版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
ImportTariffsandtheMarketforVehicles
JoshuaLinnandBeiaSpiller
Report25-10
ImportTariffsandtheMarketforVehicles A
May2025
ResourcesfortheFuture
i
AbouttheAuthors
JoshuaLinnisaprofessorintheDepartmentofAgriculturalandResourceEconomicsattheUniversityofMarylandandaseniorfellowatResourcesfortheFuture(RFF).
Hisresearchcentersontheeffectsofenvironmentalpoliciesandeconomicincentivesfornewtechnologiesinthetransportation,electricity,andindustrialsectors.HistransportationresearchassessespassengervehicletaxationandfueleconomystandardsintheUnitedStatesandEurope.HehasexaminedtheeffectsofBeijing’svehicleownershiprestrictionsontravelbehavior,laborsupply,andfertility.
BeiaSpillerisafellowandthedirectorforRFF’sTransportationProgram.PriortojoiningRFF,shewasLeadSeniorEconomistatEnvironmentalDefenseFund
(EDF),wheresheworkedforalmostadecade.ShewasalsoaBoardmemberfortheAssociationofEnvironmentalandResourceEconomiststhrough2024.Spillerisanenergyeconomist,withexperienceworkingonelectricityandtransportationissues.DuringhertimeatEDF,sheparticipatedinmanyelectricutilityproceedingsinNewYorkandCalifornia,withagoalofusheringinacleaner,moreefficientandequitableenergysystem.
AboutRFF
ResourcesfortheFuture(RFF)isanindependent,nonprofitresearchinstitutioninWashington,DC.Itsmissionistoimproveenvironmental,energy,andnaturalresourcedecisionsthroughimpartialeconomicresearchandpolicyengagement.RFFiscommittedtobeingthemostwidelytrustedsourceofresearchinsightsandpolicysolutionsleadingtoahealthyenvironmentandathrivingeconomy.
TheviewsexpressedherearethoseoftheindividualauthorsandmaydifferfromthoseofotherRFFexperts,itsofficers,oritsdirectors.
SharingOurWork
OurworkisavailableforsharingandadaptationunderanAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives4.0International(CCBY-NC-ND4.0)license.Youcancopyandredistributeourmaterialinanymediumorformat;youmustgiveappropriatecredit,providealinktothelicense,andindicateifchangesweremade,andyoumaynotapplyadditionalrestrictions.Youmaydosoinanyreasonablemanner,butnotinanywaythatsuggeststhelicensorendorsesyouoryouruse.
Youmaynotusethematerialforcommercialpurposes.Ifyouremix,transform,orbuilduponthematerial,youmaynotdistributethemodifiedmaterial.Formoreinformation,visit/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
ImportTariffsandtheMarketforVehicles
ii
Abstract
Vehicleimporttariffscanhavemeasurableimpactsonthemarketforvehicles.Dependingonhowtheyarestructured,tariffsincreasethecostofimportingvehiclesandvehicleparts,affectinghowmanufacturerspricetheirvehiclesacrosstheirentirefleet.Pricechangesaffectconsumerchoices,buttheextentdependsonconsumerpricesensitivityandthesubstitutabilityoftariff-affectedvehiclesandotheroptions.In2025,theTrumpadministrationlevied25percenttariffsonvehiclesandvehiclepartsimportedfromoutsideNorthAmerica.Inthisreport,weleverageastructuraleconometricmodelofthevehiclemarkettoquantifytheimpactofthesetariffsonoutcomesincludingvehicleprices,demand,domesticmanufacturing,tariffrevenues,manufacturerprofits,andconsumerwell-being.Thesetariffsdistortthemarket,increasingvehiclepricesandreducingdemandfornewvehicles.Moreover,thetariffswouldreducemanufacturerprofits,thoughdependingonthestructureofthetariffs,US-basedmanufacturersmayprofittosomeextent.However,thecoststoconsumersfarexceedthebenefitstodomesticmanufacturersandtherevenuescollectedbythegovernment.
