版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHSProfessorofMedicine&EpidemiologyDirector,DivisionofGeneralInternalMedicineOslerJournalClub2006VisitHopkinsGIMat/gimProspectiveCohortStudies.FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHS1..2BackgroundPhysicalactivitylowerCVDriskDHHSrecommendslife-longpursuitsSportsdifferinsustainabilityCVDbenefitsofindividualsportsuncertain.BackgroundPhysicalactivity3TheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyOver1300students(mainlywhitemen)fromtheJHUSOMClassesof1948-64.Baselinedatacollectedinpersoninmedicalschool.Follow-updatacollectedbyyearlymailedquestionnairesthereafter..TheJohnsHopkinsPrecu4CarolineThomas,MDTheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudy.CarolineThomas,MD.5Hypothesis:TennisabilityinyouthpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageDesign:ProspectivecohortstudySetting:JohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyParticipants:1019malemedicalstudentsDataCollection:Extensiveinterviewandphysicalassessmentatbaseline(early20s);annualmailedfollow-upquestionnairesOutcome:IncidentCVD,includingMI,CHD,CABGorPTCA,hypertensiveheartdisease,heartfailure,&cerebrovasculardiseaseAnalysis:Kaplan-Meier,CoxmodelsOutline.Hypothesis:Tennisabilityin6AssessmentofSportsAbilityHowwouldyourateyouroverallabilityintennis(golf,football,baseball,basketball)duringandbeforemedicalschool?NoabilityPoororfairabilityGoodorexcellentabilityNodataonfrequency,intensity,orsubsequentparticipation.AssessmentofSportsAbilityHo7Results.Results.8..9..10..11..12..13Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf-describedtennisabilityinyoungadulthoodpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageAssociationoftennistolowerriskisGraded(i.e.dose-response)IndependentofmanypossibleconfoundersSpecifictotennis(ashypothesized)SuggestspromotionoftennisasameanstoreduceCVDrisk.Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf14StrengthsProspectivedesignLong-termfollow-upMultiavariateanalysisBlindedassessmentofCVD.StrengthsProspectivedesign.15WeaknessesObservationalstudiescan’tprovecausalityResidualconfoundingislikelyAssessmentofexposurewassuboptimalAbility,notactivitySinglepoint,notrepeatedmeasuresSelf-assessed,notobjectiveSamplelimitsgeneralizability.WeaknessesObservationalstudie16DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecialaboutacohortstudy?Whatarecommonobstacles?Canitbeusedforhousestaffresearch?Caniteverbesufficienttochangepractice?Howdocohortstudiesrelatetooutcomesresearch?.DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecia17TaxonomyofDesignsRandomizedControlledTrialProspectiveCohortStudyCase-ControlStudyCross-SectionalStudyOtherDesignsQuasi-ExperimentalEcologicCaseReport.TaxonomyofDesignsRandomized18Thebasicfightingunitwasacohort,composedofsixcenturies(480menplus6centurions).Thelegionitselfwascomposedoftencohorts,andthefirstcohorthadmanyextramen—theclerks,engineers,andotherspecialistswhodidnotusuallyfight—andtheseniorcenturionofthelegion,theprimipilus,or“numberonejavelin.”.Thebasicfightingunitwasa19pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:pr&-'spek-tivalso'pr?-",prO-',pr?-'
Function:adjective
