2026年托福英語寫作專項練習(xí)題目及參考Task1:IntegratedWriting(30分鐘，綜合寫作)說明：本部分包含1題，計30分?？忌栝喿x一篇學(xué)術(shù)文章，聽取一段相關(guān)講座，然后根據(jù)講座內(nèi)容對文章觀點進行總結(jié)、對比或反駁。題目1(1題，30分):閱讀文章：ArecentstudypublishedintheJournalofEnvironmentalSciencearguesthaturbangreenspaces,suchasparksandcommunitygardens,shouldbeprioritizedincityplanningtoimprovepublichealth.Thearticlehighlightsthreekeybenefits:reducedstresslevels,increasedphysicalactivity,andenhancedmentalwell-being.Accordingtotheresearchers,greenspacesactasnatural"stressbuffers,"helpingresidentscopewithurbanpressures.Additionally,theseareasencouragewalkingandoutdoorexercise,whichcombatobesityandcardiovasculardiseases.Thestudyconcludesthatcitieswithhighergreenspacedensityreportlowerratesofmentalhealthissues,suchasanxietyanddepression.講座內(nèi)容：Auniversityprofessorchallengesthearticle'sconclusions.Theprofessornotesthatwhilegreenspacesdoprovidesomehealthbenefits,thestudyoversimplifiestheissue.First,theresearchreliesonself-reporteddata,whichmaybebiased.Second,theprofessorarguesthatsocioeconomicfactorsplayamoresignificantroleinpublichealthoutcomesthangreenspaceavailability.Forexample,low-incomeneighborhoodsoftenlackbothgreenspacesandaccesstohealthcare,makingitdifficulttoisolatetheimpactofgreenareasalone.Finally,theprofessorsuggeststhatthestudyfailstoconsideralternativesolutions,suchasimprovingpublictransportationtoreducetraffic-relatedstress.寫作任務(wù)：Summarizethepointsmadeinthelecture,explaininghowtheycastdoubtonthepointsmadeinthereadingpassage.參考答案及解析：答案：Thelecturechallengesthereadingpassage'sclaimthaturbangreenspacesaretheprimarysolutionforimprovingpublichealth.Theprofessorarguesthatthestudy'sconclusionsareflawedforthreemainreasons.First,theprofessorquestionsthereliabilityoftheresearchbecauseitdependsonself-reporteddata,whichmaybesubjective.Forinstance,residentsmightoverstatetheirstresslevelsorphysicalactivitytoappearhealthierthantheyare.Thismethodologicalweaknessunderminesthestudy'svalidity.Second,theprofessoremphasizesthatsocioeconomicfactorsaremoreinfluentialthangreenspaceavailabilityindetermininghealthoutcomes.Inmanylow-incomeareas,peoplelackbothaccesstogreenspacesandadequatehealthcare,makingitimpossibletoattributebetterhealthsolelytogreenareas.Thestudyfailstoaccountfortheseconfoundingvariables.Finally,theprofessorcriticizesthestudyforignoringalternativesolutionstourbanhealthproblems.Shesuggeststhatimprovingpublictransportationcouldreducetraffic-relatedstress,whichisanothermajorcontributortopoormentalhealth.Byfocusingonlyongreenspaces,theresearchersoverlookmorepracticalandwidespreadinterventions.Insummary,thelectureeffectivelydebunksthereadingpassage'soversimplifiedviewbyhighlightingmethodologicalweaknesses,theimportanceofsocioeconomiccontext,andtheexistenceofalternativesolutions.解析：1.準(zhǔn)確總結(jié)講座觀點：答案明確指出教授的三個反駁點——數(shù)據(jù)可靠性、社會經(jīng)濟因素影響、替代方案——與原文形成對比。2.邏輯清晰：使用"First,""Second,""Finally"等連接詞，使論證層次分明。3.語言自然：避免生硬的AI式表達(dá)，采用簡潔的學(xué)術(shù)英語，如"methodologicalweaknesses,""confoundingvariables."Task2:IndependentWriting(30分鐘，獨立寫作)說明：本部分包含1題，計30分。考生需就某一話題提出個人觀點，并支持論點。題目2(1題，30分):話題：Somepeoplebelievethatgovernmentsshouldspendmoremoneyonimprovingpublictransportation(e.g.,subways,buses)ratherthanonbuildingnewroads.Othersarguethatnewroadsarenecessarytoreducetrafficcongestion.Whichapproachdoyouprefer?Usespecificreasonsandexamplestosupportyouranswer.