ResourcesfortheFuture
iii
Contents
Introduction 1
CurrentAssessmentsofTariffImpacts 2
UnderstandingtheVehicleMarketinLightofTariffs 3
MarketStructure,ConsumerPreferences,andPriceSensitivity 3
MaterialandVehicleImports 4
FromGasolinetoElectricVehicles 5
HowWilltheTariffsAffectConsumersandProducersOverall? 5
ConsumerWelfareandTariffRevenues 5
ManufacturerProfitability 6
ModelingtheResults 6
Results 7
VehicleSales 7
VehiclePrices 8
VehicleProductionandImports 10
ManufacturerProfits 12
TariffRevenue 12
ConsumerWelfare 14
PuttingitAllTogether 14
Scenario1:25PercentTariffonNon-NorthAmericanVehicleImports 14
Scenario2:25PercentTariffonNon-NorthAmericanImportsandParts 15
Scenario3:25PercentTariffsonAllVehicleImportsandParts 15
Conclusion 16
Appendix 17
A1.Model 17
A2.ApplyingTariffstoImportedMaterials 17
A3.PoliciesintheModel 18
ImportTariffsandtheMarketforVehicles
1
Introduction
OnMarch26,2025,PresidentTrumpimposeda25percenttariffonautomobileimportsandkeyinputstotheassemblyofvehicles—includingengines,transmissions,powertrainparts,andelectricalcomponents.Thesetariffswerefollowedbya
muchbroadersetoftariffsonimportsfromallcountriesoutsideofNorthAmerica,announcedonApril2.Thoughcountry-specifictariffswereimposedformostgoods(thensubsequentlypausedonApril9for90days),asofthiswriting,vehiclesandthematerialsusedtoassemblevehiclesremainedsubjecttothepre-established
25percentimporttariff(withsomeexceptions).Therationaleexpressedbythegovernmentinimposingthesetariffswastorampupdomesticmanufacturingandraiserevenuesforthefederalgovernment,withnewssourcesstatingthattheWhiteHouseexpectstheautotariffstoproduce$100billioninfederalrevenues.1
Importantly,thesenewtariffswouldaffecttheentiresupplychainbecause,evenforvehiclesassembledintheUnitedStates,mostofthemincludeimportedvehicle
parts.Onaverage,overhalfofthematerials(byvalue)requiredtoassembleavehicleintheUnitedStatesareimported,thoughtheamountrangessignificantlyacrossmanufacturers,models,andvehiclefueltype(electricvehicles(EVs)tendtoincludemoreimportedmaterials,inlargepartduetolimiteddomesticbatterysupplychains;inthisreport,wedefineEVsasincludingbatteryelectricandplug-inhybridvehicles).Forexample,thoughbothvehiclesareassembledintheUnitedStates,Honda’sCR-VFWDismadewith15percentmaterialsimportedfromJapan,whiletheCRVe-FCEVcontains65percentofitsmaterialsfromJapan.2
Althoughsomeanalystshaveestimatedhowthetariffswouldaffectvehiclepricesandhowmuchrevenuetheywouldraise,somebigquestionsremain:willthetariffsboostdomesticvehicleproductionandproducers’profits,andhowwillthetariffrevenuecomparewiththeharmtovehicleconsumersfrompayinghigherprices?ThisreportpresentstheresultsofusingResourcesfortheFuture’sVehicleMarketModeltoanswerthosequestions.
Wefindthata25percenttariffonvehicleimportsandpartsproducedoutsideNorthAmericawouldgeneraterevenueofabout$39billion(2024US$)peryear,farlessthantheWhiteHousepredicts(theshortfalllikelyoccursbecauseofreducedvehiclesales).Thetariffswouldincreaseaveragevehiclepricesbyabout$3,500pervehicle,andtheywouldreduceimportsby1.3millionunitswhileincreasingdomesticproductionbyabout340,000units(higheraveragepricescausetotalvehiclesalestodropbyabout1millionunits).YearlyprofitsofUS-basedproducers(suchasFord,GeneralMotors,Stellantis,andTesla)wouldincreasebyabout$8.5billion,whileprofitsofforeignproducerswoulddeclinebyabout$26billion.
See
/article/autos-tariffs-trump-tax-im-
ports-ford-gm-e53823ef7bbb7b3c46d11eca90aaa638
.
See
/sites//files/2025-02/MY2025-AALA-Alphabeti-
cal-2.4.25.pdf
.
