InternationalBusinessLawLecturer:謝揚(yáng)E-mail:yang1112fan@Testing&EvaluatingModeCharacteristicsofthiscourse:amajorcompulsorycourseGreatdailyperformance+goodfinalexaminationscore=HighgradeDailyperformancetakes30%Finalexaminationresulttakes70%dailyperformancecontains:1.Attendancerate—5pointswillbedeductedforeachunreasonableabsence.Lateattendancefor3timesisconsideredasoneabsence.2.Classroomdynamics—expressyourviews3.Fufiltheassignments4.caseanalysis(The70casesinthetextbook)Suggestionsonstudy1.Preparenewlessons2.Takenotescarefullyinclass3.Underlinekeypoints4.Reviewthelessonswehavelearnt5.Raisequestionsorturntotheteacherforhelpwheneveryouareintrouble.Chapter1INTRODUCTIONTOINTERNATIONALANDCOMPARATIVELAWDefiningInternationalLawMakingInternationalLawSourcesofInternationallawScopeofInternationalLawinPracticeInternationalPersonsIndividualRightsUnderInternationalLawComparisonofMunicipalLegalSystemsTopicsforthischapter:WhatisInternationalLaw?Historically,dealtwith3kindsofinternationalrelationship：1.thosebetweenstatesandstates;2.thosebetweenstatesandpersons;3.thosebetweenpersonsandpersons.therulesandnormsregulatingtherelationshipsbetweenstates(countries)ThislawbetweennationsiscalledpublicinternationallawWithgrowthofrelationshipsbetweenpersonsandcorporationsindifferentstates,privateinternationallawdevelopedtogoverntheirconductExamplesofPublicand

PrivateInternationalLawSchoolsofThoughtDefiningTheBasisofInternationalLaw(IL)CosmopolitansarguethatILisbaseduponuniversalhumanrights.PositivistssaythatILisbasedonthesovereignequalityofallstatesandstateconsenttoILthroughtreatiesorcustom.HobbesiansclaimthatstateswillmakeagreementsandabidebyILonlywhenitsuitstheirself-interests.GoodwillandCivility

BetweenStates:ComityRepublicofthePhilippinesv.WestinghouseElec.Corp.

43

F3d65(3rdCir,1994)U.S.trialcourtorderedthePhilippinegovernmenttonotharasswitnessesinvolvedinthecase.CourtofAppealsoverturnedtheorder.Heldthatacourtcouldrequestcompliancebyaforeignsovereignasamatterofcomity,butcouldnotordercompliance.Comityrequiresthatwerespectothercountries’sovereigntyandlawsothattheywillrespectours.Case1-1

IgnacioSequihuav.TexacoInc.Comityappliedtoprivatedispute.CourtinTexasdeclinedtoexercisejurisdictionoveractivityandharmthatoccurredinEcuador.TakingjurisdictioninU.S.wouldhaveinterferedwithEcuador’ssovereignrighttocontrolitsownenvironment.Casedismissedunderthedoctrineofcomityofnations.CaseanalysisIgnacioSequihuav.TexacoInc一、當(dāng)事人：原告：厄瓜多爾被告：美國(guó)二、案情簡(jiǎn)介厄瓜多爾聲稱美國(guó)的行為污染了厄瓜多爾的空氣、土地和河流。厄瓜多爾在美國(guó)的德克薩斯州地區(qū)法院提起訴訟。原告要求被告停止侵害，將受污染的土地恢復(fù)原狀，并且提供一筆信托基金用于污染防治。該案件被轉(zhuǎn)移至聯(lián)邦法院，轉(zhuǎn)移程序合法。給予被告提出的要求聯(lián)邦法院駁回原告，不予受理該案的要求，法院最終援引“禮讓”原則解散了這一案件。三、判決結(jié)果聯(lián)邦法院解散了這一案件。四、案件爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)德克薩斯州地方法院、聯(lián)邦法院是否享有該案的管轄權(quán)。五、判決理由1.該案件的爭(zhēng)議行為和侵害事實(shí)都發(fā)生在厄瓜多爾。2.原告均居住于厄瓜多爾，但是被告不是居住在德克薩斯，故德克薩斯州地區(qū)法院的管轄權(quán)有異議。3.對(duì)該案的管轄將侵犯厄瓜多爾對(duì)于其領(lǐng)土內(nèi)的環(huán)境和資源的控制權(quán)，即侵犯其國(guó)家主權(quán)。4.厄瓜多爾強(qiáng)烈反對(duì)德克薩斯州地區(qū)法院對(duì)于該案的管轄。故該案最終被解散。六、案情分析和結(jié)論禮讓原則的適用，就是要求一國(guó)法院在某些情況下不能行使管轄權(quán)，因?yàn)檫@種管轄將侵犯另一國(guó)的法律和利益。U.S.CourtsApplyComityandRefusetoTakeJurisdictionWhen:ThedefendantisasovereignstateDefendanthasinsufficientcontactswiththeU.S.AnotherjudicialforumismoreconvenientCongressdidnotintendU.S.statutetoapplyextraterritoriallyCaseconcernsactofsovereignstateonitsownterritoryTheMakingofInternationalLawGenerally,ILcomesintoeffectonlywhenstatesconsenttoit.Generalconsentfoundinstatepractice–theconductandpracticesofstatesintheirdealingswitheachother.Evidenceofgeneralconsent:DecisionsoftheInternationalCourtofJusticeResolutionspassedbytheUNGeneralAssemblyMultilateraltreaties,conclusionsofinternationalconferences,andprovisionsrepeatedoverandoveragaininbilateraltreaties

