1、Chapter 4 EXPLANATION FOR A WORKING INVENTION第4章 一個已實現(xiàn)發(fā)明的講解When a mathematician engaged in investigating physical actions and results has arrived at his own conclusions, may they not be expressed in common language as fully, clearly, and definitely as in mathematical formulae? If so, would It not be

2、 a great boon to such as well to express them so translating them out of their heiroglyphics that we might also work upon them by experiment?-Michael Faraday to James Clerk Maxwell, 1857當一個數(shù)學家忙于研究已他經(jīng)有定論的物理運動和結(jié)果時，它們也許不能用通俗、明確、肯定的語言如數(shù)學公式來表達？如果這樣，這將不一個大恩惠對可以將難以理解的文字翻譯過來的人們，我們可以用實驗來解釋？法拉第致麥克斯韋，1857注：不大明

3、白說什么，可能是說如果總覺得說明白了不好，還是實驗更好。I will now present an explanation for a working invention which utilizes the energy within magnetic fields and produces more energy than is introduced into the system from an external energy input. Do not at this point reflect poorly upon yourself and blindly state perpet

4、ual motion. Simply put, the technological process which I will discuss converts mass into energy on a 100% conversion process via E = MC2.我現(xiàn)在提出一種可以有效工作的發(fā)明，它利用磁場中的能量，產(chǎn)生多于系統(tǒng)輸入的能量。不要盲目的認為這是“永動機”。我將簡單的討論將物質(zhì)100%轉(zhuǎn)換為能量的科學過程，遵守E = MC2.14. I believe it is imperative to reiterate that the energy in any magnet

5、ic field is the energy which composes the elements of the atom and is literally Einstein s Equation of E = MC2. Such energy in the form of gyroscopic particles is the basic building block of all matter and provides the basis for the conceptual interface between energy and matter.這堅信反復重申磁場中的能量來自于物質(zhì)中的

6、原子并遵守E = MC2是重要的。這樣的陀螺子式的能量是構(gòu)成物質(zhì)的基石，提供基礎(chǔ)的能量和物質(zhì)的交互。The following facts will clearly demonstrate a fundamental understanding which prepares the reader for a more thorough comprehension of how one technological embodiment of this Pioneering Invention can be built.下面的實事將清楚的展示一個基礎(chǔ)的理解，給讀者關(guān)于這個能被建造的首創(chuàng)發(fā)明的具體技

7、術(shù)更深入的理解。A. The prior teachings indicate that copper is nonmagnetic and that the resulting magnetic field associated with current flow in copper is the result of the current.原有的教學第一點指出銅是沒有磁場的，磁場和電流的關(guān)聯(lián)是電流的結(jié)果。B. Those teachings are totally wrong. Copper is extremely magnetic! It is so magnetic that it

8、deceives the observer. Example:這些學說是完全錯誤的。銅是有極強磁性的！它磁性強到誤導了觀察者。例如：Turn the current on as in Figure 14-B1 and a magnetic field will occur very quickly. Then turn the current off as in Figure 14-B2 and the magnetic field very quickly disappears with no remnant of the magnetic field observed in the cop

9、per material. If one then places a magnet close to the copper, it is not observed to be noticeably magnetic. Therefore, one is easily deceived since conventional, so-called magnetic materials generate a different result. Example:改變圖14-B1中的電流方向，磁場將迅速改變。之后斷開電流如圖14-B2磁場將迅速消失，在銅材料中沒有殘余的幸虧被觀察到。如果一個人拿一個磁體

10、靠近銅，沒有明顯的磁現(xiàn)象。因此，人們非常容易的被欺騙了，因為傳統(tǒng)的被叫做磁體的材料會有一個不同的結(jié)果。例如：By placing an iron core within a copper coil (as in Figure 14-B3) and turning the current on, a significantly stronger magnetic field will be generated than in Figure 14-B1 for the same energy input. Now, turn off the current as in Figure 14-B4 a

