2025年英語(yǔ)專業(yè)八級(jí)考試翻譯實(shí)戰(zhàn)專項(xiàng)訓(xùn)練試卷考試時(shí)間：______分鐘總分：______分姓名：______試卷內(nèi)容翻譯(英譯漢)directions:ReadthefollowingpassagecarefullyandthentranslateitintoChinese.WriteyourtranslationneatlyonANSWERSHEET2.(Points:30)Theriseofartificialintelligence(AI)hasprecipitatedprofounddiscussionsregardingitsethicalimplications,adiscoursethatisincreasinglymovingbeyondtheoreticalspeculationintopracticalpolicyconsiderations.Centraltothesedebatesisthequestionofalgorithmicbias—howpre-existingsocietalprejudicescanbeinadvertentlyembeddedwithinAIsystemsthroughbiasedtrainingdataorflawedalgorithms.Thisphenomenonposessignificantrisks,potentiallyleadingtodiscriminatoryoutcomesincriticalareassuchashiring,loanapprovals,andcriminaljustice.Forinstance,anAIusedforhiringmightinadvertentlyfavourcandidatesfromcertaindemographicgroupswhileexcludingothers,perpetuatingexistinginequalitiesratherthanmitigatingthem.Addressingthisissuerequiresmultifacetedefforts.Technically,developersneedtoimplementrigoroustestingprocedurestoidentifyandrectifybiases.Furthermore,thereisapressingneedforestablishingclearregulatoryframeworksthatmandatetransparencyandaccountabilityinAIdecision-makingprocesses.Ethically,fosteringapublicunderstandingofAI'scapabilitiesandlimitationsiscrucialforinformedengagementwiththistransformativetechnology.Onlythroughaconcerted,interdisciplinaryapproachinvolvingtechnologists,policymakers,andthepubliccanwehopetoharnessthebenefitsofAIwhilemitigatingitsethicalrisksandensuringamoreequitablefuture.試卷答案翻譯(英譯漢)解析1.第一句解析:*"Theriseofartificialintelligence(AI)hasprecipitatedprofounddiscussionsregardingitsethicalimplications":關(guān)鍵在于理解"precipitated"意為“迅速引發(fā)，促成”，"profounddiscussions"指“深刻的討論”，“regardingitsethicalimplications”是“關(guān)于其倫理含義”。*"adiscoursethatisincreasinglymovingbeyondtheoreticalspeculationintopracticalpolicyconsiderations":這是一個(gè)同位語(yǔ)從句，修飾"discussions"。核心是理解"discourse"在此處指“討論”，“movingbeyondtheoreticalspeculationintopracticalpolicyconsiderations”意為“從理論思辨轉(zhuǎn)向?qū)嶋H的政策考量”。*譯文處理:將長(zhǎng)句拆分或調(diào)整語(yǔ)序，如將同位語(yǔ)內(nèi)容提前或后置，確保中文表達(dá)流暢?！耙l(fā)了...的深入討論”對(duì)應(yīng)"hasprecipitatedprofounddiscussions"，“越來(lái)越多地從...轉(zhuǎn)向...”對(duì)應(yīng)"increasinglymovingo..."。2.第二句解析:*"Centraltothesedebatesisthequestionofalgorithmicbias":"Centralto"意為“處于...中心”，“thesedebates”指代前文的討論，“algorithmicbias”是核心術(shù)語(yǔ)，指“算法偏見”。*"howpre-existingsocietalprejudicescanbeinadvertentlyembeddedwithinAIsystemsthroughbiasedtrainingdataorflawedalgorithms":這是一個(gè)名詞性從句，解釋"thequestionofalgorithmicbias"。關(guān)鍵在于理解"pre-existingsocietalprejudices"（社會(huì)固有偏見）,"inadvertentlyembedded"（不自覺地嵌入）,"biasedtrainingdata"（有偏見的訓(xùn)練數(shù)據(jù)）,"flawedalgorithms"（存在缺陷的算法）。*譯文處理:名詞性從句可翻譯為“...的問(wèn)題”，即“算法偏見問(wèn)題在于...”。將長(zhǎng)句拆分，如將"how..."部分單獨(dú)成句或用“即”、“也就是說(shuō)”連接。“不自覺地”對(duì)應(yīng)"inadvertently"，“嵌入”對(duì)應(yīng)"embeddedwithin"。3.第三句解析:*"Thisphenomenonposessignificantrisks":"Thisphenomenon"指代前文所述的算法偏見，“posessignificantrisks”意為“帶來(lái)了重大風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”。*"potentiallyleadingtodiscriminatoryoutcomesincriticalareassuchashiring,loanapprovals,andcriminaljustice":這是一個(gè)現(xiàn)在分詞短語(yǔ)作結(jié)果狀語(yǔ)，說(shuō)明風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的具體表現(xiàn)?！