版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
AMSTARChecklistArticleName:ArticleName:1.DidtheresearchquestionsandinclusioncriteriaforthereviewincludethecomponentsofPICO?ForYes:Optional(recommended)PopulationTimeframeforfollowupInterventionYesNoComparatorgroupOutcomePopulationTimeframeforfollowupInterventionYesNoComparatorgroupOutcomethereviewanddidthereportjustifyanysignificantForYes:Asforpartialyes,plustheprotocolshouldberegisteredandshouldalsohavespecified:reviewquestion(s)ameta-analysis/synthesisplan,ifappropriate,andYesPartialasearchstrategy」IaplanforinvestigatingcausesYesofheterogeneityNoinclusion/exclusioncriteriaaplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneitythereviewanddidthereportjustifyanysignificantForYes:Asforpartialyes,plustheprotocolshouldberegisteredandshouldalsohavespecified:reviewquestion(s)ameta-analysis/synthesisplan,ifappropriate,andYesPartialasearchstrategy」IaplanforinvestigatingcausesYesofheterogeneityNoinclusion/exclusioncriteriaaplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneityariskofbiasassessment3.Didthereviewauthorsexplaintheirselectionofthestudydesignsforinclusioninthereview?ForYes,thereviewshouldsatisfyONEofthefollowing:ExplanationforincludingonlyRCTsYes2.Didthereportofthereviewcontainanexplicitstatementthatthereviewmethodswereestablishedpriortotheconductofdeviationsfromtheprotocol?ForPartialYes:TheauthorsstatethattheyhadwrittenprotocolorguidethatincludedALLthefollowing:
NoORExplanationforincludingonlyNRSINoORExplanationforincludingbothRCTsandNRSI4.Didthereviewauthorsuseacomprehensiveliteraturesearchstrategy?ForPartialYes(allthefollowing):ForYes,shouldalsohave(allthefollowing):」丨searchedatleast2databases」丨searchedthereferencelists/」(relevanttoresearchquestion)bibliographiesofincludedstudies廠YesPartial」1providedkeywordand/orsearch廠 searchedtrial/study ;sstrategyregistriesNo」1justifiedpublication」1included/consultedcontentrestrictions(e.g.language)expertsinthefield」丨whererelevant,searchedforgreyliterature」Iconductedsearchwithin24monthsofcompletionofthereviewDidthereviewauthorsperformstudyselectioninduplicate?ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:atleasttworeviewersindependentlyagreedonselectionofeligiblestudiesandachievedconsensusonwhichstudiestoincludeYesNoatleasttworeviewersindependentlyagreedonselectionofeligiblestudiesandachievedconsensusonwhichstudiestoincludeYesNoORtworeviewersselectedasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderselectedbyonereviewer.Didthereviewauthorsperformdataextractioninduplicate?ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:atleasttworeviewersachievedconsensusonwhichdatatoextractfromincludedstudiesYesNoatleasttworeviewersachievedconsensusonwhichdatatoextractfromincludedstudiesYesNoORtworeviewersextracteddatafromasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderextractedbyonereviewer.Didthereviewauthorsprovidealistofexcludedstudiesandjustifytheexclusions?ForPartialYes:ForYes,mustalsohave:YesPartialYesPartialNoprovidedalistofallpotentiallyrelevantstudiesthatwerereadinfull-textformbutexcludedfromthereviewJustifiedtheexclusionfromthereviewofeachpotentiallyrelevantstudyDidthereviewauthorsdescribetheincludedstudiesinadequatedetail?shouldalsohaveALLtheForPartialYes(ALLthefollowing):ForYes,shouldalsohaveALLthefollowing:describedpopulationsdescribedpopulationindetaildescribedinterventionsdescribedinterventionindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)YesYesPartialNodescribedcomparatorsdescribedcomparatorindetaildescribedpopulationsdescribedpopulationindetaildescribedinterventionsdescribedinterventionindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)YesYesPartialNodescribedcomparatorsdescribedcomparatorindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)describedoutcomesdescribedstudy'ssettingdescribedresearchdesignstimeframeforfollow-updescribedoutcomesdescribedstudy'ssettingdescribedresearchdesignstimeframeforfollow-upForRoBForRoBfrom:Didthereviewauthorsuseasatisfactorytechniqueforassessingtheriskofbias(RoB)inindividualstudiesthatwereincludedinthereview?RCTsandunconcealedallocation,andlackofblindingofpatientsassessorswhenassessingallocationsequencethatwas」nottrulyrandom,and 廠selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultipleYesandunconcealedallocation,andlackofblindingofpatientsassessorswhenassessingallocationsequencethatwas」nottrulyrandom,and 