifferentstylesWhenstylesdon’tmatch,municationcanfailinterpretationisnotaccuratepatternisinterpretedliterallybothpartiesarefrustratedoneorbothmayfeeltheyhavenotmunicatedSuccessfulmunicationdependsonmutualityofstylesponentsofSuccessfulmunication
ConfusionbetweenintentandeffectcausesfrustrationinbothpartiesWhenStylesClash
Missingtheritualaspectofstylecancauseconfusion,frustrationandeveninsultUnitedStates:“Howareyou?”“Fine.Howareyou?”“Well,myback’sbeenbad…”Philippines“Whereareyougoing?”“Nowhere.I’mstandingheretalkingtoyou.”France“Bonjour”“Hey,how’reyadoin?”StyleClash:Examples
ListenersreceivebestwhentransmissionmatchestheirstyleYourcanincreaseeffectivenessbygainingunderstandingaboutyourlistener’sstyleexpandingpersonalstyletomatchlistener’sstyleadaptingtoaudiencemorerealisticthanexpectingthemtoadapttoyouExpandingyourstyletomatchthatofyourlistener(s)
willimproveyourmunicationIncreasingYourEffectivenessCanYouUseThisModule?HowmunicationWorksmunicationandPerceptionStylesintheWorkplacemunicatingatBainUnderstandingYourIndividualStyleManagingmunicationatBainAgenda
YourmunicationstylecanimpactperceptionofyourpetenceSuespeaksoutinmeetings,statingherideasforcefully,andchallengingothersMatch:SueisconfidentClash:SueisrudeandarrogantWhenstylesmatch,
perceptionoflistenerispositiveWhenstylesclash,perceptionoflistenerisoftennegativemunicationandPerceptionSamesituationfromanotherperspectivehassameresultSuefocusesherparticipationinmeetingsonsupportingothers’ideasandaskingquestionsMatch:SueiscollaborativeClash:SueisinsecuremunicationandPerceptionPerceptionbesthebasisforfutureactionSuespeaksoutinmeetings,statingherideasforcefully,andchallengingothersMatch:SueisconfidentClash:Sueisrudeandarrogant“Suehasrealleadershippotential”“I’mnotsureSue’sgotwhatittakestoleadthisteam”municationandPerceptionSuefocusesherparticipationinmeetingsonsupportingothers’ideasandaskingquestionsMatch:SueiscollaborativeClash:Sueisinsecure“Suehasrealleadershippotential”“I’mnotsureSue’sgotwhatittakestoleadthisteam”municationandPerceptionYourmunicationoftenrepresentsyourworkjudgmentsaboutworkofteninferredfromhowitispresentedmuchofthatpresentationisintheformoftalkWhenstyledoesn’tmatchnorms,work(insteadofstyle)maybejudgedinadequateMissedsignalshavepowerfulimpact:reducedpersonalsatisfactionreducedopportunitiestoexcelskewedperformanceassessmentIntheworkplace,yourmunicationstyleimpactsperceptionofyourpetenceImplicationsatWorkYourmunicationstylecanimpactperceptionofyourpetenceSuespeaksoutinmeetings,statingherideasforcefully,andchallengingothersMatch:SueisconfidentClash:Sueisrudeandarrogant“Sueshouldbepromoted””“Let’swaitandconsiderherfornextyear”ImplicationsintheWorkplace:ExampleSuefocusesherparticipationinmeetingsonsupportingothers’ideasandaskingquestionsMatch:Sueiscollaborative,hasleadershippotentialClash:Sueisinsecure,can’tleadteam“Sueistheonetohandlethisnewproject”‘Sue’snotreadytotakeonthislevelofresponsibility”ImplicationsintheWorkplace:ExampleCanYouUseThisModule?HowmunicationWorksmunicationandPerceptionStylesintheWorkplacemunicatingatBainUnderstandingYourIndividualStyleManagingmunicationatBainAgenda
