ChapterThree

CaseStudyforContractsofSaleandPurchaseofInternationalCommodities

國際貨物買賣合同案例ChapterThree

CaseStudyforCPartOne

SelectedAnalysisofCaseStudy

第一部分案例精選PartOne

SelectedAnalysisoCase1ContractualDisputebetweenShanghaiForeignProjectContractingCompany

andaGermanSupplier

中國上海對外工程承包公司與德國供應(yīng)商因合同問題引起的糾紛CaseDescription:（請參看教材P35）Question:Ifyouwereanarbitrator,howwouldyourule?Answer：（請參看教材P35）Case1ContractualDisputebeCase2DisputeCausedbyAttachedConditions

因附加條件引起的糾紛

CaseDescription：（請參看教材P37）Question:Wasthecontracteffectivelysetup?Why?Answer：（請參看教材P38）Case2DisputeCausedbyAttaCase3OnDamageRemedy

違約賠償問題CaseDescription（請參看教材P39）Question:AreCompanyA’srequirementsreasonable?Why?Answer（請參看教材P40）Case3OnDamageRemedy

違約賠償Case4DisputeCausedbyRiskProvisionsintheContract

合同中風(fēng)險條款引發(fā)的糾紛CaseDescription（請參看教材P41）Question:Whatlessonscanbelearnedfromthecase?Answer（請參看教材P42）Case4DisputeCausedbyRiskCase5PayAttentiontoRiskProvision

注意風(fēng)險條款CaseDescription（請參看教材P43）Question:Whatcanwelearnfromthecase?Answer（請參看教材P44）Case5PayAttentiontoRiskCase6Contract

Dispute

合同糾紛CaseDescription（請參看教材P44）Question:CanthecontractbetweenCompanyAandCompanyBbesetup?Why?Answer（請參看教材P45）Case6Contract

Dispute

合同糾紛CaPartTwo

CaseExercise

第二部分案例思考題PartTwo

CaseExercise

第二部分案例1（請參看教材P46）Question:Whydidthiseventhappen?Howshouldweavoidit?WhetheristhecontractalsoaCIFcontract,andwhy?Answer（請參看教材P51）案例1（請參看教材P46）Question:案例2（請參看教材P47）Question:Canthecontractbesetup?Why?Answer（請參看教材P52）案例2（請參看教材P47）Question:案例3（請參看教材P47）Question:(1)Whetherwasthecontractestablished,andwhy?(2)WhetherisittheChinesecompany’sourmisplay?Answer（請參看教材P52）案例3（請參看教材P47）Question:案例4（請參看教材P48）Question:IstheU.S.side’srequestreasonable?Why?Answer（請參看教材P52）案例4（請參看教材P48）Question:案例5（請參看教材P48）Question:Whatdoyouthinkofdealingwiththisproblem?Pleasegiveyourreasons.Answer（請參看教材P53）案例5（請參看教材P48）Question:案例6（請參看教材P49）Question:(1)IsthecontractdisputebetweentwopartiesapplicabletotheUnitedNationsConventiononContractsfortheInternationalSaleofGoods?(2)Whenwasthecontractsetup?Why?(3)Thegoodswasdamaged,canCompanyBaskCompanyAforcompensation?Why?Answer（請參看教材P53）案例6（請參看教材P49）Question:案例7（請參看教材P49）Question:Pleasemakeassessmentonthecaseaccordingtowhatyouhavelearnedfromthischapter.Answer（請參看教材P54）案例7（請參看教材P49）Question:案例8（請參看教材P50）Question:Howtolet“Lexmark”brandtrademarkte