2025年大學(xué)英語六級閱讀理解篇章結(jié)構(gòu)專項(xiàng)突破試卷考試時間：______分鐘總分：______分姓名：______PartIReadingComprehensionDirections:Thereare2passagesinthispart.Eachpassageisfollowedbysomequestionsorunfinishedstatements.ForeachofthemtherearefourchoicesmarkedA),B),C)andD).YoushoulddecideonthebestchoiceandmarkthecorrespondingletteronAnswerSheet2withasinglelinethroughthecentre.PassageOneIntherealmofmodernwork,thetraditional9-to-5officemodelisfacingincreasingskepticism.Agrowingbodyofevidencesuggeststhatrigidschedulesmaynotalignwithhumanproductivitypeaksorthedemandsofdynamicindustries.Theargumentforflexibility,oftentermedthe"flexibleworkrevolution,"isgainingmomentum,drivenbytechnologicaladvancementsandashiftinemployeeexpectations.Oneoftheprimaryadvocatesforthistransformationistheriseofremotework.Thepandemic,inparticular,actedasacatalyst,forcingcompaniestoadaptandrealizethatemployeescouldremainproductiveoutsidetraditionalofficewalls.Thishasledtoareevaluationofthenecessityofdailycommutesandin-personcollaboration.Proponentsarguethatremoteworkcanenhancework-lifebalance,reducestress,andevenboostcreativitybyallowingindividualstoworkinenvironmentsmostconducivetotheirfocusandwell-being.However,challengesremain,includingmaintainingteamcohesionandensuringequitableopportunitiesacrossdistributedteams.Beyondmerelocationflexibility,theconceptextendstovariedschedules.Thetraditional9-to-5framework,whileseeminglystable,doesnotaccountforthenaturalvariationsinhumanenergylevelsthroughouttheday.Someindividualsaremorninglarks,performingbestearlyintheday,whileothersarenightowls,findingtheirpeakproductivitylater.Companiesareincreasinglyexperimentingwithasynchronousworkmodels,whereteammembersworkdifferenthoursbutremainconnectedthroughdigitalplatforms.Thisapproachrequiressophisticatedcommunicationprotocolsandahighdegreeoftrustbutoffersthepotentialforamorepersonalizedworkexperience.Thesuccessofflexibleworkarrangementshingesnotjustontechnologybutoncompanyculture.Aculturethattrustsemployees,encouragesautonomy,andfocusesonoutcomesratherthanmerepresenceiscrucial.Managementstylesmustevolvefromsupervisinghoursworkedtomonitoringprojectprogressandemployeewell-being.Thisshiftrequiresafundamentalmindsetchangewithinorganizations,movingawayfrommicro-managementtowardsfosteringasenseofresponsibilityandcollaboration.Critics,however,raiseconcernsaboutthepotentialforisolationandtheblurringofwork-lifeboundariesunderflexibleregimes.There'salsotheriskofcreating"digitaldivides"ifnot所有employeeshaveequalaccesstothenecessarytoolsandenvironments.Furthermore,somearguethatteambondingandinformalknowledgesharing,whichoftenoccurorganicallyinphysicalspaces,mightbehindered.Thesechallengesunderscoretheimportanceofthoughtfulimplementationandcontinuousadjustmentofflexibleworkpolicies.Ultimately,thetrajectoryofflexibleworksuggestsitisheretostay,thoughitsformwillcontinuetoevolve.Thekeyforbusinessesliesinfindingtherightbalancethatmaximizesproductivityandemployeesatisfactionwhilemitigatingpotentialdrawbacks.Thismightinvolveahybridapproach,combiningelementsofremoteandin-officework,oradoptinghighlypersonalizedschedulingoptions.Thefutureofworkappearslessabouttherigidadherencetoaclockandmoreaboutthefluidadaptationtoindividualandorganizationalneeds.Questions:1.Whatisthemainideaofthepassage?2.Accordingtothepassage,whatsignificantimpactdidthepandemichaveontheworkmodel?3.Whatdoesthephrase"flexibleworkrevolution"primarilyreferto?4.Whatcharacteristicdo"morninglarks"and"nightowls"representinthecontextofflexibleschedules?5.Whatessentialculturalelementishighlightedascrucialforthesuccessofflexibleworkarrangements?6.Accordingtocritics,whataresomeofthepotentialnegativeconsequencesofflexiblework?PassageTwoTheconceptofsustainabilityhasmovedfromthefringesofpublicdiscoursetotheforefrontofglobalpolicyagendas.Drivenbyurgentconcernsoverclimatechange,resourcedepletion,andenvironmentaldegradation,societiesareincreasinglyscrutinizingthesustainabilityoftheirconsumptionpatternsandproductionprocesses.Thisshiftnecessitatesafundamentalrethinkingofhoweconomiesoperateandhowindividualsinteractwiththenaturalworld.Attheheartofthesustainabilitydiscourseistheideaofbalancinghumandevelopmentwithenvironmentalprotection.Traditionally,economicgrowthhasoftenbeenmeasuredsolelybyincreasesinGDP,withlittleregardfortheenvironmentalcostsincurred.However,thislinear"take-make-dispose"modelisincreasinglyrecognizedasunsustainable.Sustainabledevelopment,bycontrast,advocatesforacirculareconomymodel,whereresourcesarekeptinuseforaslongaspossible,extractingmaximumvalueandthenrecoveringandregeneratingproductsandmaterialsattheendoftheirservicelife.Achievingsustainabilityrequiresmultifacetedapproachesthatspanvarioussectors.Theenergysector,forinstance,isundergoingaprofoundtransformationwiththerapidadoptionofrenewableenergysourceslikesolarandwindpower.Governmentsandcorporationsareinvestingheavilyinthesetechnologies,aimingtoreducerelianceonfossilfuelsandmitigategreenhousegasemissions.Similarly,thetransportationsectorisexploringsustainablemobilitysolutions,fromelectricvehiclesandpublictransitimprovementstocar-sharinginitiativesandthepromotionofcycling.Consumerbehavioralsoplaysapivotalroleinthesustainabilityequation.Whileindividualactionsalonecannotsolvecomplexglobalproblems,collectiveshiftsinconsumptionpatternscanexertsignificantpressureonmarketsandincentivizebusinessestoadoptmoresustainablepractices.Educatingconsumersabouttheenvironmentalimpactoftheirchoices,promotingwastereductionandrecycling,andencouragingthepurchaseofeco-friendlyproductsareallcriticalcomponentsofthiseffort.Companiesareincreasinglyrespondingtoconsumerdemandbyintegratingsustainabilityintotheircorebusinessstrategies,developinggreenproducts,andadoptingtransparentsupplychains.Despitetheprogress,implementingsustainabilityprinciplesacrosstheboardremainsaformidablechallenge.Economicinterestsoftenclashwithenvironmentalimperatives,creatingtensionsbetweenshort-termprofitsandlong-termviability.Technologicallimitationsandthehighcostsassociatedwithsustainablealternativescanalsohinderadoption.Moreover,achievingglobalconsensusandcoordinationonsustainabilitystandardsandgoalsiscomplex,requiringcooperationbetweennationswithdiverseeconomicinterestsandenvironmentalconditions.Nevertheless,themomentumtowardssustainabilityisundeniable.Theintegrationofenvironmentalconsiderationsintoeconomicdecision-makingisbecomingincreasinglymainstream.Innovationinsustainabletechnologiescontinuestoaccelerate,andagrowingnumberofbusinessesandconsumersarerecognizingthevalueofamoresustainablefuture.Whilethepathforwardisfraughtwithdifficulties,thecollectiverecognitionthatbusinessasusualisnolongerviableprovidesapowerfulimpetusforchange.Thetransitiontoatrulysustainableglobalsocietymaybearduous,butitrepresentsanecessarysteptowardsensuringthewell-beingofcurrentandfuturegenerations.Questions:7.Whathasbeentheprimarydriverfortheincreasingglobalfocusonsustainability?8.Whatfundamentaldifferencedoesthe"circulareconomymodel"proposecomparedtothetraditionallinearmodel?9.Accordingtothepassage,whataresomekeyareaswheresustainabilityeffortsarebeingconcentrated?10.Whatroledoindividualconsumersplayinthepursuitofsustainability,accordingtothepassage?11.Whatsignificantobstaclesarementionedinthepassagethathinderthewidespreadimplementationofsustainabilityprinciples?12.Whatistheoveralltoneofthepassageregardingthefutureofsustainability?---試卷答案PartIReadingComprehensionPassageOne1.D2.A3.B4.C5.E6.FPassageTwo7.C8.D9.B10.A11.E12.G---解析思路PassageOne1.D思路：通讀全文，文章從質(zhì)疑傳統(tǒng)工作模式開始，介紹了遠(yuǎn)程工作、靈活時間等“靈活工作革命”的各個方面，并討論了其優(yōu)勢、挑戰(zhàn)和未來趨勢。核心是探討工作模式的變革及其影響，D選項(xiàng)（“探討現(xiàn)代工作模式變革的利弊及其對員工和組織的影響”）最能概括主旨。2.A思路：定位第二段第一句，明確指出“新冠疫情（thepandemic）特別是起到了催化劑的作用（actedasacatalyst），迫使公司（forcingcompanies）適應(yīng)（adapt）并意識到（realize）員工可以在傳統(tǒng)辦公室墻壁之外（outsidetraditionalofficewalls）保持生產(chǎn)力（couldremainproductive）”。這與A選項(xiàng)（“促使公司認(rèn)識到員工可以在遠(yuǎn)程環(huán)境下保持生產(chǎn)力，從而推動了工作模式的改變”）意思一致。3.B思路：定位第一段第二句，提到“靈活工作革命（flexibleworkrevolution）”是由“技術(shù)進(jìn)步（technologicaladvancements）和員工期望的轉(zhuǎn)變（ashiftinemployeeexpectations）”推動的。B選項(xiàng)（“由技術(shù)進(jìn)步和員工期望轉(zhuǎn)變所推動的工作模式變革”）準(zhǔn)確反映了其核心內(nèi)涵。4.C思路：定位第三段，明確區(qū)分了“morninglarks”（早鳥型）和“nightowls”（夜貓子型），指出他們分別是“白天（earlyintheday）表現(xiàn)最佳”和“較晚（later）表現(xiàn)最佳”。這體現(xiàn)了他們在一天中精力高峰時間的不同，即C選項(xiàng)（“一天中精力高峰時間的不同”）。5.E思路：定位第四段最后一句，強(qiáng)調(diào)成功的靈活工作安排“不僅僅取決于技術(shù)（notjustontechnology），更取決于公司文化（butoncompanyculture）”。E選項(xiàng)（“公司文化”）是原文明確指出的關(guān)鍵要素。6.F思路：定位第五段，列舉了批評者的擔(dān)憂，包括“隔離（isolation）、工作與生活界限模糊（blurringofwork-lifeboundaries）、數(shù)字鴻溝（digitaldivides）”以及“團(tuán)隊(duì)凝聚力和非正式知識分享可能受阻（hinderedteambondingandinformalknowledgesharing）”。F選項(xiàng)（“如隔離、工作與生活界限模糊以及團(tuán)隊(duì)凝聚力下降等潛在問題”）概括了這些擔(dān)憂。PassageTwo7.C思路：定位第一段，指出“可持續(xù)性（sustainability）的焦點(diǎn)（focus）正由（ismovingfrom）公共話語的邊緣（fringesofpublicdiscourse）轉(zhuǎn)向（to）全球政策議程的前沿（forefrontofglobalpolicyagendas）”，主要原因是“對（drivenby）氣候變化的迫切關(guān)注（urgentconcernsoverclimatechange）、資源枯竭（resourcedepletion）和環(huán)境退化的關(guān)注（environmentaldegradation）”。C選項(xiàng)（“對氣候變化、資源枯竭和環(huán)境退化的迫切關(guān)注”）最能概括驅(qū)動因素。8.D思路：定位第二段，對比了“線性‘獲取-制造-丟棄’模式（linear'take-make-dispose'model）”和“可持續(xù)發(fā)展的循環(huán)經(jīng)濟(jì)模式（circulareconomymodel）”。前者“很少考慮（littleregardfor）環(huán)境成本（environmentalcosts）”，后者則強(qiáng)調(diào)“將資源（resources）使用盡可能長時間（aslongaspossible），最大限度地提取價值（extractingmaximumvalue），然后在服務(wù)壽命結(jié)束時（attheendoftheirservicelife）恢復(fù)和再生產(chǎn)品（recoveringandregeneratingproducts）”。D選項(xiàng)（“強(qiáng)調(diào)資源循環(huán)利用，盡可能延長使用壽命，與線性模式獲取-制造-丟棄的方式不同”）準(zhǔn)確描述了二者關(guān)鍵區(qū)別。9.B思路：根據(jù)第三段和第四段內(nèi)容，可持續(xù)性努力集中在“能源領(lǐng)域（energysector，特別是可再生能源）”、“交通運(yùn)輸領(lǐng)域（transportationsector，可持續(xù)交通解決方案）”、“消費(fèi)者行為（Consumerbehavior，改變消費(fèi)模式、減少浪費(fèi)、購買環(huán)保產(chǎn)品）”以及“企業(yè)層面（Companies，將可持續(xù)性融入戰(zhàn)略、開發(fā)綠色產(chǎn)品、透明供應(yīng)鏈）”。10.A思路：定位第四段，指出“雖然單獨(dú)的個人行動（althoughindividualactionsalone）無法解決（cannotsolve）復(fù)雜的全球問題（complexglobalpr