Theparticularconsentofastate1.declarationsofitsgovernment2.domesticlegislation3.courtdecisions4.treatiesthestatesignedorenteredinto.SourcesofInternationalLawTreatiesorconventionsInternationalcustomGeneralprinciplesoflawrecognizedbycivilizednationsJudicialdecisionsandteachingsofhighlyqualifiedlegalwritersThislist,ascontainedinArticle38(1)oftheStatuteoftheInternationalCourtofJustice,impliesahierarchy,ororder,inwhichthesesourcesaretobereliedon.TreatiesandConventionsEquivalentsoflegislationinILare:Treaties–legallybindingagreementbetweentwoormorestates.Conventions–legallybindingagreementbetweenstatessponsoredbyaninternationalorganization.CustomaryrulesthatgoverntreatiesarecontainedintheViennaConventionontheLawofTreaties,ratifiedby108countries.CustomAsSourceofInternationalLawCustom–along-establishedtraditionorusagethatbecomescustomarylawifitis:Behavioralelement:Consistentandrecurringaction--Consistentlyandregularlyobserved.(Evidenceofthisfoundinofficialstatementsofgovernments,opinionsoflegaladvisors,executivedecrees,orderstomilitaryforces,andcourtdecisions.)Psychologicalelement:Recognizedbythosestatesobservingitasapracticethattheymustobligatorilyfollow.

GeneralPrinciplesofLawandJusCogensCourtswilloftenrelyupongeneralprinciplesoflawthatarecommontothelegalsystemsoftheworldtosolveinternationaldisputes.Juscogensisaperemptorynormofgeneralinternationallaw,recognizedbytheinternationalcommunityasanormfromwhichnoderogationispermitted.Juscogens-statesmustrespectcertainfundamentalprinciples.Treatiesarevoidiftheyconflictwithjuscogens.Ex:Treatybytwonationstouseviolenceagainstathirdnationviolateshigherstandardofjuscogens.

ScopeofInternationalLawinActualPracticeInternationaltribunalsregardmunicipallawassubservienttointernationallaw.Stateshaveobligationtobringtheirmunicipallawintocompliancewithinternationalnorms.Municipalcourtsoftenbalkatthisobligationbaseduponstrongfeelingsofnationalismandbeliefinpriorityforthesovereignstate’sownlaw.PracticeinMunicipalCourtsInmunicipalcourts,internationallawgenerallytreatedascorrelative.Iftheinternationallawisbasedoncustomarypractice,itisreceivedinaccordancewiththedoctrineofincorporation.CustomaryILispartofdomesticlawtotheextentthatitisnotinconsistentwithpriormunicipallegislationorjudicialdecisionoffinalauthority.Minorityofcourts-doctrineoftransformationCustomaryILisapplicabledomesticallyonlyafteradoptedbylegislation,courtdecision,orlocalusage.

MunicipalCourtReceptionRulesFoundinTreaties–TwoFactorsNatureofthetreaty:Self-executing–containsaprovisionstatingthatthetreatywillapplytothepartieswithouthavingtoadoptdomesticenablinglegislation.Non-Self-Executing–requiresenablinglegislationbeforeeffectivedomestically.Constitutionalstructureoftheratifyingstate:InU.S.,PresidentnegotiatesconstitutionaltreatiesthatarethenratifiedbytheSenate.