參考答案及解析：答案：Istronglypreferthatgovernmentsprioritizeinvestmentsinpublictransportationovernewroadconstruction.Whilenewroadsmayoffershort-termrelieffromtrafficcongestion,theyfailtoaddresstherootcausesofurbanmobilityissuesandoftenleadtounintendedconsequences.Incontrast,expandingpublictransitsystemspromotessustainability,equity,andlong-termeconomicgrowth.First,investinginpublictransportationismoreenvironmentallyfriendly.Unlikeroads,whichencouragecardependencyandcontributetoairpollution,trainsandbusescanmovelargenumbersofpeopleefficientlywhilereducingcarbonemissions.Forexample,citieslikeCopenhagenandAmsterdamhavesuccessfullyreducedtrafficjamsandpollutionbyinvestinginbike-sharingprogramsandhigh-frequencymetrosystems.Theseinitiativesnotonlyimproveairqualitybutalsoattractbusinessesandresidentswhovalueeco-friendlyliving.Second,publictransportationbenefitssocialequity.Inmanyurbanareas,low-incomefamiliesrelyonbusesandsubwaystocommutetoworkoraccesshealthcare.Newroads,however,primarilyserveprivatevehicles,exacerbatinginequalitybyisolatingthosewithoutcars.Forinstance,inNewYorkCity,thesubwaynetworkconnectsaffordablehousingwithjobcenters,whereassuburbansprawlhasmadeitharderforlow-incomeresidentstoreacheconomicopportunities.Finally,publictransitiseconomicallysustainableinthelongrun.Whileroadconstructionrequiresconstantmaintenanceandleadstohigherfuelcosts,well-designedtransitsystemscangeneraterevenuethroughticketsalesandreducedparkingfees.Tokyo’s地鐵system,forexample,isself-sufficientandhasspurredcommercialdevelopmentalongitsroutes.Roads,bycontrast,oftenrequireadditionaltaxestofundrepairs,divertingresourcesfromotherpublicservices.Inconclusion,althoughnewroadsseemlikeaquickfixfortraffic,theycreatedependencyonfossilfuels,widensocialgaps,anddrainfinances.Publictransportationoffersamoreholisticsolutionbypromotingsustainability,equity,andeconomicefficiency.Governmentsshouldthereforefocusonexpandingtransitnetworkstobuildsmarter,morelivablecitiesforfuturegenerations.解析：1.明確立場：首段清晰表明觀點，避免模糊表述。2.分點論證：使用"First,""Second,""Finally"結(jié)構(gòu)，每個段落圍繞一個核心論點展開。3.例證豐富：引用具體城市案例（如哥本哈根、紐約、東京），增強說服力。4.語言流暢：避免AI式套話，采用自然銜接（如"Forexample,""Incontrast"），符合學(xué)術(shù)寫作風(fēng)格。Task1:IntegratedWriting(30分鐘，綜合寫作)說明：本部分包含1題，計30分?？忌栝喿x一篇學(xué)術(shù)文章，聽取一段相關(guān)講座，然后根據(jù)講座內(nèi)容對文章觀點進行總結(jié)、對比或反駁。題目3(1題，30分):閱讀文章：AreportbytheWorldHealthOrganizationsuggeststhatremoteworkpoliciescanimproveemployeeproductivityandreduceworkplacestress.Thearticlearguesthatvirtualcollaborationtools(e.g.,Zoom,Slack)havemadeitpossibleforteamstoworkeffectivelyfromhome.Additionally,thereporthighlightsbenefitssuchasreducedcommutingtime,lowerofficeoverheadcosts,andincreasedflexibilityforemployees.However,theauthorscautionthatremoteworkmayleadtoisolationanddecreasedteamcohesion.