高血壓英文課件ProspectiveC_第1頁(yè)
高血壓英文課件ProspectiveC_第2頁(yè)
高血壓英文課件ProspectiveC_第3頁(yè)
高血壓英文課件ProspectiveC_第4頁(yè)
高血壓英文課件ProspectiveC_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩63頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHSProfessorofMedicine&EpidemiologyDirector,DivisionofGeneralInternalMedicineOslerJournalClub2006VisitHopkinsGIMat/gimProspectiveCohortStudies.FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHS1..2BackgroundPhysicalactivitylowerCVDriskDHHSrecommendslife-longpursuitsSportsdifferinsustainabilityCVDbenefitsofindividualsportsuncertain.BackgroundPhysicalactivity3TheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyOver1300students(mainlywhitemen)fromtheJHUSOMClassesof1948-64.Baselinedatacollectedinpersoninmedicalschool.Follow-updatacollectedbyyearlymailedquestionnairesthereafter..TheJohnsHopkinsPrecu4CarolineThomas,MDTheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudy.CarolineThomas,MD.5Hypothesis:TennisabilityinyouthpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageDesign:ProspectivecohortstudySetting:JohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyParticipants:1019malemedicalstudentsDataCollection:Extensiveinterviewandphysicalassessmentatbaseline(early20s);annualmailedfollow-upquestionnairesOutcome:IncidentCVD,includingMI,CHD,CABGorPTCA,hypertensiveheartdisease,heartfailure,&cerebrovasculardiseaseAnalysis:Kaplan-Meier,CoxmodelsOutline.Hypothesis:Tennisabilityin6AssessmentofSportsAbilityHowwouldyourateyouroverallabilityintennis(golf,football,baseball,basketball)duringandbeforemedicalschool?NoabilityPoororfairabilityGoodorexcellentabilityNodataonfrequency,intensity,orsubsequentparticipation.AssessmentofSportsAbilityHo7Results.Results.8..9..10..11..12..13Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf-describedtennisabilityinyoungadulthoodpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageAssociationoftennistolowerriskisGraded(i.e.dose-response)IndependentofmanypossibleconfoundersSpecifictotennis(ashypothesized)SuggestspromotionoftennisasameanstoreduceCVDrisk.Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf14StrengthsProspectivedesignLong-termfollow-upMultiavariateanalysisBlindedassessmentofCVD.StrengthsProspectivedesign.15WeaknessesObservationalstudiescan’tprovecausalityResidualconfoundingislikelyAssessmentofexposurewassuboptimalAbility,notactivitySinglepoint,notrepeatedmeasuresSelf-assessed,notobjectiveSamplelimitsgeneralizability.WeaknessesObservationalstudie16DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecialaboutacohortstudy?Whatarecommonobstacles?Canitbeusedforhousestaffresearch?Caniteverbesufficienttochangepractice?Howdocohortstudiesrelatetooutcomesresearch?.DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecia17TaxonomyofDesignsRandomizedControlledTrialProspectiveCohortStudyCase-ControlStudyCross-SectionalStudyOtherDesignsQuasi-ExperimentalEcologicCaseReport.TaxonomyofDesignsRandomized18Thebasicfightingunitwasacohort,composedofsixcenturies(480menplus6centurions).Thelegionitselfwascomposedoftencohorts,andthefirstcohorthadmanyextramen—theclerks,engineers,andotherspecialistswhodidnotusuallyfight—andtheseniorcenturionofthelegion,theprimipilus,or“numberonejavelin.”.Thebasicfightingunitwasa19pro·spec·tive

Pronunciation:pr&-'spek-tivalso'pr?-",prO-',pr?-'

