版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
LegalEnglish
法學(xué)英語(yǔ)
課程教案
ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchDepartment
HeilongjiangUniversity
ChapterI.Jurisprudence
I.Objectives
Afterlearningthischapter,studentsshallbeableto:
1.getacquaintedwiththebasicwordsandphrasesofjurisprudence;
2.understandthefundamentalissuesofjurisprudence,suchaswhatjurisprudenceis,whatlawis,
howtoclassifylaw,andwhatthebasicbranchesoflaware;
3.comprehendtheissuesoflegalculture,legalprofession,legaleducation,andsomebasicsof
socialistlawtheory.
ILSummary
Asthefoundationoflaw,thischapterfirstintroduceswhatjurisprudenceisanditsrelevant
matters,suchasscopeofjurisprudence.Second,itprovidessomeconceptsoflawandclassifies
lawintwoways.Third,itcomestothecomparisonoflegalculturesbetweenChinaandAmerica.
Four,itfocusesonthelegalprofession.Five,itsummarizesthelegaleducationsinCivilLaw
countriesandChina.Finally,itoutlinessocialisttheoryoflaw.
III.Text
BriefContents
1.IntroductiontoJurisprudence......................................................................................2
2.TheOntologyofLaw...................................................................................................7
3.LegalCulture.................................................................................................................13
4.LegalProfession...........................................................................................................24
5.LegalEducation............................................................................................................32
6.SocialistTheoryofLaw..............................................................................................35
1.IntroductiontoJurisprudence
1.1WhatistheScienceofLaw?法學(xué)
Thescienceoflawreferstothescientificactivitiesanditsfruitbasedonthe
studyoflegalorquasi-legalphenomena.Thesystemofscienceoflawmaybe
dividedasfollowingaccordingtodifferentscholarsofdifferentnations:
>UK:D.M.Walker,TheOxfordCompaniontoLaw
Theoreticalscienceoflaw:legaltheoriesandphilosophy,legalhistoryandother
historyoflegalsystems,andresearchoncomparativelaw.
Practicalscienceoflaw:internationallaw,transnationallaw,domesticlaw,and
othersubsidiarydisciplines,suchasforensicmedicine.
>Japan:
Publiclaw:constitution,administrativelaw,andinternationallaw.
Privatelaw:civillaw,businesslaw,civilprocedurelaw,laborlaw,andprivate
internationallaw.
Criminallaw:criminallaw,criminalprocedurelaw,andcriminalpolicy.
Basicscienceoflaw:legalphilosophy,legalsociology,legalhistory,and
comparativelaw.
>China
Basedonbranchesoflaw:jurisprudence,legalhistory,constitution,
administrativelaw,civillaw,criminallaw,procedurelaw,internationallaw,andthe
like.
Basedonepistemology:theoreticallawandpracticallaw,theformerfocuseson
theresearchonfundamentalconcepts,principles,andregularpattern.Thelatter
structureandcontentoflaw,andits'making,interpretation,andapplication.
1.2RelationBetweenJurisprudenceandtheScienceofLaw法理學(xué)
Jurisprudenceconstitutesthefoundationofthescienceoflaw,bywhichthe
generalcharacteristicsandregularpatternsofdifferentdivisionsoflaware
examinedandimportantlytheuniversalprinciplesareoutlined.Meanwhile,
jurisprudenceshouldcontainthemethodologyofthescienceoflaw.Therefore,
thoughjurisprudencedealswithavarietyofissues,theunifyingelementinallthese
aspectsofthestudyisthatineverycasethemainquestionthatisbeinginvestigated
andtowhichananswerisbeingsoughtis,briefly,whatislaw?Essentially,
jurisprudencedealswiththequestionsliketheincidence,development,and
consequenceoflaw.So,generalquestionstobeansweredhavetodowithsuch
mattersasfollowing:
1)Theorigin,sourcesanddevelopmentoflawgenerallyand/orinspecific
societies;
2)Themeaningofspecificlegalconceptsandtheconstructionofvariouslegal
structuresandprocesses;
3)Thefunctionsandvaluesoflaw;and
4)Theoperationofthelawandthelinkbetweenlawandothersocialphenomena
suchaspolitics,economics,cultureandmorality.