Executiveagreements-treatiesenteredintobythePresident,notratified,noteffectivedomestically.InternationalPersonsStatesIndependentstatesDependentstatesInchoatestatesInternationalOrganizationsIntergovernmentalorganizations(IGO)Nongovernmentalorganizations(NGO)InternationalPersons-StatesState-politicalentitycomprisingaterritory,apopulation,agovernmentcapableofenteringintointernationalrelations,andagovernmentcapableofcontrollingitsterritoryandpeoples.Anindependentstateissovereignandoperatesindependentlyinternationally.Adependentstate(PuertoRico)hasformallysurrenderedsomeaspectoftheirpoliticalandgovernmentalfunctionstoanotherstate.Aninchoatestatelackssomeattributesofindependentstate,suchasterritoryorpopulation.RecognitionRecognizedbyotherstatesistheadmittancetoenterintotheinternationalcommunity.It’saunilateraldeclarationwhichiseitherexplicitorimplicit.Therecognitionofagovernmentisdifferentfromtherecognitionofastate.

twotheoriesasguidelinesforagovernmenttoberecognized:Declaratorydoctrine:thelegalexistenceofagovernmenthappensautomaticallywheneveritcancontrolitsterritoryandpeople.Constitutivedoctrine:thegovernmentdoesnottrulycomeintoexistenceuntilotherstatesrecognizedit.EstradaDoctrine:Estrada’sobjectivewasforMexicotoremainneutralinforeigncontroversiesbyrejectingtheusualpracticeofrecognizingforeigngovernments.TerritorialSovereigntyAfterTheRiodeJaneiroConference-1992Modernly,stateshaveadoptednegativeservitudeasformalpartofinternationallaw.Howdoesastateacquireterritory?1.occupationoflandnotclaimedbyanysovereigns2.voluntarytransferofterritoryfromonesovereigntoanother3.conquestandcontinuedoccupationoftheterritoryofanothersovereign.Onceterritoryisacquired,astate’stitleisaffirmedeitherbytheformalrecognitionofotherstatesoraprocessofestoppel.ChangesinTerritorialSovereigntyWithachangeinsovereigntyoverterritory,severallegalconsequencesariseandweapplythefollowingrules:Successorstatesareboundbydispositivetreaties–treatiesconcernedwithrightsoverterritory(boundaries&servitudes.)MergerRule–treatiesineffectinaformerstateremainineffectinitsterritorywhenitbecomespartofanewstate.Ex:TreatiesofbothEgyptandSyriaremainedineffectwhentheymergedintotheUnitedArabRepublicMovingBoundariesRule–treatiesofstateabsorbingnewterritorybecomeeffectivewithinabsorbedterritory.ChangesinTerritorialSovereignty(continued)Ex:France’streatiesdisplacedGermantreatiesinannexedterritoryofAlsace-LorraineatendofWWI.CleanSlateDoctrine–newstatecreatedfromcolonynotboundbytreatiesofitsformercolonialpower.SuccessionofStates–whentwostatesagreetojoinandformsinglestateorwhenastatedissolvesintotwoormorestates,thenewstatesareboundbythepredecessor’streaties.Ex:WhentheSovietUnionsplitin1991,the12republicswereboundbytheexistingtreatiesoftheSovietUnion.InternationalPersons

-InternationalOrganizationsAccordingtotheUnitedNationsCharter,therearetwokindsofinternationalorganizations:Publicorintergovernmentalorganizations(IGO)Privateornongovernmentalorganizations(NGO)IGOisapermanentorganizationsetupbytwoormorestatestocarryonactivitiesofcommoninterest.NGOisaninternationalorganizationmadeupoforganizationsotherthanstates.MaybenonprofitNGOorfor-profitmultinationalenterprise(MNE).

InternationalPersons

-IGOsIGOcharter(Ex:UNCharter)setsoutitsAimsObjectivesInternalstructureResourcesExpresspowersIGOmustberecognizedtohavelegalcapacity–thequalificationorauthoritytodealwithotherinternationalpersonsInternationalPersons

-IGOs

-TheUnitedNationsMostimportantIGOItscharterisamultilateraltreatyOperatesthoughitsorgans-anagencythatcarriesonspecificfunctionswithinalargerorganizations.UNorgansaretheGeneralAssembly,theSecurityCouncil,theInternationalcourtofJustice,theTrusteeshipCouncil,andtheEconomicandSocialCouncil.UnitedNationsSystemNamegiventovariousautonomousorganizations(alsoIGOs)thathaveenteredintoagreementswiththeUNtobeUNagencies.InternationalPersons

-IGOs

-TheEuropeanUnionTheEuropeanUnionisa25-memberIGOcreatedbythefoundingstatesinordertointegratetheireconomiesandpoliticalinstitutions.TheEuropeanTreatyin1992establisheda:politicalunioncommoncitizenshipfornationalsofmemberstatesSocialChartermonetaryunionCentralBank,andcommoncurrency(theeuro).

