住所（營(yíng)業(yè)場(chǎng)所）使用證明企業(yè)名稱地址郵政編碼電話用途使用面積平方米產(chǎn)權(quán)歸屬使用關(guān)系住所（營(yíng)業(yè)場(chǎng)所）使用情況使用期限謹(jǐn)此確認(rèn)，以上內(nèi)容不含虛假成份申請(qǐng)人簽字日期附注1“使用關(guān)系”系指自有，租賃2“使用期限”不得少于一年3另附產(chǎn)權(quán)證或能證明產(chǎn)權(quán)歸屬的有效文件。如系租賃房屋，則除提交產(chǎn)權(quán)證或能證明產(chǎn)權(quán)歸屬的有效文件外，還應(yīng)提交租賃協(xié)議書或合同。4租賃協(xié)議書或合同應(yīng)是使用人直接與房屋產(chǎn)權(quán)所有人簽訂CURBSONBUSINESSMETHODCLAIMSWOULDBEADRAMATICABOUTFACEBECAUSEITWASTHEFEDERALCIRCUITITSELFTHATINTRODUCEDSUCHPATENTSWITHIS1998DECISIONINTHESOCALLEDSTATESTREETBANKCASE,APPROVINGAPATENTONAWAYOFPOOLINGMUTUALFUNDASSETSTHATRULINGPRODUCEDANEXPLOSIONINBUSINESSMETHODPATENTFILINGS,INITIALLYBYEMERGINGINTERNETCOMPANIESTRYINGTOSTAKEOUTEXCLUSIVEPINHTSTOSPECIFICTYPESOFONLINETRANSACTIONSLATER,MOVEESTABLISHEDCOMPANIESRACEDTOADDSUCHPATENTSTOTHEIRFILES,IFONLYASADEFENSIVEMOVEAGAINSTRIVALSTHATMIGHTBENTTHEMTOTHEPUNCHIN2005,IBMNOTEDINACOURTFILINGTHATITHADBEENISSUEDMORETHAN300BUSINESSMETHODPATENTSDESPITETHAFACTTHATITQUESTIONEDTHELEGALBASISFORGRANTINGTHEMSIMILARLY,SOMEWALLSTREETINVESTMENTFILMSARMEDTHEMSELVESWITHPATENTSFORFINANCIALPRODUCTS,EVENASTHEYTOOKPOSITIONSINCOURTCASESOPPOSINGTHEPRACTICETHEBILSKICASEINVOLVESACLAIMEDPATENTONAMETHODFORHEDGINGRISKINTHEENERGYMARKETTHEFEDERALCIRCUITISSUEDANUNUSUALORDERSTATINGTHATTHECASEWOULDBEHEARDBYALL12OFTHECOURTSJUDGES,RATHERTHANATYPICALPANELOFTHREE,ANDTHATONEISSUEITWANTSTOEVALUSTEISWETHERITSHOULD“RECONSIDER”ITSSTATESTREETBANKRULINGTHEFEDERALCIRCUITSACTIONCOMESINTHEWAKEOFASERIESOFRECENTDECISIONSBYTHESUPREMECOUNTTHATHASNURROWEDTHESCOPEOFPROTECTIONSFORPATENTHOLDERSLASTAPRIL,FOREXAMPLETHEJUSTICESSIGNALEDTHATTOOMANYPATENTSWEREBEINGUPHELDFOR“INVENTIONS”THATAREOBVIOUSTHEJUDGESONTHEFEDERALCIRCUITARE“REACTIONTOTHEANTI_PATENTTRENDATTHESUPREMECOURT”SAYSHAROLECWEGNER,APARTENDINHISBOOKTHETIPPINGPOINLMALCOHNALADUELLALOUESTHATSOCIALEPIDEMICSAREDLIVENINLARGEPARTBYTHEACTINGOFATINYMINORITYOFSPECIALINDIVIDUALS,OFTENCALLEDINFLUENTIALSWHOAREUNUSUALLINFORMED,PERSUASIVE,ORWECONNECTTHEIDEAISINTUITIVELYCOMPELLINGBUTITDOESNTEXPLAINHOWIDEASACTUALLYSPREADTHESUPPOSEDIMPORTANCEOFINFTUENTIALSDERIVESFROMAPLANSIBLESOUNDINGBUTLARGELYUNTESTEDTHEORYUNTESTEDTHELRYCALLEDTHE“TOWSTEPFLOWOFCOMMUNICATION“INFORMATIONLLOWSFROMTHEMEDIATOTHEINFTUENTIALSANDFROMTHENTOERERYONEELSEMARKETERSHAVEEMBRACEDTHETWOSTEPFLOWBECAMEITSUGGESTSTHATIFTHEYCANJUSTFINDANDINFLUENCETHEINFLUENTIALS,THOSESELECTPEOPLEWILLDOMOSTOFTHEWORKFORTHEMTHETHEORYALSOSEEMSTOEXPLAINTHESUDDENANDUNEXPECTEDPOPULARITYOFPEOPLEWASWEARINGPROMOTINGORDEVELOPINGWHATERVERITISBEFOREANYONEELSEPAIDATTENTIONANECDOTALEVIDENCEOFTHISKINDFITSNICELYWITHTHEIDEATHATONLYCERTAINSPECIALINTHEIRRECENTWORKHOWEYERSOMERESEARCHERSHAVECOMEUPWITHTHEFINDINGTHATINFLUENTIALSHAVEFARLESSIMPACTONSOCIALEPIDEMICSTHANISGENETALLYSUPPOSEDINTHERESEARCHERSARGUMENTSTEMSFROMASIMPLEOBSERRATINGABOUTSOCIALINFLUENCEWITHTHEEXCEPTIONOFAFEWCELEBRITIESLIKEOPRAHWINFREYWHOSEOUTSIZEPRESENCEISPRIMANRILLYAFUNCTIONOFMEDIANOTINTERPERSONALINFLUENCEENENTHEMOSTINFLUENTIALMEMBERSOFAPOPULATIONSIMPLYDONTINTERACTWITHTHATMANYOTHERSYETITISPRECISELYTHESENONCELEBRINGINFLUENTIALSWHOACCORDINGTOTHETWOSTEPFLOWTHEORYARESUPPOSEDTODRIVESOCIALENIDEMICSBYINFLUCENCINYTHEIRFRIENDSANDCOLLEAGUESDIRECTLYFORASOCIALEPIDEMICTOOCCURHOWEVEREACHPERSONSOSFFECTEDMUSTTHENINFLUCENCEHISORHEROWNACQUAINTANCES,WHOMUSTINTURNINFLUENCETHEIRSANDSOONANDJUSTHOWMANYOTHERSPAYATTENTIONTOEACHOFTHESEPEOPLEHASLITTLETODOWITHTHEINITIALINFLUENTIALIFPEOPLEINTHENETWORKJUSTTWODEGREESREMOVEDFROMTHEINITIALINFLUENTIALPROVERESISTANTFOREXAMPLEFROMTHEINITIALINFLUENTIALPROVERESISTANT,FOREXAMPLETHECASECADEOFCHANGEWONTPROPAGATEVERYFARORAFFECTMANYPEOPLEBANKERSHAVEBEENBLAMINGTHEMSELVESFORTHEIRTROUBLESINPUBLICBEHINDEHTSCENES,THEYHAVEBEENTAKINGAIMATSOMEONEELSETHEACCOUNTINGSTANDARDSETTERSTHEIRRULES,MOANTHEBANKS,HAVEFORCEDTHEMTOREPORTENORMOUSLOSSES,ANDITSJUSTNOTFAIRTHESERULESSAYTHEYMUSTVALUESOMEASSETSATTHEPRICEATHEIRDPARTYWOULDPAY,NOTTHEPRICEMANAGERSANDREGULATORSWOULDLIKETHEMTOFETCHUNFORTUNATELY,BANKSLOBBYINGNOWSEEMSTOBEWORKINGTHEDETAILSMAYBEUNKNOWABLE,BUTTHEINDEPENDENCEOFSTANDARDSETTERS,ESSENTIALTOTHEPROPERFUNCTIONINGOFCAPITALMARKSTS,ISBEINGCOMPROMISEDAND,UNLESSBANKSCARRYTOXICASSETSATPRICESTHATATTRACTBUYERS,REVIVINGTHEBANKINGSYSTEMWILLBEDIFFICULTAFTERABRUISINGENCOUNTERWITHXONGRESSAMERICASFINANCIALACCOUNTINGSTANDARDSBOARDFASBRUSHEDTHROUGHRULECHANGSETHESEGAVEBANKSMOREFREEDOMTOUSEMODELSTOVALUEILLIQUIDASSETSANDMOREFLEXIBILITYINRECOGNIZINGLOSSESONLONG0TERMASSETSINTHEIRINCOMESTATEMENTBOBHERZ,THEFASBSCHAIRMAN,CRIEDOUTAGAINSTEHOSEWHO”QUESTIONOURMOTIVES”YETBANKSHARESROSEANDTHECHANGESENHANCEWHATONELOBBYGROUPPOLITELYCALLS”THEUSEOFJUDGMENTBYEUROPEANMINISTERSINSTANTLYDEMANDEDTHATTHEINTERNATIONALACCOUNTINGSTANDARDSBOARDIASBDOLIKEWISETHEIASBSAYSITDOESNOTWANTTOACTWITHOUTOVERALLPLANNING,BUTTHEPRESSURETOFOLDWHENITCOMLETESITRECONSTRUCTIONOFRULESLATERTHISYEARISSTRONGCHARLIEMCCREEVY,AEUROPEANCOMMISSIONER,WARNEDTHEIASBTHATISDID”NOTLIVEINAPOLITICALVACUUM”BUT”INTHEREALWORD”ANDTHEEUROPECOULDITWASBANKSTHATWEREONTHEWRONGPLANET,WITHACCOUTSHTATWASTLYOVERVALUEDASSETSTODAYTHEYARGUEHTATMARKETPRICESOVERSTATELOEEES,BECAUSEHTEYLARGERLYREFLECTTHETEMPORARYILLIQULDITYOFMARKETS,NOTTHELIKELYENTENTOFBADDEBTSTHETRUTHWILLNOTBEKNOWNFORYEARSBUTBANKSSHARESTRADEBELOWTHEIRBOOKVALUE,SUGGETINGTHATINVESTORSAREAKEPTICALANDDEADMARKETSPARTLYREFLECTTHEPARALYSISOFBANKSWHICHWILLNOTSELLASSETSFORFEAROFBOOKINGLOSSES,YETARERELUCAANTTOBUYALLTHOSESUPPOSEDBARGAINSTOGETTHESYSYTEMWORKINGAGAIN,LOSSESMUSTBERECOGNIZEDANDDEALTWITHAMERICASNEWPLANTOBUYUPTOXICASSETSWILLNOTWORKUNLESSBANKSMARKASSETSTOLEVELSWHICHBUYERSFINDATTRACTIVESUCCESSFULMARKETSREQUIREINDEPENDENTANDEVENCOMBATIVESTANDARDSETTERSTHEFASBANDIASBHAVEBEENEXACTLYTHAT,CLEANINGUPRULESONSTOCKOPTIONSANGPENSIONS,FOREXAMPLE,AGAINSTHOSTILITYINTERESTSBUTBYGIVINGINTOCRITICSNOWTHEYAREINVITINGPRESSURETOMAKEMORECONCESSIONS在供貨商方面，我們通常希望的是可以強(qiáng)化對(duì)賣方供貨商的談判力，這是因傳統(tǒng)上買方采購(gòu)者與賣方供貨商之間的關(guān)系往往是相互沖突的，而在選擇供貨商時(shí)往往也是一次價(jià)格的拉鋸戰(zhàn)。但近年來(lái)企業(yè)間的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)逐漸轉(zhuǎn)型為全球化，講求快速反應(yīng)消費(fèi)者的需求。所以在供應(yīng)鏈管理的概念下，供貨商與采購(gòu)者的關(guān)系不再敵對(duì)，相反的兩者必須培養(yǎng)出良好的默契，利用將彼此所收集之?dāng)?shù)據(jù)做完整而快速的交流，才可發(fā)展出比其它同業(yè)更快的反應(yīng)速度，充分滿足消費(fèi)者的需求，以便在這波競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中生存下來(lái)。企業(yè)在選擇供貨商時(shí)，若選擇到良好供貨商對(duì)企業(yè)的成長(zhǎng)是一個(gè)助力，反之，若選擇到不良的供貨商則就如同揮之不去的夢(mèng)魘，輕則延誤交期造成不便，重則影饗公司營(yíng)運(yùn)，造成商譽(yù)及財(cái)務(wù)的嚴(yán)重?fù)p失。因此選擇一個(gè)良好的供貨商，對(duì)企業(yè)而言是十分重要的。然而怎樣選擇適當(dāng)?shù)墓┴浬?，是許多企業(yè)中采購(gòu)部門最感頭痛的問(wèn)題，一個(gè)良好的供貨商，其所供應(yīng)的物料或服務(wù)應(yīng)有適當(dāng)?shù)馁|(zhì)量、應(yīng)有合理的價(jià)格、應(yīng)在適當(dāng)?shù)臅r(shí)間送達(dá)、還應(yīng)提供適當(dāng)?shù)姆?wù)，以滿足客戶之需求；正因供貨商的地位重要，所以一般公司均有一套評(píng)估供貨商績(jī)效的方法，此方法是指與公司有往來(lái)之供貨商，為期建來(lái)制度、確保可靠的供應(yīng)來(lái)源，而對(duì)與各供貨商交易之記錄來(lái)予以考核，以評(píng)定其優(yōu)劣等級(jí)，而作為公司選擇