1.3TheNatureofJurisprudence:Whatquestionsdoesjurisprudenceanswer?
Jurisprudence
一PhilosophyofLaw
WhatisLaw?
\
/\
AnalyticalNormative分析式;規(guī)范
—Whatthelawis—Whatthelawshouldbe式
Theword'jurisprudence'isderivedfromtwoLatinwords,juris-meaning'of
law'andprudens-meaning'skilled'.Thetermhasbeenusedvariouslyatdifferent
times,rangingfromitsusetodescribemereknowledgeofthelaw,toitsmore
specificdefinitionasadescriptionofthescientificinvestigationoffundamental
legalphenomena.
Astrictdefinitionofjurisprudenceisdifficulttoarticulate.Themainproblem
withjurisprudenceisthatitsscopeofinquiryrangesovermanydifferentsubjects
andtouchesonmanyotherdisciplines,suchaseconomics,politics,sociologyand
psychology.
Asasubject,jurisprudencemaybesaidtoinvolvethestudyofawiderangeof
socialphenomena,withthespecificaimofunderstandingthenature,placeandrole
oflawwithinsociety.Themainquestionwhichjurisprudenceseekstoanswerisof
ageneralnatureandmaybephrasedsimplyas:Whatisthenatureoflaw?This法的本質(zhì)
questioncanbeseenasbeingactuallytwoquestionsinone,thatis:Whatisthe
law?Andwhatconstitutesgoodlaw?
Answerstothesetwoquestionsconstitutetwomajordivisionsinjurisprudential
inquiry.Theseareanalyticaljurisprudenceandnormativejurisprudence.
ThesetwodivisionswerefirstclearlyspecifiedbyJohnAustininhistextThe法理學(xué)范疇
ProvinceofJurisprudenceDetermined(1832).Otherdivisionsandsubdivisions
havebeenidentifiedandarguedforasthefieldofjurisprudenceorlegalphilosophy
hasexpanded.
InthecivillawtraditionofEuropeitmeansthecollectivityofdecisionsa
particularcourt.Inthecommonlawtraditionitmeanslegalphilosophyaboutwhich
weaskwhatislaw,howlawistobedefined,whatareitsessentialaspects,andthe
like.
1.4SomeDistinctionsinJurisprudence
Theworkofjuristscanbedividedintovariousdistinctiveareas,depending
mainlyonthespecificsubjectmatterwithwhichthestudydeals.Whatfollowsare
someofthemoreimportantdivisionsandsubdivisions,althoughitisimportantto
rememberthatthereareothers.
1)BasicDivisions
Analyticaljurisprudence
Involvesthescientificanalysisoflegalstructuresandconceptsandthe
empiricalexerciseinvolvedindiscoveringandelucidatingthebasicelements經(jīng)驗(yàn)主義的
constitutinglawinspecificlegalsystems.Thequestiontobeansweredis:whatis
thelaw?
Normativejurisprudence
Referstotheevaluationoflegalrulesandlegalstructuresonthebasisofsome
standardofperfectionandthespecificationofcriteriaforwhatconstitutes'good'
law.Thisinvolvesquestionsofwhatthelawoughttobe.
2)Subdivisions一般法理學(xué)
Generaljurisprudence
Referstoanabstractedstudyofthelegalrulestobefoundgenerallyinthemore
developedlegalsystems.專門法理學(xué)
Particularjurisprudence
Thespecificanalysisofthestructuresandotherelementsofasinglelegal
system.歷史法理學(xué)
Historicaljurisprudence
Astudyofthehistoricaldevelopmentandgrowthoflegalsystemsandthe
changesinvolvedinthegrowth.批判法理學(xué)
Criticaljurisprudence
Studiesintendedtoprovideanestimationoftherealvalueofexistinglegal
systemswithaviewtoprovidingproposalsfornecessarychangestosuchsystems.社會(huì)法學(xué)
Sociologicaljurisprudence
Seekstoclarifythelinkbetweenlawandothersocialphenomenaandto
determinetheextenttowhichitscreationandoperationareinfluencedandaffected
bysocialinterests.經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)
Economicjurisprudence
Investigatestheeffectsonthecreationandapplicationofthelawofvarious
economicphenomena.
