2025年CATTI三級(jí)筆譯專項(xiàng)真題集考試時(shí)間：______分鐘總分：______分姓名：______第一部分英譯漢directions:ReadthefollowingpassagecarefullyandthentranslateitintoChineseintothespaceprovidedbelow.(Writenomorethan400words.)Theconceptof"smartcity"hasgainedsignificanttractioninrecentyears,drivenbyrapidtechnologicaladvancementsandtheurgentneedforsustainableurbandevelopment.Atitscore,asmartcityutilizesinformationandcommunicationtechnologies(ICTs)tocollectandanalyzedatafromvariousurbansystems—suchastransportation,energy,andpublicsafety—aimingtoenhancetheefficiencyofcityoperationsandthequalityoflifeforresidents.However,theimplementationofsmartcityinitiativesisnotwithoutitschallenges.Onemajorconcernrevolvesarounddataprivacyandsecurity.Ascitiesbecomemoreinterconnectedthroughsensorsanddigitalplatforms,thepotentialformisuseofpersonalinformationincreases,raisingethicalquestionsaboutsurveillanceandautonomy.Additionally,thedigitaldividepresentsasignificantbarrier.Whiletechnologycanbridgegaps,itcanalsoexacerbateinequalitiesifaccessanddigitalliteracyarenotevenlydistributedamongallcommunities.Anothercriticalissueistherelianceonproprietarytechnologiesandthecreationof"vendorlock-ins."Manysmartcityprojectsdependonspecificcompaniesorplatforms,limitingflexibilityandpotentiallyleadingtohighercostsinthelongrun.Moreover,thesustainabilityofthesetechnologiesmustbescrutinized.Theenergyconsumptionofextensivedigitalinfrastructureandthee-wastegeneratedbyfrequentlyupdateddevicesposeenvironmentalrisksthatcannotbeignored.Ultimately,thesuccessofsmartcityinitiativeshingesonaholisticapproachthatbalancestechnologicalinnovationwithsocialequity,environmentalresponsibility,androbustgovernanceframeworks.Withoutaddressingthesemultifacetedchallenges,thevisionofsmarter,morelivablecitiesmayremainoutofreach,despitetheallureofcutting-edgetechnology.第二部分漢譯英directions:ReadthefollowingpassagecarefullyandthentranslateitintoEnglishintothespaceprovidedbelow.(Writenomorethan400words.)中國(guó)古代哲學(xué)中的“中庸”思想，強(qiáng)調(diào)在處理復(fù)雜事務(wù)時(shí)尋求平衡與適度。這一理念認(rèn)為，過猶不及，最理想的狀態(tài)往往存在于兩個(gè)極端之間。例如，在個(gè)人修養(yǎng)方面，過度追求權(quán)力或財(cái)富可能導(dǎo)致道德敗壞，而完全忽視物質(zhì)需求則可能妨礙正常生活。因此，“中庸”主張采取一種溫和、理性的態(tài)度，根據(jù)具體情況靈活調(diào)整行為，避免走向極端?！爸杏埂彼枷氩粌H適用于個(gè)人品德，也關(guān)乎社會(huì)治理。一個(gè)公正的政府應(yīng)當(dāng)避免過度集權(quán)或放任自流。對(duì)民眾過于嚴(yán)苛的統(tǒng)治可能引發(fā)反抗，而過于寬松的政策則可能造成混亂。因此，理想的統(tǒng)治者應(yīng)像一位技藝精湛的弓箭手，既能拉緊弓弦，又能保持適當(dāng)張力，使力量得到最佳發(fā)揮。在當(dāng)今社會(huì)，“中庸”的智慧依然具有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。在全球化的浪潮下，各國(guó)文化相互碰撞，不同意識(shí)形態(tài)激烈交鋒。此時(shí)，固守己見或盲目追隨他人都可能帶來負(fù)面后果。“中庸”啟示我們，應(yīng)當(dāng)以開放包容的心態(tài)看待差異，既要堅(jiān)持自身原則，也要尊重他人選擇，通過對(duì)話與協(xié)商尋求共識(shí)。同時(shí)，在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中，既要追求效率，也要關(guān)注公平；既要擁抱創(chuàng)新，也要保護(hù)環(huán)境。唯有如此，才能實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)的和諧穩(wěn)定與可持續(xù)發(fā)展。