廠selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultipleYesYesPartialNooutcomes(unnecessaryforobjectivemeasurementsoranalysesofaoutcomessuchasall-causespecifiedoutcomemortality)IncludesonlyNRSINRSIForPartialYes,musthaveassessedForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoB:RoB:fromconfounding,andfromselectionbiasmethodsusedtoascertainexposuresandoutcomes,and」IselectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcomeYesYesPartialNoIncludesoutcomes(unnecessaryforobjectivemeasurementsoranalysesofaoutcomessuchasall-causespecifiedoutcomemortality)IncludesonlyNRSINRSIForPartialYes,musthaveassessedForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoB:RoB:fromconfounding,andfromselectionbiasmethodsusedtoascertainexposuresandoutcomes,and」IselectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcomeYesYesPartialNoIncludesonlyRCTsDidthereviewauthorsreportonthesourcesoffundingforthestudiesincludedinthereview?ForYes」IMusthavereportedonthesourcesoffundingforindividualstudies」Yesincludedinthereview.Note:Reportingthatthereviewerslookedforthis廠noinformationbutitwasnotreportedbystudyauthorsalsoqualifiesIfmeta-analysiswasperformeddidthereviewauthorsuseappropriatemethodsforstatisticalcombinationofresults?RCTsForYes:Theauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysisANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresultsandadjustedforheterogeneityifpresent.YesNoNoANDinvestigatedthecausesofanyheterogeneitymeta-analysisconductedTheauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysisANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresultsandadjustedforheterogeneityifpresent.YesNoNoANDinvestigatedthecausesofanyheterogeneitymeta-analysisconductedForNRSIForYes:YesNoANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresults,adjustingforheterogeneityifpresentincludedonlylowriskofbiasRCTsYesYesNoANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresults,adjustingforheterogeneityifpresentincludedonlylowriskofbiasRCTsYesTheauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysisNormeta-analysisANDtheystatisticallycombinedeffectestimatesfromNRSIthatwereconductedadjustedforconfounding,ratherthancombiningrawdata,orjustifiedcombiningrawdatawhenadjustedeffectestimateswerenotavailableANDtheyreportedseparatesummaryestimatesforRCTsandNRSIseparatelywhenbothwereincludedinthereviewIfmeta-analysiswasperformed,didthereviewauthorsassessthepotentialimpactofRoBinindividualstudiesontheresultsofthemeta-analysisorotherevidencesynthesis?ForYes:NoNometa-analysisconductedincludedonlylowriskofbiasRCTsYesNoNometa-analysisconductedincludedonlylowriskofbiasRCTsYesOR,ifthepooledestimatewasbasedonRCTsand/orNRSIatvariableRoB,theauthorsperformedanalysestoinvestigatepossibleimpactofRoBonsummaryestimatesofeffect.DidthereviewauthorsaccountforRoBinindividualstudieswheninterpreting/discussingtheresultsofthereview?ForYes:NoOR,ifRCTswithmoderateorhighRoB,orNRSIwereincludedthereviewprovidedadiscussionofthelikelyimpactofRoBontheresultsDidthereviewauthorsprovideasatisfactoryexplanationfor,anddiscussionof,anyheterogeneityobservedintheresultsofthereview?ForYes:TherewasnosignificantheterogeneityintheresultsYesNo
TherewasnosignificantheterogeneityintheresultsYesNoORifheterogeneitywaspresenttheauthorsperformedaninvestigationofsourcesofanyheterogeneityintheresultsanddiscussedtheimpactofthisontheresultsofthereviewIftheyperformedquantitativesynthesisdidthereviewauthorscarryoutanadequateinvestigationofpublicationbias(smallstudybias)anddiscussitslikelyimpactontheresultsofthereview?ForYes:performedgraphicalorstatistical
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)局專利局專利審查協(xié)作北京中心2026年度專利審查員公開招聘100人備考題庫及一套答案詳解
- jawa 布局與日歷課程設(shè)計
- 2025年中國科學(xué)院高能物理研究所軟件工程師崗位招聘備考題庫及1套完整答案詳解
- matlabe課程設(shè)計的論文
- 2440秒表課程設(shè)計
- 2025年洛陽市公安機關(guān)招聘警務(wù)輔助人員職位數(shù)核減及調(diào)劑情況考試重點試題及答案解析
- 2025恒豐銀行上海分行社會招聘29人參考考試試題及答案解析
- 2025年深圳市優(yōu)才人力資源有限公司公開招聘聘員(派遣至深圳市龍崗區(qū)工信局)的備考題庫完整參考答案詳解
- 2025年昆明市官渡區(qū)云南大學(xué)附屬中學(xué)星耀學(xué)校招聘備考題庫及一套參考答案詳解
- 2025湖北智新半導(dǎo)體有限公司招聘備考考試題庫及答案解析
- 2025年1月黑龍江省普通高中學(xué)業(yè)水平合格性考試物理試卷(含答案)
- 江西省三新協(xié)同體2025-2026年高一上12月思想政治試卷(含解析)
- 知識點及2025秋期末測試卷(附答案)-蘇教版(新教材)小學(xué)科學(xué)小學(xué)科學(xué)二年級上冊
- 2025安徽蕪湖市鳩江區(qū)人民醫(yī)院招聘工作人員21人筆試考試參考試題及答案解析
- 《城市軌道交通車站機電設(shè)備運用》課件 項目三:站臺門系統(tǒng)
- 企業(yè)財務(wù)盡調(diào)咨詢服務(wù)合同
- 企業(yè)稅務(wù)規(guī)劃合規(guī)審查手冊
- 2026年山西工程職業(yè)學(xué)院單招職業(yè)技能考試題庫及答案解析(名師系列)
- 附件扭轉(zhuǎn)診治中國專家共識(2024年版)解讀
- 社區(qū)工作者社工面試題及答案解析
- 2024年福建省特殊技能人才錄用公安特警隊員筆試真題
評論
0/150
提交評論