版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
GETTINGUNDERTHEHOODOFAUTOMOTIVELABORCOSTPERVEHICLE
DanielHirschJimSchmidtJenniferWong
GettingUnderTheHoodOfAutomotiveLaborCostPerVehicle
?OliverWyman
PAGE
10
Theglobalautomotiveindustryisfacingsignificantnewchallengestogrowthandprofitability—fromtariffsintheUnitedStatestoincreasinglyaggressiveChinesecarmarketingoutsideofChinaandasimultaneousslowdowninsalesofbatteryelectricvehicles.Theheightenedcompetitionandcomplicatedeconomicsareputtingpressureonautomakersworldwidetobalanceproduction,right-sizecapacity,andmanagecostseffectivelyto
staycompetitive.
Thecurrentenvironmentisshininganewlightonlaborcostpervehicle,whichconsidersbothwagesandproductivity,andrepresentsakeymetricindetermininganautomaker’scompetitivenessandprofitability.Becauseofthemeasurement’sincreasingimportance,
OliverWyman’sHarbourReportteamrecentlycompletedanin-depthlookatlaborcostpervehicleacrossmorethan250vehicleassemblyplantsworldwide,usingpubliclyavailabledataandthird-partysources.Thenewanalysisalsoconsiderssourcingstrategiesincalculatinglaborcostspervehicle.
Beyondlaborcostpervehicle,thereportgoesontoexamineconversioncost,whichiscalculatedbylookingatdirectandindirectlaborcosts,overheadincludingrent,energyconsumption,equipmentmaintenance,andproductionsupplies,anddepreciation.Thefocusonlaborcostandproductivityprovidesawindowintoaplant’scompetitivenessaslabortypicallyrepresents65%to70%ofthetotalconversioncost.
Exhibit1:Laborcostisamajorcomponentofconversioncosts
35%
65%
Other(IndirectMaterial,Depreciation,Energy)
LaborCost
Source:OliverWymananalysis
Basedonthedata,wecreatedfourgroupingsofcarcompanieswithsimilarlabor-cost-per-vehicleattributesbutoftenwithverydifferentchallengesbeyondlaborcost.Theanalysisrevealssubstantialdifferencesinlaborproductivityandwageratesamongleadingautomotivemanufacturers,whichcouldcomeintoplayasthecompetitiveatmosphereintensifies.
Exhibit2:Fourmainautomakerarchetypesbasedonlaborcostpervehicle
InUSdollars($),2024
Europremiums 2,232
EV-onlymanufacturers 1,660
Mainstreammodelmanufacturers 880
Chinesecarmanufacturers 585
Source:OliverWymananalysis,automotivemanufacturerwebsites,originaldatasourceGlobalData,GermanAssociationoftheAutomotiveIndustry(VDA),Liepin
HEREAREDESCRIPTIONSOFTHEFOURARCHETYPESWEDEVELOPED
EUROPREMIUMS
Withthehighestlaborcostpervehicleatanaverageof$2,232,thiscategoryincludesaselectgroupofEuropeancarcompaniesthatproducepremiumautomobiles,suchasMercedes-Benz,BMW,Audi,andJaguarLandRover.TheEuropremiumcategory’saveragelaborcostpervehicleisnearly$570morethanthenextgroup.
EventhoughVolkswagendoesn’toftencompetedirectlyagainstthesepremiumbrandsforconsumers,itisincludedwithEuropremiumsbecausemostofthebrand’sproductionisinGermany,givingVWasimilarlaborcostpervehicle.Additionally,formanyyears,VWhascommandedahigherpricepointovermainstreammodels,especiallyinEurope.
Therangeoflaborcostpervehicleisalsowidewithsomeofthemanufacturersaveragingcloserto$1,800pervehicleandothersabove$2,900.Onaverage,Germancarproducersdealwithasignificantlyhighlaborcostpervehicleof$3,307—theproductofstronglaborunionsandstrictregulationonworkinghours.Ingeneral,allmembersofthegroupalsohavesizableproductioncostspervehicle,highcapitaldepreciation,andahigherlevelofcomplexityinmanufacturinginvolvingmoreindependentparts.Theimpactoftheseattributesiscompoundedbylowerlaborproductivitycoupledwithelevatedwagecosts.
