. I 摘要 .n in . 3 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 s . 8 s . 8 . 8 . 9 s . 10 s . 12 s . 12 s . 14 s . . 15 s . 16 s . 17 s . 18 s . 19 s . 20 s . 21 . 22 s . 22 s .s . 24 of of . 24 u of . 25 n . 26 s . 27 s . 28 s . 31 s . 31 s . 32 . 33 s of . 35 s of . 36 .I of at on of of as of in a of or of of in 0a to it to on a As a s is on As a s a in of It on of of of s of on s is a in He is of he of s of ins uns of s i i to s on to s of s 要 縱觀古今中外的翻譯研究領(lǐng)域，大多數(shù)學(xué)者都將研究的落腳點(diǎn)放在翻譯理論、翻譯學(xué)及翻譯史的研究上。而作為翻譯主體的譯者卻始終處于一種鮮人問(wèn)津的境地，關(guān)于譯者主體性的相應(yīng)研究更是鳳毛麟角，作為翻譯領(lǐng)域保證翻譯工作順利進(jìn)行的譯者始終處于邊緣化的地位。隨著 20 世紀(jì)西方翻譯研究“文化轉(zhuǎn)向”的出現(xiàn)，翻譯研究不再是僅僅局限于簡(jiǎn)單的文字符號(hào)之間的轉(zhuǎn)換，而是被置于更為廣闊的背景下，這使得我們得以從全新的角度對(duì)翻譯領(lǐng)域進(jìn)行研究。由此，對(duì)于譯者文化身份的研究亦提上日程，作為翻譯研究領(lǐng)域的一個(gè)全新視角，文化身份在整個(gè)翻譯過(guò)程中都發(fā)揮著極為重要的影響，不論是文本的選擇還是翻譯策略的運(yùn)用等都承載著譯者文化身份的印記。對(duì)于譯者文化身份的探究無(wú)疑為翻譯研究開辟了一塊嶄新的天地，并促進(jìn)翻譯研究向縱深延展。 本文以上述理論背景為依據(jù)， 對(duì)翻譯領(lǐng)域一位極其特殊的華籍美裔翻譯家沙博理進(jìn)行個(gè)案研究。探討了翻譯家的文化身份與其翻譯活動(dòng)之間的關(guān)系。西德尼沙博理是一位非常多產(chǎn)的翻譯家，在中國(guó)從事翻譯的半個(gè)多世紀(jì)，他翻譯了許多部?jī)?yōu)秀的中國(guó)文學(xué)作品，如施耐庵的水滸傳 、巴金的家 、茅盾的林家鋪?zhàn)?、 春蠶 ，趙樹理的李有才板話 、 小二黑結(jié)婚等。本文試圖通過(guò)對(duì)西德尼沙博理的特殊文化身份進(jìn)行分析，進(jìn)而剖析該特殊文化身份對(duì)于其翻譯活動(dòng)及翻譯思想的影響，以期從文化身份的視角重新審視西德尼沙博理的翻譯思想。 關(guān)鍵字： 文化轉(zhuǎn)向 譯者主體性 文化身份 西德尼沙博理 翻譯思想 1 or a on of of on in a to of in 0th a s s As a an in on of at of 0as a a to it to on a on s is on to s is a in He is a of he of to s of s of is an of of an to of In a on of is in 2 is a s is s of of s on in in to s on is a of He to 3 n in ue to of is a of to a in of 0a of in of to to in a of 970s, a to is a of of of a as a of is to be by at a is a to In it is in by of to of of of on 989, in K of in 990, 4 in a in of In on of to of on of or of to as in In in he is by to a to a 980s, a A of in an on it s to of on to as a n of in It in to is up a of as so in to of 006:90). 980s, 5 in in of is of in is of be In to we of if we to a a on to a be of of to in of to by on an on