11、nd there will be a small, remnant magnetic field surrounding the iron core. If a magnet is placed near the iron core, the magnet will be visibly affected. However, one is easily deceived by these tests and can be mislead into believing that copper is non-magnetic. This is exactly what happened to Ha

12、ns Christian Oersted in 1820 when he first discovered that an electric current produced a magnetic field which would cause a magnet to align at right angles to the conducting wire. Oersted noted that the deflection of the magnet lasted only as long as the current was flowing through the conducting w

13、ire and hence, such magnetic action could not be caused by the (copper) wire, but must be a result of the current itself. This same incorrect conclusion is still rigidly taught to this day.通過放置一個鐵芯在銅線圈中（如圖14-B3）并接通電流，一個有重要意義的比圖14-B1中更強大磁場將產(chǎn)生【用同樣的能量輸入】?，F(xiàn)在斷開電流，如圖14-B4，鐵芯會有一個很小的殘余磁場。如果一個磁體接近鐵芯，磁體將明顯被影響

14、。然而，人們被非常容易被這些實驗欺騙并被帶入歧途，相信銅是沒有磁性的。這恰恰發(fā)生在奧斯特1820年觀察到電流產(chǎn)生了一個能產(chǎn)生一個引起磁體相對導線產(chǎn)生一定角度偏轉(zhuǎn)時。奧斯特發(fā)現(xiàn)偏轉(zhuǎn)只有在電流流過導線時發(fā)生，因此這種磁體運動不能由（銅）導線引起，一定是電流自身的結(jié)果。同樣不正確的結(jié)論今天仍然在用于教學。The following facts will clearly prove that copper is bigbly magnetic relative to the speed of atom alignment/unalignment as well as the action /react

15、ion effect of the energy release (in the form of the gyroscopic particles previously discussed) from the atoms comprising the copper wire!下面的事實將清楚的證明銅的磁性大小既關(guān)系到原子排序/混亂的速度，也關(guān)系到組成銅線的原子釋放（以前面討論的陀螺子形式）的能量的行動/反應！The prior teachings indicate that copper is non-magnetic and that the resulting magnetic field

16、 associated with current flow in copper is the result of the current. Those teachings are totally wrong. Copper is extremely magnetic! It is so magnetic that it deceives the observer.原有的教學指出銅是沒有磁性的，磁場和銅中電流的關(guān)系是電流的結(jié)果。這種學說是完全錯誤的。銅是極具磁性的！它的磁性強到誤導了觀察者。C. What the Prior Art teaches: Hypothetically, if one

17、 imposes current into a (copper*) conductor coil of pure inductance, the same current would be returned as that which was initially placed into the (copper*) conducting coil. (See Figures 14-C1 and 14-C2.)原來的學說：假設，如果加大進入純自感（銅）導體線圈的電流，同樣的電流將返回，如開始輸入（銅）導體線圈中的。（看圖14-C1和14-C2。）*This process is in no way

18、 limited to copper. Actually, one can utilize any suitable materials for conducting, e.g., super-conducting materials such as niobium tin, etc.這個過程中不只可以用銅。實際上，可以用任何合適的導體材料，如超導材料鈮錫等。Physically speaking, this simply means that the energy contained within the magnetic field - when generated by positive

19、 (+) current flow in one direction - is returned by the collapsing magnetic field as negative ( -) current flow when the current flow reverses direction.物理上講，這簡單的意味著磁場中的能量-由正向電流在一定方向流動產(chǎn)生-被返回，通過電流反向產(chǎn)生的負電流瓦解磁場。D.The Prior Art also teaches Kirchhoffs Law which states: the same amount of current placed

20、into a system (as a copper conductor) for a given-instant of time has the same amount of current flowing from that system (copper conductor) for the same given- instant of time. (See Figure 14-D.)原來的學說也經(jīng)常教授基爾霍夫法則，法則規(guī)定：瞬間輸入系統(tǒng)（如銅導體）的電流和流過系統(tǒng)（如銅導體）的電流一樣多（看圖14-D）。D.The above FACTS of 14C and 14D totally