EV-ONLYMANUFACTURERS
ThesecondgroupiscomposedofstartupEVmanufacturers.WeincludeTeslainthisgroup—eventhoughithasgrownbeyondstartupstatus—becauseitsharesasimilarlaborcostpervehicle.Likemoststartups,italsodoesnotworkwithorganizedlaborcontractsandnegotiatedwageratesandbenefits.Foravarietyofreasons,includingrelativelylowproductionratescomparedwithmainstreamproducers,thisgrouphasrelativelyhighproductioncostpervehicleandrelativelyhighlaborcostspervehicle—twicetheratetheirprimarycompetitionamongmainstreamproducersmustcontendwith.Competitivelaborproductivityischallengingforthegroup—evenwithnon-unionwagerates—becauseoflowerproductionvolumes.Butthereisalsoawiderangeoflaborcostspervehicle,withthelowest$1,502andthehighest$13,291.Thisgroup’scompetitiveedgehasbeenprovidedbysubsidiesandtaxcreditsthatencouragecarmakerstobuildEVandbatteryplantsandconsumerstobuyEVs.TheTrumpadministrationintheUSisworkingtoeliminateincentivesforEVproductionandconsumerpurchases,whichwouldeliminatethiscompetitiveadvantageandcouldaffectthegroup’sabilitytoreachscale.
MAINSTREAMMODELMANUFACTURERS
Themakeupofthisgroupisbroad,consistingoftraditionalautomakersinFrance,Italy,theUnitedStates,Japan,andSouthKorea—allwithmodelsthatboasthighproductionvolumesataffordablepricepoints.Withanaveragelaborcostpervehicleof$880,thisgroupiscompetitivein
termsoflaborproductivityandwages,withmostmaintainingdiversifiedmanufacturingnetworksinbothhigher-andlower-costcountries.Thesecarmakerstendtomaintainolderfactorieswithlowerdepreciation,andtheirproductcomplexityislowerthanthatofEuropremiums.
Buttherearealsosignificantdifferencesbetweenmainstreammembers.Japaneseautomakers,forinstance,maintainarelativelylowlaborcostpervehicleinJapanof$769,whichisonparwithnewerplantsinEasternEurope.In1982,whenTheHarbourReport?publisheditsfirstreportcomparingcostdifferencesbetweenUS-basedmanufacturersandJapanesemanufacturersmakingcarsinJapan,theaverageJapanesecostpervehiclewasover250%lessthanAmericanmanufacturers.Todaythedifferenceis200%,withlaborcostspervehiclestillrepresentingsomeofthegap.TheaverageUSlaborcostpervehicleis$1,341,whichincludestheimpactofthemostrecentunionnegotiationsin2023whentheUnitedAutoWorkersstrikebroughthistoricgainsforautomotiveassemblylineworkers.
CHINESECARMANUFACTURERS
Chinesecarcompanieshavealowaveragelaborcostpervehicleof$585,whichistheproductoflowwagesandhighefficiencyamongcarmanufacturersandthesupplychain.Thatsaid,thereisawiderangeoflaborcostpervehiclebetweendomesticChinesemanufacturersandWestern-affiliatedjointcarproductionoperationslocatedinChina.That’sbecauseChinese-ownedcarcompaniesmaintainlargerworkforcesandlowerproductivitymetricsthanthejointventuresbetweenChineseinterestandWesterncarmanufacturerswhichmaintainworkforcesmorealignedwithWesternoperations.
Thisgroupisclearlyleadingthemarketwiththelowestoverallconversioncost,excludingdepreciation,atone-quarterofwhatthehighestcostpervehiclegroupachieves.Productcomplexityisrelativelylow,andmanufacturingtechnologyattheirmostlygreenfieldfactoriesmatchesthehigheststandardsetbytheindustry.WithanetworkofplantslocatedinChina,wageratesarestillrelativelylow,albeitincreasingrapidlyincoastalareas.AutomationresembleslevelsatmostwesternEuropremiumandmainstreamfactories,andproductivityisrelativelycompetitive.
