版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
InterpretingScoresonthe
EnhancedACT:GuidanceforK-12andHigherEducationInstitutions
JamesRiddlesperger
ACTStateandFederalPolicy
?2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT1
C·
?2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
EnhancingtheACT
Lastyear,ACTannouncedaseriesofenhancementsdesignedtomodernizetheACTtest
andofferstudentsmorechoiceandflexibilityindemonstratingtheirreadinessforlifeafterhighschool.Theenhancementsprovidestudentsmoreflexibilitybyallowingthemto
choosewhethertotakethescienceassessment,therebyreducingthetestlengthbyuptoone-third.Statesanddistrictsthatadministeraschool-dayACTarealsogivenmore
flexibility:theycanchoosetooffertheACTwithorwithoutscience,astheycurrently
chooseforwriting.Whenscienceandwritingarepartoftheiradministration,theyhavethechoicetoadministerthosesectionsonaseparatedayfromthethreecoresectionsof
English,mathematics,andreading.
Weseektocreatea
fairer,moreaccessible
experiencewhile
preservingtheACT’s
historicroleasa
nationallyrecognized
measureofacademic
achievementandcollegereadiness.
Theseupdatesaddressfeedbackfromeducatorsand
researchersaboutbalancingefficiencyandaccuracyinlarge-scaleassessments.Byreducingtestfatigueandsimplifyingcertainelementsoftheassessment,weseektocreatea
fairer,moreaccessibleexperiencewhilepreservingtheACT’shistoricroleasanationallyrecognizedmeasureofacademicachievementandcollegereadiness.Wehavemadethese
enhancementswhilemaintainingthetest’sreliability,predictivevalidity,andalignmentwithstateacademicstandards.
Inpreparationforthelaunchoftheenhancements,werecentlypublishedtechnical
documentationdetailingthetestdevelopmentprocessandthedataanalysesusedto
verifythattheACTcontinuestobeapowerfultoolformeasuringcollegereadiness
.1
Thisbriefservesasaguideforstakeholdersinsecondaryandhighereducationtotwokey
findingsoftheseanalyses:
1.Wedevelopedthetestenhancementstoensurethesectionscoresonthelegacy
ACTareinterchangeablewithsectionscoresontheenhancedACT.Asaresult,wedonotanticipateaneedforstatesorotherinstitutionstorevisittheuseofACTsectionscoresindecision-making.
2.TheCompositescoreontheenhancedACTwillbecalculatedusingEnglish,math,andreadingsectionscores(referredtohereafterwiththeshorthand“EMR”).ThisCompositescorecanbeusedinterchangeablywiththeCompositescoreonthe
legacyACT,whichiscalculatedwiththeEnglish,math,reading,andsciencescores(referredtohereafterwiththeshorthand“EMRS”),thoughtherearesomepracticaldifferencesinthetwoscores.Itisexpectedthatthescoreswilldifferforsome
1InitialEvidenceSupportingInterpretationsofScoresfromtheEnhancedACTTestsummarizessomeoftheevidencesupportinginterpretationsofthescoresfromtheenhancedACT.TheEnhancedACTLinkingStudyReportfocusesonpsychometricanalysesandfindingsfromtheJune2024linkingstudy.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT2
C·
?2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
students,andindividualstudentdifferencescouldresultinslightlydifferentscoredistributions.Formostuses,thesedifferencesareofasimilarmagnitudetowhatstakeholderswouldexperiencewiththeannualvariationtheyseeinCompositescoredistributions.
Thesefindingsaredetailedbelow.Inthefollowingdiscussion,the“l(fā)egacy”ACTreferstotheversionofthetestthatisbeingphasedoutoverthe2025-26calendaryears,andthe
“enhanced”ACTreferstotheupdated,shortenedACTtestexperience.Additionalinformationabouttheenhancementsisavailableonourwebsite
.2
DesigningtheEnhancements
TheACTEnhancementsprovidemoreflexibilityforstudents,states,anddistricts.
