2025年CFA三級(jí)案例分析專項(xiàng)訓(xùn)練_第1頁(yè)
2025年CFA三級(jí)案例分析專項(xiàng)訓(xùn)練_第2頁(yè)
2025年CFA三級(jí)案例分析專項(xiàng)訓(xùn)練_第3頁(yè)
2025年CFA三級(jí)案例分析專項(xiàng)訓(xùn)練_第4頁(yè)
2025年CFA三級(jí)案例分析專項(xiàng)訓(xùn)練_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩3頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

2025年CFA三級(jí)案例分析專項(xiàng)訓(xùn)練考試時(shí)間:______分鐘總分:______分姓名:______CaseStudy1:PortfolioRebalancingandAlternativeInvestmentIntegrationMr.andMrs.Smithareamarriedcoupleintheirlate40s,withMr.SmithbeingacorporatelawyerandMrs.Smithworkingasanexecutiveassistant.Theyhavetwochildren,ages15and18.Theycurrentlyresideinanapartmentinanurbanareaandareplanningtopurchaseasuburbanhouseinthenext2-3years.Theirinvestmentportfolio,managedbyyou,consistsprimarilyofpubliclytradedstocksandbonds.Theyhaveexpressedconcernsaboutportfolioperformancevolatilityandpotentialunderperformanceagainstmarketindicesoverthepasttwoyears.Theyalsoindicateaninterestindiversifyingtheirinvestmentsbeyondtraditionalstocksandbondstopotentiallyincludeprivateequityandrealestateinvestmenttrusts(REITs).Theircurrentportfoliovalueis$1.2million,withaallocationof60%tostocks(domesticlarge-cap40%,domesticmid-cap20%,internationaldevelopedmarkets20%,internationalemergingmarkets20%)and40%tobonds(governmentbonds25%,corporatebonds15%).Theirrisktoleranceisassessedasmoderate-to-high,withatimehorizonof10-15yearsformostoftheirinvestments,thoughtheyhaveaseparate$150,000emergencyfundwithaveryshorttimehorizon.Theirtargetretirementageis65.Mr.Smithhasbeenapproachedbyacolleaguewhoworksataprivateequityfirm,suggestingthataportionoftheSmiths'portfoliocouldbeinvestedinaspecializedprivateequityfundfocusingonhealthcareinfrastructure.Hementionspotentialforhighreturnsbutalsowarnsofilliquidityandhigherrisk.Mrs.SmithisinterestedinREITsfordiversificationandpotentialincome,butsheisconcernedabouttheircorrelationwiththestockmarket.YouhaveconductedduediligenceonbothoptionsbuthavenotyetpresentedyourfindingstotheSmiths.Thecurrentmarketenvironmentshowsrelativelyhighvaluationsinthepublicequitymarkets,withconcernsaboutrisinginterestratespotentiallyimpactingbothstockvaluationsandbondyields.Theprivateequityfundtheyareconsideringhasaminimuminvestmentof$100,000andalock-upperiodof5years.TheREITmarkethasshownresiliencebutalsoincreasedvolatilitycomparedtohistoricalnorms.Questions:1.DescribetheprocessyouwouldfollowtodetermineanappropriateportfoliorebalancingstrategyfortheSmiths,consideringtheirinvestmentgoals,timehorizon,risktolerance,andconcerns.Discussthekeyfactorsyouwouldconsiderandhowyouwouldcommunicateyourproposedrebalancingplantothem.2.AnalyzethepotentialbenefitsandrisksofallocatingaportionoftheSmiths'portfoliotothehealthcareinfrastructureprivateequityfund.Evaluatethesuitabilityofthisinvestmentoptiongiventheircurrentfinancialsituation,investmentobjectives,andthecharacteristicsofthefund.Discusshowyouwouldassessthefund'sperformanceandriskprofile.3.EvaluatethesuitabilityofREITsforinclusionintheSmiths'portfolio.CompareandcontrastthecharacteristicsofREITswithtraditionalstocksandbondsintermsofrisk,return,incomegeneration,andliquidity.DiscusspotentialportfolioallocationlevelsandhowREITscouldcontributetothediversificationgoalsoftheSmiths.ConsiderthecurrentmarketconditionsandpotentialcorrelationsbetweenREITsandotherassetclasses.4.ConsideringtheSmiths'interestinalternativeinvestmentsandtheircurrentportfoliocomposition,outlinethekeyconsiderationsandstepsyouwouldtakeinmakingadecisionaboutincludingprivateequityand/orREITsintheirinvestmentportfolio.Discusstheimportanceofdiversificationbenefits,riskmanagement,andtheintegrationoftheseassetsintotheiroverallinvestmentstrategy.Howwouldyouaddresstheirconcernsregardingilliquidityandmarketcorrelation?