試卷答案第一部分英譯漢Theconceptof"smartcity"hasgainedsignificanttractioninrecentyears,drivenbyrapidtechnologicaladvancementsandtheurgentneedforsustainableurbandevelopment.Atitscore,asmartcityutilizesinformationandcommunicationtechnologies(ICTs)tocollectandanalyzedatafromvariousurbansystems—suchastransportation,energy,andpublicsafety—aimingtoenhancetheefficiencyofcityoperationsandthequalityoflifeforresidents.However,theimplementationofsmartcityinitiativesisnotwithoutitschallenges.Onemajorconcernrevolvesarounddataprivacyandsecurity.Ascitiesbecomemoreinterconnectedthroughsensorsanddigitalplatforms,thepotentialformisuseofpersonalinformationincreases,raisingethicalquestionsaboutsurveillanceandautonomy.Additionally,thedigitaldividepresentsasignificantbarrier.Whiletechnologycanbridgegaps,itcanalsoexacerbateinequalitiesifaccessanddigitalliteracyarenotevenlydistributedamongallcommunities.Anothercriticalissueistherelianceonproprietarytechnologiesandthecreationof"vendorlock-ins."Manysmartcityprojectsdependonspecificcompaniesorplatforms,limitingflexibilityandpotentiallyleadingtohighercostsinthelongrun.Moreover,thesustainabilityofthesetechnologiesmustbescrutinized.Theenergyconsumptionofextensivedigitalinfrastructureandthee-wastegeneratedbyfrequentlyupdateddevicesposeenvironmentalrisksthatcannotbeignored.Ultimately,thesuccessofsmartcityinitiativeshingesonaholisticapproachthatbalancestechnologicalinnovationwithsocialequity,environmentalresponsibility,androbustgovernanceframeworks.Withoutaddressingthesemultifacetedchallenges,thevisionofsmarter,morelivablecitiesmayremainoutofreach,despitetheallureofcutting-edgetechnology.解析思路1.首句解析："gainedsignificanttraction"譯為“獲得廣泛認(rèn)可/受到廣泛關(guān)注”，結(jié)合語(yǔ)境指其流行程度。“drivenby”譯為“由...驅(qū)動(dòng)/推動(dòng)”，“informationandcommunicationtechnologies(ICTs)”譯為“信息和通信技術(shù)(ICTs)”并保持原文縮寫，“variousurbansystems”譯為“各種城市系統(tǒng)”，“enhancetheefficiency...andthequalityoflife”譯為“提高城市運(yùn)營(yíng)效率和生活質(zhì)量”，注意“atitscore”譯為“其核心”。2.第二句解析："implementation...isnotwithoutitschallenges"譯為“實(shí)施...并非沒有挑戰(zhàn)/面臨挑戰(zhàn)”，“revolvesaround”譯為“圍繞”，“dataprivacyandsecurity”譯為“數(shù)據(jù)隱私和安全”，“potentialformisuse”譯為“被濫用的可能性”，“raisesethicalquestions”譯為“引發(fā)倫理問題”，“digitaldivide”譯為“數(shù)字鴻溝”，“exacerbateinequalities”譯為“加劇不平等”，“ifaccessanddigitalliteracyarenotevenlydistributed”譯為“如果訪問權(quán)和數(shù)字素養(yǎng)不能平均分配”，注意長(zhǎng)句的拆分和邏輯連接詞的使用。3.第三句解析："Anothercriticalissueis”譯為“另一個(gè)關(guān)鍵問題是”，“relianceonproprietarytechnologies”譯為“對(duì)專有技術(shù)的依賴”，“creationof'vendorlock-ins'”譯為“‘供應(yīng)商鎖定’的產(chǎn)生”，“dependonspecificcompaniesorplatforms”譯為“依賴于特定公司或平臺(tái)”，“l(fā)imitingflexibility”譯為“限制靈活性”，“potentiallyleadingtohighercosts”譯為“可能導(dǎo)致長(zhǎng)期成本更高”，“sustainabilityofthesetechnologies”譯為“這些技術(shù)的可持續(xù)性”，“scrutinized”譯為“受到審視”，“extensivedigitalinfrastructure”譯為“廣泛的數(shù)字基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施”，“frequentlyupdateddevices”譯為“頻繁更新的設(shè)備”，“poseenvironmentalrisks”譯為“帶來環(huán)境風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”，注意專業(yè)術(shù)語(yǔ)的準(zhǔn)確翻譯。4.第四句解析："Ultimately,thesuccess...hingeson”譯為“最終，成功...