Exhibit3:Rangesoflaborcostspervehiclewithineachcategory
InUSdollars($),2024
Average
Europremiums
1,829
2,232
2,959
EV-onlymanufacturers
1,502
1,660
13,281
Mainstreammodelmanufacturers
597
880
1,275
Chinesecarmanufacturers
323
585
929
Source:OliverWymananalysis,Automotivemanufacturerwebsites,originaldatasourceGlobalData,GermanAssociationoftheAutomotiveIndustry(VDA),Liepin
GLOBALLABORCOSTDISPARITIES
Theanalysishighlightssubstantialdifferencesinlaborcostsamongleadingautomotivemanufacturingcountries.Perhapssurprisingtosome,Chinaisnolongerthelowestlaborcostpervehiclenation.Today,lowerwageratesarepaidinnations,suchasMoroccoandRomania,andrisingproductionvolumesandproductivityhavepushedthesenewproductioncentersintothetopslotsforlowestlaborcostpervehicle,alongwithMexico.
Morocco,forinstance,hasbecomethelow-costproductioncenterforFrenchmanufacturers,muchinthesamewaytheDetroitThreeautomakershaveoperatedoutofMexicoforthepast40years.FrenchcarmanufacturersnowhavemorethanhalfoftheirproductionoutsideofFrance.
Mexicohasalsobecomeastrategiclow-costproductionbaseforGerman,Japanese,andSouthKoreanautomotivemanufacturers.ThisoffshoringhereandinplaceslikeMoroccohaskeptdownthelaborcostpervehicle,especiallyforthemainstreamcategory.ButthecompetitiveadvantagesprovidedbyMexico’srelativelylowproductioncostsmaybetemperedbyproposedTrumpadministrationtariffs.
Turkey,whilestillamongthetopfivecountrieswiththelowestlaborcostpervehicle,hasbeenaffectedbyhighinflation,whichpushedupwagestolevelscomparablewithJapan.MonthlywagesinTurkeyhavetripledoverthelastthreeyears.
Exhibit4:Laborcostpervehiclebycountry
InUSdollars($),2024
ProductionTrend
(2024vs.2019)
Morocco
106
29%
Romania
273
11%
Mexico
305
4%
Turkey
414
-5%
China
597
24%
Poland
663
-7%
CzechRepublic
691
-2%
Japan
769
-7%
SouthKorea
789
-15%
Slovakia
830
4%
Spain
955
-17%
Canada
968
-30%
UnitedStates
1,341
-2%
France
1,569
-36%
Italy
2,067
-34%
UnitedKingdom
2,333
-31%
Germany
3,307
-13%
Source:OliverWymananalysis,Automotivemanufacturerwebsites,originaldatasourceGlobalData,GermanAssociationoftheAutomotiveIndustry(VDA),Liepin
PRODUCTIONVARIABLESTHATINFLUENCELABORCOSTPERVEHICLE
Inadditiontoregionaldifferencesinlaborcostpervehicle,hereareseveralotherfactorsthathaveasignificantimpactonlaborcostpervehicleandthetotalproductioncostpervehicle:
DESIGNCOMPLEXITY
Oneveryimportantfactoraffectingproductivityand,thus,laborcostpervehicleisengineeredhourspervehicle—ametricreflectingthelevelandsophisticationofengineeringneededtobuildavehicle.Thisincludestheestimatedtimeneededforanoptimaldesignandproduction
processtomakeasinglevehicle.Oftenusedasakeymetricforbenchmarkingefficiency,thelowertheengineeredhourspervehicle,themoreefficientthedesignprocess.Workingtowardlowengineeredhourspervehicleleadstolowerproductioncosts,fasterdevelopmentcycles,andifexecutedproperly,betterproductivityandlowerlaborcostpervehicle.
Exhibit5:Therangeofdesigncomplexityisanimportantfactorinthelaborcostpervehicle.
Engineeredhoursperunit(EHPV),2024
8
32
7
28
6
5
12
11
Europremiums
EV-onlymanufacturersMainstreammodelmanufacturersChinesecarmanufacturers
0
Source:OliverWymananalysis
5 10
15 20 25 30 35
Chineseautomakershavesignificantlyreducedtheirengineeredhourspervehicleoverthelastdecade,keepingitlowerthanothercompetitors.OuranalysishasrevealedChinesecarsrequireone-halfoftheengineeredhourspervehicleoftheEuropremiums.Additionally,mostChineseplantsbenefitfrombeingnewer,greenfieldfactoriesthatprovidemoremanufacturingflexibilityandstate-of-the-artlayouts,equipment,andprocesses.
