國際商務(wù)談判教案Chapter4 (預(yù)習(xí)復(fù)習(xí))教學(xué)文稿_第1頁
國際商務(wù)談判教案Chapter4 (預(yù)習(xí)復(fù)習(xí))教學(xué)文稿_第2頁
國際商務(wù)談判教案Chapter4 (預(yù)習(xí)復(fù)習(xí))教學(xué)文稿_第3頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩2頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

精品文檔精品文檔精品文檔精品文檔Chapter4Negotiation:StrategyandOverviewInthischapter,wediscusswhatnegotiatorsshoulddobeforeopeningnegotiations.Effectivestrategyandplanningarethemostcriticalprecursorsforachievingnegotiationobjectives.Witheffectiveplanningandtargetsetting,mostnegotiatorscanachievetheirobjectives;withoutthem,resultsoccurmorebychancethanbynegotiatoreffort.Regrettably,systematicplanningisnotsomethingthatmostnegotiatorsdowillingly.Althoughtimeconstraintsandworkpressuresmakeitdifficulttofindthetimetoplanadequately,formanyplanningissimplyboringandtedious,easilyputoffinfavorofgettingintotheactionquickly.Itisclear,however,thatdevotinginsufficienttimetoplanningisoneweaknessthatmaycausenegotiatorstofail.Thediscussionofstrategyandplanningbeginsbyexploringthebroadprocessofstrategydevelopment,startingwithdefiningthenegotiator’sgoalsandobjectivesthenmovestodevelopingastrategytoaddresstheissuesandachieveone’sgoals.Finally,weaddressthetypicalstagesandphasesofanevolvingnegotiationandhowdifferentissuesandgoalswillaffecttheplanningprocess.LearningObjectivesGoals–Thefocusthatdrivesanegotiationstrategy.Strategy–Theoverallplantoachieveone’sgoals.Gettingreadytoimplementthestrategy:Theplanningprocess.GoalsFocusThatDrivesaNegotiationStrategyDirecteffectsofgoalsonchoiceofstrategyTherearefourimportantaspectstounderstandabouthowgoalsaffectnegotiations:Wishesarenotgoals,especiallyinnegotiation.Goalsareoftenlinkedtotheotherparty’sgoals.Thereareboundariesorlimitstowhatgoalscanbe.Effectivegoalsmustbeconcrete,specificandmeasurable.Iftheyarenot,thenwillbehardto:CommunicatetotheotherpartywhatwewantUnderstandwhattheotherpartywantsDeterminewhetheranofferonthetablesatisfiesourgoals.Goalscanbetangibleorprocedural.Thecriteriausedtodeterminegoalsdependonyourspecificobjectivesandprioritiesamongmultipleobjectives.IndirecteffectsofgoalsonchoiceofstrategyShort-termthinkingaffectsourchoiceofstrategy;indevelopingandframinggoals,wemayignorethepresentorfuturerelationshipwiththeotherpartyinaconcernforachievingasubstantiveoutcomeonly.Negotiationgoalsthatarecomplexordifficulttodefinemayrequireasubstantialchangeintheotherparty’sattitude.Inmostcases,progresswillbemadeincrementally,andmaydependonestablishingarelationshipwiththeotherStrategy–TheOverallPlantoAchieveOne’sGoalsStrategyversusTacticsAmajordifferencebetweenstrategyandtacticsisthatofscale,perspectiveimmediacy.Tacticsareshort-term,adaptivemovesdesignedtoenactorpursuebroadstrategies,whichinturnprovidestability,continuity,anddirectionfortacticalbehaviors.Tacticsaresubordinatetostrategy:theyarestructured,directed,anddrivenstrategicconsiderations.UnilateralversusbilateralapproachestostrategyAunilateralchoiceismadewithouttheactiveinvolvementoftheotherparty.Unilaterallypursuedstrategiescanbewhollyone-sidedandintentionallyignorantanyinformationabouttheothernegotiator.Unilateralstrategiesshouldevolveintoonesthatfullyconsidertheimpactoftheother’sstrategyonone’sown.Thedualconcernsmodelasavehiclefordescribingnegotiationstrategies.Thisproposesthatindividualshavetwolevelsofrelatedconcerns:aconcernfortheirownoutcomes,andalevelofconcernfortheother’soutcomes.AlternativesituationalstrategiesThereareatleastfourdifferenttypesofstrategieswhenassessingtherelativeimportanceandpriorityofthenegotiator’ssubstantiveoutcomeversustherelationaloutcome:competitive,collaboration,accommodation,andavoidanceThenonengagementstrategy:AvoidanceTherearemanyreasonswhynegotiatorsmaychoosenottonegotiate:Ifoneisabletomeetone’sneedswithoutnegotiatingatall,itmaymakesensetouseanavoidancestrategyItsimplymaynotbeworththetimeandefforttonegotiate(althoughtheresometimesreasonstonegotiateinsuchsituationsThedecisiontonegotiateiscloselyrelatedtothedesirabilityofavailabalternatietheoutcomesthatcanbeachievedifnegotiationsdon’tworkActive-engagementstrategies:Competition,collaboration,andaccommodationCompetitionisdistributivewin-losebargaining.Collaborationisintegrativeorwin-winnegotiation.Accommodationisasmuchawin-losestrategyascompetition,althoughithasadecidedlydifferentimageitinvolvesanimbalanceofoutcomes,butintheoppositedirection. (“Ilose,youwin”asopposedto“Iwin,youlose.”)Therearedrawbackstothesestrategiesifappliedblindly,thoughtlesslyinflexibly:Distributivestrategiestendtopatterns,whichmayresultinadistortionwellastheirvalues,needsandpositions.