EUPowersEUhassupranationalpowers.SupranationalpowersarepowerssurrenderedbymemberstatestoanIGO.EUlawissuperiortothelawsofmemberstates.Thismeans:ThememberstatesarerequiredtobringtheirinternallawsintocompliancewithEUlaw,andEx:Commissionv.BelgiumheldthatBelgiummustchangeitslawstopreventdiscriminationagainstlumberproducedinotherstatesTheEUlawisdirectlyeffectivewithinmemberstates

Ex:Costav.ENELheldthatindividualisentitledtoinvoketheEUTreatyinthecourtsofEUmemberstates.Case1-5

CommissionoftheEuropeanCommunitiesv.Fed.Rep.ofGermanyGermanyprohibitedtheimportationandmarketingofmeatproductsfromothermemberstatesthatdidnotcomplywithitsMeatRegulationlaw.NationalrulesrestrictingimportsarecompatiblewiththeEECTreatyonlyasnecessaryfortheeffectiveprotectionofhumanlifeandhealthandemploytheleastrestrictivemeanstoaccomplishthis.Theimportedmeatwasnotinjurioustohealth.Held:GermanymustconformtoEUlawandtheprincipleoffreemovementofgoodsbetweenmemberstates.InstitutionsoftheEU

-TheEuropeanCommissionThemaininstitutionsoftheEUarethe:EuropeanCommission–EU’sexecutivebranchwithsomelegislativefunctioncomprised27individualsappointedbyParliament.Dutiesareto:EnsurethatEUrulesarerespectedProposemeasurestotheEuropeanCouncilImplementEUpoliciesManagethefundsthatmakeuptheEUbudgetSeehttp://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm

InstitutionsoftheEU

-CounciloftheEuropeanUnionMaindecision-makingbodyoftheEU.Exercisesco-decisionswithParliament.Roleisto:Adoptlegislation(withParliament)Adoptannualbudget(withParliament)AdoptinternationalagreementsCoordinatetheeconomicpoliciesofthememberstatesSeehttp://www.consilium.europa.eu

InstitutionsoftheEU

-EuropeanParliamentCo-legislativebodyandmainsupervisoryinstitutionoftheEU.786memberselectedeveryfiveyears.Arrangedbypoliticalparties,notbynationality.Threemainroles:OversightauthorityoverallEUinstitutionsShareslegislativepowerwithCounciloftheEUDeterminestheEU’sannualbudgetwithCounciloftheEUInstitutionsoftheEU

-EuropeanCourtofJusticeIsthesupremetribunaloftheEU.Comprisedof27judgesand8advocates-general.Advocategeneralbriefscasesforjudgesandsuggesthowcasesshouldbedecided.Sitsinchambersofthreetofivejudgesorinplenarysession.Hearsfourkindsofcases:appealsfromtheCourtofFirstInstancecomplaintsbroughtbythecommissionorbyonememberagainstanothermembercomplaintsbroughtbymemberagainstEUinstitutioncomplaintstoannulEUlegalmeasuresInternationalPersons

-otherIGOsGeneralIGOsthataredevotedtopoliticalcooperation,security,&promotionofeconomic,social,andculturaldevelopmentinclude:CouncilofEurope,AfricanUnion,ArabLeague,OrganizationofAmericanStates,CommonwealthofIndependentStates(formerrepublicsoftheSovietUnion).SpecializedIGOsdealwithissuesofmutualinterestsuchasEuropeanSpaceAgencyandInternationalCriminalPoliceAgency(INTERPOL).FreeTradeAreasarecooperativeeconomicIGOs.TheseincludetheNorthAmericanFTA(NAFTA).InternationalPersons

-NongovernmentalOrganizations(NGOs)NonprofitNGOsserveascoordinatingagenciesforprivatenationalgroups.IncludeInternationalBarAssoc.,AmnestyInternational,andtheInternationalCommitteeoftheRedCross.For-profitNGOs,knownastransnationalcorporationsormultinationalenterprises(MNEs),arebusinessesoperatingjointventuresinmultiplecountries.Thesejointventuresbystateshaveincludedspaceandoilexploration.

RightsofIndividualsUnderInternationalLawIndividualshavenodirectrightsundertraditionalviewofIL.Stateallowedtoseekcompensationforinjurytoitsnationalsunderthelawofstateresponsibility.Individualmayassertclaimforviolationofbasichumanrightsintendedtoprotectallpeoplefromcruelandinhumantreatment,threatstotheirlives,and