Chinesefactoriesalsoaretypicallymanufacturingalimitednumberofmodelvariants,withalimitednumberofpropulsiontechnologiesandindependentpartscomparedwithEuropeanpremiumcarmakers.Thisstrategyhasadvantagesintermsofinvestmentsandflexibilityandhasledtolowerengineeredhourspervehicleandlaborcostpervehicle,whichultimatelycutsoverallproductioncosts.
Fordecades,themajorityofmainstreamcarmakershavefocusedonloweringengineeredhourspervehicle,evenasfeaturesandcontentcontinuetobeadded.ThisgroupisnownotfarawayfrommatchingChinesemanufacturers,whichhashelpedmainstreamautomakerscuttheirlaborcostspervehicle.
EXPANDINGCONSUMERCHOICESDOESN’TCOMECHEAP
Offeringcustomersmorechoicesmayendupboostingsales,butitcanreduceefficiencyatassemblyplantsandboostcosts.Oneplacethisisbeingfeltiswiththeincreasingnumberofpowertrains—gas,diesel,hybrid,andall-electric—beingofferedandproduced.
Efficientautomakersutilizesplitlinesanddynamicsequencestohandledifferentpowertrainvariants,butaccommodatingtheaddedcomplexityoftenraisesthelaborcostpervehicleaswellastheoverallconversioncostsasitoftenrequiresalargermanufacturingfootprintinthefactory,moreequipmentandhigherenergyconsumption.Thereisaclearcorrelationbetweencostsandthenumberofindependentpartsperfactory,withmorepartsresultinginhighercosts.
Linebalancing,complexlogistics,andhighspacerequirementscontributetoveryhighcostspervehicle.Unfortunately,thehighcomplexityoftheproductnolongertranslatesintohighermarginsinthemarket,andproducersofcomplexvehiclescannolongercompensateforthehighercostsoftheirfactorieswithincreasedmargins.
ENERGYCOSTS
Energycostsarenotincludedincalculationsoflaborcostspervehicle,buttheycangreatlyenhanceordetractfromaccomplishmentsinloweringlaborcostspervehicle.Ourresearchshowssignificantvariationsintheseadditionalcostspermarket.Forinstance,GermanandFrenchautomakersfacedifferentsituationswhenitcomestoenergypricing.WhilenaturalgascostsinGermanyhavebeenrisingbecauseoftheinvasionofUkraineandaddingtoGermanautomakers’productioncostspervehicle,Frenchcarcompanydomesticproductionisbenefitingfromlowerratesfromincreasedrelianceonnuclearpowerandloweroilprices.Meanwhile,Chinakeepsenergycostsdownwithcontinuedrelianceoncoal,despitepledgestoreducecarbonemissions.
SUPPLYCHAINRESTRUCTURING
Whilealsonotdirectlypartoflaborcostpervehicle,disruptioninthesupplychaincanaffectitbycuttingproductivityasworkerswaitforpartstoarrive.SincetheCOVID-19pandemicandthe
semiconductorchipshortageearlierthisdecade,restructuringthesupplychainhasbeenamajorfocusoftheautoindustry.Whetheraimedatreducingrisksorpreventinglogisticalbottlenecks,automakersarelookingtodual-sourcingandnear-shoringtobringstabilitytosourcingpartsandrawmaterials.Recently,theequationalsoincludesdeterminingtheimpactofthreatenedtariffsandothergeopoliticalstrainsthatcouldinterruptthesupplychain.
RECOMMENDEDSTRATEGIESFOREACHAUTOMAKERCATEGORY
Automakersgloballyfacesignificantdisparityinlaborcostspervehiclewiththecompetitiveadvantagesanddisadvantagesthatgowiththedifferences.Therearestrategiesthateacharchetypecouldpursuetobettercapitalizeonadvantagesandtemperdisadvantages.
Europremiums:Theneedtorestructure
Thisgroupneedssignificantrestructuringtoachievebetterfocusinitsproductportfolioandmarginoptimizationandpreparefortheprospectofatariffwarbetweenmajortradingpartners.SincethegrouphasreliedheavilyonChinaforbothsalesandlowercostproduction,Europremiumsshouldconsiderredesigningtheirproductionfootprintnowtoenhanceefficiencyandprofitabilitytooffsetpotentialtariffs.