UnderlyingtheACTtestisthebeliefthatstudents’
preparationforcollegeandtheworkplaceisbestassessed
bymeasuring,asdirectlyaspossible,theskillslearnedin
highschoolthatarerequiredforsuccessinfirst-yearcollege-levelcourses.Therequiredacademicskillscanbeassessedmostdirectlybyreproducingthecomplexityofthework
studentscompleteinhighschoolandareexpectedtocompleteincollegeinthe
classroom.Therefore,theACTisdesignedtodeterminehowskillfullystudentssolve
problems,graspimpliedmeanings,drawinferences,evaluateideas,andmakejudgmentsinsubjectmatterareasimportanttosuccessincollege.ThesephilosophicalfoundationsoftheACTtestarenotchangingwiththeenhancements.
Ashappenedafterotherperiodicreviews,externalexpertpanelswerebroughttogethertoevaluatetheproposedchangestothelegacyACTandtoevaluatetheknowledgeandskillstestedbytheACT.Weconductedaseparatepanelforeachtestsection,withreviewers
chosenbecauseoftheirknowledge,expertise,andexperience.Thesepanelsalsoevaluatedthealignmentofspecificationsandblueprintstoseveralstatehighschoolstandardsfor
ELA,math,andscience.Additionally,ourTechnicalAdvisoryCouncil(TAC)evaluateddraftandfinalversionsoftheenhancedACTblueprintsandspecificationstovalidatethattheassessmentwillcontinuetopredictcollegeandcareerreadiness.Fulldetailsaboutthe
changesmadetotestspecificationsandblueprintscanbefoundintheforthcoming“DesignFrameworkfortheEnhancedACTTest.”
LinkingtheEnhancedandLegacyACTTests
In2024,afterthenewformsoftheenhancedACThadbeenconstructed,weconducteda“l(fā)inking”studytoensurethattheenhancedACTmeasuresthesameskillsandknowledgeasthelegacyACTwhilemaintaininghighstandardsofaccuracy,fairness,andconsistentscoreinterpretation.ThestudyusedalargerepresentativesampleofACTtesttakerswhowererandomlyassignedtotakeeitherthelegacyACTtestformoroneofthetwo
2ACTTestEnhancements|ACT
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT3
C·
?2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
enhancedACTforms.TheresultsconfirmedthatsectiontestscoresfromtheenhancedACTareinterchangeablewiththosefromthelegacyACT.
ThefindingsaffirmthattheenhancedACTprovidesareliableandvalidmeasureof
students’academicreadiness,supportingconsistentinterpretationanduseofscores
acrosseducationalcontexts.Asaresult,wedonotanticipateaneedforstatesorother
institutionstochangetheiruseofACTsectiontestscoresindecision-making.Forexample,performancelevelsthatweresetthroughastandard-settingprocessesandotherACT
sectioncutscorescancontinuetobeused.
Reducedtestlengthhadminoreffectsonprecisionanddidnotaffecttheconstructsmeasured
OneofthemaindifferencesbetweenthelegacyACTandtheenhancedACTisthatthe
enhancedversionhasfewerquestionsandashortertestingtimebutmoretimeper
question.Thischangeaimstoreducetestfatigueandimprovethetestingexperience.
However,suchmodificationscouldpotentiallyresultinchangestotheconstructs
measuredinthetestsectionsandreducedscoreprecision.Thesefactorswereevaluatedaspartofthecognitivelabsandexternalpanelreviewsdescribedabove.Then,ouranalysesin
0.94
0.88
0.88
0.93
0.88
0.88
0.89
0.84
0.83
0.89
0.85
0.85
0.97
0.94
0.94
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
Reliability
LegacyFormEnhancedForm1EnhancedForm2
2.66
2.75
1.58
2.23
2.26
1.43
1.92
1.94
2.22
1.88
2.22
2.25
1.03
1.32
1.35
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
StandardErrorofMeasurement
3
0
aLegacyFormEnhancedForm1uEnhancedForm2
Figure1.ReliabilityandStandardErrorofMeasurementfortheLegacyand
EnhancedFormsoftheACTNotethattwoseparateformsoftheenhancedACTwereusedinthelinkingstudy,andeachisshowninthefigure.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT4
C·
?2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
thelinkingstudyensured
thattheconstruct
equivalencerequiredfor
effectivelinkingwasmet
empirically;thelinkingstudyisdescribedbelowandinfulldetailin“TheEnhancedACTLinkingStudyReport.
