2025年SAT寫作專項(xiàng)訓(xùn)練試卷2025年必考話題預(yù)測(cè)考試時(shí)間：______分鐘總分：______分姓名：______寫作部分Directions:Youhave50minutestoreadthefollowingpassageandwriteanessayinwhichyouargueapositionontheissuepresented.Youshouldsupportyourpositionwithreasoningandrelevantexamplesdrawnfromthepassageandyourownknowledge.Thefollowingappearedinalettertotheeditorofthe*Localnewspaper*:>"Therecentproposaltoturntheoldindustrialparkontheoutskirtsofourcityintoalargeparkandcommunitycenterisaterriblemistake.Thislandistoovaluabletobewastedonsomethingastrivialasapark.Weneedtopreservethislandforfuturedevelopment.Thecity'seconomyisstruggling,andwecannotaffordtospendmillionsofdollarsonaprojectthatwillnotgenerateanyrevenue.Instead,weshouldusethatmoneytoattractnewbusinessesandcreatejobs.Buildingaparkwouldbeahugemistakeforourcity."Writeanessayinwhichyouargueapositionontheissuepresentedinthepassage.Youmaychoosetoexplainhowtheproposaltoturntheoldindustrialparkintoaparkandcommunitycenterwouldactuallybenefitthecity,oryoumayargueagainsttheproposal,butyoumustdosobyreferringtothepassageandyourownknowledge.Theoldindustrialparkontheoutskirtsofourcity,sittingvacantandrustedforyears,presentsauniqueopportunityforrenewalandachancetoaddressseveralpressingissuesfacingourcommunity.Whilethelettertotheeditorarguesthatconvertingthislandintoaparkandcommunitycenterisawasteofvaluableresourcesandapoorinvestment,Ifirmlybelievethatthistransformationisessentialforthecity'sfuturevitalityandwell-being.Aparkandcommunitycenterwouldnotonlyprovideamuch-neededgreenspaceforresidentsbutalsooffersignificanteconomic,social,andenvironmentalbenefitsthatoutweighthepotentialdrawbacksofnotdevelopingthelandforbusinesspurposes.Firstly,thecreationofaparkandcommunitycenterwouldprovideamultitudeofeconomicbenefits.Whilethelettersuggeststhattheprojectwouldnotgeneraterevenue,therealityismorecomplex.Awell-designedparkcanattracttouristsandvisitors,boostinglocalbusinessesthroughincreasedfoottrafficandspending.Additionally,acommunitycentercanserveasahubforvariousactivities,workshops,andevents,furthercontributingtothelocaleconomy.Furthermore,thedevelopmentofinfrastructuretosupporttheparkandcommunitycenter,suchasimprovedroadsandpublictransportation,wouldbenefittheentirecity,notjusttheareasurroundingthepark.Theseeconomicadvantagesdemonstratethattheprojectisnotawasteofmoneybutastrategicinvestmentinthecity'sfutureprosperity.Secondly,thesocialbenefitsofaparkandcommunitycenterareundeniable.Intoday'sfast-pacedworld,wherepeopleareincreasinglyisolatedandstressed,aparkprovidesamuch-neededspaceforrelaxation,recreation,andsocialinteraction.Itoffersaplaceforfamiliestospendqualitytimetogether,forchildrentoplayandexplore,andforadultstoenjoyoutdooractivitiesandexercise.Acommunitycenter,ontheotherhand,canprovideawiderangeofprogramsandservicesthatcatertothediverseneedsofthepopulation.Thiscouldincludeeducationalworkshops,fitnessclasses,culturalevents,andspacesforcommunitygatherings.Byfosteringasenseofcommunityandprovidingopportunitiesforsocialengagement,theparkandcommunitycenterwouldsignificantlyenhancethequalityoflifeforallresidents.Thirdly,theenvironmentalbenefitsoftransformingtheoldindustrialparkintoagreenspacearesubstantial.Thecurrentstateoftheabandonedfactoryisnotonlyaneyesorebutalsopotentiallyhazardous,withpotentialenvironmentalcontamination.Aparkwouldhelptomitigatetheseissuesbycleaningupthesite,creatinggreenspace,andimprovingairandwaterquality.Greenspacesalsoplayacrucialroleinmitigatingtheurbanheatislandeffect,reducingpollution,andprovidingahabitatforlocalwildlife.Byinvestingintheenvironment,thecityisnotonlyimprovingthephysicalappearanceoftheareabutalsocontributingtothelong-termsustainabilityofthecommunity.Inconclusion,theproposaltoconverttheoldindustrialparkintoaparkandcommunitycenterisnotafrivoloususeofresourcesbutawiseinvestmentinthecity'sfuture.Thepotentialeconomic,social,andenvironmentalbenefitsfaroutweightheconcernsraisedinthelettertotheeditor.Bycreatingavibrantandwelcomingspaceforresidents,thecitycanenhanceitseconomicvitality,strengthenitssenseofcommunity,andimproveitsenvironmentalquality.Thistransformationisnotjustaboutbuildingapark;itisaboutbuildingabetterfutureforeveryonewhocallsthiscityhome.試卷答案寫作部分評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及解析思路評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)概述：SAT寫作部分主要考察學(xué)生的分析、推理和論證能力。評(píng)分基于三個(gè)維度：任務(wù)完成情況（TaskAchievement）、論證質(zhì)量（ArgumentQuality）和語(yǔ)言表達(dá)（OrganizationandStyle）。1.任務(wù)完成情況(TaskAchievement)*評(píng)分要點(diǎn)：是否明確闡述了對(duì)題目的立場(chǎng)，是否圍繞該立場(chǎng)展開論證，論證是否充分，是否有效回應(yīng)了題目要求。*解析思路：評(píng)閱者需要判斷考生是否理解了題目的核心議題，并提出了清晰的論點(diǎn)?？忌恼撟C是否圍繞這個(gè)論點(diǎn)展開，是否提供了足夠的證據(jù)和理由來(lái)支持其觀點(diǎn)?？忌欠裼行У剡\(yùn)用了題目中提供的信息，并與其自身知識(shí)相結(jié)合。2.論證質(zhì)量(ArgumentQuality)*評(píng)分要點(diǎn)：論證過程是否合理，邏輯是否清晰，推理是否嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)，論據(jù)是否具有說(shuō)服力。*解析思路：評(píng)閱者需要評(píng)估考生的論證是否建立在合理的邏輯基礎(chǔ)上?？忌欠袂逦仃U述了論點(diǎn)和分論點(diǎn)之間的關(guān)系，是否使用了有效的推理技巧（如舉例、對(duì)比、因果分析等）。論據(jù)是否與論點(diǎn)相關(guān)，是否具有說(shuō)服力，是否能夠有效支撐考生的觀點(diǎn)。3.語(yǔ)言表達(dá)(OrganizationandStyle)*評(píng)分要點(diǎn)：文章結(jié)構(gòu)是否清晰，段落劃分是否合理，過渡是否自然，語(yǔ)言是否準(zhǔn)確、流暢、有表現(xiàn)力。*解析思路：評(píng)閱者需要評(píng)估考生的寫作結(jié)構(gòu)和組織能力。文章是否有一個(gè)清晰的開頭、主體和結(jié)尾，段落之間是否過渡自然，是否有效地使用了主題句和總結(jié)句。語(yǔ)言表達(dá)方面，評(píng)閱者需要判斷考生的詞匯是否豐富、準(zhǔn)確，句式是否多樣、流暢，是否有語(yǔ)法和拼寫錯(cuò)誤。針對(duì)模擬試卷的解析：任務(wù)完成情況：*論點(diǎn)：考生明確提出了反對(duì)將舊工業(yè)區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楣珗@和社區(qū)中心的立場(chǎng)，并論證了該項(xiàng)目的經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和環(huán)境效益。*論證：考生從經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和環(huán)境三個(gè)角度進(jìn)行了論證，每個(gè)角度都提供了具體的理由和例子。例如，考生提到了公園可以吸引游客和游客，社區(qū)中心可以提供各種活動(dòng)和課程，以及公園可以改善環(huán)境質(zhì)量等。*回應(yīng)題目：考生有效地回應(yīng)了題目要求，圍繞“將舊工業(yè)區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楣珗@和社區(qū)中心是否明智”這一議題進(jìn)行了論證，并明確表達(dá)了反對(duì)將舊工業(yè)區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楣珗@和社區(qū)中心的立場(chǎng)。論證質(zhì)量：*邏輯：考生的論證邏輯清晰，每個(gè)論點(diǎn)都得到了詳細(xì)的闡述和支撐。例如，考生在論證經(jīng)濟(jì)效益時(shí)，提到了公園可以吸引游客和游客，社區(qū)中心可以提供各種活動(dòng)和課程，這些都能夠?yàn)楫?dāng)?shù)亟?jīng)濟(jì)帶來(lái)貢獻(xiàn)。*推