Tomaintainattractivemargins,thetargetlaborcostpervehiclefortheEuropremiumsshouldbecloserto$1,500—33%lowerthanthecurrentaverage.Sinceitwouldbedifficultandunpopulartocutwages,thegoalshouldbetoincreaseproductivitybyimprovingengineeredhourspervehicle.Bycollaboratingwithsuppliersandstakeholdersearlyintheproductdevelopmentprocess,themajorcarcompaniescanreducecomplexityandidentifycost-savingopportunitiesbeforeproductionbegins.Earlyengagementwithsuppliersandevenpotentialinvestmentinkeyonescanleadtoinnovativeproductionfootprintsthatmitigatetheimpactofincreasedcosts.
EV-onlymanufacturers:Definingthepathtoscale
EmergingplayersintheEVsector,suchasRivian,arenavigatingthechallengesofscalinguptheiroperationsandestablishingdefinedproductionsystems.Thepursuitofscaleandefficiencyinproductionprocessesiscriticalforthesecompaniesastheystrivetobalancegrowthwith
costmanagement.
ThisistrueevenforamoreestablishedplayerlikeTesla,whichisstilllookingtobuilditsplantinMexicoandstruggleswithlowutilizationatitsBerlinfacility.Thejourneytowardsachievinga
streamlinedproductionsystemisessentialforthesestartupstoreducelaborcostsandenhancetheircompetitivepositioninginthemarket.Additionally,achievingmorescalewillbenefittheirsupplychainnetwork,openinglargeropportunitiesandsavingsachievedfrommorevolume.
Inthecurrentmarket,oneofthebiggestchallengesallEVproducersfaceisthereductionofgovernmentalsubsidies,oftennecessaryfortheestablishmentofnewtechnology.IntheUS,theexpectationisforalltaxcreditsandcorporatesubsidiestobereducedorwipedoutbythe
newadministration.Butsubsidiesinotherpartsoftheworldhavebeendeclininginrecentyears,whichputsnewcomersatadisadvantagetomoreestablishedEVbrands.
Mainstreammodelmanufacturers:Keepcostslowerthroughtechnologyinvestment
Severalmainstreamcarmakers,suchasHyundai,RenaultandStellantis,leveragestrongcapitaldepreciationandefficientmanufacturingprocesses,includingkeepingengineeredhourspervehiclelow,tokeepcostsdown.Thetradeoffhasbeencuttingthenumberofchangesfromonemodelyeartothenextandfromonemodeltothenext.Whilethisstrategyhaskeptproductioncostsdownandlaborcostspervehicleonparwithothercarcompaniesinitspeergroup,ithasthedownsideoflowertechnologyintegration.Mainstreamautomakers—especiallythoseinEuropewhereChinesecarcompaniesarebeginningtomakeheadwayinthemarket—mustchoosetherighttechnologiesfortheirmarketstokeeppacewithChinesemodels,especially
insoftware,infotainmentsystems,andautonomousdriving.Thehighestcostreductionleversfortheseproducersliewithinthesupplychainthroughright-sourcing,whichofteninvolvesinsourcingsmallerpartsandtechnologies.
Carmakersinthisgroupwithrisinglaborcostpervehicle,suchastheDetroitThreeautomakers,needtocontinueinvestingindigitaltechnologiestoenhancetheiroperationalefficiencyanddata-drivendecision-making.Byleveragingdigitaltoolssuchasvisionsystems,digitaltwiningandautomatedlogistics,manufacturerscanoptimizetheirproductionprocesses,improvelaborproductivity,andmaintainprofitabilitydespiteexternalpressures.
Chinesecarmanufacturers:Establishbrandvaluebywinningthequalityrace
Whilecostsarealreadylowfortheseautomakers,therearecost-savingpotentialsthroughinvestmentsinquality.ImprovingthequalityoftheirvehicleswillbeakeysuccessfactorinthecomingyearstobuildtheirbrandvalueandgaintrustintheEuropeanandAmericanmarkets,whichcouldmeanasignificantvolumeincrease.Mostqualityissuesarecausedbysuppliersanddesignflawsthatcanberemediedthroughdisciplinedsupplierperformanceprocesses.