asIfanegotiatorpursuesanintegrativestrategywithoutregardtotheothertheothermaymanipulateandexploitthecollaboratorandtakeadvantageoffaithandgoodwillbeingdemonstrated.Accommodativestrategiesmaygenerateapatternofconstantlygivinginkeeptheotherhappyortoavoidafight.UnderstandingtheFlowofNegotiations:StagesandPhasesPhasemodelsofnegotiation:InitiationProblemsolvingResolutionGreenhalgh(2001)suggeststhattherearesevenkeystepstoanidealnegotiationprdecidingwhatisimportant,defininggoals,thinkingaheadhowtowortogetherwiththeotherparty.Relationshiptoknowtheotherparty,understandinghowyouandtheotheraresimilaranddifferent,andbuildingcommitmenttowardachievingmutuallybeneficialsetofoutcomes.Informationgatheiearningwhatyouneedtoknowabouttheissues,abouttheotherpartyandtheirneeds,aboutthefeasibilityofpossiblesettlements,whatmighthappenifyoufailtoreachagreementwiththeotherside.Informationthisstage,negotiatorsassemblethecasetheywanttomakefotheirpreferredoutcomesandsettlement,onethatwillmaximizethenegotiator’sneeds.theprocessofmakingmovesfromone’sinitial,idealpositiontotheacoutcome.Closingthedatheobjectivehereistobuildcommitmenttotheagreementinthepreviousphase.Implementingtheagreeeeterminingwhoneedstodowhatoncehandsshakenandthedocumentssigned.GettingReadytoImplementtheStrategy:ThePlanningProcessDefiningtheissuesUsuallybeginswithananalysisofwhatistobediscussedinthenegotiation.Thenumberofissuesinanegotiation,alongwiththerelationshipbetweenthenegotiatorandtheotherparty,areoftentheprimarydeterminantofwhetheroneadistributiveorintegrativestrategy.Inanynegotiation,acompletelistoftheissuesatstakeisbestderivedfromfollowingsources:Ananalysisofallthepossibleissuesthatneedtobedecided.Previousexperienceinsimilarnegotiations.Researchconductedtogatherinformation.Consultationwithexpertsinthatindustry.AssemblingtheissuesanddefiningthebargainingmixThecombinationoflistsfromeachsideinanegotiationdeterminesthebargainingmix.Therearetwostepsanegotiatorcanusetoprioritizetheissuesonanagenda:Determinewhichissuesaremostimportantandwhicharelessimportant.Determinewhethertheissuesarelinkedtogetherorareseparate.DefiningInterestsInterestsmaybe:Substantive,thatis,directlyrelatedtothefocalissuesundernegotiation.Process-based,thatis,relatedtohowthenegotiatorsbehaveastheynegotiate.Relationship-based,thatis,tiedtothecurrentordesiredfuturebetweentheparties.Interestsmayalsobebasedonintangiblesofnegotiation.KnowinglimitsandalternativesGoodpreparationrequiresthatyouestablishtwoclearpoints:Resistancepoint–theplacewhereyoudecidethatyoushouldabsolutelystopnegotiationratherthancontinue.Alternatives–otheragreementsnegotiatorscouldachieveandstillmeettheirneeds.Alternativesdefinewhetherthecurrentoutcomeisbetterthanpossibility.SettingtargetsandopeningsTwokeypointsshouldbedefinedinthisstep:ThespecifictargetponhereonerealisticallyexpectstoachieveasettlementTheaskingprice,representingthebestdealonecanhopetoachieve.Targetsettingrequirespositivethinkingaboutone’sownobjectives.Targetsettingoftenrequiresconsideringhowtopackageseveralissuesandobjectives.Targetsettingrequiresanunderstandingoftrade-offsandthrowaways.AssessingconstituentsandthesocialcontextofanegotiationWhenpeoplenegotiateinaprofessionalcontext,theremaybemorethantwoparties.Theremaybemorethantwonegotiatorsatthetable.Multiplepartiesoftentotheformationofcoalitions.Negotiatorsalsohaveconstituentswhowillevaluateandcritiquethem.Negotiationoccursinacontextofrules–asocialsystemoflaws,commonbusinesspractices,culturalnorms,andpoliticalcross-pressures.“Fieldanalysis”canbeusedtoassessallthekeypartiesinanegotiation.Whois,orshouldbe,ontheteamonmysideofthefield?Whoisontheothersideofthefield?Whoisonthesidelinesandcanaffecttheplayofthegame?Whoarenegotiationequivalentsofowners,managersandstrategists?Whoisinthestands?Whoiswatchingthegame,isinterestedinit,butcanindirectlyaffectwhathappens?Whatisgoingoninthebroaderenvironmentinwhichthenegotiationplace?Whatiscommonandacceptablepracticeintheethicalsysteminwhichthedealbeingdone?Whatiscommonandacceptablepracticegiventhecultureinwhichnegotiationisconducted?AnalyzingtheotherpartyLearningtheother’sissues,preferences,priorities,interests,alternativesandconstraintsisalmostasimportantasdeterminingone’sown.Severalkeypiecesofbackgroundinformationwillbeofgreatimportance,including:Theotherparty’sresources,issues,andbargainingmix–investigate:Otherparty’sbusinesshistoryorpreviousnegotiations.Financialdata.Inventories.Visitorspeakwiththeotherparty’sfriendsandpeers.Questionpastbusinesspartners.Theotherparty’sinterestsandneeds.Conductapreliminaryinterviewincludingabroaddiscussionofwhatotherpartywouldliketoachieveintheupcomingnegotiations.Anticipatingtheotherparty’sinterests.Askingotherswhoknoworhavenegotiatedwiththeotherparty.Readinghowtheotherpartyportrayshim/herselfinthemedia.Theotherparty’slimits(resistancepoint)andalternative(s).Understandingtheotherparty’slimitsandalternativesisimportantbecauseitwillprovideinformationastohowfaryoucan“push”them.Theotherparty’stargetsandopenings.Systematicallygatherinformationdirectlyfromtheotherparty.Constituents,socialstructure,andauthoritytomakeanagreement.Themostdirectimpactofthebroadersocialcontextisontheothernegotiator’sabilitytomakebindingagreements.Thenegotiatorneedstoknowhowtheotherparty’sorganizationmakesdecisionstosupportorratifyanagreement.Reputationandnegotiationstyle.Anegotiator’stypicalstyle(integrativeordistributiveapproach)isanimportantdeterminantofhowtoapproachtheotherpartyintheOne’simpressionoftheotherparty’sreputationmaybebasedonseveralfactors:Howtheotherparty’spredecessorshavenegotiatedwithyouinthepast.Howtheotherpartyhasnegotiatedwithyouinthepast,eitherintheorindifferentcontexts.Howtheotherpartyhasnegotiatedwithothersinthepast.Likelystrategyandtactics.Informationcollectedaboutissues,objectives,reputation,style,andauthoritymayindicateagreatdealaboutwhatstrategytheotherpartyintendstopursue.PresentingissuestotheotherpartyWhatfactssupportmypointofview?WhommayIconsultortalkwithtohelpmeelaborateorclarifythefacts?Havetheseissuesbeennegotiatedbeforebyothersundersimilarcircumstances?Whatistheotherparty’spointofviewlikelytobe?HowcanIdevelopandpresentthefactssotheyaremostconvincing?Whatprotocolneedstobefollowedinthisnegotiation?Thea

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論