21、contradict the prior teaching that the magnetic field generated by the current flowing in a (copper) conductor is solely a result of the current itself and that copper is non-magnetic.Look at the facts and open your mind!上述14C和14D的事實完全反駁了原來的學說，由電流產(chǎn)流過（銅）導體產(chǎn)生的磁場只是電流本身的結(jié)果，銅完全沒有磁性！The facts demonstrate

22、the following: 14C above shows that if one inputs a given amount of current (X) into a copper coil during a given-instant of time then, as described in I4D above, the same amount of current (X) outputs from the copper coil during the same instant of time. In addition, 14C above also shows that if th

23、e current is then cut off and the coil shorted with meters in the line, then the same amount of current (X) will now come from the copper coil.事實證明如下：上面14C顯示如果瞬間輸入給定電流（X），如14D所述，同樣的電流（X）將同時從銅線圈輸出。另外，上述14C同樣顯示，如果電流斷開并且線圈適于一米，那么同樣大小的電流（X）將從銅線圈中輸出。The facts therefore demonstrate: (X) current in and(X)

24、current out plus (X) current out again when the (X) current input is stopped. These facts are therefore equivalent to 1 (X) amount of current into the coil (copper) and 2 (X) amount of current out of the (copper) coil.事實因此證明：（X）輸入電流和（X）輸入電流加當（X）輸入電流斷開時產(chǎn)生的（X）輸出電流。這些事實因此等于1（X）電流輸入到（銅）線圈，2（X）電流輸出（銅）線圈。

25、注：英文是（X）數(shù)量的電流，意思是電流量，也可說是電子流過的數(shù)量，這里將數(shù)量省略，因為不通順。QUESTION: From where did the extra (X) amount of current coming from the copper coil emanate?ANSWER: By analogy, the Prior Teachings indicate that current is equivalent to the volume of water and that voltage is equivalent to the pressure of water. Ther

26、efore, one should understand the essence of this analogy relative to the facts discussed above. (See Figures 14-E1 and 14-E2.)問題：從銅線圈中產(chǎn)生的額外的（X）數(shù)量電流是從哪來的?回答：通過分析，原來的學說暗示電流可以比作水的量，電壓可以比作水壓。因此一個人應該明白討論的事實的本質(zhì)。（看圖14-E1和14-E2。）The facts clearly demonstrate that in Figure 14-E1 , one gallon of current came

27、 from the copper coil Itself and most definitely not from the initial one gallon of current put into the copper coil. (This is an analogy only. The mass or volume of the electric current input or output cannot be seen or weighed because it is composed of gyroscopic particles and is the mechanical es

28、sence of E = MC2.)圖14-E1的事實證明，一“加侖”的電流來自銅線圈自身，非常明確不是來自開始輸入銅線圈的一“加侖”電流。（這只是一個類比。輸入輸出電流的質(zhì)量和數(shù)量是不能看見和稱重的，因為它由陀螺子組成，是E = MC2的本質(zhì)。）F.The Prior Teachings distort the above facts and would indicate that the analogy of one gallon of current has no pressure when coming from the coil in Figure 14-E1 , and that

29、one gallon of current has a pressure which is thereby equivalent to one gallon of current with the input pressure. Furthermore, such teachings would indicate that because of the resistance within the coil and other losses, not even the latter pressure will occur in reality. 原來的學說歪曲了上述事實，指出電流“加侖”的類比當

30、來自圖14-E1的線圈時沒有壓力，并且一“加侖”的電流有輸入的一“加侖”的壓力。更深入的，這樣的學說指出因為線圈電阻的想在和其它損失，之后的壓力在實際中不會發(fā)生。Even I was mislead by these teachings for many years, and I finally came to the realization that copper was highly magnetic by a completely different means than outlined above. These means included: (1) my general compr

