May

2023FY

2023

GuineaCountry

Opinion

Survey

–

PulseReportECR

Business

Intelligence

TeamAcknowledgementsThe

Guinea

Country

Opinion

Survey

is

part

of

the

Country

OpinionSurvey

Program

series

of

the

W

orld

Bank

Group.

This

report

wasprepared

by

the

Business

Intelligence

(BI)

team,

led

by

José

De

Buerba(Senior

External

Affairs

Officer).

Yulia

Danilina,

Jessica

Cameron,

NanLin,

and

Sofya

Gubaydullina

oversaw

the

design,

reporting,

and

analysis.Noreen

Wambui,

and

Irina

Popova

provided

data

support.BI

acknowledges

the

significant

contribution

from

the

Guinea

countryteam.

In

particular,

BI

is

grateful

for

the

support

from

Nguessan

Enoh

Ndri(External

Affairs

Officer),

Zubah

Emmanuel

Flomo

Beavogui

(ExternalAffairs

Officer),

and

Thierno

Hamidou

Diallo

(Operations

Analyst),

whocoordinated

the

survey-related

activities

from

Conakry,

Guinea.ContentsObjectivesOverall

ContextWorld

BankGroup’s

Support

in

Development

AreasOverall

Attitudes

Towardthe

World

BankGroupWorld

Bank

Group’s

Work

and

Engagement

on

the

GroundCommunicationsand

OutreachSample

DemographicsMethodology3ObjectivesThis

survey

was

designed

to

assist

the

World

Bank

Group

(WBG)

in

gaining

a

better

understanding

ofhow

stakeholders

in

Guinea

perceive

the

WBG.The

survey

explored

the

following

questions:1.

W

hat

opinion

do

key

stakeholders

have

ofthe

WBG

in

terms

of

its

effectiveness,

relevance,alignment

with

Guinea’s

development

priorities,

as

well

as

other

key

indicators?

Areopinions

improving

or

worsening?2.

W

hat

areas

ofdevelopment

are

perceived

tobe

the

most

important?

Have

the

prioritieschanged

over

the

past

three

years?3.

Ho

w

is

the

WBG

perceived

as

a

development

partner?

Are

opinions

improving

orworsening?4.

W

hat

are

the

main

information

sources

about

the

WBG’s

work

reported

by

respondents?5.

W

hat

key

topics

concerning

WBG

communications

do

stakeholders

recall?

Is

there

arelationship

between

message

recall

and

views

ofthe

WBG’s

work?4Overall

Context5Familiarity

with

the

World

Bank

GroupMeanFamiliarityRatingYear

comparison:

Respondents

in

this

year’sCountry

Survey

reported

significantly

higher12345678910levels

of

familiarity

with

the

World

Bank

Groupthan

in

fiscal

year

(FY)

2019:All

Respondents7.2Mean

familiarity:

FY23

=7.2Office

of

the

President,

Prime

Minister,8.7FY19

=

6.3.MinisterCollaboration:

Respondents

who

indicated

thatthey

collaborate

with

the

WBG

in

FY23

reportedsignificantly

higher

levels

of

familiarity

with

theinstitution’s

work:Government

Institution7.6Private

SectorBilateralor

MultilateralAgencyCivilSocietyOrganization7.4Mean

familiarity:

WBG

collaborators

=

8.1Non-collaborators

=

4.96.86.5Media5.4Academia/Research

Institute/ThinkTank4.5QHow

familiar

are

you

with

thework

of

theWorld

Bank

Group

in

Guinea?Scale:

1-10

(1:

Not

familiar

at

all

–10:

Extremely

familiar)6Tr

ust

in

Instituti

o

nsMeanTrust

Rating12345678910The

WBG

and

other

donor

institutions

continued

tobe

the

most

trusted

institutions

in

Guinea

amongthose

studied.8.3The

WorldBank

Group*6.8Other

donor

institutions

(European

Union,

AFD,AfDB,

JICA,

GIZ)*8.16.4Civil

society,

faith-based

organizations,

and

localgovern

me

n

ts

are

the

least-trusted

institutions,according

to

respondents.7.9The

United

Nations

(UN)

Agencies*The

International

Monetary

Fund

(IMF)*The

Central

Bank

of

Guinea*The

government5.97.6?In

this

year’s

COS,72%

ofrespondents

indicatedthat

they

collaborated

with

the

WBGas

comparedto

just

40%

in

FY19.