Everymunityhasamunicationnormthe“waythingsaredone”manystylesmaybepresentingroupdominantstylebesgroupnormWorkplaces,likeothermunities,havemunicationnormsdominantstyledependsonstyleofleaderstypeofindustryregionallocationsizeoforganizationclientneedsworkprocessesDominantmunicationstylewithinagroupisitsnormmunicationStylesintheWorkplace
Generallytwomunicationstylesinanorganizationhierarchy:organizesrelationshipsintermsofstatusequality:organizesrelationshipsintermsofconnectionDominantstylewillbeorganization’snormTherearegenerallytwoprimarystylesintheworkplace.Theyareorganizedbyafocusonhierarchyorequality.municationStylesintheWorkplace
Bothsystemsorganizeinteractionsandrelationships--theyjustdoitdifferently.HierarchyObjectiveDescriptionProcessEqualityMaintainequalstatusingroupEachgroupmemberstrivestominimizedifferencesbymaintainingappearanceofequalstatusMembersavoidtakingcenterstage,deflectorshareattentioniftheygetit,avoidchallengesMaintainrankedstatusingroupEachgroupmemberstrivestobeoneupbyputtingothersdownIndividualsjockeyforcenterstage,challengethosewhogetit,leaderdeflectschallenge
CharacteristicsofHierarchyandEqualityTheworldisseenverydifferentlyineachsystem.Hierarchy/Equality(ViewsoftheWorld)Processofinteractionisalsoseenverydifferentlybythetwosystems.Hierarchy/EqualityInteractionThefunctionofbothsystemsistoorganizerelationshipsintermsofbothstatusandconnectionTheirprimaryfocusisdifferentThetwosystemsdifferintheirfocus,nottheirfunction.FunctionandFocusofWorkplaceStylesEachstyletendstobebiasedtowardownnorm,hasanegativeviewoftheother,andmisseselementsthatdon’tfittheirperceptionofthemselves.Styles’ViewofEachOtherHistorically,workplacewasprimarilymalementendtomunicateinhierarchicalstyleworkplacereflectsinfluencemanyorganizationshavehierarchicalnormWomen’spresenceintroducednewstylewomentendtomunicateinegalitarianstyleorganizationsadoptnewstyletothedegreeit:reflectsstyleofleadersisrepresentedinorganizationsupportsworkpracticesmayusestylesituationallyifnotusedasnormmunicationsintheworkplacereflectthegenerallydifferentstylesofmenandwomen.TheImpactofGenderEachofusbelievesdeeply:ournormisthebestwaytomunicatemakesthemostsense,hasthemostvalueeveryoneshouldmunicatethewaywedoiftheydon’t,theyshouldchangeThisbiasreduceseffectivenessinanormthatdoesn’tmatchourstyleWeholdstrongbiasesaboutthegroupnormwesubscribeto...UnderstandingGroupNormsWheneveryoujoinanestablishedmunity,individualstylemayormaynotmatchgroupnormIfitdoesn’t,mayclashwithsomeormanystylisticbehaviorscanbeveryfrustratingclashesmayfeelpersonalremember:clashesresultfromstylisticdifferencesIfyourstyleclasheswithorganization’snorm:getsmartaboutoperatingeffectivelywithinitlookatnewgroupasnewaudiencefocusonlearninghowaudiencefunctionsWhenyoujoinagroup,yourindividualstylemayormaynotmatchthenorm.JoiningaNewGroupObserveittounderstanditparewhattheydotowhatyoudolookforcongruenciesinyourvaluesandtheirsbothvaluedeliveringanexcellentproductprocessfordoingsoisdifferentunderstandhowtheirprocessservesthecultureKeytounderstandinganothergroup’snormisobjectivitystrategicallyassessnewculturewhatittakestobeheardwhatittakestohaveworkrecognizedwhatittakestoexcelEverystyleislogicalandvaluabletotheindividualororganizationthatholdsitUnderstandingOther’sGroupNormsEachstylehasa“wayofdoingthings.”Stylecharacteristicsaresummarizedhere,andexplainedindetailinthenextsection.StyleinAction:ASummaryScenario1Scenario2MariolooksforanopportunitytospeakinmeetingsOthersspeakwithoutstopping,orinterrupteachotherquicklyHeleavesthemeetingwithoutsayinganythingAsSimonespeaks,shepausesbrieflyexpectsotherstojumpinandchallengeideasWhennoonedoes,shecontinuestoelaborateonherideaStyleinAction-ParticipationinMeetingsBothMarioandSimoneareusingpausestosignalwhentostartandendtheirparticipationMarioislookingforalongpauseasawayinSimone‘sbriefpausesareinvitationsforotherstojoinherNeitherareoperatinginanormthatmatchestheirstyleMario’sgroupusepausestooshortforhimtorecognizeMariofeelshecan’tgetawordinedgewisehisgroupthinkshedoesn’thaveanythingtocontributeSimone’sgroupneedslongerpausesthansheprovidesSimonefeelslikesheisalwayscarryingtheballhergroupthinkssheisself-absorbedKeytakeawayAnalyzingStyle-ParticipatinginMeetingsStylisticNorms-ParticipatinginMeetingsHierarchyEqualityStyleAssumptionStatusAssumptionMeetingsareachancetograbthespotlightAssertStatusBy:SpeakingAssertivelyHoldingthefloorChallengingothers’ideasInterruptingMeetingsareaplacetoconnectaroundsharedconcernsMaintainequalstatusby:Speakingonlywheninvitedfollowinglongpausefollowingliteralinvitation:“Whatdoyouthink?”Duringtraining,ahospitalresidentaskedquestionsaboutpatientsandtheirillnessesmethodsofprovidingcareAtendofterm,residentreceivedapoorevaluationSupervisor’sexplanationwasresidentknewlessthanothersingroupevidence:“Youaskedmorequestions”StyleinAction-AskingQuestionsResidentandSupervisorhelddifferentexpectationsofquestionsresident:questionsindicatedpetencehadtohaveknowledgetoknowwhattoaskaskingquestionsresultedinbettercareforpatientssupervisorquestionsindicatedignoranceyouonlyaskwhatyoudon’tknowthemorequestions,themoreignorancestyleperceptionoutweighedotherevidenceofpetenceAnalysisofStyle-AskingQuestionsStylisticNorms-AskingQuestionsApologiesareusedtoacceptblameandtodemonstrateconcern.Theyareanimportantelementofnegotiatingstatusinrelationship.Scenario1TylerdelivershisreportlateHesays:“I’msorrythereportislate”Hisbosssays:“Iacceptyourapology”Scenario2TylerdelivershisreportlateHesays:“I’msorrythereportislate”Hisbosssays:“It’sokay.Thedeadlinewastight.”Scenario3TylerdelivershisreportlateHesays:“Thisjustdidn’tturnoutwellatall”Hisbosssays:“I’msorry.Iknowyou’veworkedhardonthis.”StyleinAction-ApologizingScenario1TylerdelivershisreportlateHesays:“I’msorrythereportislate”Hisbosssays:“Iacceptyourapology”Scenario2TylerdelivershisreportlateHesays:“I’msorrythereportislate”Hisbosssays:“It’sokay.Thedeadlinewastight.”Scenario3TylerdelivershisreportlateHesays:“Thisjustdidn’tturnoutwellatall”Hisbosssays:“I’msorry.Iknowyou’veworkedhardonthis.”ResponseassignsblametoapologizerPutsapologizerinone-downpositionResponsesharesblameMovesapologizeroutofone-downpositionRestoresbalancetorelationshipResponseexpressesconcernneithersharesorassignsblameshiftsfocusfromnegativetopositiveRestoresbalancetorelationshipAnalyzingStyle-Apologizing(1of2)Mostobviousmisinterpretationisbetweenacceptingblameanddemonstratingconcernfrequentapologizingmaybeheardliterallyevenifmeanttoexpressconcernmaybeseenweaker,ipetent,blameworthyAvoidingapologyalsocanbemisinterpretedgenerallyintendedasawaytosavefacecanbetakenasunwillingnesstotakeresponsibilityblindtoeffectofactionsonothersAswithanyactivitywhichservesmultiplepurposes,apologiescaneasilybemisinterpreted.AnalyzingStyle-Apologizing(2of2)StylisticNorms-ApologizingPresentingideasWeshouldstoptheinterviewsimmediatelyandshiftinsteadtophonesurveys.Iknowwe’veputalotoftimeintotheseinterviews,andtheyareuseful,butI’mwonderingifmaybeweshouldconsiderphonesurveys’.I’msorrytodisrupteverything…ResponsefromgroupHaveyoucalculatedthecosts?They’vegottobeoutrageous.Andwe’llneverconvincetheclient?It’llkillourcredibilityNo,don’tworry.It’sagoodidea.Explainalittlemoreabouthowitwouldwork.Now,whatdoyouthinkaboutcost?Wouldtherebeanyproblemthere?RebuttalIalreadyexplainedhowwecouldmakeupthecosts.Theclientisnotaproblem,wejusthavetoshowhowbeneficialthisis.Wecandothateasily.Icouldbewrong,butIdon’tthinkthecostswillbeanyproblem.Itookafirstpassatanewbudget,anditseemedtobefine.Icantakeanotherlook.JanDeanStyleinAction-PresentingIdeasinMeetings(1of2)BothscenariosarerelyingonpatternsofinteractiontotestideasanddeliveragoodproductJan’smeetingusesverbaloppositionaritualfighttestsforweaknessesthroughchallengesandrebuttalspresenterholdscenterstageandfendsoffchallengersDean’smeetingusesverbalsupportaritualdiscussiontestsforweaknessesthroughinquiryanddialoguepresentersharesinteractionandinvitesinteractionIfindividualstyledoesnotmatchnormJan’smeetingmayfeellikeseriesofhostile,personalattacksDean’smeetingmayfeellikenothinggetsdoneStyleinAction-PresentingIdeasinMeetings(2of2)
HierarchyEqualityStyleAssumptions:StyleAssumptions:IdeasarebestexploredthroughoppositionFocusisonbestoueAttentiontofeelingsisunnecessaryIfyouaregoodyoucan“takeit”IdeasarebestexploredthroughdialoguePrimaryattentionisonpreservingrelationshipBestouewillemergefrominteractionsPresenterassumesone-uppositionbytakingfloorandkeepingitRetainsrankbyfightingoffchallengersPresenteroffsetsone-upuppositionthroughdisclaimersDisagreementsareneutralizedthroughquestionsanddisclaimersStylisticNorms-PresentingIdeasinMeetings
Francestellstwomarketingcoordinators,AlandJohn,torewritemostrecentreport.beginsbypraisingthereportcitesoverallimpact,clarity,creativitythenidentifiesmajorproblemstobefixedinthere-writeAlandJohnturninre-writesAl’scontainminorcorrections,ignoremajorweaknessesJohn’saddressesallofFrances’concernsAssumptionsabouthowfeedbackshouldbegivenmaymakefeedbackimpossibletobeheard.StyleinAction-GivingFeedback(1of2)
Francesassumedthatcriticismshouldbetemperedwithpraiseincludingpraiseequalizestheotherwiseone-downpositionJohnrecognizedtheritualheardpraiseasfirststepofpatternappreciatedtactofapproachunderstoodthatcriticismwasthemainmessageAlassumedfeedbackwouldbedirectshouldbedirect:whatissaidisthemessageFrancetoldhimeverythingwasfinecriticismwassuggestionratherthandirectionAnalysisofStyle-GivingFeedback(2of2)HierarchyEqualityStyleAssumptions:StyleAssumptions:BluntfeedbackisdirectandhonestFeedbackisaboutbusiness,notfeelingsBluntfeedbackiscallousandharshTherelationshipisasimportantasthemessageImportanttobetactful;includepraiseGivingcriticismisaninherentlyone-uppositionitcan’tbedisguisedOne-upnatureneedstobeequalized“Saveface”byprovidingpraiseaswellascriticismStylisticNorms-GivingFeedbackIsabelleintroducesanideainameetingItisignoredLaterinthemeeting,Janesuggeststhesameideaagainexpandsonit,sellingittogroupIdeaisadopted;JanereceivescreditNeitherIsabellenorJaneacknowledgetheideaasIsabelle’sInitiatinggoodideasisnotenough.Youalsohavetogetcreditforthem.StyleinAction-GettingCreditforYourIdeas(1of2)