Date:circa1699
1
:relatingtooreffectiveinthefuture
2a
:likelytocomeabout:EXPECTED<theprospectivebenefitsofthislaw>b
:likelytobeorbecome<aprospectivemother>.pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:20“Prospective”inEpidemiologyClearlydefinedcohort(group,sample)ofpersonsatriskfollowedthroughtimeDataregardingexposures(riskfactors,predictors)collectedpriortodataonoutcomes(endpoints)Research-gradedatacollectionmethodsusedforpurposeoftestinghypothesis(?).“Prospective”inEpidemiologyC21DiagramofHypothetical6-YearCohortStudytoIdentifyRiskFactorsforFacialAcneinTeenagers100012-year-oldswithoutacne50018-year-oldswithoutacne90015-year-oldswithoutacne50withAcne300withAcne5moved10noanswer35refused10moved40noanswer48refused2deaths350incidentcasesofacneover6years6-yrFollow-upRate=850/1000=85%IncidenceRateofAcne=350/5475PY=63.9per1000PY.DiagramofHypothetical6-Year22WhyDoACohortStudy?GetincidencedataStudyarangeofpossibleriskfactorsEstablishtemporalsequenceGetrepresentativedataPrepareforrandomizedcontrolledtrialEstablisharesearchempire.WhyDoACohortStudy?Getinci23TypesofCohortsOccupational(e.g.Asbestosworkers)Convenience(e.g.Precursors,Nurses)Geographic(e.g.Framingham,ARIC)DiseaseorProcedureNaturalHistory(e.g.Syncope,Lupus)OutcomesResearch(e.g.Dialysis,Cataracts).TypesofCohortsOccupational(24SourcesofCohortDataClinicVisitsLaboratoryAssaysInterviewPhysicalExaminationImagingPhysiologictestsHomevisitsMailedmaterialsTelephoneInterviewMedicalRecordsAdministrativeDataMedicareMedicaidManagedCareVeteransAdminBirthRecordsDeathCertificatesSpecimenBank.SourcesofCohortDataClinicV25WilliamCastelli,MDTheFraminghamHeartStudy.WilliamCastelli,MDTheFramin26RecentlyPublishedStudiesfromtheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyCoronaryDisease -Anger,Depression,Gout,-SportsAbilityType2Diabetes -Bloodpressure,AdiposityHypertension -CoffeeKneeOsteoarthritis -KneeinjuryDepression -InsomniaOutcomeExposure.RecentlyPublishedStudiesfro27WhatMightExplainObservedRelationshipofTennisAbilitytoHeartDiseaseRisk?TennisprotectsagainstheartdiseaseMenwholiketoplaytennisaredifferentThinnerHealthierLifestylesHigherSocioeconomicStatusMenwhoplaytenniswellaredifferentTaller,ThinnerGreaterCardiovascularFitnessChance(typeIerror)–Needsconfirmation.WhatMightExplainObservedRe28PlaysTennisPlaysTennisWellSustainedActivityThruMidlifeLoweradiposity,GreaterFitnessLowerBP,LowerLDL,HigherHDLLowerRiskofCHDHypotheticalCausalPathwayHealthierMenChooseTennisHealthierMenPlayTennisWellPotentialConfounders.PlaysTennisPlaysTennisWellS29GreyHairHigherRiskofCHDHypotheticalCausalPathwayOlderAgePotentialConfounders.GreyHairHigherRiskofCHDHyp30ChallengesinCohortStudiesPossiblylongdurationPossiblylargesamplesizeNeedtorecruitpeople“atrisk”Dropouts,Deaths,OtherlossesConcernaboutresidualconfoundingMultiplecomparisonsTypeIerror.ChallengesinCohortStudiesPo31HowtoExploitCohortDesignWhenTimeisShort&MoneyisScarceAnalyzeexistingdatafromanotherstudyPiggy-backontoon-goingstudyChoosehospital-basedcohortChooseshort-termoutcomeConsideradministrativedataConsiderpublic-usedataConsidernon-concurrentdesign.HowtoExploitCohortDesignW32..33..34FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHSProfessorofMedicine&EpidemiologyDirector,DivisionofGeneralInternalMedicineOslerJournalClub2006VisitHopkinsGIMat/gimProspectiveCohortStudies.FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHS35..36BackgroundPhysicalactivitylowerCVDriskDHHSrecommendslife-longpursuitsSportsdifferinsustainabilityCVDbenefitsofindividualsportsuncertain.BackgroundPhysicalactivity37TheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyOver1300students(mainlywhitemen)fromtheJHUSOMClassesof1948-64.Baselinedatacollectedinpersoninmedicalschool.Follow-updatacollectedbyyearlymailedquestionnairesthereafter..TheJohnsHopkinsPrecu38CarolineThomas,MDTheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudy.CarolineThomas,MD.39Hypothesis:TennisabilityinyouthpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageDesign:ProspectivecohortstudySetting:JohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyParticipants:1019malemedicalstudentsDataCollection:Extensiveinterviewandphysicalassessmentatbaseline(early20s);annualmailedfollow-upquestionnairesOutcome:IncidentCVD,includingMI,CHD,CABGorPTCA,hypertensiveheartdisease,heartfailure,&cerebrovasculardiseaseAnalysis:Kaplan-Meier,CoxmodelsOutline.Hypothesis:Tennisabilityin40AssessmentofSportsAbilityHowwouldyourateyouroverallabilityintennis(golf,football,baseball,basketball)duringandbeforemedicalschool?NoabilityPoororfairabilityGoodorexcellentabilityNodataonfrequency,intensity,orsubsequentparticipation.AssessmentofSportsAbilityHo41Results.Results.42..43..44..45..46..47Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf-describedtennisabilityinyoungadulthoodpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageAssociationoftennistolowerriskisGraded(i.e.dose-response)IndependentofmanypossibleconfoundersSpecifictotennis(ashypothesized)SuggestspromotionoftennisasameanstoreduceCVDrisk.Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf48StrengthsProspectivedesignLong-termfollow-upMultiavariateanalysisBlindedassessmentofCVD.StrengthsProspectivedesign.49WeaknessesObservationalstudiescan’tprovecausalityResidualconfoundingislikelyAssessmentofexposurewassuboptimalAbility,notactivitySinglepoint,notrepeatedmeasuresSelf-assessed,notobjectiveSamplelimitsgeneralizability.WeaknessesObservationalstudie50DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecialaboutacohortstudy?Whatarecommonobstacles?Canitbeusedforhousestaffresearch?Caniteverbesufficienttochangepractice?Howdocohortstudiesrelatetooutcomesresearch?.DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecia51TaxonomyofDesignsRandomizedControlledTrialProspectiveCohortStudyCase-ControlStudyCross-SectionalStudyOtherDesignsQuasi-ExperimentalEcologicCaseReport.TaxonomyofDesignsRandomized52Thebasicfightingunitwasacohort,composedofsixcenturies(480menplus6centurions).Thelegionitselfwascomposedoftencohorts,andthefirstcohorthadmanyextramen—theclerks,engineers,andotherspecialistswhodidnotusuallyfight—andtheseniorcenturionofthelegion,theprimipilus,or“numberonejavelin.”.Thebasicfightingunitwasa53pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:pr&-'spek-tivalso'pr?-",prO-',pr?-'
Function:adjective
Date:circa1699
1