取決于”，“holisticapproach”譯為“整體方法/綜合方法”，“balances”譯為“平衡”，“technologicalinnovationwithsocialequity,environmentalresponsibility,androbustgovernanceframeworks”譯為“技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、社會(huì)公平、環(huán)境責(zé)任和健全的治理框架”，“Withoutaddressing”譯為“如果不解決”，“multifacetedchallenges”譯為“多方面的挑戰(zhàn)”，“visionofsmarter,morelivablecities”譯為“更智能、更宜居的城市愿景”，“mayremainoutofreach”譯為“可能無法實(shí)現(xiàn)”，“despitetheallureofcutting-edgetechnology”譯為“盡管尖端技術(shù)具有吸引力”，注意總結(jié)性語(yǔ)句的翻譯，保持邏輯清晰。第二部分漢譯英TheChinesephilosophyof"Zhongyong"emphasizesseekingbalanceandmoderationindealingwithcomplexmatters.Thisconceptholdsthatextremesareequallyundesirable,andtheidealstateoftenexistsbetweentwoextremes.Forexample,inpersonalcultivation,anexcessivepursuitofpowerorwealthmayleadtomoralcorruption,whilecompletelyignoringmaterialneedsmayhindernormallife.Therefore,"Zhongyong"advocatesadoptingamildandrationalattitude,adjustingone'sactionsflexiblyaccordingtospecificcircumstances,andavoidingextremes."TheZhongyong"philosophyalsopertainstogovernance.Ajustgovernmentshouldavoidexcessivecentralizationorcompletelaissez-faire.Harshruleoverthepeoplemayprovokeresistance,whileoverlylenientpoliciesmaycausechaos.Therefore,anidealrulershouldbelikeanexpertarcher,capableofpullingthebowstringtautwhilemaintainingpropertension,thusharnessingstrengthoptimally.Thewisdomof"Zhongyong"remainshighlyrelevantintoday'ssociety.Amidthewavesofglobalization,culturesclash,anddifferentideologiesconfronteachotherfiercely.Insuchcircumstances,beingrigidlyattachedtoone'sownviewsorblindlyfollowingotherscanleadtonegativeconsequences."Zhongyong"advisesustoadoptanopenandinclusivemindsettowardsdifferences,堅(jiān)持自身原則，也要尊重他人選擇，通過對(duì)話與協(xié)商尋求共識(shí)。同時(shí),ineconomicdevelopment,onemustpursueefficiencywhilealsoattendingtofairness;embraceinnovationwhileprotectingtheenvironment.Onlybydoingsocansocietyachieveharmoniousstabilityandsustainabledevelopment.解析思路1.首句解析："Chinesephilosophyof'Zhongyong'"譯為“中國(guó)‘中庸’哲學(xué)”，“emphasizesseekingbalanceandmoderation”譯為“強(qiáng)調(diào)尋求平衡與適度”，“indealingwithcomplexmatters”譯為“在處理復(fù)雜事務(wù)時(shí)”，“thisconceptholdsthat”譯為“這一理念認(rèn)為”，“extremesareequallyundesirable”譯為“過猶不及”，“idealstateoftenexistsbetweentwoextremes”譯為“最理想的狀態(tài)往往存在于兩個(gè)極端之間”，“personalcultivation”譯為“個(gè)人修養(yǎng)”，“excessivepursuit”譯為“過度追求”，“moralcorruption”譯為“道德敗壞”，“completelyignoringmaterialneeds”譯為“完全忽視物質(zhì)需求”，“hindernormallife”譯為“妨礙正常生活”，“advocatesadopting”譯為“主張采取”，“mildandrationalattitude”譯為“溫和、理性的態(tài)度”，“adjustingone'sactionsflexiblyaccordingtospecificcircumstances”譯為“根據(jù)具體情況靈活調(diào)整行為”，“avoidingextremes”譯為“避免走向極端”，注意文化概念“中庸”的翻譯和引號(hào)使用。2.第二句解析："pertainstogovernance"譯為“關(guān)乎社會(huì)治理”，“justgovernment”譯為“公正的政府”，“shouldavoidexcessivecentralizationorcompletelaissez-faire”譯為“應(yīng)當(dāng)避免過度集權(quán)或放任自流”，“Harshruleoverthepeople”譯為“對(duì)民眾過于嚴(yán)苛的統(tǒng)治”，“provokeresistance”譯為“引發(fā)反抗”，“overlylenientpolicies”譯為“過于寬松的政策”，“causechaos”譯為“造成混亂”，“therefore,anidealruler”譯為“因此，理想的統(tǒng)治者”，“shouldbelikeanexpertarcher”譯為“應(yīng)該像一位技藝精湛的弓箭手”，“pullingthebowstringtautwhilemaintainingpropertension”譯為“既能拉緊弓弦