Isabelle’smentsdidnotgetheardintroducedherideaindirectly,usingadisclaimer“thisprobablywon’tworkbut…”spokesoftlyspokebrieflyspoketentativelyJane’smentsdidgetheardintroducedherideadirectlyandsuccinctlyspokeenthusiasticallyspokeatlengthspokewithcertaintyAnalyzingStyle-GettingCreditforYourIdeas(2of2)HierarchyEqualityStyleAssumptions:StyleAssumptions:SeekvisibilityDownplaydoubtsotherwiseyou’llappearinsecureClaimcreditforyourideasSeekequalexposureDownplaycertaintyotherwiseyou’llappearboastfulGoodworkwillberecognizedShiftstatusuponebyclaimingcreditMaintainequalstatusbyneverclaimingcreditStylisticNorms-GettingCreditforYourIdeasCanYouUseThisModule?HowmunicationWorksmunicationandPerceptionStylesintheWorkplacemunicatingatBainUnderstandingYourIndividualStyleManagingmunicationatBainAgendaDirectmunicationAggressiveinteractionPro-activeproblem-solvingIdeaassessmentbychallengeBain’sdominantstylereflectsmanyhierarchicalcharacteristics.Stylefavors:Bain’sNorm(1of2)WhileBain’smunicationnormisprimarilyhierarchical,thenormmaydependonthesituation.SituationOne-on-onewithmanagerCaseteammeetingTaskforcemeetingClientmeetingStyleDependsonmanagerHierarchicalEqualityDependsonclientnormBain’sNorm(2of2)Bain’sdominantstyleevolvedfromworkandclientneedsStylesupportsworkdirectmunicationisfast;bestforshorttimeframedisplayslogicclearlysoproblemscanbefoundquicklyStylemeetsclientneedsclientswantstronganalysispresentedclearlyexpectsBaintodrivedecisionsthroughtheirorganizationStylepreparesteamforclientinteractionchallengingideasincaseteamanticipateschallengesfromclientmatchespredominantstyleofmanyclientsWhyItIstheWayItIsCanYouUseThisModule?HowmunicationWorksmunicationandPerceptionStylesintheWorkplacemunicatingatBainUnderstandingYourIndividualStyleManagingmunicationatBainAgendaBeginbyconsideringthefollowingcharacteristics:HowDoIKnowWhatMyStyleIs?(1of2)Looktoseewhichcharacteristicsreflectyoumayhavesomefromboths
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2026年麗水縉云縣教育部門面向全國(guó)引進(jìn)高層次人才和緊缺人才8人備考題庫(kù)及答案詳解(易錯(cuò)題)
- 2026廣東江門市新會(huì)區(qū)圭峰會(huì)城招聘4人備考題庫(kù)及完整答案詳解
- 2025上海對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)統(tǒng)計(jì)與數(shù)據(jù)科學(xué)學(xué)院教學(xué)秘書招聘?jìng)淇碱}庫(kù)有答案詳解
- 2025年漯河市民族宗教事務(wù)局所屬事業(yè)單位人才引進(jìn)1名備考題庫(kù)及完整答案詳解一套
- 2025貴州銅仁市德江縣消防救援大隊(duì)冬季招聘政府專職消防員30人備考題庫(kù)有答案詳解
- 2026江西九江市廬山市應(yīng)急管理局招聘森林消防隊(duì)隊(duì)員60人備考題庫(kù)參考答案詳解
- 2026四川廣安市華鎣市人力資源和社會(huì)保障局全市各見習(xí)基地招聘就業(yè)見習(xí)人員14人備考題庫(kù)(含答案詳解)
- 2026廣東深圳市龍崗區(qū)某機(jī)關(guān)單位辦事員招聘1人備考題庫(kù)及答案詳解1套
- 2026年安慶太湖縣政務(wù)服務(wù)中心綜合窗口面向社會(huì)招聘工作人員1人備考題庫(kù)及一套完整答案詳解
- 2026山東淄博市臨淄區(qū)教育和體育局所屬事業(yè)單位招聘31人備考題庫(kù)帶答案詳解
- 2026年榆能集團(tuán)陜西精益化工有限公司招聘?jìng)淇碱}庫(kù)及參考答案詳解一套
- 課堂變革經(jīng)驗(yàn)介紹課件
- 2026年魯教版初三政治上冊(cè)月考真題試卷(含答案)
- 物業(yè)春節(jié)前安全生產(chǎn)培訓(xùn)課件
- TJFPA 0023-2025《社會(huì)單位滅火與應(yīng)急疏散評(píng)審導(dǎo)則》
- 2026年衛(wèi)浴潔具安裝合同協(xié)議
- 建房框架結(jié)構(gòu)合同范本
- 2025年寧波市數(shù)據(jù)局直屬事業(yè)單位公開招聘工作人員筆試歷年典型考題(歷年真題考點(diǎn))解題思路附帶答案詳解
- 民用無人機(jī)安全培訓(xùn)課件
- 廣東省2026屆高二上數(shù)學(xué)期末復(fù)習(xí)檢測(cè)試題含解析
- 醫(yī)務(wù)科科長(zhǎng)年度述職報(bào)告課件
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論