皃otentiallyleadingto”意為“可能導(dǎo)致”，“discriminatoryoutcomes"（歧視性結(jié)果），“criticalareas"（關(guān)鍵領(lǐng)域），如列舉的"hiring,loanapprovals,andcriminaljustice"（招聘、貸款審批和刑事司法）。*譯文處理:使用“這種風(fēng)險(xiǎn)可能導(dǎo)致...”來(lái)引出分詞短語(yǔ)的翻譯?！瓣P(guān)鍵領(lǐng)域”對(duì)應(yīng)"criticalareas"，列舉部分保持清晰。4.第四句解析:*"Forinstance,anAIusedforhiringmightinadvertentlyfavourcandidatesfromcertaindemographicgroupswhileexcludingothers":"Forinstance"引導(dǎo)舉例?！癮nAIusedforhiring”指“一個(gè)用于招聘的AI系統(tǒng)”，“mightinadvertentlyfavour”意為“可能會(huì)無(wú)意中偏愛”，“candidatesfromcertaindemographicgroups”指“某些群體背景的候選人”，“whileexcludingothers”意為“同時(shí)排斥另一些群體”。*"perpetuatingexistinginequalitiesratherthanmitigatingthem":這是另一個(gè)現(xiàn)在分詞短語(yǔ)，與"favour...whileexcluding..."形成對(duì)比，說(shuō)明其加劇不平等?！皃erpetuating”意為“加劇，使永久化”，“existinginequalities”指“現(xiàn)有的不平等”，“ratherthanmitigatingthem”意為“而非緩解它們”。*譯文處理:"Forinstance"譯為“例如”。將兩個(gè)分詞短語(yǔ)分別處理，如“可能會(huì)無(wú)意中偏愛...同時(shí)排斥...”和“從而加劇而非緩解...”。保持邏輯清晰。5.第五句解析:*"Addressingthisissuerequiresmultifacetedefforts":"Addressingthisissue"指“解決這一問(wèn)題”，“requires”意為“需要”，“multifacetedefforts”指“多方面的努力”。*"Technically,developersneedtoimplementrigoroustestingprocedurestoidentifyandrectifybiases":"Technically"意為“從技術(shù)角度看”?！癲evelopers”指“開發(fā)者”，“needtoimplement”意為“必須實(shí)施”，“rigoroustestingprocedures”指“嚴(yán)格測(cè)試程序”，“toidentifyandrectifybiases”是目的狀語(yǔ)，意為“以識(shí)別和糾正偏見”。*譯文處理:"Technically"引導(dǎo)技術(shù)層面的內(nèi)容?！靶枰睂?duì)應(yīng)"requires"，“實(shí)施”對(duì)應(yīng)"implement"，“嚴(yán)格測(cè)試程序”對(duì)應(yīng)"rigoroustestingprocedures"，“以識(shí)別和糾正偏見”對(duì)應(yīng)"toidentifyandrectifybiases"。6.第六句解析:*"Furthermore,thereisapressingneedforestablishingclearregulatoryframeworks":"Furthermore"意為“此外”，“thereisapressingneedforestablishing”意為“迫切需要建立”，“clearregulatoryframeworks”指“明確的法律監(jiān)管框架”。*"thatmandatetransparencyandaccountabilityinAIdecision-makingprocesses":這是一個(gè)定語(yǔ)從句，修飾"frameworks"?！皌hatmandate”意為“強(qiáng)制要求”，“transparencyandaccountability”指“透明度和問(wèn)責(zé)制”，“inAIdecision-makingprocesses”指“在AI決策過(guò)程中”。*譯文處理:"Furthermore"譯為“此外”。定語(yǔ)從句可翻譯為“需要建立...的框架”?！皬?qiáng)制要求”對(duì)應(yīng)"mandate"，“透明度和問(wèn)責(zé)制”對(duì)應(yīng)"transparencyandaccountability"，“在AI決策過(guò)程中”對(duì)應(yīng)"inAIdecision-makingprocesses"。7.第七句解析:*"Ethically,fosteringapublicunderstandingofAI'scapabilitiesandlimitationsiscrucialforinformedengagementwiththistransformativetechnology":"Ethically"意為“從倫理角度看”，“fosteringapublicunderstandingofAI'scapabilitiesandlimitations”是動(dòng)名詞短語(yǔ)作主語(yǔ)，意為“增進(jìn)公眾對(duì)AI能力與局限性的理解”，“iscrucialfor”意為“對(duì)于...至關(guān)重要”，“informedengagement”指“明智的互動(dòng)”，“withthistransformativetechnology”指“與這項(xiàng)變革性技術(shù)”。*譯文處理:"Ethically"引導(dǎo)倫理層面的內(nèi)容。動(dòng)名詞短語(yǔ)作主語(yǔ)，可翻譯為“...對(duì)于...至關(guān)重要”?！霸鲞M(jìn)...的理解”對(duì)應(yīng)"fosteringapublicunderstanding"，“能力與局限性”對(duì)應(yīng)"capabilitiesandlimitations"，“明智的互動(dòng)”對(duì)應(yīng)"informedengagement"，“變革性技術(shù)”對(duì)應(yīng)"transformativetechnology"。8.第八句解析:*"Onlythroughaconcerted,interdisciplinaryapproachinvolvingtechnologists,policymakers,andthepubl