2025年托??谡Z模擬測(cè)試卷:中美科技競(jìng)爭態(tài)勢(shì)及未來展望_第1頁
2025年托??谡Z模擬測(cè)試卷:中美科技競(jìng)爭態(tài)勢(shì)及未來展望_第2頁
2025年托??谡Z模擬測(cè)試卷:中美科技競(jìng)爭態(tài)勢(shì)及未來展望_第3頁
2025年托??谡Z模擬測(cè)試卷:中美科技競(jìng)爭態(tài)勢(shì)及未來展望_第4頁
2025年托??谡Z模擬測(cè)試卷:中美科技競(jìng)爭態(tài)勢(shì)及未來展望_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩2頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

2025年托??谡Z模擬測(cè)試卷:中美科技競(jìng)爭態(tài)勢(shì)及未來展望考試時(shí)間:______分鐘總分:______分姓名:______Part1Youwillnowbeaskedaquestionaboutafamiliartopic.Afteryouhearthequestion,youwillhave30secondstothinkaboutyouranswerand60secondstospeak.Prompt:Manypeopleconsidertechnologytobethemostsignificantinfluenceontheirdailylivestoday.Whatisanexampleofaspecifictechnologythathashadamajorimpactonyourlifeorthelivesofpeoplearoundyou?Explainhowithaschangedthings,usingspecificreasonsandexamplesfromyourownexperienceorobservations.Part2Youwillnowbeaskedaquestionaboutapointofvieworadecision.Afteryouhearthequestion,youwillhave30secondstothinkaboutyouranswerand60secondstospeak.Prompt:Somepeoplebelievethatgovernmentsshouldinvestheavilyinfundingbasicscientificresearchthatmaynothaveimmediatepracticalapplications,evenifitseemsrisky.Othersbelievethatfundingshouldprimarilyfocusonresearchwithclear,short-termbenefitsforsocietyandtheeconomy.Whatisyourview?Usespecificreasonsandexamplestosupportyouropinion.Part3Youwillnowfirstlistentoashortconversationorashortlecture.Then,youwillreadashortpassagerelatedtothetalk.Finally,youwilllistentothetalkagain.Afteryouhearthesecondtalk,youwillbeaskedaquestionaboutwhatyouheardandread.Afteryouhearthequestion,youwillhave30secondstoprepareyourresponseand60secondstospeak.(Scenario:Auniversityprofessorisdiscussingtheroleofgovernmentgrantsinfundingtechstartups.)Professor:"So,inourdiscussionlastweekaboutthetechindustry,wetouchedontheimportanceoffunding.Today,let'slookatgovernmentgrants.Somearguetheyarecrucialforfosteringinnovation,especiallyinfieldslikequantumcomputingorbiotechwhereprivateinvestmentmightbetooriskyorslow.Agrantcanprovidetheinitialseedmoneyforateamtoprovetheirconcept.However,otherspointoutthatgovernmentfundingoftencomeswithbureaucracyandisn'talwaysefficient.Theybelievethatventurecapital,drivenbymarketdemandandpotentialprofit,isactuallybetteratidentifyingandnurturingsuccessfulstartups.Itselectsbasedoncommercialviability,whichoftenleadstomoreproductsthatreachconsumers.So,thedebatecontinuesaboutthemosteffectivewaytosupportthenextgenerationoftechcompanies."(ReadingPassage):"Governmentfundingoftechnologicalresearchanddevelopmentisoftenadvocatedonthegroundsthatsuchresearchpromiseslong-termbenefitsforsociety.Critics,however,contendthatwithouttheprofitmotivedrivingit,government-fundedresearchislessefficientandlesslikelytoyieldcommerciallyviableproducts.Theyarguethatprivatesectorinvestment,whilepotentiallymorefocusedonimmediatereturns,hashistoricallybeentheprimaryengineoftechnologicalinnovationandeconomicgrowthinthetechnologysector.Therefore,resourcesshouldbedirectedtowardsinitiativeswithclearer,moreimmediateapplications."Question:Summarizethemainpointsmadeinthetalkabouttheroleofgovernmentgrantsinfundingtechstartups.Thenexplainhowthepointsmadeinthereadingpassagecontrastwiththoseinthetalk.Part4Youwillnowlistentoashortlecture.Then,youwillreadashortpassagerelatedtothetalk.Finally,youwilllistentothelectureagain.Afteryouhearthesecondtalk,youwillbeaskedaquestionaboutwhatyouheardandread.Afteryouhearthequestion,youwillhave30secondstoprepareyourresponseand60secondstospeak.