Establishingaresilientsupplychainandincreasingproductmaturitywillbetoppriorities.Yearsago,SouthKoreanmanufacturershadasimilarchallengetoincreasebrandvalueoutsideofSouthKoreabutovercameit.HyundaiMotorGroup,whichincludesHyundaiandKia,isnowthethird-largestglobalcarmanufacturer.
CONCLUSION
Astheautomotiveindustrynavigatesarapidlychangingenvironmentmarkedbyproposedtariffsandcompetitivepressures,OliverWyman’slaborcostpervehicleanalysiswillhelpautomakerswithcriticalinsightsintopivotalcostlevers.Lookingahead,weplanfuturereleasesandanalysesoverthenextmonthsonothercriticalindustrytopics,includingtariffs,sourcing,batteryelectricvehicledemand,andChineseexpansionintheautomotivesector.
METHODOLOGY
Whatislaborcostpervehicle?
FromthedeskofTheHarbourReport?,thepre-eminentauthorityofautomotivemanufacturingbenchmarking,OliverWymanconductedathoroughanalysisofworkforce,wages,productionandsourcingofsubassembliesandservicesforglobalcarmanufacturersinkeyregionsoftheworld,includingNorthAmerica,Europe,China,Japan,andSouthKorea.Thefindingsinourlaborcostpervehiclestudyarebasedonextensiveresearch,aswellasourexperienceastrustedadvisersintheindustry.Theeffortincludedresearchingvehicleassemblyplantsproducing
cars,trucksandSUVswithinternal-combustionengines,hybrid-andbattery-electricpropulsionsystems.Theanalysisisbasedonpubliclyavailableinformationasofyearend2024unlessotherwisestated.
OliverWymanshallnothaveanyliabilitytoanythirdpartyinrespectofthisreportoranyactionstakenordecisionsmadeinconnectionwiththecontentofthereport.
Theopinionsexpressedhereinarevalidonlyforthepurposestatedhereinandasofthedatehereof.Informationfurnishedbyothers,uponwhichallorportionsofthisreportarebased,isbelievedtobereliablebuthasnotbeenverified.Nowarrantyisgivenastotheaccuracyofsuchinformation.PublicinformationandindustryandstatisticaldataarefromsourcesOliverWymandeemstobereliable;however,neitherOliverWymannoranyproviderofsourcedatamakesanyrepresentationastotheaccuracyorcompletenessofsuchinformationandOliverWymanhasacceptedtheinformationwithoutfurtherverification.Noresponsibilityistakenforchangesinmarketconditionsorlawsorregulationsandnoobligationisassumedtorevisethisreporttoreflectchanges,events,orconditi
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- (新教材)2026年滬科版七年級(jí)下冊(cè)數(shù)學(xué) 7.3 一元一次不等式組 課件
- 護(hù)理實(shí)踐學(xué)習(xí)題庫(kù)
- 老年人臨終關(guān)懷的護(hù)理要點(diǎn)
- 2025年便攜式超聲設(shè)備供應(yīng)合同
- 2025年白酒品牌推廣合作合同
- 人工智能安全風(fēng)險(xiǎn)測(cè)評(píng)白皮書(2025年)
- 國(guó)際食品產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈整合研究
- 城市設(shè)計(jì)中的非物質(zhì)文化傳承
- 審計(jì)題目模板及答案
- 2026 年中職景觀藝術(shù)設(shè)計(jì)(景觀設(shè)計(jì))試題及答案
- 科研項(xiàng)目進(jìn)度管理與質(zhì)量控制
- 《信息系統(tǒng)安全》課程教學(xué)大綱
- 民族學(xué)概論課件
- 新產(chǎn)品開發(fā)項(xiàng)目進(jìn)度計(jì)劃表
- 2024年湖南石油化工職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握新殬I(yè)技能測(cè)試題庫(kù)及答案
- 2020年科學(xué)通史章節(jié)檢測(cè)答案
- 長(zhǎng)期臥床患者健康宣教
- 穿刺的并發(fā)癥護(hù)理
- 設(shè)計(jì)公司生產(chǎn)管理辦法
- 企業(yè)管理綠色管理制度
- 2025年人工智能訓(xùn)練師(三級(jí))職業(yè)技能鑒定理論考試題庫(kù)(含答案)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論