”3
Toensurethatthischangedidnotaffecttheconstructsbeingmeasuredineachtestsection,weconducted
confirmatoryfactoranalysesusingvariousmodels.The
resultsoftheseanalyses
Form
Mean
Standard
Deviation
English
LegacyForm
20.68
6.31
EnhancedForm1
20.78
6.40
EnhancedForm2
20.76
6.44
Math
Reading
Science
LegacyForm
20.85
5.44
EnhancedForm1
20.84
5.60
EnhancedForm2
LegacyForm
20.93
22.44
5.57
6.59
EnhancedForm1
22.37
6.67
EnhancedForm2
LegacyForm
22.41
21.76
6.71
5.74
EnhancedForm1
21.79
5.73
EnhancedForm2
21.78
5.83
Table1.ScaleScoreDescriptiveStatistics
showedconsistencyintheconstructequivalenceofmeasurement,withfitindicesand
factorloadingsoftheenhancedACTformssimilartothoseofthelegacyACTform.Inotherwords,theanalysesshowedthatthelegacyandenhancedtestsectionsmeasurethesameunderlyingacademicskills.Asanticipated,reducingthenumberofquestionsdidleadtoasmalldecreaseinreliabilityandasmallincreaseinthestandarderrorofmeasurement.
However,thesechangeswereminorandwellwithinacceptableindustrystandards.In
particular,thereliabilityofeverysectiontestremainedwellover0.80.Thisresultindicatesthat,overall,thetestenhancementsdonotfundamentallychangetheaccuracyofthe
scores.
SectionscoresfromtheenhancedACTareinterchangeablewithsectionscoresfromthelegacyACT
AfterestablishingthatthelegacyandenhancedACTtestsweresufficientlysimilar,we
linkedtheenhancedtesttothelegacytestusingawell-establishedmethodologyknownasIRTtrue-scoreequating.Threesignificantfindingsemergedfromthispartofthestudy:
StatesandotherinstitutionswillnotneedtorevisithowtheyinterpretACTsection
scoresfordecision-makingandaccountability.
?Wecomparedthedifficultyofquestionsonthe
enhancedandlegacyformstoensurethattheenhancedformsmetthetestspecifications.Theanalysisconfirmedthattheenhancedformsdidmeettestspecificationsandthatslightdifferencesindifficultydidnotimpactthe
comparabilityofthescoresbetweentheforms.
3TheEnhancedACTLinkingStudyReport
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT5
C·
?2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
?Thelinkingresultsledtonearlyidenticalscoredistributionsofthelegacyandenhancedforms,meaningthatscoresrepresentthesamelevelofachievementbetweenthe
legacyandenhancedforms,asshowninTable1.
?Theresultsofpopulationinvarianceevaluationshowedconsistencybetweenlegacyandenhancedforms,indicatingthelinkingresultsarerobust.
Together,thesefindingsshowthattheenhancedACTmaintainsconsistentmeasurementpropertieswiththelegacyACT,andsectionscoresontheenhancedACTare
interchangeablewithsectionscoresonthelegacyACT,allowingfordirectcomparisonbetweenstudentscoresoneachofthetwoassessments.Therefore,statesandotherinstitutionswillnotneedtorevisithowtheyinterpretACTsectionscoresfordecision-makingandaccountability.