ResourcesfortheFuture
2
Consumerwell-being(asapproximatedbythedifferenceinwhatconsumerswouldbewillingtopayandtheprice—whateconomiststermconsumerwelfare)woulddeclinebyabout$59billionperyear.Thisdropinconsumerwell-beingreflectsnotjustthehigherpricesconsumersface,butalsoadecreaseinbenefitsconsumersreceivefrompurchasingvehicles;specifically,thetariffscauseconsumerstoshifttheirpurchasestoless-desirablevehiclesand/oravoidbuyinganewvehiclealtogether.Theseconsumercostsarefargreater(inmagnitude)thanthetariffrevenue,indicatinghowmuchthesetariffswoulddistortthemarket.CoststoconsumersalsoexceedtheincreaseinUSfirmprofitsby$50billion,whichrepresentsthenetlosstoUSwelfare.
TheabovefindingsreflectthefactthatvehiclesandpartsimportedfromMexicoandCanadaarecurrentlyexemptfromthetariffs,yetchangestothecurrenttariffpolicywouldhavesignificantimpactsonoutcomes.ImposingtariffsonMexicanandCanadianimportedvehiclesandpartsraisestariffrevenueto$64billion,butitharmsUS-basedvehicleproducers.Ratherthanseeingprofitsincrease,US-basedvehicleproducers’profitswoulddecreaseby$7.7billionperyearbecauseoftheirrelianceonpartsproducedinCanadaandMexico.Italsocausessignificantdecreasesinvehiclepurchasesandmuchhigherimpactsonvehicleprices.Wenotethatthetariffshavebeeninastateofflux,andthechosenscenariosrepresentvariationsinhowtheadministrationmayhandletariffsonimportedparts.
CurrentAssessmentsofTariffImpacts
Severalindustryandconsultancyestimatesofautotariffimpactsareavailable,butitisunclearwhatunderlyingassumptionsandmodelswereusedtocalculatethese
impacts,aslittletonodetailisprovidedwiththereportedestimates.Industryanalystshaveestimatedthatthetariffscouldresultinaveragevehiclepriceincreasesof$3,000to$10,0003.CoxAutomotiveexpectspricesoftariffedvehiclestoincreaseby10–15percent4,withpricesofvehiclesnotsubjecttotariffsalsoincreasingby5percent.
TheAndersonEconomicGroupconsultingfirmestimatesthatpricescouldincreasebetween$2,500to$20,000(withthehigherrangeonimportedvehicles),costingconsumers$30billioninthefirstyear.5JPMorganestimatesthatvehiclepricescouldriseby11.4percentunderaspecificscenario.6
See
/post/car-tariffs-no-problem-heres-how-get-best-deal-
amid-president-donald-trumps-looming/16112125/
.
See
/market-insights/new-auto-tariffs-are-now-in-place-
driving-the-industry-into-uncharted-territory/
.
See
/tariffs-economic-impact-on-auto-in-
dustry/
.
See
/insights/global-research/current-events/us-tariffs
.
ImportTariffsandtheMarketforVehicles
3
Yale’sBudgetLabestimatesthatthevehicletariffswouldincreasevehiclepricesby
$6,400.7ThisanalysisusedtheGlobalTradeAnalysisProject(GTAP)toestimatetradeflowchanges,andtheBureauofEconomicAnalysis’input-outputandimportrequirementmatricestoestimatepricechanges.Importantly,unlikeourmodel,thisanalysisdoesnotaccountforstrategicbehaviorbyvehiclemanufacturers,northeresultingchangeinconsumerchoices.
TheFederalReserveBankofRichmondestimatesthatthetariffswillbecompletelypassedthroughtocustomers.8Theyalsodonotdirectlyestimatetheimpactonprices.
Importantly,theseassessmentsdonotattempttounderstandtheimpactofthetariffsonawiderangeofoutcomesthataffectthevehiclemarket.Forexample,theydo
notestimateimpactsonUSandnon-USmanufacturerprofitsorhowtariffrevenuescomparetoconsumerwellbeingandproducerprofitchanges.Furthermore,theyignorethefactthatmanufacturersmakestrategicpricingdecisionsinlightofdifferencesinconsumerpriceresponsivenessacrossvehiclemodelsandfueltypes—whichwillhavecompleximpactsonthedemandandpriceofvehiclesregardlessoftheirfueltypeorcountryoforigin.
UnderstandingtheVehicleMarketinLightofTariffs
Theseindustryanalysesprovideasenseofthevehiclepricechangeswemayseeinthenearterm.Buttounderstandhowtheindustrywillbeaffectedinallitsdimensions,it’simportanttounderstandafewkeyissuesabouthowthevehiclemarketworks,includingthestructureofthemarket,preferencesandpricesensitivityacrossvehiclebuyers,theextenttowhichmaterialsandvehiclesareimported,andhowreadilybuyersswitchbetweengasolineandelectricvehicles.