31、ehension which originated with my recognition that the basic building block of all matter matter was the gyroscopic particle , and (2) a test I conducted using a single piece of copper wire 800 feet long, which was doubled-back 400 feel to the starting point and hooked to a meter and dry cell batter

32、y. (See Figures 14-Fl and 14-F2.)雖然我也被這些常說誤導了很多年，最終我認識到銅是有很強磁性的，和上面描繪的意義完全不同。這包括：（1）物質(zhì)的基石是陀螺子的原始認知，（2）一個我設計的實驗，只用了800英尺長的銅線和一節(jié)干電池，銅線有400英尺折疊回來到起點并連接一個電表。The test shown in Figure 14-F1 has the parallel positions of the wire 10 feet apart, with no Unobvious Force between the parallel portions of the w

33、ire. The test shown in Figure 14-F2 has the parallel portions of the wire extremely close, with an Unobvious Force between the parallel pares of the single wire.圖14-F1中展示的實驗有平行相距10英尺的一條導線，沒有“不可見的力”在導線的平行部分。圖14-F2的實驗平行部分的導線離的非常近，有一種“不可見的力”在導線的平行部分。The results of these two tests demonstrated the same

34、current input for both tests. Prior to these results I had recognized that the words Work , Force, and Power are implicit engineering statements and do not represent precise, scientific terms based upon observational reality . I conceptually altered such macroscopic, engineering statements to Obviou

35、s work, Obvious Force, and Obvious Power. I would microscopically describe what occurs internally, with in matter as Unobvious Work, Unobvious Force, and Unobvious Power. (I will explain these concepts later in this Book.) Such semantic clarification enabled me to know - upon completing the above te

36、sts in Figures 14-Fl and 14-F2 -that copper is extremely magnetic.這兩個實驗證明同樣的電流輸入到兩個實驗系統(tǒng)。在這結(jié)果之前我已經(jīng)認識到“功”、“力”和“能量”是絕對的學術(shù)陳述，沒有清楚科學的基于可觀測事實的示范。我概念上改變這種宏觀、學術(shù)的陳述為“可見功”、“可見力”和“可見能量”。我將從微觀上描述在物質(zhì)的內(nèi)部發(fā)生了什么，如“可見功”、“可見力”和“可見能量”。（我將解釋這些概念在這本書后面。）這樣語義上的澄清讓我知道-完全基于圖14-F1和14-F2的實驗-銅是極強磁性的。G.Returning to the above te

37、st of Figure l 4-E1 and14-E2: by my teaching, the facts clearly show that in the above analogy, one gallon of current matter (consisting of gyroscopic particles) was released from the atoms of the copper coil! This extra one gallon of current (gyroscopic particles) comes from the component parts of

38、the atoms comprising the copper coil and simply utilizes Einsteins Equation of E = MC2.(I must stress that this is an analogy only. The volume or mass of matter via the gyroscopic particles represents the mechanics of E=MC2 and such particles cannot be seen or weighed by conventional means. Their ex

39、istence can be inferred, however, based on their mechanical behavior combined with known, observational faces.)QUESTION: How can this extra one gallon of current exist? 回到圖14-F1和14-F2的實驗：通過我的教學，事實清楚的表明上面的類比，一加侖電流“物質(zhì)”（由陀螺子組成）從銅線圈的原子中釋放！這額外的一加侖電流（陀螺子）來自組成銅線圈的原子的組成部分，簡單的利用了E = MC2等式。（我必須強調(diào)這只是類比。物質(zhì)的數(shù)量和質(zhì)

40、量通過陀螺子表現(xiàn)為E=MC2 的構(gòu)成，這樣的微粒不能通過傳統(tǒng)的方法看到或稱重。然而，它們的存在能基于它們和已知可觀察現(xiàn)象關(guān)聯(lián)的力學行為推斷出來。）問題：這多出來的一加侖電流如何存在?ANSWER: The current input (gyroscopic particles) simply acts as a catalyst relative to the atoms comprising the copper coil- atoms which align and unalign extremely fast compared to the atoms of conventional,