UnderstandingtheNewCompositeScoreCalculation
GivingstudentstheflexibilityofanoptionalsciencesectionrequiredustochangethewaywecalculatetheACTCompositescore.OnthelegacyACT,theCompositescoreisthe
roundedaverageofthestudent’sscoresontheEnglish,math,reading,andscience
sections(“EMRS”).OntheenhancedACT,theCompositescoreistheroundedaverageof
theEnglish,math,andreadingsectionscores(“EMR”).Thesciencesectionscoreandthe
STEMscore(averageofscienceandmathematicssectionscores)willcontinuetobe
reportedforstudentswhotakethesciencetest.WhilethesciencescorewillnolongerbeincludedintheCompositecalculation,itremainsavaluableindicatorofstudents’scientificreasoningskillsandpreparednessforSTEM-relatedfields,andorganizationsmaycontinuetoconsiderscienceandSTEMscoresforadmissionsandscholarshipdecisions.
LegacyCompositeScore(“EMRS”)NewCompositeScore(“EMR”)
English,math,andreadingtests
English,math,reading,andsciencetests
Table2.LegacyandNewCompositeScoreCalculations
BecausetheCompositescoreisameasureofgeneralacademicreadinessthatplaysavitalpartindecision-makingformanyinstitutions,itisimportanttounderstandthepropertiesofthenewEMRCompositescoreanditsrelationshiptothelegacyEMRSversion.Our
investigationintothesechangesissummarizedbelow.Fulldetailscanbefoundinthe
technicalreport:“InitialEvidenceSupportingInterpretationsofScoresfromtheEnhancedACTTest.
”4
OuranalysesdemonstratethattheCompositescoresfromtheenhancedACTcanbeusedinterchangeablywiththelegacyCompositescoresforthesamepurposes.In
4InitialEvidenceSupportingInterpretationsofScoresfromtheEnhancedACTTest
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT6
C·
?2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
addition,therearesomepracticaldifferencesbetweenthedistributionsofthetwoscoresthatinstitutionsshouldanticipate,whicharediscussedbelow.
LegacyACT
EnhancedACT
Composite
Composite
(EMRS)
(EMR)
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
TheCompositeScoreCalculationsareInterchangeable
Ourresearchhasdeterminedthat,exceptforverylowCompositescores,theEMRSandEMRscoresconcordwitheachotherpointforpoint.Thatis,whenwe
establishedanequipercentilescoreconcordance
betweentheEMRandEMRSCompositescores,theclosestEMRscoretoanyEMRSscoreabove13isthesamescore.ThesameanalysisshowsthattheEMR
scoreisanear-perfectpredictoroftheEMRSscore,
withacorrelationof0.99.Forthisreason,no
conversionbetweenlegacyACTCompositescores
andenhancedACTCompositescoresisneeded,andwewillreportEMRS-andEMR-calculatedCompositescoresasinterchangeablewitheachother.Inall
officialscorereporting,astudentwillonlyreceiveoneCompositescore,andtherewillbenolabelindicatingwhetheritisEMRorEMRS.Stakeholderscan
determinetheCompositescoreversionbasedonthetestdate—onlineNationaltestadministrations
startinginApril2025andalltestadministrationsbeginninginSeptember2025willreportthenewEMRcompositescore
.
OuranalysesconfirmedtheappropriatenessofusingCompositescoresfordecision-makingbecausetheEMRandEMRSCompositescoreshavenearly
identicalpredictivepowerwhenitcomestostudentsuccessincollege.Infact,asshowninFigure2,thecorrelationsbetweenCompositescoreandcollegeoutcomes(first-yearGPA,likelihoodofearninga
Table3.ConcordancebetweenLegacyandEnhanced
CompositeScores5
bachelor’sdegree,andlikelihoodofearninganydegree)wereidenticalfortheEMRSscoreobtainedfromthelegacyACTandforEMRobtainedfromasimulatedenhancedACT.
(NotethatthesimulationaccountedfortheenhancedACT’sshortertestlength).