1.5SomeImportantSchoolsofJurisprudence
Apartfromdifferenttypesofjurisprudence,differentschoolsofjurisprudence
exist.
Thereistheclassicdebateovertheappropriatesourcesoflawbetween實(shí)證主義者
positivistandnaturallawschoolsofthought.Generally,Positivistsarguethatthere
isnoconnectionbetweenlawandmoralityandtheonlysourcesoflawarerules實(shí)體
thathavebeenexpresslyenactedbyagovernmentalentityorcourtof自然主義者
law.Naturalists,orproponentsofnaturallaw,insistthattherulesenactedby
governmentarenottheonlysourcesoflaw.Theyarguethatmoralphilosophy,
religion,humanreasonandindividualconsciencearealsointegratingpartsofthe
law.自然法
ANaturallaw
Theoldestandoneofthemostsignificantschoolsofjurisprudenceisthenatural
lawschool,whichholdsthatgovernmentandthelegalsystemshouldreflect
universalmoralandethicalprinciplesthatareinherentinhumannature.
TheconceptofnaturallawtracesitsancientGreece.TheGreekphilosopher
Aristotle(384-322BC)madethedistinctionbetweennaturallawandcommonlaw普通法
(orcalledpositivelaw,writtenlaw).Accordingtohim,naturallaw^everywherehas實(shí)在法,成文
thesameforceanddoesnotexistbypeople'sthinkingorthat."Therefore,natural法
lawismoralprinciplesthatareuniversalinhumansocieties.Conventionallaws,on
theotherhand,reflectthevaluesandmoralsthatareacceptedbyaparticular
societyataparticulartime.
St.ThomasAquinas(AD1225-1274),amedievaltheologian,triedtoreconcile
Aristotle'sphilosophyofnaturallawwithChristianity.Accordingtohim,thereare
fourtypesoflaw.(1)EternallawisGod'splanfortheuniverse.(2)Naturallawis
madeupofthoseaspectsofeternallawthatareaccessibletohumansthrough
reason.(3)DivinelawisGod'sdirectrevelationtohumankindthroughthe
Scriptures.(4)Humanlawsarespecificrulescreatedbymenandwomenaddress
particularproblemsorcircumstances.
Atthebasisofnaturallawistheconceptthatallpersonshavenaturalrights.
JohnLocke,animportantEnglishpoliticalphilosopher,arguedin1689thatnoone
wasbomwithanobligationtoobeyrulers.Heclaimedthatallindividualswere
bornfree,equal,andindependent,andthattheyhadanaturalrighttolife,liberty,
andproperty.Thepurposeofgovernmentwastosecurethoserights.
InourowntimeLonFullerhasattemptedtoapplynatural-lawprinciplestoan
analysisofthelegalsystem.InTheMoralityofLaw(1964),Fullerexaminedour
legalsystemtounderstandits"internalmorality:'Insodoing,helaidoutcertain內(nèi)在的道德
requirementsoraninternallymorallegalsystem:(1)Thelegalsystemshould
comprisereasonablycleargeneralrulesthatareknowntoallcitizensinadvance.
(2)Theserulesshouldnotberetroactive-thatis,theyshouldnotbeappliedto
situationsthatoccurredbeforethoseruleswereestablished.(3)Lawsshouldnotbe
contradictoryorrequiretheimpossible.(4)Lawsshouldremainovertimeand
shouldbeadministeredinaconsistentmanner.Apartthedifferencebetween
Fuller'sformulationofnaturallawandthatofAristotle,heattemptstoidentify
certainunchangedablemoralprinciplesthatshouldformthefoundationofevery
legalsystem.