Because

respondents

whocollaborate

with

the

WBGtend

to

rate

it

morepositi

vely,

analyses

were

conducted

comparingcollaborators

in

FY19

with

collaborators

in

FY23.This

was

done

to

ensure

that

the

increased

ratingsover

time

were

not

due

to

the

greater

number

ofcollaborators

in

the

sample

for

this

year’s

surve

y.Indeed,

even

when

just

looking

atratings

amongthose

who

collaborate

with

the

WBG,

respondentsin

FY23

rated

their

trust

in

the

WBG,

other

donorinstitutions,

the

United

Nations

(UN),

and

theInternational

Monetary

Fund

(IMF)

significantlyhigher

than

in

FY19.

In

addition,collaborators

inFY23

ratedtheir

trust

in

civilsociety

and

faith-based

organizations

significantly

higher

than

inFY19.6.17.26.37.06.4Regional

development

banks

(BOAD,

BIDC

:Banque

d’Investissement

etde

Développement

dela

CEDEAO)7.06.56.96.3Private

sector*Civil

society

(e.g.,

NGOs,

CBOs)*Faith-based

organizations*FY23FY196.75.86.54.86.0Localgovernment

(collectivités

locales)*5.3QTo

what

extent

do

you

trust

each

ofthefollowing

groups

to

do

what

is

right?Scale:

1-10

(1:

To

no

degree

at

all

–10:

To

a

very

significant

degree)*significantlydifferentbetween

years7World

Bank

Group’s

Supportin

Development

Ar

eas8Development

Prioritiesfor

the

WBGVs

FY1977%

+45+35HealthAgriculture

and

food

securityEducation67%65%63%Health,agriculture

and

food

security,

education,and

water

supply

and

sanitation

infrastructure

werethe

topareas

where

stakeholders

would

like

the

WBGto

focus

its

resources

in

FY23.

Allthree

significantlyincreased

in

priority

since

FY19,

with

water

supply

andsanitation

infrastructure

having

morethan

three

timesthe

percentage

ofrespondents

choosing

it

ascompared

to

FY19.+21Water

supply

and

sanitation

infrastructurePublic

sector

governanceTransport^+44+19+23NANA+138%37%Gender

equity27%25%Energy

/ExtractivesJob

creation/youth

employment/developmentClimate

change19%15%12%10%+13NA+3Environment

/Naturalresource

managementPrivate

sector

developmentDigital

DevelopmentIMPORTANT

NOTE:

The

overall

increase

in

percentages

in

thechart

is

partially

attributable

to

thechange

in

themethodology.Specifically,

in

FY19,

respondents

were

offered

to

select

uptothree

priorities,

whereas

in

FY23,

they

were

offered

up

to

five.8%8%7%+7Social

Inclusion^+6Disaster

risk

managementMacroeconomic

stabilityCrimeand

violenceNANANA+13%3%3%2%Social

protectionQFY23:

Which

areas

should

theWorld

Bank

Group

prioritize

in

its

workin

Guinea

to

have

themost

impact

on

development

results

in

thecountry?

(Choose

no

more

than

5)

(N=95)Debt

sustainabilityNAFY19:

Whenthinking

about

how

theWorld

Bank

Group

canhave

themost

impact

on

development

results

in

Guinea,

in

which

sectorsdoyou

believe

theWorld

Bank

Group

should

focus

most

of

its

resources(financial

and

knowledge

services)

in

Guinea?

(Choose

no

morethan

THREE)

(N=306)^Transportwas

compared

to

infrastructure

in

FY19;Social

inclusion

was

compared

to

social

cohesion

in

FY19Effectiveness

of

WBG

Support

in

SectoralAr

easThe

W

BG’s

wor

k

in

the

areas

of

health

and

macroeconomic

stability

in

Guinea

received

the

highest

ratings

of

effectiveness.Overall,

the

ratings

of

the

W

BG’s

effectiveness

across

most

sectoral

areas

wer

e

significantly

higher

inFY23

as

compared

toFY19.MeanLevelofEffectivenessMeanLevelofEffectiveness12345678910123456789107.48.0Disaster

riskmanagement*SocialInclusion*Health*Macroeconomicstability*^Public

sector

governance*Gender

equity*5.06.67.47.47.28.07.97.87.77.67.67.65.75.9Socialprotection*Job

creation

/

employment*Private

sector

development*Judiciary

reform*5.35.15.65.45.36.76.07.17.17.06.96.86.8FY23FY19Agriculture

and

food

security*Debt

sustainability6.3FY23FY19Climate

change*Energy

/

Extractives*Education*6.1Urban

developmentTrade*^7.04.87.67.47.4Regionalintegration*^Transport^6.46.5*significantlydifferentbetween

yearsEnvironment

/

Naturalresourcemanagement*^6.6DigitalDevelopment*5.55.85.7Water

supplyand

sanitationinfrastructure*^Macroeconomic

stabilityin

FY23

was

compared

to

Economic

diversification

and

growth

in

FY19;