5NotethatconcordanceestimatesforEMRSscoresbelow14werenotobtainedbecausethecumulativefrequencyofscoreswaslessthan50inthatscorerange,resultinginunreliableestimates.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT7
C·
?2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
.35.35
LegacyACTEMRS
SimulatedEnhancedACTEMR
.43.43
.40.40
First-YearEarnedEarnedAny
CollegeBachelor'sDegree
GPADegreeN=116,918
N=1,111,776N=116,918
Figure2.CorrelationsofEMRSandEMR
CompositeScoreswithFirst-YearCollegeGPAandDegreeAttainment
Similarly,Figure3shows
thattheEMRSandEMR
CompositescorescorrelatewithhighschoolGPAandtheACTRigorIndex,whichisameasurethatcanbe
usedtocomparestudents,courseperformancefairlyacrossdifferentcourseworktaken,atlevelsnearly
identicaltoeachother.
Therefore,wewillreporttheEMRandEMRSCompositescoresinterchangeably,andtheevidenceshould
encouragestakeholderstocontinuetousethe
Compositescoreasthey
haveinthepast.Inaddition,thecurrentACT-SAT
concordancecancontinuetobeused
.6
LegacyACTEMRS
EnhancedACTEMR
.56
.54
.48
.50
HighSchoolGPARigorIndex
Figure3.CorrelationsofEMRSandEMR
CompositeScoreswith
HighSchoolGPAandtheACTRigorIndex.7
PracticalImplicationsoftheNewCompositeScoreCalculation
AlthoughourresearchprovidesastrongbasisforusingtheEMRCompositescore
interchangeablywiththeEMRSCompositescore,therearesomepracticalconsiderationsthatstakeholdersshouldunderstand
.
First,therewillbeatransitionperiodinwhichsometest-takersreceiveanEMRCompositescore,andothersreceiveanEMRSCompositescore.Inthespringof2025,mostjuniorswill
6ACTrecommendsstakeholderscontinuetousetheACT/SATConcordancetoalign:
?ACTCompositescoreswithSATTotalscores
?ACTmathscoreswithSATmathscores
?ACTEnglish+readingscoreswithSATreading/writingscores
Whileformalprogressonupdatingtheconcordancehasnotyetbegun,ACTresearchersarepreparedto
collaboratewithCollegeBoardcounterpartswhenthetimingisappropriate,shoulditbedeterminedthatanupdateisnecessary.AreviewandupdateoftheconcordancebetweenACTandSATscoreswouldrequire
sufficientdatafromstudentswhohavetakenboththeenhancedACTandthedigitalSAT.
7Notethatthedifferencesdonotreachthestandardp<.05leveloftenusedasathresholdforstatisticalsignificance.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT8
C·
?2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
receiveanEMRSCompositescore
,8
whereaswewill
beginreportingEMR
CompositescoresforallexamineesinSeptember
2025.Forthisreason,weanticipatethattheACT-testedgraduatingclassof
2025willnearlyuniversallyhaveEMRS-calculated
Compositescores,theACT-
GraduatingClass
Year
Projected
Percentageof
Graduateswith
EMRScore
Projected
Percentageof
Graduateswith
EMRSScore
2025
0.3%
99.7%
2026
33.5%
66.5%
2027
98.9%
1.1%
Table4.ProjectedShareofEMRandEMRSCompositeScoresbyGraduatingClassYear
testedgraduatingclassof2026willhaveamixofEMR-calculatedandEMRS-calculated
Compositescores,andtheACT-testedgraduatingclassof2027willnearlyuniversallyhaveEMR-calculatedscores.Projectionsbasedonhistoricalgraduatingclassdatausinga
student’slastACTscoreareprovidedinTable4.InstitutionsofhighereducationwilllikelyseeagreaterproportionofEMRscoresfortheclassof2026thanthoseprojectedhere
becausestudentswhoapplytocollegearemorelikelytotaketheACTmorethanonce,
makingtheirmostrecenttest(andalsoSuperscore
9)
likelytobethenewEMRCompositescore.