Function:adjective

Date:circa1699

1

:relatingtooreffectiveinthefuture

2a

:likelytocomeabout:EXPECTED<theprospectivebenefitsofthislaw>b

:likelytobeorbecome<aprospectivemother>.pro·spec·tive

Pronunciation:20“Prospective”inEpidemiologyClearlydefinedcohort(group,sample)ofpersonsatriskfollowedthroughtimeDataregardingexposures(riskfactors,predictors)collectedpriortodataonoutcomes(endpoints)Research-gradedatacollectionmethodsusedforpurposeoftestinghypothesis(?).“Prospective”inEpidemiologyC21DiagramofHypothetical6-YearCohortStudytoIdentifyRiskFactorsforFacialAcneinTeenagers100012-year-oldswithoutacne50018-year-oldswithoutacne90015-year-oldswithoutacne50withAcne300withAcne5moved10noanswer35refused10moved40noanswer48refused2deaths350incidentcasesofacneover6years6-yrFollow-upRate=850/1000=85%IncidenceRateofAcne=350/5475PY=63.9per1000PY.DiagramofHypothetical6-Year22WhyDoACohortStudy?GetincidencedataStudyarangeofpossibleriskfactorsEstablishtemporalsequenceGetrepresentativedataPrepareforrandomizedcontrolledtrialEstablisharesearchempire.WhyDoACohortStudy?Getinci23TypesofCohortsOccupational(e.g.Asbestosworkers)Convenience(e.g.Precursors,Nurses)Geographic(e.g.Framingham,ARIC)DiseaseorProcedureNaturalHistory(e.g.Syncope,Lupus)OutcomesResearch(e.g.Dialysis,Cataracts).TypesofCohortsOccupational(24SourcesofCohortDataClinicVisitsLaboratoryAssaysInterviewPhysicalExaminationImagingPhysiologictestsHomevisitsMailedmaterialsTelephoneInterviewMedicalRecordsAdministrativeDataMedicareMedicaidManagedCareVeteransAdminBirthRecordsDeathCertificatesSpecimenBank.SourcesofCohortDataClinicV25WilliamCastelli,MDTheFraminghamHeartStudy.WilliamCastelli,MDTheFramin26RecentlyPublishedStudiesfromtheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyCoronaryDisease -Anger,Depression,Gout,-SportsAbilityType2Diabetes -Bloodpressure,AdiposityHypertension -CoffeeKneeOsteoarthritis -KneeinjuryDepression -InsomniaOutcomeExposure.RecentlyPublishedStudiesfro27WhatMightExplainObservedRelationshipofTennisAbilitytoHeartDiseaseRisk?TennisprotectsagainstheartdiseaseMenwholiketoplaytennisaredifferentThinnerHealthierLifestylesHigherSocioeconomicStatusMenwhoplaytenniswellaredifferentTaller,ThinnerGreaterCardiovascularFitnessChance(typeIerror)–Needsconfirmation.WhatMightExplainObservedRe28PlaysTennisPlaysTennisWellSustainedActivityThruMidlifeLoweradiposity,GreaterFitnessLowerBP,LowerLDL,HigherHDLLowerRiskofCHDHypotheticalCausalPathwayHealthierMenChooseTennisHealthierMenPlayTennisWellPotentialConfounders.PlaysTennisPlaysTennisWellS29GreyHairHigherRiskofCHDHypotheticalCausalPathwayOlderAgePotentialConfounders.GreyHairHigherRiskofCHDHyp30ChallengesinCohortStudiesPossiblylongdurationPossiblylargesamplesizeNeedtorecruitpeople“atrisk”Dropouts,Deaths,OtherlossesConcernaboutresidualconfoundingMultiplecomparisonsTypeIerror.ChallengesinCohortStudiesPo31HowtoExploitCohortDesignWhenTimeisShort&MoneyisScarceAnalyzeexistingdatafromanotherstudyPiggy-backontoon-goingstudyChoosehospital-basedcohortChooseshort-termoutcomeConsideradministrativedataConsiderpublic-usedataConsidernon-concurrentdesign.HowtoExploitCohortDesignW32..33..34FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHSProfessorofMedicine&EpidemiologyDirector,DivisionofGeneralInternalMedicineOslerJournalClub2006VisitHopkinsGIMat/gimProspectiveCohortStudies.FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHS35..36BackgroundPhysicalactivitylowerCVDriskDHHSrecommendslife-longpursuitsSportsdifferinsustainabilityCVDbenefitsofindividualsportsuncertain.BackgroundPhysicalactivity37TheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyOver1300students(mainlywhitemen)fromtheJHUSOMClassesof1948-64.Baselinedatacollectedinpersoninmedicalschool.Follow-updatacollectedbyyearlymailedquestionnairesthereafter..TheJohnsHopkinsPrecu38CarolineThomas,MDTheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudy.CarolineThomas,MD.39Hypothesis:TennisabilityinyouthpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageDesign:ProspectivecohortstudySetting:JohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyParticipants:1019malemedicalstudentsDataCollection:Extensiveinterviewandphysicalassessmentatbaseline(early20s);annualmailedfollow-upquestionnairesOutcome:IncidentCVD,includingMI,CHD,CABGorPTCA,hypertensiveheartdisease,heartfailure,&cerebrovasculardiseaseAnalysis:Kaplan-Meier,CoxmodelsOutline.Hypothesis:Tennisabilityin40AssessmentofSportsAbilityHowwouldyourateyouroverallabilityintennis(golf,football,baseball,basketball)duringandbeforemedicalschool?NoabilityPoororfairabilityGoodorexcellentabilityNodataonfrequency,intensity,orsubsequentparticipation.AssessmentofSportsAbilityHo41Results.Results.42..43..44..45..46..47Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf-describedtennisabilityinyoungadulthoodpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageAssociationoftennistolowerriskisGraded(i.e.dose-response)IndependentofmanypossibleconfoundersSpecifictotennis(ashypothesized)SuggestspromotionoftennisasameanstoreduceCVDrisk.Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf48StrengthsProspectivedesignLong-termfollow-upMultiavariateanalysisBlindedassessmentofCVD.StrengthsProspectivedesign.49WeaknessesObservationalstudiescan’tprovecausalityResidualconfoundingislikelyAssessmentofexposurewassuboptimalAbility,notactivitySinglepoint,notrepeatedmeasuresSelf-assessed,notobjectiveSamplelimitsgeneralizability.WeaknessesObservationalstudie50DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecialaboutacohortstudy?Whatarecommonobstacles?Canitbeusedforhousestaffresearch?Caniteverbesufficienttochangepractice?Howdocohortstudiesrelatetooutcomesresearch?.DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecia51TaxonomyofDesignsRandomizedControlledTrialProspectiveCohortStudyCase-ControlStudyCross-SectionalStudyOtherDesignsQuasi-ExperimentalEcologicCaseReport.TaxonomyofDesignsRandomized52Thebasicfightingunitwasacohort,composedofsixcenturies(480menplus6centurions).Thelegionitselfwascomposedoftencohorts,andthefirstcohorthadmanyextramen—theclerks,engineers,andotherspecialistswhodidnotusuallyfight—andtheseniorcenturionofthelegion,theprimipilus,or“numberonejavelin.”.Thebasicfightingunitwasa53pro·spec·tive