Regional

integration

wascompared

to

Global/regional

integration;Environment/Nature

resource

managementwas

compared

to

Natural

resourcemanagement;Trade

was

compared

to

Trade

and

exports;

Transportin

FY23

was

compared

to

infrastructure

in

FY19.How

EFFECTIVE

do

youbelieve

theWorld

Bank

Group

is

in

terms

of

thework

it

does

in

thefollowing

areas

of

development

in

Guinea?(If

youhave

NO

exposure

to/experience

in

working

in

any

of

thesectors

listed

below,

please

respond

“Don’t

know”),Scale:

1-10

(1:

Not

effective

at

all

–

10:

Very

effective)Q10Land

and

Forest

Degradation:

Main

Concerns

forRespondents

regarding

Climate

ChangeOver

half

of

the

respondents

are

ver

y

concerned

about

land

and

forest

degradation

(57%)

and

unsafe

drinking

water

(52%)

interms

of

the

potential

impacts

of

climate

change

in

Guinea.

Respondents

reported

being

least

concerned

about

mor

e

frequent

andsevere

floods.

Increases

in

natural

disasters

is

the

issue

of

least

concern

(26%).Very

concernedLandandforestdegradationUnsafe

drinkingwater57%52%50%49%48%48%47%Air

pollutionDecreasedcropyields/foodinsecurityEffects

on

public

healthDiminished

water

supply

forpeople

andthe

economyExtinctionof

plant/animal

speciesIncrease

erosionof

shoreline41%Loss

of

jobs37%36%ForestfiresMore

frequentandsevere

droughts

/

heatwavesClimate-drivenmigration32%28%26%26%More

frequentandsevere

floodsIncrease

in

natural

disasters

(for

example,

cyclones

or

sea-level

surges)QWhat

is

your

level

of

concern

for

each

of

thepotential

impacts

of

climatechange

as

it

affects

your

country?

(N=~95)(Only

thosewho

responded

“Very

concerned”

are

shown.)11Overall

Attitude

s

towardthe

World

Bank

Group12Key

Performance

IndicatorsIn

FY23,

there

was

significant

improve

men

t

in

the

ratings

across

the

key

indicator

questions.

Six

in

10

respondents

gave

highratings

(9

or

10

on

a

10-point

scale)

for

the

W

BG’s

alignment

wi

th

Guinea’s

development

priorities

and

for

its

relevance

inGuinea.

About

one-third

of

respondents

gave

the

WBGhigh

ratings

for

the

W

BG’s

effectiveness

in

achieving

developmentresults,

as

well

as

for

its

ability

to

influence

the

development

agenda

in

Guinea.FY23MeanFY19MeanPercentage

points

change

from

FY19-25-4+298.4*8.2*7.06.6RelevanceAlignment16%20%59%-30+34-419%23%58%-22+9+12Effectiveness

in

achieving

resultsInfluence32%36%32%7.4*7.26.66.6-17-5+2131%30%39%*significantlydifferentbetween

yearsLow

(1-6)Medium

(7-8)High

(9-10)TheWorldBank

Group’s

work

is

aligned

with

what

I

consider

the

developmentpriorities

for

Guinea,

Scale:

1-10

(1:

Strongly

disagree

–

10:Strongly

agree)Towhat

extent

does

the

WorldBank

Group

influence

thedevelopmentagenda

in

Guinea?

Scale:

1-10

(1:

Tono

degree

at

all–

10:

To

avery

significantdegree)Towhat

extent

do

you

agree/disagree

with

the

following

statements

aboutthe

World

Bank

Group’s

work

in

Guinea?:

Scale:

1-10

(1:

Strongly

disagree

–

10:Strongly

agree)QTheWorldBank

Groupcurrently

plays

arelevant

role

in

developmentin

Guinea.TheWorldBank

Group’s

work

is

well

aligned

with

what

I

consider

the

developmentpriorities

for

Guinea.^Effectiveness

was

compared

with

the

mean

score

of

thetwoquestions

asked

in

FY19:

Overall,

please

rate

your

impression

of

theWorld

Bank

Group’s

effectiveness

in

Guinea.Scale:

1-10

(1:

Not

effective

at

all–

10:

Very

effective);

To

what

extent

does

the

WorldBank

Group’s

work

help

to

achievedevelopmentresults

in

Guinea?