MarketStructure,ConsumerPreferences,andPriceSensitivity
Thevehiclesupplymarketfunctionsasanoligopoly,meaningthesemanufacturerspossessacertaindegreeofmarketpowerduetothelimitednumberofmanufacturersinthemarket.Theabilityofmanufacturerstopassthroughtariffstovehiclepricesdependsonthepricesensitivityofconsumers.Furthermore,whentheychooseprices,manufacturersaccountforhowthepricesofeachoftheirvehiclesaffectconsumerdemandfortheirothervehicles.
See
/research/fiscal-economic-and-distributional-ef-
fects-25-auto-tariffs
.
See
/publications/research/economic_brief/2025/eb_25-
12
.
ResourcesfortheFuture
4
Importantly,thispriceresponsivenesswillvarywithseveralfactors.Forexample,consumerincome:wealthiervehiclebuyerswillbemorewillingtopurchasevehiclesathigherpricesthanlowerincomevehiclebuyers.Becausethevehiclesthatwealthyindividualspurchasedifferfromthevehiclespurchasedbylowerincomebuyers,theamountthatthesetariffsarepassedthroughtotheconsumerwilldependonthetypeofvehicle.Luxuryvehicleswillseehigherpriceincreases,whilebudgetvehicleswilllikelyseemuchlowerpriceincreases.
Theeffectoftariffsonpricesalsodependsonthesubstitutabilityacrossvehicles.Forexample,iftariffscauseamanufacturertoraisethepriceofanimportedvehicle,customerswhowouldhavepurchasedthatvehiclewithoutthetariffwouldbemorelikelytopurchaseadomesticvehicleifitisconsideredaclosesubstitute.Thissubstitutabilityisakeyfactorinhowpriceswillbesetacrossvehicletypes(includingcar/van/SUVandgasoline/electric),domesticvsimported,andnewvsused.
Furthermore,whenthisresponsivenessleadsconsumerstopurchasedifferentvehicles,thesealternativevehiclescouldalsoseepriceincreasesduetoincreasesindemand(thoughlessthanthatofthevehiclessubjecttohighertariffs).
MaterialandVehicleImports
ManufacturerswhosellvehiclesintheUnitedStatestendtoofferablendofvehiclesthatareimportedandmanufactureddomestically.Similarly,forvehiclesthatareassembledintheUnitedStates,mostmanufacturersimportatleastsomeoftheirmaterials.Onaverage,around50percentofthevalueofthevehicleisimported.
However,therearesomemanufacturers(suchasTesla)whoonlyimportmaterialsfromMexicoorCanada(bothcountriesarecurrentlyexemptfromthese25percenttariffs).
Whenvehicleimportsaresubjecttoatariff,manufacturerswhobothimportandproducedomesticallycouldrampupdomesticproductionwhilereducingimports.Thismeansthatthosewhohaveagreaterdomesticpresenceincreasetheirvehiclepricesbylessandwillalsolikelyrampupproductioninresponse.
However,intheshortrun—whichmayspanafewyears—manufacturersarelikelytohaveahardtimesourcingmaterialsfromdomesticsuppliersgiventhelimitedexistingdomesticmanufacturingbase.Inthelongerterm,newmanufacturingplantscouldemerge,particularlyifinvestorshavecertaintyaboutthetariffs.Yet,
withoutanestablishedmanufacturingbaseintheUnitedStates,tariffswillmeanthatvehiclemanufacturerswillfacechallengesinfindingsuppliersthatcanavoidthe25percentimporttariff,andthuswillpaymoreontheirproductscurrentlyimported.
Thesechallengeslikelyexplainwhymanymanufacturershavebeenlobbyingtheadministrationfortariffrelief.
ImportTariffsandtheMarketforVehicles
5
FromGasolinetoElectricVehicles
Thepricesofgasolineandelectricvehicleswillalsolikelybeaffectedindifferentways.Forexample,EVshaveahighershareofimportedmaterialsthangasolinevehicles.