(Scenario:AuniversitylectureabouttheethicalimplicationsofAIdevelopment.)Lecturer:"Whenwetalkabouttherapidadvancementofartificialintelligence,wemustconsidertheethicalchallengesitpresents.Onemajorconcernisjobdisplacement.AsAIsystemsbecomemorecapable,theycouldpotentiallyautomatetaskscurrentlyperformedbyhumans,leadingtosignificantworkforceshifts.Proponentsargue,however,thathistoryshowstechnologyeventuallycreatesnewjobsevenasitdisplacesoldones,andthatweshouldfocusoneducationandretrainingtoadapt.Anotherethicalissueisbias.AIalgorithmsaretrainedondata,andifthatdatareflectsexistingsocietalbiases,theAIcanperpetuateorevenamplifythem.Ensuringfairnessrequirescarefulalgorithmdesignanddiversedatasets.Finally,there'sthequestionofaccountability.Ifanautonomousvehiclecausesanaccident,whoisresponsible?Themanufacturer,thesoftwaredeveloper,ortheowner?ThesearecomplexquestionsthatsocietyneedstoaddressasweintegrateAImoredeeplyintoourlives."Question:Thereadingpassagediscussesanewreportontheimpactofartificialintelligenceonsociety.Explainthemainpointsofthereportaspresentedinthelecture.Thenstatewhetheryouagreeordisagreewithoneofthepointsmadeinthereport,andexplainyourreasoning.試卷答案Part1*SampleAnswer:"Ithinksmartphoneshavehadahugeimpactonmylifeandeveryonearoundme.Beforesmartphones,wehadtouseseparatedevicesforcalls,texts,maps,cameras,etc.Now,onedevicedoesitall,makingcommunicationincrediblyconvenient.Forexample,Iuseitforvideocallswithfamilyoverseasalmosteveryday,whichfeelsverypersonalandeasy.Also,navigationappshelpmefindthequickestroutestoworkorschool,savingalotoftime.Itconnectsusconstantly,butalsomeanswe'reoftendistractedbynotifications.Overall,it'schangedhowwestayintouch,getinformation,andmanageourdailyschedules."*解析思路:*識(shí)別技術(shù):明確回答了“具體技術(shù)”是什么(智能手機(jī)),這是回答的基礎(chǔ)。*闡述影響(如何改變):提供了具體的例子說明智能手機(jī)如何改變了生活(溝通方式、獲取信息、日常安排)。例如,提到了視頻通話、導(dǎo)航應(yīng)用。*使用具體理由和例子:“幾乎每天與海外家人視頻通話”、“導(dǎo)航應(yīng)用幫助找到路線”是具體的例子,支撐了“巨大影響”和“改變”的觀點(diǎn)。*提及復(fù)雜性(加分項(xiàng)):可以簡要提及雙面性(如連接與分心),顯示更深入的思考,但非必需。*結(jié)構(gòu)清晰:回答有中心(智能手機(jī)),有條理地說明了影響和具體例子。Part2*SampleAnswer:"Ibelievethatgovernmentsshouldinvestinbasicscientificresearch,evenifitseemsriskyanddoesn'thaveimmediateapplications.Mymainreasonisthathistoryhasshownusthatmanyofthetechnologieswenowtakeforgrantedoriginatedfromfundamentalresearchthatwasinitiallyconsideredspeculative.Thinkabouttheinternetorantibiotics–theyweren'tdevelopedwithimmediatecommercialgoalsinmindinitially.Basicresearchexpandsourknowledgebaseandpavesthewayforfutureinnovationsthatwecannotpredicttoday.Whileappliedresearchwithshort-termbenefitsisimportant,long-termprogressoftenreliesonthefreedomtoexplorefundamentalquestionswithoutthepressureofimmediatereturns.Thiskindofinvestmentiscrucialforsocietaladvancementoverthelonghaul."*解析思路:*明確立場(chǎng):清晰表明了觀點(diǎn)(支持政府投資基礎(chǔ)研究)。*提供理由1:使用歷史例子(互聯(lián)網(wǎng)、抗生素)說明基礎(chǔ)研究是重大創(chuàng)新的源頭,即使最初沒有短期應(yīng)用目標(biāo)。*提供理由2:強(qiáng)調(diào)基礎(chǔ)研究的作用是擴(kuò)展知識(shí)和為未來創(chuàng)新鋪路,突顯其長期價(jià)值。*對(duì)比論證:將基礎(chǔ)研究與應(yīng)用研究進(jìn)行對(duì)比,說明兩者角色不同,但基礎(chǔ)研究不可或缺。*使用具體例子和詞匯:提到了具體技術(shù)(互聯(lián)網(wǎng)、抗生素),“speculative”(投機(jī)的)、“knowledgebase”(知識(shí)基礎(chǔ))、“societaladvancement”(社會(huì)進(jìn)步)等詞匯提升了回答質(zhì)量。*結(jié)構(gòu)完整:有觀點(diǎn)、有多個(gè)理由支撐,并進(jìn)行了對(duì)比。Part3*SampleAnswer:"Inthelecture,theprofessordiscussedtwomainviewsongovernmentgrantsfortechstartups.First,hementionedthatsupportersbelievegrantsareessentialforfundinghigh-risk,fundamentalresearchinareaslikequantumcomputing,asprivateinvestmentmightbetoosloworcautious.Second,theprofessorpointedoutthatcriticsarguegovernmentfundingisn'tefficientduetobureaucracyandthatventurecapital,drivenbymarketdemandandprofit,isactuallybetteratselectingpromisingstartupsandleadingtocommerciallysuccessfulproducts.Thereadingpassage,however,takesadifferentstance.Itstatesthatgovernmentfundingofresearchisoftenjustifiedbypotentiallong-termsocietalbenefits.Conversely,itarguesthatwithouttheprofitmotive,governmentresearchislessefficientandthatprivatesectorinvestment,focusedonimmediatereturns,hashistoricallybeenthemaindriverofinnovationandeconomicgrowthinthetechfield.So,thelecturepresentsthedebatebetweensupportforgovernmentgrantsforrisk-takingandsupportforprivatefundingbasedoncommercialviability,whilethereadingpassagelargelyfavorsprivateinvestmentandquestionstheefficiencyandnecessityofgovernmentfunding,emphasizinglong-termsocietalbenefits."*解析思路:*總結(jié)講座要點(diǎn):準(zhǔn)確概括了教授提到的兩點(diǎn)對(duì)立觀點(diǎn)(支持者認(rèn)為政府資助風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究重要;批評(píng)者認(rèn)為政府資助低效,私企更好)。*總結(jié)閱讀要點(diǎn):準(zhǔn)確概括了閱讀文章的核心論點(diǎn)(支持政府資助基于長遠(yuǎn)社會(huì)效益;但質(zhì)疑政府研究效率,認(rèn)為私企基于利潤驅(qū)動(dòng)更能創(chuàng)新)。*對(duì)比差異:清晰地指出了講座(呈現(xiàn)辯論)與閱讀(傾向于私企,質(zhì)疑政府效率)在觀點(diǎn)上的不同之處。例如,講座承認(rèn)政府資金的作用,而閱讀更批判性地看待政府資金;講座對(duì)比了兩種資金方式,閱讀更側(cè)重于批判政府方式。*語言準(zhǔn)確:使用了準(zhǔn)確的術(shù)語(governmentgrants,venturecapital,bureaucracy,commercialviability,long-termsocietalbenefits,profitmotive)。*結(jié)構(gòu)清晰:先說講座觀點(diǎn),再說閱讀觀點(diǎn),最后點(diǎn)明兩者對(duì)比和差異。Part4*SampleAnswer:"Thelecturepresentedthreemainethicalchallengesrelatedtothedevelopmentofartificialintelligence.First,itdiscussedjobdisplacement,arguingthatwhileAIcouldautomatetasksandcauseworkforceshifts,historysuggestsnewjobswilleventuallyemerge.Second,ithighlightedtheissueofbias,explainingthatAIalgorithmscaninheritandamplifysocietalbiasespresentintheirtrainingdata,requiringcarefuldesignanddiversedatasetstoensurefairness.Third,thelectureaddressedaccountability,posingthecomplexquestionofwhoisresponsiblewhenanautonomousvehicleorotherAIsystemcausesharm–themanufacturer,de

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論