Scale:1-10

(1:

To

no

degreeat

all–

10:

To

avery

significantdegree)13W

BG’s

Knowledge

WorkThe

perceptions

that

the

WBG’s

knowledge

work

and

activities

contribute

to

development

results

in

Guinea

haveimproved

as

compared

to

FY19.

Indeed,

the

rating

is

higher

than

in

other

West

African

countries

surveyed

in

FY22.123456789108.26FY23FY19How

significant

a

contribution

do

you

believe

the

World

Ba

nk

Group

sknowledge

work

and

activitiesmake

to

development

results

inGuinea?*7.11*significantlydifferentbetween

yearsQHS

coawles:i

g1

n-

1i

f0i

c(a1n:

tNaoctosni

gtrni

bi

fui

ctiaonnt

daot

aylol–u

1b0e:lVieevreythseigWnifoicrladnBt)ank

Group's

knowledge

work

and

activities

make

to

developmentresults

in

Guinea?14Overall

Ratings

for

Indicator

QuestionsMeanRating123456789108.78.2Collaboration

with

th

e

government*Collaboration:

Respondents

who

collaborate

with

theHow

significant

the

WBG's

knowledge

workcontributeto

development

results

in

Guinea?*8.68.6WBG

had

significantly

higher

mean

ratings

for

theaggregated

responses

to

the

same

twelve

indictorquestions

as

compared

to

respondents

who

do

notcollaborate

wi

th

the

W

BG:8.0The

WBG

currently

plays

a

relevant

role

indevelopment

in

Guinea.*8.0Collaboration

with

other

donors

anddevelopment

partners*8.58.58.5WBGcollaborators

=

8.17.2Non-W

BG

collaborators

=

7.1.The

WBG’s

work

is

well

aligned

withdevelopment

priorities

for

Guinea.*7.7To

what

extent

do

youtrust

theWBG

to

do

whatis

right?

*?In

this

year’s

COS,72%

ofrespondents

indicated

thatthey

collaborated

with

the

WBGas

compared

to

just40%

in

FY19.

Because

respondents

who

collaboratewith

the

WBG

tend

to

rate

it

more

posi

ti

vely,

analyseswere

conducted

comparing

collaborators

in

FY19

tocollaborators

in

FY23

to

ensure

that

the

increasedratings

over

time

were

not

due

to

the

greater

number

ofcollaborators

in

the

sample

for

this

year’s

surve

y.

Whenlooking

only

atratings

among

those

who

collaborate

withthe

WBG,

respondents

in

FY23

reported

higher

ratingsfor

most

ofthe

indicator

questions

–

except

for

theeffectiveness

and

influence

of

the

WBG.7.28.1Access

to

WBG

staff

and

experts*Responsiveness

to

needs*6.47.96.3How

effective

has

theWBG

beenin

achievingdevelopment

results

in

Guinea?7.67.67.6Collaborationwith

civil

society*Collaborationwith

privatesector*6.07.56.4To

what

extent

does

th

e

W

BG

influence

th

edevelopment

agendain

Guinea?7.17.1FY23

collaboratorsFY19

collaboratorsQ*significantlydifferentbetween

yearsMean

Ratings

for

thet

welve

COS

Indicator

Questions

by

Stakeholder

Groups

on

a

Scale

from

1

to10.These

selectedindicators

are

listed

at

theend

ofthis

report.15World

Bank

Group’s

Work

andEngagement

on

the

Gr

ound16The

W

BG’s

Accessibilityand

Responsive

nes

sMean

Level

of

Agreement123456789108.0The

improvement

in

perceptions

of

access

to

theWBG

staff

and

experts

and

responsiveness

toneeds

is

significant

compared

to

FY19.Access

to

WBG

staffand

experts*5.3FY23FY197.8Responsiveness

to

needs*5.7*

Significantly

differentbetween

Guinea

FY23

and

Guinea

FY'19QTo

what

extent

is

theWorld

Bank

Group

an

effective

development

partner

in

Guinea,

in

terms

of

eachof

thefollowing?,

Scale:

1-10

(1:

To

no

degree

at

all

–10:

To

a

very

significant

degree)17W

BG’s

Collaborationwith

StakeholderWBGas

development

partner

in

collaboration

with

…12345678910Groups

in

Guinea8.6The

government*Other

donors

and

development

partners*Local

governments

(collectivités

locales)^Civil

society

(e.g.,

NGOs,

CBOs)*Engagement

with

YouthGroup^Private

sector*7.7The

WBG

received

the

highest

mean

ratings

for

itscollaboration

with

the

govern

me

n

t

(mean

rating

=8.6).8.16.5The

mean

rating

for

collaborating

with

the

government

,other

donors

and

development

partners,

civil

society,and

the

private

sector

have

improve

d

significantly

ascompared

to

FY19.7.47.2FY23FY195.55.7The

WBG

received

relatively

lower

ratings

for

itscollaboration

with

the

media.7.17.07.0Academia/researchcenters/thinktanks^Media^6.6*significantlydifferentbetween

yearsQ^Not

asked

in

FY19To

what

extent

is

theWBG

an

effective

development

partner

inGuinea,

interms

ofcollaborating

with

thefollowing

groups:

(1-Strongly

disagree,

10-Strongly

agree)18WBG

StakeholderCollaborations

in

the

Futur

e%of

RespondentsThe

majority

of

respondents

indicated

that

the

WBGshould

collaborate

more

with

the

government

(77%)and

local

governments

(63%).

Mor

e

than

one-third

ofrespondents

indicated

that

the

WBG

shouldcollaborate

more

wi

th

the

private

sector

(41%)

andcivil

society

(35%).The

governmentLocalgovernment77%63%Private

sector41%Civil

society

(e.g.,

NGOs,

CBOs)35%Academia/think

tanks/researchinstitutionsOther

donors

and

development

partnersParliament/legislative

branchYouth

organizations20%19%15%11%Media8%Regional

development

banks

(BOA,

BIDC)Other4%3%19QWhich

THREE

of

thefollowing

groups

should

theWBG

collaborate

with

more

in

Guinea?

(Choose

no

more

than

3)

(N=95)Communications

and

Outreach20Information

Sources

abouttheWBG

andits

Work%of

RespondentsTelevision

(TV)67%Respondents

reported

using

a

variety

of

sourcesto

obtain

information

about

the

WBG

and

its

work,but

a

majority

relied

on

television

(67%).

Nearlyhalf

of

the

respondents

reported

also

having

directcontact

with

WBG

staff

(48%),

attendingevents/conferences/seminars

(44%),

or

utilizingthe

WBG

website

(43%).Direct

contact

with

WBG

staff48%Event

/

conference

/

seminar

(inperson

or

online)44%WBG

WebsiteRadio43%28%Newspapers(Print

or

online)Socialmedia19%18%e-Newsletters6%6%OtherDirect

messaging

(e.g.,WhatsApp,

Telegram,

Viber)5%Blogs1%QWhichwould

you

say

are

your

MAIN

sources

ofinformation/news

about

theWorld

BankGroup

and

itswork?

(Choose

no

more

than

3)

(N=109)21Recent

Engagement

with

theWBG74%

of

respondents

recall

hearing

or

seeing

something

about

the

WBG

in

the

last

30

days.Six

in

10

recalled

seeing

that

information

on

television

(62%)

or

having

direct

contact

with

WBG

staff

(61%).About

one-quarter

of

all

respondents

reported

seeing

information

on

social

media

(24%).

Among

those

respondents,

Facebookwas

used

most

often

(77%),

followed

by

Twitter

(29%),

LinkedIn

(29%),

and

YouTube

(29%).%of

RespondentsTelevision(TV)62%61%Direct

contact

with

WBG

staff77%Event/conference/seminar

(in

person

or

online)44%35%27%24%21%RadioWBG

WebsiteSocial

media29%29%29%Newspapers

(Print

or

online)e-Newsletters20%18%FacebookTwitterLinkedInYouTubeDirect

messaging(e.g.,

WhatsApp,

Telegram)BlogsOther4%4%3%PodcastsQWhere

do

yourecall

seeing

or

hearing

thisinformation?

(Check

all

that

apply)

(N=71)What

social

media

platforms

do

yourecall

seeing

this

information

on?