BecausemanyoftheEVssoldinthiscountryusebatteriesimportedfromAsia,thevalueoftariff-applicablematerialsinEVstendstobehigher.AccordingtodatafromtheNationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration(NHTSA),about
65percent(by
value)ofthematerialsinEVsisimported
9,whichisabouttenpercentagepointsmorethangasolinevehicles.
Givenanincreaseinpricesforimportedvehicles,manufacturersmaychoosetorampupdomesticproduction,yettheabilitytodosowillvaryacrossgasolineandelectricvehicles.Forexample,TeslaproducesallofitsvehiclesintheUnitedStates;thus,anincreaseinimportedgasolinevehiclepricescouldleadtomorebuyerspurchasingtheirvehicles.However,giventhelimitedcapacitythatcurrentlyexiststodomesticallyproducebatteriesandthemineralstheyrequire,placingtariffsonvehiclepartswouldhaveafurtherincreaseinthecostofEVsassembledintheUnitedStates.
HowWilltheTariffsAffectConsumersandProducersOverall?
Aboveandbeyondvehicleprices,understandinghowthesetariffsaffectoutcomessuchastariffrevenues,consumerwelfare,manufacturerprofitability,andvehiclemanufacturingisfundamentaltoassessingthewide-rangingimpactsofvehicletariffs.
ConsumerWelfareandTariffRevenues
Oneofthechallengeswithtariffsisthatallvehiclebuyerswillbeworseofffromawelfareperspective.Forimportedvehicles,priceswillrise.Individualswhocontinuetopurchaseanimportedvehiclewillpaymoreforthesameproduct,andthosewhoshifttoadomesticvehiclearealsomadeworseofffortworeasons.First,intheabsenceofimporttariffs,consumerswhopreferimportedvehicleswouldnothave
chosenadomesticvehicle;thus,thesubstituteddomesticvehicleprovidesconsumerswithfewerbenefitsthantheimportedvehiclewouldhave.Second,importtariffs
canincreasepricesonallvehicles,includingnon-importedvehicles(duetoshiftingpurchasingpatternsandthepotentialforincreasingdemandtocausedomesticvehiclepricestorise);thus,individualswhonowpurchasedomesticvehicleswillnotjustbeworseoffduetohavingtopurchasetheirless-preferredvehicle,theymaynowalsobepayingmoreforitthanintheabsenceofatariff.
See
/sites//files/2025-02/MY2025-AALA-Alphabeti-
cal-2.4.25.pdf
.
ResourcesfortheFuture
6
Themagnitudeofthetariffrevenuescollectedonvehiclesandpartsimportedwilldependonthelevelofdemandforvehiclessubjecttothetariffandthetariffrate.Asconsumersshifttowardsdomesticvehiclesandvehiclesproducedwithagreaterpercentageofdomesticparts,thiswillreducetheamountoftariffrevenuesraised.10
ManufacturerProfitability
Theprofitsaccruedbymanufacturersunderdifferenttariffscenarioswilldependonhowconsumersrespondtochangesinprices.Forvehiclesthatfacelowerpriceresponsiveness,eitherduetoahigherincomegrouppurchasingthem,orthosethathavefewerclosesubstitutes,manufacturerswillbeabletopassthroughgreateramountsofthetariff,therebyreducingthenegativeimpactontheirprofits.
Inthecaseofdomesticallyproducedvehiclesthatarenotsubjecttoatariff,manufacturersmayseeprofitincreasesasconsumersshiftawayfromimportedvehicles—bothduetohighervehiclesales,andmanufacturers’abilitytostrategicallyincreasethepriceoftheirvehicles.
ModelingtheResults
Tounderstandhowthesetariffswillaffectthevehicleindustry,weleverageamodelofthevehiclesectorintheUnitedStates.