Inessence,thenaturallawtraditionpresupposesthatthelegitimacyof合法性
conventionalorpositivelawderivesfromnaturallaw.Wheneveritconflictswith
naturallaw,conventionallawloseslegitimacyandthenshouldbechanged.
LaoZi(b.604B.C.)maintainsthatthesystemoflawmostconduciveto
welfareisonethatgivesafullplaytotheinarticulatedictatesofnature.Itiswithin
theboundsofnaturaljusticethattherulermustenforcehislaws.Justiceandreason
aretheonlylegitimatejudgesandexecutioners.Whentherulerreplacesjusticeand
reasonbyhiscaprice,heusurpsthefunctionofthelawofnature.Thereby,he
condemnshimself.
Confucius(551B.C.-478B.C.)holdsthatifarulerdirectspeopletothepractice
ofvirtueandregulatesthemtothatpracticethroughthemediumofmoral
discipline,theywillnaturallyhaveastrongsenseofpersonalhonorandwillbe
orderlyintheirconduct.However,iftheruleremphasizeslawsandresortsto
punishmentfortheirviolation,thepeoplewilltryonlytolivetotheminimum
requirementoflawandwillbedestituteofasenseofpersonalhonor.Therefore,the
mostimportantfunctionofa“judge“istoseethatunderhisjurisdictionthereareno
occasionsforgoingtolaw.Inordertoqualifyforapublicoffice,amanshould
knowhowtoavoidthefourvicesoftyranny,violence,oppression,andmechanical
administrationoflaw.
>PositiveLaw實(shí)證法
Incontrasttonaturallawschool,thepositivistschoolmaintainsthatthereareno
“natural“rights;rightscomeintoexistenceonlywhenthereisasovereignpower
(government)toconferandenforcethoserights.
Attheotherendofthespectrumisthepositivistschoolorpositivism
(formalisticoranalyticaljurisprudence).Thosewhoadheretothisschoolbelieve
thattherecanbenohigherlawthananation'spositivelaw-lawcreatedbya
particularsocietyataparticularpointintime.
TheEnglishphilosopherThomasHobbes(1588-1679)isviewedbymanyas
thefounderofthepositivistapproachtolaw.Hobbesbelievedthatintheoriginal
stateofnature,humanswerenobetterthanmonkeyskillingeachothertogetatthe
fewbananasonthebananatree,andheconcludedthatsovereignpowerwas
necessaryforstabilityandpeace-----infact,forsurvival.Individualsdonothave
any“natural“rights;rather,theypossessonlythoserightsacquiredasaresultof
enforceablelaw.Whetheraparticularlawcanbediscussed,andlawscanbe
changedinanorderlymannerthroughlegitimatelawmakingprocess.Butaslongas
alawexists,itmustbeobeyed.
JohnAustin(1790-1859),oneofthemostimportantthinkersinthetraditionof
legalpositivism,didagreethatmoralityshouldplaysomeroleinshapingthelaw.
ButAustin,likeotherpositivists,believedthatmoraltheoryhasnoroleindefining
whatlawactuallyis,Abadlawisasmuchalawasagoodone:^^Theexistenceof
lawisonething,“hewrote,44itsmeritordemeritisanother7*
ToAustin,thedifferencebetweenalawandanopinionliesinthefactthatalaw
mustbeobeyedonpainofpunishment:Alawisthusa“command”issuedbya
“sovereign."Acommand,accordingtoAustin,hastwocomponents.Thefirstisthe
expressionofadesirethatsomepeopledoornotdosomething;theotherisathreat
orimpliedthreatagainstanyonewhodoesnotcomplywiththatdesire.
ShangYang(?-338B.C.),HanFeizi(280B.C.-223B.C.)
TheChinesepoliticsofthefourthandthirdcenturiesB.C.weremarkedbythe
tendencyforconsolidationofpowerthroughabsorptionofsmallstatesbylarger
ones,eliminationoftheauthorityofthenoblesovertheirpeasants,administration
ofjusticedirectlybytheofficialsofthecentralgovernment,andcentralizedtax
collection.Legalismgrewformsuchpoliticalethos.