試卷答案CaseStudy1:PortfolioRebalancingandAlternativeInvestmentIntegrationQuestion1:TodetermineanappropriateportfoliorebalancingstrategyfortheSmiths,Iwouldfollowthesesteps:1.ReviewFinancialGoalsandConstraints:Reaffirmtheirlong-termretirementgoals,housepurchasetimeline,andrisktolerance.Confirmthe$150,000emergencyfundisadequateandseparatelymanaged.2.AssessCurrentPortfolioPerformanceandRisk:Analyzetherealizedreturnandvolatilityofthecurrent60/40portfolioagainstrelevantbenchmarks.Evaluatetheunderperformanceconcerns.3.BenchmarkComparison:ComparetheSmiths'portfolioweightsagainsttheirtargetallocationsbasedonmodernportfoliotheoryandtheirrisktolerance.Thecurrent60%stocks/40%bondsmightbehighfortheirmoderate-to-highrisktolerance,especiallygivenmarketvaluations.4.DetermineTargetAllocations:Basedontheirgoalsandrisktolerance,establishtargetallocations.Giventheir10-15yearhorizonandmoderate-to-highrisktolerance,ahigherstockallocation(e.g.,70-80%)mightbeappropriate,withacorrespondingreductioninbonds.Asmallallocation(e.g.,5-10%)toalternativeslikeREITscouldbeconsideredinitiallyfordiversification.5.CalculateRebalancingNeeds:Computethedifferencebetweencurrentandtargetweightsforeachassetclass.Identifywhichassetsneedtobesold(overweight)andwhichneedtobepurchased(underweight).6.MethodologySelection:Decideontherebalancingmethod.Optionsinclude:*Time-BasedRebalancing:Rebalanceannuallyorsemi-annuallyregardlessofdeviationlevels.*Threshold-BasedRebalancing:Rebalanceonlywhenassetclassweightsdeviatebyacertainpercentage(e.g.,+/-5%).*Combination:Ahybridapproach.Consideringtheirpotentialinterestinalternativesandmarketconditions,acombinationapproachmightbesuitable.7.ConsiderTransactionCosts:Estimatepotentialbrokerageandtransactioncostsassociatedwithrebalancingandfactorthemintothedecision.8.CommunicatethePlan:Presenttherebalancingstrategyclearly.Explaintherationaleforthetargetallocations,therebalancingmethodology,potentialtaximplications,andtheexpectedimpactonportfoliodiversificationandrisk-returnprofile.Usevisualaids(liketargetvs.currentallocationcharts)ifappropriate,thoughexplicitlyrequestednottousetables/graphsinthepromptforthesimulation.Emphasizethatrebalancingisadynamicprocessdrivenbymarketmovementsandtime-basedreviews.Question2:Thepotentialbenefitsofallocatingtothehealthcareinfrastructureprivateequityfundinclude:1.HighReturnPotential:Privateequity,particularlyinspecializedsectorslikehealthcareinfrastructure,canofferhigherreturnsthantraditionalpublicmarketsduetoleverage,activemanagement,andinvestmentinhigh-demandareas.2.Diversification:Privateequitytypicallyhasalowcorrelationwithpublicequitiesandbonds,potentiallyreducingoverallportfoliovolatility.3.AccesstoUndervaluedAssets:Thefundmayinvestinspecializedinfrastructureprojects(e.g.,hospitals,medicalfacilities)withlong-termdemanddrivers.4.PotentialInflationHedging:Infrastructureassetsoftenhavepricingpowerthatcanhelphedgeagainstinflation.Thepotentialrisksinclude:1.LiquidityRisk:The$100,000minimuminvestmentand5-yearlock-upperiodrestrictaccesstocapital,whichisunsuitablefortheirshort-termemergencyfundorpotentialnear-termhousingpurchaseneeds.2.IlliquidityRisk:Theunderlyingassetsarenotpubliclytraded,makingvalueassessmentdifficultandpotentialearlywithdrawalimpossibleorsubjecttosignificantpenalties.3.HighManagementFees:Privateequityfundstypicallychargesubstantialmanagementfees(e.g.,2%annualfee)andperformancefees(e.g.,20%ofprofits),potentiallyerodingreturns.4.CreditRisk:Ifthefundusesleverage,defaultriskoftheunderlyingassetsorborrowerscouldimpactperformance.5.PerformanceRisk:Privateequityperformanceisdependentonthefundmanager'sexpertiseandmarketconditions.Notallfundsoutperformpublicmarkets.6.ComplexityandLackofTransparency:Theinvestmentstrategyandvaluationsmaybelesstransparentthanpublicmarketinvestments.GiventheSmiths'situation,thesuitabilityisquestionable.The5-yearlock-upconflictswiththeirshorter-termfinancialneedsandtimehorizonforaportionoftheirportfolio.Whilediversificationisabenefit,thehighfeesandilliquidityposesignificantrisksthatmayoutweighthepotentialreturnsfortheirmoderate-to-highrisktolerance,especiallygiventhelackofurgencyindicatedbytheir10-15yeartimehorizonformostassets.Athoroughduediligenceprocessisessential,includingevaluatingthefundmanager'strackrecord,feestructure,investmentstrategyalignment,andthespecificrisksoftheunderlyingassets.Performanceshouldbemeasuredonanabsolutebasisandcomparedtorelevantbenchmarks,consideringfees.Question3:REITscanbesuitablefortheSmithsforseveralreasons:1.IncomeGeneration:REITsarerequiredtodistributeatleast90%oftheirtaxableincomeasdividends,providingpotentialcurrentincome,whichalignspartiallywithMrs.Smith'sinterest.2.Diversification:REITsoftenhavelowcorrelationwithstocksandbonds,offeringdiversificationbenefits.Theyrepresentownershipinrealassets(property).3.PotentialCapitalAppreciation:Likestocks,REITscanappreciateinvaluebasedonpropertyperformance,rentalincomegrowth,andmarketconditions.4.Liquidity:MostREITsarepubliclytradedonstockexchanges,offeringrelativelyhighliquiditycomparedtoprivateequity.However,theydifferfromtraditionalassets:1.Taxation:Dividendsaretypicallytaxedasordinaryincome,whichcanbelessfavorablethanqualifieddividendsfromstocks.2.MarketCorrelation:Whilegenerallylowerthanstocks,REITscancorrelatemorestronglywiththeoverallstockmarket,especiallyduringeconomicdownturnsimpactingcommercialrealestate.3.Volatility:REITpricescanbevolatile,influencedbyinterestrates(asrealestateissensitivetoborrowingcosts),propertymarketcycles,andeconomicconditions.4.ManagementQuality:Performancevariessignificantlybasedonthequalityofpropertymanagementanddevelopment.Suitabilityconsiderations:Giventheirmoderate-to-highrisktolerance,asmallallocation(e.g.,5-10%oftheentireportfolio,or0.05*$1.2M=$60,000)toREITscouldenhancediversificationwithoutsignificantlyincreasingoverallportfoliorisk.Thisalignswiththeirinterestandaddressesthedesiretodiversifybeyondtraditionalassets.Theallocationshouldbecarefullymonitored.Inthecurrentenvironment,assesssector-specificrisks(e.g.,industrialvs.office)andpotentialovervaluationconcerns.REITscouldbeintegratedintotheirstockallocation,perhapsbyreplacingsomedomesticlarge-capstockswithREITETFsorindividualREITs.Question4:Keyconsiderationsandstepsforintegratingalternatives(privateequity/REITs):1.DefineObjectives:Clarifythegoals:diversification,returnenhancement,oraccessingspecificexpertise(privateequityinhealthcareinfrastructure).Isthegoalprimarilydiversificationoralphageneration?2.AssessRiskCapacityandTolerance:ConfirmtheSmithsunderstandandacceptthehigherrisk,lowerliquidity,andilliquidityassociatedwithalternatives,especiallythe5-yearlock-upofthePEfund.Ensuretheallocationfitswithintheiroverallriskframework.3.EvaluateAlternativeOptions:*PrivateEquity:Conductthoroughduediligenceonthespecifichealthcareinfrastructurefund(managerexpertise,trackrecord,fees,investmentstrategy,dealflow,risks).ComparedirectlyagainsttheSmiths'needsandconstraints.*REITs:ResearchspecificREITsorREITETFs,consideringsectors,geographies,managementquality,dividendyield,payoutratio,andvaluation.Assesstheircorrelationwiththeexistingportfolio.4.DiversificationAnalysis:Quantifytheexpecteddiversificationbenefitsbyanalyzingthecorrelationcoefficientsbetweenthealternativeinvestmentsandtheexistingportfolioassets.Lowcorrela

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論