Thismodel
11,developedbyResourcesfortheFuture,providesinsightsintohowsuppliersandconsumersrespondtochangesinfederalandstatepolicies.Forexample,themodelhasbeenusedto
estimatethe
impact
offederalvehicleemissionsandefficiencystandardsonEVadoption,prices,emissions,andmore.12
Inthisreport,weusethemodeltodemonstratetheshort-termimpactofthesetariffsongasolineandEVsalesandprices,producerprofits,consumerwellbeing,andtariffrevenue.Twokeypolicydesignchoicesincludewhethertoplacetariffsonlyonassembledvehiclesoronvehiclesandparts,andwhethertoplacetariffsonpartsandvehiclesproducedinCanadaandMexico.Toassesstheimplicationsofthesechoices,wemodelthreetariffscenarios:1)onlyimportedvehiclesface25percenttariffs;2)importedvehiclesandimportedvehiclepartsfromnon-NorthAmericancountriesface25percenttariffs(thecurrentsituation,asofthetimeofwritingthisarticle);and3)importedvehiclesandimportedvehiclepartsface25percenttariffs,regardlessofthecountryoforigin.WedescribethetariffsasincreasinginstringencyfromScenarios1to3,whichreflectshowbroadlytheyapplytovehiclessoldintheUnitedStates.These
Forsimplicityandgiventheshort-termaspectofourresults,wedonotassumeanytariffrevenuesarerefundedbacktohouseholds.
See
/topics/data-and-decision-tools/rff-vehicle-market-model/
.
See
/publications/reports/how-would-the-proposed-epa-passen-
ger-vehicle-greenhouse-gas-emissions-standards-affect-new-vehicle-consumers/
.
ImportTariffsandtheMarketforVehicles
7
threescenariosarecomparedtoano-tariffbaseline13thatincludesexistingpoliciesthataffectthevehiclemarket,suchasfederalgreenhousegasstandardsandInflationReductionAct(IRA)vehicleproductionandpurchasesubsidies.
Forthebaselineandpolicyscenarios,themodelpredictssalesandpricesofnewandusedvehicles,aswellasmanufacturerprofits,consumerwellbeing(orwelfare),andtariffrevenue.Thenextsectionreportsthemodelingresults.Baselineresultscanbeviewedintheappendixofthisreport.
Table1.TariffScenarios
TariffsImposedon TariffsImposedon
TariffScenario ImportedVehicles ImportedPartsfromNon-
TariffsImposedonImportedpartsfromNorth
NorthAmericanCountries
AmericanCountries
1
25%
0%
0%
2
25%
25%
0%
3
25%
25%
25%
Changesinvehiclepricesacrossmodelsandfueltypeswillhaveimportantimplicationsforhouseholdbudgets(and,morebroadly,consumerwelfare)andrevenuescollectedbytariffs.Thoughmanufacturingmayadjustovertime,quantifyingtheimpactofthesetariffsintheshortrunwillbekeytoprovidinginformationforpolicymakersandhouseholdsalike.
Results
VehicleSales
Asexplainedabove,weexpectthetariffstoraisevehicleprices,reducingoverallconsumerdemandfornewvehiclesandsales.Acrossallthreescenarios,thetariffssharplyreducethetotalnumberofvehiclessoldperyear.Figure1shows,foreachscenario,thechangeinvehiclesalesinmillionunitscomparedtotheno-tariffbaseline(withpercentagechangesreportedaswell).Theseresultsdemonstratethatvehiclesalesdecreaseacrossallscenarios,withthemoststringenttariffscenarioreducingsalesby1.7million,or10.5percent.
SeeAppendixTableA1forbaselineresults.
ResourcesfortheFuture
8
Figure1.TotalVehicleSales(MillionsofVehicles)
–2.70%
–6.06%
Scenario1 Scenario2 Scenario3
–0.2
Numberofvehicles(millions)
–0.4
–0.6
–0.8
–1.0
–1.2
–1.4
–1.6
–1.8
–10.51%
Figure2demonstratestheseresultsbyfueltype.Hereweshowthatgasolinevehiclesalesdeclinebymore,innumberofunitssoldandasapercentageofbaselinesales,comparedtoelectricvehicles.Scenario3imposesthelargestoveralltariffs,anditreducesgasolinevehiclesalesbythemost:1.6millionunits.
Figure2.ChangeinVehiclesSold,byFuelType
Numberofvehicles(millions)
–0.2
–0.4
–0.6
–0.8
–1.0
–1.2
–1.4
–1.6
–1.8
Scenario1 Scenario2 Scenario3
–3.20%
–2.07%
–3.16%
–2.64%
–6.48%
–11.28%
Electricvehiclesales Gasolinesales
VehiclePrices
Asexpected,thetariffsbroadlyincreasevehiclepricesfortworeasons:1)theyincreasethecostofsupplyingvehiclestotheUSmarket,and2)theyshiftconsumerdemand
tovehiclesthatfacelowertariffs,whichinturn,canraisethepricesonthosevehicles.Themagnitudeoftheoverallpricechangeispositivelycorrelatedwiththetariffamounts.Figure3showsthataveragepricesincreasebyabout4–11percent,or$2,000
ImportTariffsandtheMarketforVehicles
9
to$5,000pervehicle.However,asexpected,wefindthatimportedvehiclesseethegreatestpriceincreases,increasingby$8,800(oralmost19percent)underthemoststringenttariffscenario(Figure4).DomesticvehiclepricesincreasebyanegligibleamountinScenario1,wheretheyarenotsubjecttotariffs,buttheyincreaseintheotherscenarios—bothbecausethetariffsincreasethecostofproducingdomesticvehiclesandbecausethetariffsshiftdemandfromimportedtodomesticvehicles.