ThesecondpracticalconsiderationisthatweanticipateaslightincreaseinthenumberofstudentswhowillscoreatthebottomoftheCompositescoredistribution.Becauseofthis,weanticipatethataverageACTCompositescoreswilldeclinebyapproximately0.1to0.4
pointsformostpopulations,asshowninFigure4.Itisimportanttonotethatthe
anticipateddeclines,thoughrealinthesensethattheymayhaveactualconsequences,areofamagnitudethatiswellwithintherangeofnormalannualvariationoftheComposite
score.Further,ifallstudentstookthesciencetest,wewouldexpectmorethan90%tohaveanEMRCompositescorethatiswithinonepointofwhattheirEMRSCompositescore
wouldhavebeenifthelegacyCompositescorewerereported.
Outofadesiretofullysupportinstitutionsinorganizationalplanning,weareproviding
supplementalreportstohighereducationinstitutionsthatreceiveACTscoresthatwillhelpthemunderstandandplanforanyminorimpactsfromthechangeinCompositescore
calculation.Thereportsshowaprojectionofthenumberofstudentsatoraboveeachscore
8OnlyexamineeswhotaketheACTNational(Saturday)onlineteststartinginApril2025willreceivethenew
EMR-calculatedCompositescore.AllotherexamineesinSpring2025willtakethelegacyACTandwillreceiveanEMRS-calculatedComposite.
9TheACTSuperscorewillnolongerincludethesciencescoreafterthetransitiontothenewEMR-calculated
Compositescore.WhengeneratingtheACTSuperscorereport,wewilluseastudent'sbestscorefromeach
section,regardlessofwhichversionofthetestthatsectionscorecamefrom.Thereportwillstilldisplaythe
highestscienceandSTEMscoresifthestudenthastakenthesciencesection.Ifnot,thereportwillshow"-/-"forthatsection.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT9
C·
?2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
pointforthenewEMRCompositescore
alongsidehistoricaldatashowingthelegacy
EMRSCompositescore.Thisinformationcanbeusedtoassesspotentialimpactstoexisting
programsbasedon
Compositescorecutoffs.
AdditionalResources
Tosupportstakeholders
withinformationabout
thetransitiontothe
enhancedACT,several
EMR21.4
22.621.3
EMRS
22.4
21.621.3
19.2
19.418.0
18.3
June2024
EnhancedACT
Spring2024SchoolDay
2024High
SchoolCohort
2022College
Enrollees
20224-YearCollege
Enrollees
Figure4.AverageACTCompositeScore,SelectedPopulations
resourcesareavailablethroughtheACTTestEnhancementssectionofACT.org.
?PracticeTests:Wehavereleasedtimedanduntimedpracticetestsalignedtothenewtestbluep
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 醫(yī)藥旅游協(xié)議書
- 代管貨物協(xié)議書
- 租賃終止合同協(xié)議
- 博瑞醫(yī)藥協(xié)議書
- 休產(chǎn)假的協(xié)議書
- 電梯合同框架協(xié)議
- 入駐寺廟協(xié)議書
- 底薪提成合同范本
- 疫情消毒合同范本
- 應(yīng)屆生就業(yè)協(xié)議書
- 應(yīng)收賬款債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議
- 四川省宜賓市長寧縣2024-2025學(xué)年九年級(jí)上學(xué)期期末化學(xué)試題(含答案)
- CNAS-CC01:2015 管理體系認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)要求
- 可行性報(bào)告商業(yè)計(jì)劃書
- 甲流防控知識(shí)培訓(xùn)課件
- DB32 T538-2002 江蘇省住宅物業(yè)管理服務(wù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
- 湖南師范大學(xué)課程毛概題庫
- 借住合同范本(2篇)
- 2025年民航華北空管局招聘筆試參考題庫含答案解析
- 公司反腐敗反賄賂培訓(xùn)
- 江西省2024年“三新”協(xié)同教研共同體高三聯(lián)考 地理試卷(含答案解析)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論