ThecontentionbetweentheConfucianismandtheLegalismfocusedonthescopeof
officialjudgmentasagainstfixedandimpersonallaws.TheConfucianscontended
thatlawsmustbeenforcedbymen.Iftherulerandhisofficialswereupright,a
permanentbodyoflawswouldbeunnecessary.Thelegalistscontendedthata
uniformsetofstandardsoughttoapplytotheentirepopulation.Lawoughtnotto
besubjecttothediscretionofmagistrates.Furthermore,theyconceivedoflawas
self-operativeinthesensethattherulerpublisheshisdecreesandafixedpenaltyis
imposedforeachoffense,withoutanyexceptionsforrankorextenuating
circumstances.
Shanglangspeaksofthesupremacyoflawandmaintainsthatacountryis
governedthrough_threeinstrumentalities,namely,(a)laws,(b)thecertaintythatthe
lawswillbeenforced,and(c)thepowertocarrythelawsineffect.
HanFeiZiregardshumannatureasfundamentallyevil.Butunlikehisteacher,
XunZi,hedoesnotbelievethateducationandculturearecapableofredeemingof
it.HedisputestheConfucianargumentthatgovernmentministersshouldbe
selectedonthebasisoftheiruprightcharacter.Hebelievesthatallofficialsare
potentiallydishonestsothateachshouldbemadetoactasacheckupontheothers.
Themassesareignorantandincapableofseeingbeyondtheirownimmediate
interests.Thegovernmentshoulddirectitselftothem.Therefore,heconcludes,a
strictsetoflawsandpenalties,impartiallyenforced,isindispensabletopublic
order.Helikensthesovereigntothehelmsmanofaship.Anintelligentruler
governswiththeIwohandlesofrewardandpunishment.Oncelawshavebeen
established,everyoneshouldobeythem.Inthestateoftheintelligentruler,onlythe
lawsserveasteachings.Therearenootherbooksandrecordsfitforsuchteachings.
This,incidentally,ledthefirstemperoroftheQinEnpiretoburnthebooks,
especiallytheConfucianisttexts.
>SociologicalJurisprudence
Legaltheorysuggestingthatthelawanditsjudicialinterpretationsshould
considerthefindingsofsociology.Sociologicaljurisprudencesuggeststhatboththe
lawandjudicialinterpretationsofitshouldtakeintoaccountthefindingsof
sociology.
>LegalRealism法現(xiàn)實(shí)主義
Aschooloflegalthoughtofthe1920sand1930sthatchallengedmanyexisting
jurisprudentialassumptions,particularlytheassumptionthatsubjectiveelements
playednopartinjudicialreasoning.
Thelegalrealistsgenerallyadvocatedalessabstractandmorerealisticapproach
tothelaw,anapproachthatwouldtakeintoaccountcustomarypracticesandthe
circumstancesinwhichconductstakeplace.Thatistosay,eachcaseisattendedby
auniquesetofcircumstances.
Summary
連續(xù)體
Therearenobrightlinesbetweendifferentschoolsofjurisprudence.Thelegal
philosophyofaparticularlegalscholarmayconsistofacombinationofstrains
frommanyschoolsoflegalthought.Somescholarsthinkthatitismoreappropriate
tothinkaboutjurisprudenceasacontinuum.Theabovementionedschoolsoflegal
法的本體
thoughtsareonlypartofadiversejurisprudentialpicture.Otherprominentschools
oflegalthoughtexist.
法的定義
2.TheOntologyofLaw-DefinitionandClassificationofLaw
2.1DefinitionofLaw
本體
>Plato(B.C427—B.C.347Greece):Lawisaformofsocialcontrol,(functional
perspective—lawissocialcontrol)
>Aristotle(B.C384—B.C.332Greece):Seeinglawasaruleofconduct.