(Check

all

that

apply)

(N=17)22Topics

Recalled%of

RespondentsWorld

Bank

work

to

help

alleviate

theimpactsof

theCOVID-19

pandemic55%Of

those

respondents

who

recalled

seeing

or

hearingsomething

about

the

WBG

in

the

last

30

days,

amajority

recalled

seeing

or

hearing

about

the

W

BG’swork

to

help

alleviate

the

impacts

of

the

COVID-19

pandemic

(55%)

and

the

WBG’s

work

tostrengthen

human

capital

(51%).WBG

work

to

strengthen

humancapitalthrough

improving

health

care,

nutrition,education,

jobs

and

skills51%W

BG

work

to

improve

gender

equity

andempower

womenand

girls41%WBG

work

or

research

on

food

insecurityWBG

work

to

create

more

and

better

jobs32%28%WBG

work

to

provide

debt

relief

fordeveloping

countries25%WBG

work

or

research

on

climate

change(mitigation,

adaptation)21%WBG

global

economic

forecasts21%21%W

BG

work

or

research

on

energy

(increasingenergy

supply,

reducing

dependence

of

fossilfuels)W

BG

work

or

research

on

rebuilding

trustbetween

citizens

and

thestate

to

createanew

social

contract

in

Guinea17%WBG

work

to

help

reduce

regional

securitythreats13%Other11%QWhat

topics

were

included

in

what

you

sawor

heard?

(Check

all

that

apply)

(N=71)23Message

Recalland

Perceptions

of

the

WBG’s

WorkMeanLevelof

Agreement12345678910Overall,

respondents

had

the

highest

levels

ofagreement

that

the

WBG

is

working

with

keystakeholders

during

the

COVID-19pandemic

(mean

=

8.4)

and

that

the

WBGhelps

strengthen

human

capital

in

Guinea(mean

=

8.1).The

WBG

is

working

with

governments,

theprivate

sector,

and

other

partners

to

supportcritical

facilities

duringthe

COVID-198.4pandemic,

while

increasing

vaccinations…The

WBG

helps

strengthens

human

capitalin

Guinea

through

improving

health

care,nutrition,

education,

jobs,

and

skills.8.1The

WBG

is

committed

to

comprehensivedebt

solutions

that

bringreal

benefits

topeople

inpoorcountriesRespondents

who

recalled

seeing

or

hearingsomething

about

the

WBG

in

the

last

30

daystended

to

have

higher

levels

of

agreementconcerning

the

key

areas

of

the

W

BG’s

work.They

indicated

higher

levels

of

familiarity

withthe

WBG

as

compared

to

those

who

reportednot

hearing

or

seeing

anything

about

the

WBGrecently;

however,

these

differences

did

notreach

statistical

significance.7.77.67.6The

WBGsupports

countries

to

ensuretransition

to

more

diversifiedand

cleanersources

of

energyThe

WBG

helps

improvegender

equity

andempower

women

and

girls

in

Guinea.The

WBG

helps

Guinea

rebuild

trustbetween

citizens

and

thestate

to

create

anew

social

contract.7.4The

WBG

helps

address

thecurrent

foodcrisis

and

enables

greater

preparedness

tofuture

food

security

crises7.4The

WBG

helps

Guinea

boost

climateresilienceand

mitigatethe

effects

ofclimatechallenges.7.2The

World

Bank

helps

create

more

andbetter

jobs

in

Guinea.7.1QDo

yourecall

seeing

or

hearing

anything

about

theWBG

in

thelast

30

days?(N=

93)To

what

extent

do

youagree

with

thefollowing

statements:

Scale:

1-10

(1:

To

no

degree

at

all

–

10:

To

a

very

significant

degree)24Sample

Demographics25Respondent

Profile:

Affiliation

and

GenderCurrent

AffiliationGovernment

InstitutionBilateral/MultilateralAgencyOffice

ofthe

President/PM/MinisterCivil

Society

OrganizationMedia45%Gender16%21%10%Male10%10%Female79%PrivateSector7%Academia2%QWhichofthefollowing

best

describes

yourcurrent

affiliation?

(Select

only

1

response)

(N=109)What’s

your

gender?

(N=109)26Respondent

Profile:

Collaboration

with

theWBGCollaboration

with

the

WBGCollaboration

Institution28%YesNoThe

World

Bank

(IDA)91%72%The

International

FinanceCorporation

(IFC)9%QCurrently,

do

youprofessionally

collaborate/work

withtheWorld

Bank

Group

(IBRD,

IFC,

MIGA,

ICSID)

in

your

country?

(N=109)Which

of