41、magnetic materials -thereby releasing virtually immeasurable portions of the gyroscopic particles comprising the atoms of the coil. This release generates the magnetic field. When the input current is turned off, the collapsing (gyroscopic particles of the) magnetic field within the coil results in

42、the gyroscopic particles attempting to return to the atoms from which they initially emanated. Such mechanical action results in the gyroscopic particles striking other atoms within the copper coil at some degree of a right angle and moving at right angles to that force. This gyroscopic motion expla

43、ins the source for the additional one gallon of current (gyroscopic particles) discussed in the above water analogy. Because of the conversion efficiency of this process via E = MC2, there will be no observable change in the mass of the copper coil even after decades of use.回答：輸入電流（陀螺子）簡單表現(xiàn)為組成銅線圈原子的

44、催化劑-銅原子與傳統(tǒng)磁性材料相比可以極快的重排或失序-由此釋放無法計量的組成線圈原子的陀螺子。這種釋放產(chǎn)生了磁場。當輸入電流斷開，線圈中磁場（陀螺子）的崩潰導致陀螺子試圖返回最初發(fā)出它們的原子。這樣的力學運動導致陀螺子在適當角度以一定程度撞擊到銅線圈中其它原子，并在適當?shù)慕嵌认蛄σ苿?。陀螺運動解釋了上面以水類比討論時多出的“一加侖”電流（陀螺子）的來源。因為這個進程“轉(zhuǎn)換效率”等于E = MC2，銅線圈的物質(zhì)方面將沒有明顯的改變，即使用了幾十年。Such mechanical action results in the gyroscopic particles striking other a

45、toms within the copper coil at some degree of a right angle and moving at right angles to that force.這樣的力學運動導致陀螺子在適當角度以一定程度撞擊到銅線圈中其它原子，并在適當?shù)慕嵌认蛄σ苿印 should add that there is an important conceptual distinction between two meanings of the word efficiency. To state that a given invention is 8.2 effici

46、ent, i.e., it produces over eight times as much energy as it consumes, is different from stating that the invention is 100 percent efficient, i.e., it completely converts the gyroscopic particles within the magnet from magnet mass to electrical energy. The former process involves production efficien

47、cy and the latter process involves conversion efficiency.另外我要說的是，效率一詞的兩個意義有一個重要的觀念上的不同。說一個指定發(fā)明8.2的效率，也就是，它產(chǎn)生8倍于它消耗的能量，這不同于說發(fā)明的效率是100%，也就是，它完全將來自磁體“磁場物質(zhì)”的陀螺子轉(zhuǎn)化為電能。前一個過程包含生產(chǎn)效率，后一個過程包含轉(zhuǎn)化效率。15. Now to discuss the practical usage for this new understanding of the gyroscopic particles which are the mechan

48、ical essence of the equation E = MC2 and comprise the component parts of the atoms within all matter, conductors, and copper. By understanding the teachings (of this Pioneering Invention), one can build a physical embodiment of this Pioneering Invention by using a conducting coil which will produce

49、more energy out of the system than that put into the system from an outside source such as battery, generator , etc.現(xiàn)在討論關(guān)于陀螺子新理解的實際應用，陀螺子是E = MC2等式的力學本質(zhì)，是所有物質(zhì)、導體和銅的原子的組成部分。通過理解教學（關(guān)于這個開創(chuàng)性發(fā)明），可以建造一個這個開創(chuàng)性發(fā)明的物理實現(xiàn)，通過用一個導體線圈輸出多于輸入系統(tǒng)的能量，輸入能量來自外部電源如電池，發(fā)電機等。I wish to thank Dr. Roger Hastings, Senior Physicis

50、t for Sperry-Univac, for calculating by conventional mathematics the quantitative measurements for the following test which I had proposed. Dr. Hastings is an exceptional scientist who had the character to come forth in my behalf when many others were fearful or close-minded.我希望感謝Roger Hastings，。For