Figure3.VehiclePrices
$6,000
US$pervehicle
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
10.80%
7.40%
4.38%
$2,000
$1,000
Scenario1 Scenario2 Scenario3
Figure4.VehiclePrices,byCountryofOrigin
$10,000
US$pervehicle
$8,000
18.85%
13.16%
14.40%
0%
7%
4%
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
Scenario1 Scenario2 Scenario3Domesticvehicles Importedvehicles
ResourcesfortheFuture
10
Figure5showshowthesepricechangesdifferacrossfueltypes.Forgasolinevehicles,pricesincreasewiththestringencyofthetariff,regardlessofvehicleorigin.Thelargestpriceincreasesareforimportedgasolinevehicles,whichseeaverageincreasesofalmost$9,500underScenario3.PricesofimportedgasolinevehiclesincreasemorewhenthetariffsapplytodomesticvehiclesinScenarios2and3comparedtoScenario1,asinthesescenarios,producersofimportedgasolinevehiclesareabletopassalongmoreofthetarifftoconsumerswhenthetariffsapplytodomesticvehiclesaswell.
ForEVs,likelyduetobatteryimportscomingfromKoreaandJapan,domesticEVpricesincreasesignificantlywhenvehiclepartscomingfromoutsideofNorthAmericafacetariffs(Scenarios2and3).However,unlikeforimportedgasolinevehicles,pricesofimportedEVsincreasebysimilaramountsacrossthethreescenarios.Thisis
likelybecauseconsumerdemandforimportedEVsisrelativelypricesensitive,givingimporterslimitedopportunitytoincreasepriceswhenconsumerdemandshiftsawayfromdomesticEVs.
Figure5.AveragePriceofVehicles,byCountryofOriginandFuel
$10,000 21.7%25%
US$pervehicle
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
20%
14.9%
16.4%
6.5%
4.2%
7.0%3.9%
2.5%4.3%
0.1%0.1%
4.1%
15%
10%
5%
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 基于注意力機制的超分辨率模型
- 2025年海南省公需課學(xué)習(xí)-生態(tài)環(huán)境公益訴訟制度研究1646
- 2025年質(zhì)量月質(zhì)量知識競賽試題集及答案(共80題)
- 2025年營養(yǎng)健康顧問知識競賽題庫及答案(共140題)
- 松林鎮(zhèn)小升初試卷及答案
- 內(nèi)鏡護士考證題庫及答案
- 維修消防合同范本
- 深圳語文一模試卷及答案
- 2025年護理編制真題分析及答案
- 2025年江蘇煙草作文真題及答案
- 旅游導(dǎo)游簡易勞動合同
- 在線網(wǎng)課知慧《形勢與政策(吉林大學(xué))》單元測試考核答案
- 業(yè)主授權(quán)租戶安裝充電樁委托書
- 化工建設(shè)綜合項目審批作業(yè)流程圖
- 親子鑒定的報告單圖片
- 遼寧軌道交通職業(yè)學(xué)院單招《職業(yè)技能測試》參考試題庫(含答案)
- 新概念二單詞表新版,Excel 版
- 2023年陜西西安經(jīng)濟技術(shù)開發(fā)區(qū)招聘120人(共500題含答案解析)筆試必備資料歷年高頻考點試題摘選
- 第八講 發(fā)展全過程人民民主PPT習(xí)概論2023優(yōu)化版教學(xué)課件
- 篇12pmc窗口功能指令舉例講解
- GB/T 7332-2011電子設(shè)備用固定電容器第2部分:分規(guī)范金屬化聚乙烯對苯二甲酸酯膜介質(zhì)直流固定電容器
評論
0/150
提交評論