地方重大行政決策程序法治化探析,行政管理論文本篇論文目錄導(dǎo)航：【題目】地方重大行政決策程序法治化探析【第一章】【第二章】【第三章】【第四章】【第五章】【結(jié)束語(yǔ)/以下為參考文獻(xiàn)】摘要法令行則國(guó)治，法令弛則國(guó)亂。法治是一個(gè)國(guó)家發(fā)展的重要保障，是治國(guó)理政的基本方式。厲行法治是當(dāng)代社會(huì)的一項(xiàng)普遍的政治原則和社會(huì)行為準(zhǔn)則，也是中國(guó)社會(huì)政治發(fā)展的必然歸宿。重大行政決策因其廣泛性、全局性、綜合性的特征使其成為行政管理中的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)，越來(lái)越遭到社會(huì)各界的廣泛關(guān)注。在行政權(quán)日益擴(kuò)大化的今天，重大行政決策所面臨的決策環(huán)境日益復(fù)雜，決策難度也隨之增加，這就對(duì)地方做出重大行政決策提出了更高層次的要求。然而在實(shí)際的行政決策活動(dòng)中，拍腦袋決策，拍胸脯執(zhí)行，拍屁股走人的現(xiàn)象屢見(jiàn)不鮮。為了實(shí)現(xiàn)行政決策的科學(xué)化、民主化和法治化，減少?zèng)Q策失誤造成的損失，保證國(guó)家行政管理的秩序，必需要有完善、統(tǒng)一的重大行政決策程序法律法規(guī)，以此為根據(jù)，按照法定程序制定重大行政決策、并嚴(yán)格依法執(zhí)行，進(jìn)而實(shí)現(xiàn)重大行政決策程序的法治化。因而，對(duì)于地方來(lái)講，實(shí)現(xiàn)依法決策，推進(jìn)重大行政決策程序法治化，不管是營(yíng)造穩(wěn)固的決策民意基礎(chǔ)，還是保證各項(xiàng)工作的順利完成，或是推進(jìn)法治建設(shè)都具有非常重要的意義。通過(guò)對(duì)現(xiàn)有重大行政決策程序法規(guī)、規(guī)章以及行政規(guī)范性文件的梳理，明晰了重大行政決策程序立法層面的現(xiàn)在狀況，并結(jié)合重大行政決策程序的執(zhí)行狀況，進(jìn)一步分析了重大行政決策程序法治化經(jīng)過(guò)中存在的問(wèn)題，進(jìn)而提出了推動(dòng)地方重大行政決策程序法治化建設(shè)的對(duì)策建議。論文分為下面幾部分：第一部分是緒論，主要是文章的研究意義、國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)在狀況、研究方式方法等。第二部分是理論支撐及概念界定。在闡述文章理論支撐的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)論文中的相關(guān)概念做了界定。第三部分是我們國(guó)家地方重大行政決策程序法治化現(xiàn)在狀況。主要從重大行政決策程序的立法與執(zhí)行兩方面闡述。立法方面主要基于對(duì)當(dāng)前我們國(guó)家重大行政決策程序規(guī)范性法律文本的梳理；執(zhí)行方面主要通過(guò)對(duì)蘭州市建立城鎮(zhèn)居民生活用水階梯價(jià)格制度聽(tīng)證會(huì)的實(shí)證考察。第四部分是重大行政決策程序法治化經(jīng)過(guò)中存在的問(wèn)題。針對(duì)重大行政決策程序法治化現(xiàn)在狀況，總結(jié)出了立法缺位、執(zhí)法不嚴(yán)、公民介入決策的渠道不暢以及決策信息公開(kāi)不全面，缺乏與公眾的信息互動(dòng)等幾方面存在的問(wèn)題。第五部分是推動(dòng)我們國(guó)家地方重大行政決策程序法治化建設(shè)的對(duì)策建議。包括推進(jìn)重大行政決策程序的法制體系建設(shè)、加強(qiáng)重大行政決策程序的法治觀念、強(qiáng)化對(duì)重大行政決策程序的監(jiān)督以及保障公眾有效介入重大行政決策等幾方面的建議。本文關(guān)鍵詞語(yǔ)：重大行政決策程序；法治化；地方；程序規(guī)范ABSTRACTEnforcethelawtomakepeaceandstabilityofacountry,laxlawsmakeacountrybecomechaotic.Lawisanimportantguaranteeforthedevelopmentofacountryisthebasicwayofmanagingstateaffairs.Rigorouslyenforcetheruleoflawisauniversalprincipleofpoliticalandsocialbehaviornormsofmodernsociety,andalsoafinaldestinationofthesocialandpoliticaldevelopmentofChina.Unlikemajoradministrativedecision-makingofgeneraladministrativedecision-making,becauseofitsbroad,globalandcomprehensivefeaturesmakeitakeylinkintheadministration,moreandmoreattentioninthecommunity.Increasinglyexpansioninthegovernmentexecutivepowertoday,majoradministrativedecisionsfacingincreasinglycomplexdecision-makingenvironment,alsoincreasesthedifficultyofthedecision,whichthelocalgovernmenttomakemajoradministrativedecisionsputforwardhigherrequirements.However,Inthecaseofactualdecision-makingactivities,pattinghisheadtomakedecisions,boldlyexecuteddecision,butdecision-makingisaproblemthatnooneisresponsibleforthecommon.Inordertoachievescientific,democratizationandtheruleoflawofadministrativedecision-making,reducethelossescausedbywrongdecisions,andensureorderlyadministrationoftheState,theremustbeasoundmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessasaguarantee,andletthisprogramintheformoflawfinalized,onlytheformationofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocesstoimprovetherulesandregulationsinorderonthisbasis,accordingtothelawtoprotectmajoradministrativedecision-making,implementationoflaw,ruleoflawinordertoachievemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocess.Therefore,forthelocalgovernment,implementationdecisionsaccordingtothelaw,topromotethelegalizationofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocess,whetheritisfortheGovernmenttoensurethesuccessfulcompletionofthework,ortocreateasolidbasisforgovernmentdecision-makingofpublicopinion,promotetheruleoflaworagovernmentbuildinghasaverySignificance.Bycombingthemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessontheexistinglaws,regulationsandadministrativenormativedocuments,clearthestatusofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessofthelegislativelevel,combinedwiththestatusofimplementationofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessonmajoradministrativedecisionsoflocalgovernmentlawprogramoftheoverallstatushaveamoreclearunderstanding.Atthesametimesummarizesthemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessofthelegalizationprocessproblemsandanalyzesthereasonsforthis,andthenproposedtopromotelocalmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessofbuildingtheruleoflawcountermeasures.Thispaperisdividedintothefollowingparts:Thefirstpartistheintroduction,itistostudythesignificanceofthearticle,currentresearch,researchmethodsandinnovationsanddeficiencies.Thesecondpartisthetheoreticalsupportandrelatedconcepts.Itdescribesthetheoreticalsupportofthearticle,anddefinesthemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessrelatedtotheconceptoftheruleoflaw.Thethirdpartisaboutthestatusofourlocalgovernmentmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessoftheruleoflaw.Mainlyfromtheimplementationofmajorlegislativeandadministrativedecision-makingprocessbothpaper.Legislationismainlybasedonthecurrentmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessofnormativelegaltextscomb;implementationmainlythroughtheestablishmentofLanzhouurbanhouseholdwaterpriceladdersystemhearingsempiricalstudycombiningthesetwoaspectsdrawnmajoradministrativeofLocalGovernmentdecision-makingprocessoftheoverallstatusoftheruleoflaw.Thefourthpartisthemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessofthelegalizationprocessproblemsandcauseanalysis.Accordingtocurrentsituationofmajoradministrativedecision-makingproceduresundertheruleoflaw,summeduptheabsenceoflegislation,laxenforcement,poordecision-makinginformationchannelsandcitizenparticipationinpublicdecision-makingisnotcomprehensive,thelackofgovernmentinteractwithinformationandotheraspectsofthepublicandsoon,andanalyzesthereasons.Thefifthpartissomesuggestionstopromotethemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessundertheruleoflawandLegalConstructionofLocalGovernment.Includingthelegalsystemtopromotetheconstructionofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocess,enhancetheruleoflawmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocess,strengthenthesupervisionofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessandtoguaranteeeffectivepublicparticipationinthemajoradministrativedecision-makingandsoon.KeyWords:Majoradministrativedecision-makingProcesses;Undertheruleoflaw;Localgovernment;Programspecification目錄摘要ABSTRACT第一章緒論一、研究背景及意義〔一〕研究背景〔二〕研究意義二、研究現(xiàn)在狀況〔一〕國(guó)外的研究現(xiàn)在狀況〔二〕國(guó)內(nèi)的研究現(xiàn)在狀況〔三〕國(guó)內(nèi)外研究簡(jiǎn)評(píng)三、研究方式方法〔一〕文獻(xiàn)研究〔二〕實(shí)地研究四、研究的思路和主要內(nèi)容〔一〕研究思路〔二〕主要內(nèi)容五、創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)與缺乏〔一〕創(chuàng)新之處〔二〕缺乏之處第二章理論支撐及概念界定一、理論支撐〔一〕程序正當(dāng)原理〔二〕有限理論〔三〕依法治國(guó)理論二、概念界定〔一〕重大行政決策的概念及范圍的界定〔二〕重大行政決策程序的含義〔三〕地方重大行政決策程序法治化概念的內(nèi)涵及基本要求〔四〕