Pronunciation:pr&-'spek-tivalso'pr?-",prO-',pr?-'

Function:adjective

Date:circa1699

1

:relatingtooreffectiveinthefuture

2a

:likelytocomeabout:EXPECTED<theprospectivebenefitsofthislaw>b

:likelytobeorbecome<aprospectivemother>.pro·spec·tive

Pronunciation:54“Prospective”inEpidemiologyClearlydefinedcohort(group,sample)ofpersonsatriskfollowedthroughtimeDataregardingexposures(riskfactors,predictors)collectedpriortodataonoutcomes(endpoints)Research-gradedatacollectionmethodsusedforpurposeoftestinghypothesis(?).“Prospective”inEpidemiologyC55DiagramofHypothetical6-YearCohortStudytoIdentifyRiskFactorsforFacialAcneinTeenagers100012-year-oldswithoutacne50018-year-oldswithoutacne90015-year-oldswithoutacne50withAcne300withAcne5moved10noanswer35refused10moved40noanswer48refused2deaths350incidentcasesofacneover6years6-yrFollow-upRate=850/1000=85%IncidenceRateofAcne=350/5475PY=63.9per1000PY.DiagramofHypothetical6-Year56WhyDoACohortStudy?GetincidencedataStudyarangeofpossibleriskfactorsEstablishtemporalsequenceGetrepresentativedataPrepareforrandomizedcontrolledtrialEstablisharesearchempire.WhyDoACohortStudy?Getinci57TypesofCohortsOccupational(e.g.Asbestosworkers)Convenience(e.g.Precursors,Nurses)Geographic(e.g.Framingham,ARIC)DiseaseorProcedureNaturalHistory(e.g.Syncope,Lupus)OutcomesResearch(e.g.Dialysis,Cataracts).TypesofCohortsOccupational(58SourcesofCohortDataClinicVisitsLaboratoryAssaysInterviewPhysicalExaminationImagingPhysiologictestsHomevisitsMailedmaterialsTelephoneInterviewMedicalRecordsAdministrativeDataMedicareMedicaidManagedCareVeteransAdminBirthRecordsDeathCertificatesSpecimenBank.SourcesofCohortDataClinicV59WilliamCastelli,MDTheFraminghamHeartStudy.WilliamCastelli,MDTheFramin60RecentlyPublishedStudiesfromtheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyCoronaryDisease -Anger,Depression,Gout,-SportsAbilityType2Diabetes -Bloodpressure,AdiposityHypertension -CoffeeKneeOsteoarthritis -KneeinjuryDepression -InsomniaOutcomeExposure.

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論