(noumenonperspective—lawisrule)
>MarcusTulliusCicero(B.C.106一B.C.43AncientRome):Lawisthe
agreementofreasonandnature,thedistinctionbetweenthejustandtheunjust,
(originperspective—lawisreason)
>SirWilliamBlackstone(1723—1780TheBritishJurist):Describinglawas“a
ruleofcivilconductprescribedbythesupremepowerinastate,commanding
whatisright,andprohibitingwhatiswrong.”(noumenonperspective—lawis
command)
>OliverWendellHolmes(1841—1935AmericanJurist):Contendingthatlaw
isasetofrulesthatallowedonetopredicthowcourtwillresolveaparticular判決
dispute:"Thepropheciesofwhatthecourtswilldoinfact,andnothingmore
pretentious,arewhatImeanbylaw.”(noumenonperspective—lawis
judgement)
ARoscoePound(1870—1964AmericanJurist):44SometwentyyearsagoI
pointedtwoideasrunningthroughdefinitionsoflaw:oneanimperativeidea,
anideaofarulelaiddownbythelawmakingorganofapoliticallyorganized
society,derivingitsforceformtheauthorityofthesovereign;andtheothera
rationalorethicalidea,anideaofaruleofrightandjusticederivingits
authorityformitsintrinsicreasonablenessorconformitytoidealsofrightand
merelyrecognized,notmade,bythesovereign.^^(functionalperspective-law
issocialcontrol)
>RichardPosner:"Itwillhelptodistinguishthreesensesoftheword'law.'
Thefirstislawasadistinctivesocialinstitution;thatisthesenseinvoked
whenweaskedwhetherprimitiveisreallylaw.Thesecondislawasa
collectionofsetsofpropositions—thesetswerefertoasantitrustlaw,thelaw
oftorts,theStatutesofFrauds,andsoon.Thethirdislawasasourceofrights,
duties,andpowers,asinthesentence'Thelawforbidsthemurderingheirto
inherit.'"
>SocialistView:Lawisasystemofrulesonhumanconduct,madeandratified
bycountry,implementedthroughforceofbodypolitic.Rightsandobligations
serveasregulatingmechanism,conductandrelationofwhichregulating
object.Whatlawreflectsgoestothewillofclassofreign(inthesocietyof
classantagonism)ordumbmillions(insocialist).Thepurposeoflawisto
ratify,protectanddevelopsocialrelationshipandvaluepresumeduponthe法的分類
rulingclassortheruled.
2.2ClassificationofLaw法系
Basedondifferentstandards,therearedifferenttypesoflaw.Here,weintroduce
twoissues.First,severalimportantworldlegalsystemsaretobecomparedbased
ontheirrespectivesharedheritage.Second,thedefinitionsofsomebasicdivisions
oflawaretobegivenbasedontheclassicalapproachoflaw'sclassification.
羅馬日爾曼
民法法系
2.2.1WorldLegalSystems
IntheWorld,therearefourlegalsystemsorlegalfamilieseachofwhichshares
adistinctivetradition.Namely,theyareRomano-GermanicCivilLaw,
Anglo-AmericanCommonLaw,IslamicLaw,andSocialistLaw(Chineselawwill
beintroducedinotherchapters).Theycanbedividedintosubfamilies.Thereare
alsohybrids.Further,therearesomepracticesthatareuniquetoaparticular
country.
ATheRomano-GermanicCivilLawSystem
a.Oldestandmostinfluentialofthelegalfamilies.
b.Sourcesinclude:
1)CorpusJurisCivilis(uTheBodyofCivilLaw")ofRoman
EmperorJustiniancompletedaround534AD.
3)Canonlaw:ThechurchlawofthemedievalRomanCatholic
church.
4)Juscommune:("TheCommonLaw")oflatemedievalEuropethat
wasusedintowns,fairs,andmarkets.
5)Renaissancephilosophies:
a)FrenchHumanists.
b)DutchNaturalists.
6)Seventeenthcenturynationalism:Ledtothewritingofnational
legalcodesinEurope.
c.Mostinfluentialnationalcodes:
1)FrenchCivilCode(CodeNapoleon)of1804.
a)Firstmoderncode.
b)UnderlyingprinciplestakenfromtheFrenchRevolution:
1]Therighttopossessprivateproperty.
2]Thefreedomtocontract.