:relatingtooreffectiveinthefuture
2a
:likelytocomeabout:EXPECTED<theprospectivebenefitsofthislaw>b
:likelytobeorbecome<aprospectivemother>.pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:54“Prospective”inEpidemiologyClearlydefinedcohort(group,sample)ofpersonsatriskfollowedthroughtimeDataregardingexposures(riskfactors,predictors)collectedpriortodataonoutcomes(endpoints)Research-gradedatacollectionmethodsusedforpurposeoftestinghypothesis(?).“Prospective”inEpidemiologyC55DiagramofHypothetical6-YearCohortStudytoIdentifyRiskFactorsforFacialAcneinTeenagers100012-year-oldswithoutacne50018-year-oldswithoutacne90015-year-oldswithoutacne50withAcne300withAcne5moved10noanswer35refused10moved40noanswer48refused2deaths350incidentcasesofacneover6years6-yrFollow-upRate=850/1000=85%IncidenceRateofAcne=350/5475PY=63.9per1000PY.DiagramofHypothetical6-Year56WhyDoACohortStudy?GetincidencedataStudyarangeofpossibleriskfactorsEstablishtemporalsequenceGetrepresentativedataPrepareforrandomizedcontrolledtrialEstablisharesearchempire.WhyDoACohortStudy?Getinci57TypesofCohortsOccupational(e.g.Asbestosworkers)Convenience(e.g.Precursors,Nurses)Geographic(e.g.Framingham,ARIC)DiseaseorProcedureNaturalHistory(e.g.Syncope,Lupus)OutcomesResearch(e.g.Dialysis,Cataracts).TypesofCohortsOccupational(58SourcesofCohortDataClinicVisitsLaboratoryAssaysInterviewPhysicalExaminationImagingPhysiologictestsHomevisitsMailedmaterialsTelephoneInterviewMedicalRecordsAdministrativeDataMedicareMedicaidManagedCareVeteransAdminBirthRecordsDeathCertificatesSpecimenBank.SourcesofCohortDataClinicV59WilliamCastelli,MDTheFraminghamHeartStudy.WilliamCastelli,MDTheFramin60RecentlyPublishedStudiesfromtheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyCoronaryDisease -Anger,Depression,Gout,-SportsAbilityType2Diabetes -Bloodpressure,AdiposityHypertension -CoffeeKneeOsteoarthritis -KneeinjuryDepression -InsomniaOutcomeExposure.
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2026年岳陽(yáng)樓區(qū)衛(wèi)健系統(tǒng)事業(yè)單位公開(kāi)招聘工作人員23人備考題庫(kù)含答案詳解
- 2025年紹興市上虞區(qū)中醫(yī)醫(yī)院醫(yī)共體公開(kāi)招聘編外人員備考題庫(kù)(三)有答案詳解
- 2026年《中國(guó)文化報(bào)》社有限公司招聘?jìng)淇碱}庫(kù)含答案詳解
- 2026年國(guó)家空間科學(xué)中心空間環(huán)境探測(cè)重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室硬件測(cè)試人員招聘?jìng)淇碱}庫(kù)及一套完整答案詳解
- 2026年天津醫(yī)科大學(xué)總醫(yī)院導(dǎo)診員崗位(北方輔醫(yī)外包項(xiàng)目)招聘?jìng)淇碱}庫(kù)及一套參考答案詳解
- 2026年中國(guó)瑞達(dá)投資發(fā)展集團(tuán)有限公司招聘?jìng)淇碱}庫(kù)含答案詳解
- 銀行電信詐騙內(nèi)控制度
- 日本內(nèi)控制度
- 支付公司內(nèi)控制度
- 民政局內(nèi)控制度
- DB54∕T 0527-2025 西藏自治區(qū)好住宅技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
- 人形機(jī)器人數(shù)據(jù)訓(xùn)練中心項(xiàng)目規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)方案
- 2026年內(nèi)蒙古化工職業(yè)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握新殬I(yè)適應(yīng)性考試題庫(kù)帶答案
- 2025年教育系統(tǒng)教師年度考核的個(gè)人工作總結(jié)
- 2025年留置看護(hù)考試題庫(kù)及答案
- 2025民航華東空管局畢業(yè)生招聘58人筆試歷年參考題庫(kù)附帶答案詳解
- 《怎樣選材》課件
- 2025年四川省甘孜教師職稱(chēng)考試(理論知識(shí))在線(xiàn)模擬題庫(kù)及答案
- 2025四川綿陽(yáng)市江油鴻飛投資(集團(tuán))有限公司招聘40人(公共基礎(chǔ)知識(shí))測(cè)試題附答案解析
- 2026年河南省職業(yè)病診斷醫(yī)師資格(塵肺病類(lèi))高分突破必練試題庫(kù)(含答案)
- 2026年浙江高考英語(yǔ)題庫(kù)及答案
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論