51、 mind-opening purposes (to use the current vernacular) carefully study the following two tests:為了打開思想（用普通的語言）認真的學習了下面兩個實驗：A. Take 40-gauge copper wire which has a resistance of 1,049 Ohms for 1000 feet with a total weight (of atoms composed of gyroscopic particles) of a mere .02993 lbs., turning sam

52、e into a coil with a 10-foot interior diameter and 8.32 feet in height. One would therefore have approximately a mere 31.8 turns of copper wire (copper atoms, i.e., gyroscopic particles). (See Figure 15-A.)用（由陀螺子組成的原子）總重0.02993磅1000英尺1049歐40-gauge的銅線（gauge是一個單位，40-gauge應該不到2mm），繞制成10英尺內(nèi)直徑8.32英尺高的線圈。

53、這將大約僅僅31.8圈銅線。（看圖15-A）If 100 volts is connected to coil 15-A, then a current flow of approximately 95MA would occur with total power input of 9.5 watts and a resulting weak, magnetic field of .012 Gauss or a mere .0000 14 Joules of energy stored in this weak, magnetic field.如果100伏特連接到15-A中的線圈，之后產(chǎn)生一個

54、大約95MA 的電流，總能量輸入是9.5瓦特，導致一個微弱的0.12高斯的磁場或僅僅.0000 14焦耳的能量存儲在這個弱磁場中。An insignificant current flow would now occur if the current input was stopped and coil 15-A was shorted-out to collapse a weak magnetic field and provide an inductance of only .003 Henries.如果停止輸入電流并短路線圈，一個微小的電流將產(chǎn)生，15-A中的線圈被短路來瓦解微弱的磁場并

55、產(chǎn)生一個0.003亨的自感應。注：意思是斷開電源并使線圈的兩個輸入相連。B.Now, conduct another test with 5-gauge copper wire which has a resistance of .3133 Ohms for 1000 feet. However, to equal the same resistance as in 15-A above, one must now use 3,348,000 feet of 5-gauge wire with a massive, total weight (of atoms composed of gyro

56、scopic particles moving and traveling at the speed of light, i.e., the mechanical essence of Einstein s Equation E = MC2) of 335,469.6 lbs. or 16.77 tons. Such wire is turned into a coil with a 10-foot interior diameter and 8.32-foot height. This structure would have approximately a phenomenal 90,00

57、0 turns of 5-gauge (copper atoms). If 100 volts were now connected to coil 15-B (see drawing below), then a current flow of approximately 95MA could occur with a total power input of 9.5 watts and a resulting, phenomenally larger magnetic field of 23.7 Gauss, or 1,905 times larger for coil 15-B than

58、 for coil 15-A, and 116 Joules of energy stored in the magnetic field of Figure 15-B below. This represents a phenomenal 8 million times more energy than in the 40-gauge coil of 15-A above.現(xiàn)在，實現(xiàn)另一個實驗，用1000英尺.3133歐的5-gauge銅線圈。然而，為了與15-A有相同的電阻，現(xiàn)在必須用3,348,000英尺 5-gauge的銅線，（由光速運動的符合E = MC2力學本質(zhì)的陀螺子組成的原子）

59、總重335,469.6磅或16.77噸。將這樣的線圈繞成10英尺內(nèi)徑8.32英尺高。這個結(jié)構(gòu)大約90,000圈5-gauge銅線。如果100伏特連接到15-B的線圈（看下圖），之后產(chǎn)生一個大約95MA 的電流，總能量輸入是9.5瓦特，導致一個23.7高斯的明顯的磁場區(qū)域，或比15-A中的線圈大1905倍，116焦耳能量存儲在15-B中的磁場中。這顯示出比15-A中40-gauge線圈多明顯的8百萬倍的能量。A phenomenally larger current flow would now occur if the current input was stopped and coil 15-B was shorted-out as a result of the collapsing,