講座內(nèi)容：Abusinessconsultantchallengesthereport'soptimisticview.Theprofessornotesthatwhileremoteworkcanboostproductivityinsomecases,italsocreatesnewchallenges.First,thestudyoverlookstheimpactof"digitalfatigue"—employeeswhospendhoursonvideocallsexperienceburnoutandreducedcreativity.Second,theprofessorarguesthatremoteworkunderminescompanyculturebecausein-personinteractionsareessentialforbuildingtrust.Forexample,astudybyStanfordUniversityfoundthatremoteworkersreportedfeelinglessconnectedtotheirteamsthanoffice-basedemployees.Finally,theprofessorsuggeststhatthereportfailstoaddresstheissueofunequalaccesstoremoteworkopportunities,asemployeesinlow-payingjobsoftenlackthenecessaryequipmentorstableinternetconnections.寫作任務(wù)：Summarizethepointsmadeinthelecture,explaininghowtheycastdoubtonthepointsmadeinthereadingpassage.參考答案及解析：答案：Thelecturechallengesthereadingpassage'sclaimthatremoteworkuniversallyimprovesproductivityandemployeewell-being.Theprofessorraisesthreekeyconcerns:digitalfatigue,culturalerosion,andunequalaccesstoremotework.First,theprofessorarguesthatthereportignoresthenegativeeffectsofprolongedscreentime.Thestudysuggeststhatremoteworkersaremoreproductivebecausetheyavoidofficedistractions,buttheprofessorpointsoutthat"digitalfatigue"canleadtoexhaustionandcreativitystagnation.Forinstance,employeeswhoattenddailyvideomeetingsmayexperiencementalfatigue,makingtheirworklessefficientinthelongrun.Second,theprofessorcriticizesthereportforunderestimatingtheimportanceofface-to-faceinteractionsinteamcohesion.Whilethestudymentionspotentialchallengeslikeisolation,theprofessorclaimsthatremoteworkfundamentallyweakenscompanyculture.Stanford’sresearchonremoteemployeessupportsthis,showingthatin-personcollaborationfosterstrustandinnovation,whichvirtualtoolscannotfullyreplicate.Finally,theprofessorhighlightsthereport’sfailuretoaddresssocioeconomicdisparitiesinremotework.Shenotesthatthestudyassumesallemployeeshaveequalaccesstotechnology,butthisisnottrueforlow-wageworkers.Withoutreliableinternetorhomeoffices,theseemployeesstruggletoperformremotely,makingthepolicyunfair.Insummary,thelectureeffectivelyquestionsthereadingpassage’soptimisticviewbypointingouttherisksofdigitalfatigue,culturaldecline,andunequalaccesstoremotework.解析：1.精準(zhǔn)概括：答案明確指出教授的三個反駁點，與原文形成直接對比。2.引用研究：提及StanfordUniversity的研究，增強學(xué)術(shù)性。3.邏輯連貫：使用"First,""Second,""Finally"及過渡句（如"Forexample"），保持論證清晰。Task2:IndependentWriting(30分鐘，獨立寫作)說明：本部分包含1題，計30分?？忌杈湍骋辉掝}提出個人觀點，并支持論點。題目4(1題，30分):話題：Somepeoplebelievethatmuseumsshouldbefreetovisittoencouragepubliceducation,whileothersarguethatchargingadmissionisnecessarytofundpreservationandexhibitions.Whichviewdoyouagreewith?Usespecificreasonsandexamplestosupportyouranswer.參考答案及解析：答案：Istronglyagreethatmuseumsshouldchargeadmissionfees,asthisensuresfinancialsustainability,supportspreservationefforts,andalignswiththeprivateenterprisemodelofculturalinstitutions.Whilefreeaccessmayseemidealforpubliceducation,itignoresthepracticalchallengesofmaintaininghigh-qualityexhibitsandhistoricsites.First,chargingadmissionallowsmuseumstofundcriticalpreservationwork.InstitutionsliketheLouvreandtheBritishMuseumrelyonticketsalestorestoreagingartifactsandmaintaininfrastructure.Withoutrevenue,manyhistoricalsiteswoulddeteriorateduetobudgetcuts.Forexample,theNationalMuseumofRomehasincreasedticketpricestoallocatefundsforurgentrepairstoancientfrescoes.Second,feeshelpmuseumsmaintaincompetitivestandardsinexhibitions.High-qualitydisplaysrequireexpensivetechnology,speciallighting,andprofess