3]Theautonomyofthepatriarchalfamily.
c)Organizedstructurallyinmuchthesamefashionasthe
JustinianCode.
1]Manyofitsprovisionsweretakenfrom:
a]Juscommune.
b]Frenchroyalordinances.
c]Academicwritings.
d]Customarylaw.
d)DifferencesfromtheGermanCode:法典學(xué)家
1]Writteninashortperiodoftime.
21Itsstyleandformareonethatisstraightforward,easyto
read,andunderstandabletoeveryone.
e)DifferencesfromtheEnglishcommonlaw:Itcontainsflexible
generalrulesratherthandetailedprovisions.
2)GermanCivilCodeof1896.
a)Reasonitwasnotenacteduntil1896:
1]Germanyfirsthadtobecomeanation.
2]Scholarsknownas(iPandectistsf,spentyearsdoing
preliminarystudiesanddraftingthecode.
b)CharacteristicsoftheGermanCode:
1]Incrediblypreciseandtechnical.
b]Specialterminologyisused.
c)DifferencesfromtheFrenchCode:Itismeantexclusivelyfor
theuseoftrainedexperts(notlayreaders).
d)CountrieswithCivilLawsystemsdistinguishbetweenthe
civillawandpublicLaw.
1]Publiclawevolvedseparatelyfromthemovementfor
codificationofcivilorprivatelaw.
a]Civillaw(forcivilianlawyers)isonlythelaw
containedinthecodesanditsauxiliarystatutes(that
is,thelawofpersons,familylaw,propertylaw,
successionlaw,thelawofobligations,commercial
law,laborlaw,andcriminallaw).
b]Publiclawisconstitutionalandadministrativelaw.
2]Publiclawistreatedinavarietyofwaysinthecivillaw
countries.
a]Many
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2026北京西城區(qū)北自科技校園招聘參考考試試題及答案解析
- 2026年鄭州商貿(mào)旅游職業(yè)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握芯C合素質(zhì)考試備考試題含詳細(xì)答案解析
- 2026年寧夏職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握芯C合素質(zhì)考試模擬試題含詳細(xì)答案解析
- 2026年廣東茂名農(nóng)林科技職業(yè)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握芯C合素質(zhì)考試備考題庫(kù)含詳細(xì)答案解析
- 2026年鐵嶺師范高等??茖W(xué)校高職單招職業(yè)適應(yīng)性測(cè)試模擬試題及答案詳細(xì)解析
- 2026年長(zhǎng)沙電力職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握芯C合素質(zhì)筆試備考試題含詳細(xì)答案解析
- 2026年長(zhǎng)白山職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握芯C合素質(zhì)考試備考試題含詳細(xì)答案解析
- 2026年遼寧工程職業(yè)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握芯C合素質(zhì)考試參考題庫(kù)含詳細(xì)答案解析
- 2026廣西崇左憑祥市退役軍人服務(wù)中心見習(xí)人員招聘1人考試參考題庫(kù)及答案解析
- 2026年海南外國(guó)語(yǔ)職業(yè)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握新殬I(yè)技能考試備考試題含詳細(xì)答案解析
- 物資管理實(shí)施細(xì)則
- 2025年北京東城區(qū)天街集團(tuán)有限公司招聘筆試參考題庫(kù)含答案解析
- 結(jié)腸炎與腸道菌群的關(guān)系
- 安全健康與自我管理學(xué)習(xí)通超星期末考試答案章節(jié)答案2024年
- 2024年《國(guó)際貨運(yùn)代理實(shí)務(wù)》考試復(fù)習(xí)題庫(kù)資料(含答案)
- 人教版2019高中英語(yǔ)選擇性必修二(課文語(yǔ)法填空)
- 乳腺炎與乳腺癌關(guān)聯(lián)研究
- 2022年初會(huì)《經(jīng)濟(jì)法》真題答案
- 新華人壽培訓(xùn)講義
- GB/T 22551-2023旅居車輛居住要求
- mdvx節(jié)能證書及第三方檢測(cè)報(bào)告cqc
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論