微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)Microeconomics英文課件 33 Welfare_第1頁
微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)Microeconomics英文課件 33 Welfare_第2頁
微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)Microeconomics英文課件 33 Welfare_第3頁
微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)Microeconomics英文課件 33 Welfare_第4頁
微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)Microeconomics英文課件 33 Welfare_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩70頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

Lec20

ChapterThirty-ThreeWelfareSocialChoiceDifferenteconomicstateswillbepreferredbydifferentindividuals.Howcanindividualpreferencesbe“aggregated〞intoasocialpreferenceoverallpossibleeconomicstates?AggregatingPreferencesx,y,zdenotedifferenteconomicstates.3agents;Anna,Bill,andCindy.Usesimplemajorityvotingtodecideastate?AggregatingPreferencesMorepreferredLesspreferredAggregatingPreferencesMajorityVoteResultsxbeatsyAggregatingPreferencesMajorityVoteResultsxbeatsyybeatszAggregatingPreferencesMajorityVoteResultsxbeatsyybeatszzbeatsxAggregatingPreferencesMajorityVoteResultsxbeatsyybeatszzbeatsxNosociallybestalternative!AggregatingPreferencesMajorityVoteResultsxbeatsyybeatszzbeatsxMajorityvotingdoesnotalwaysaggregatetransitiveindividualpreferencesintoatransitivesocialpreference.Nosociallybestalternative!AggregatingPreferencesAggregatingPreferencesRank-ordervoteresults(lowscorewins).AggregatingPreferencesRank-ordervoteresults(lowscorewins).x-score=6AggregatingPreferencesx-score=6y-score=6Rank-ordervoteresults(lowscorewins).AggregatingPreferencesx-score=6y-score=6z-score=6Rank-ordervoteresults(lowscorewins).AggregatingPreferencesx-score=6y-score=6z-score=6Nostateisselected!Rank-ordervoteresults(lowscorewins).AggregatingPreferencesx-score=6y-score=6z-score=6Nostateisselected!Rank-ordervotingisindecisiveinthiscase.Rank-ordervoteresults(lowscorewins).ManipulatingPreferencesAswell,mostvotingschemesaremanipulable.I.e.oneindividualcancastan“untruthful〞votetoimprovethesocialoutcomeforhimself.Againconsiderrank-ordervoting.ManipulatingPreferencesThesearetruthfulpreferences.ManipulatingPreferencesThesearetruthfulpreferences.CindyintroducesanewalternativeManipulatingPreferencesThesearetruthfulpreferences.CindyintroducesanewalternativeManipulatingPreferencesThesearetruthfulpreferences.Cindyintroducesanewalternativeandthenlies.ManipulatingPreferencesThesearetruthfulpreferences.Cindyintroducesanewalternativeandthenlies.Rank-ordervoteresults.x-score=8ManipulatingPreferencesThesearetruthfulpreferences.Cindyintroducesanewalternativeandthenlies.Rank-ordervoteresults.x-score=8y-score=7ManipulatingPreferencesThesearetruthfulpreferences.Cindyintroducesanewalternativeandthenlies.Rank-ordervoteresults.x-score=8y-score=7z-score=6ManipulatingPreferencesThesearetruthfulpreferences.Cindyintroducesanewalternativeandthenlies.Rank-ordervoteresults.x-score=8y-score=7z-score=6-score=9zwins!!Bonusinfo:ForMoreinfoaboutdiffernetvotingrules,pleasereadDonaldSaari’sbooks.DesirableVotingRuleProperties1.Ifallindividuals’preferencesarecomplete,reflexiveandtransitive,thensoshouldbethesocialpreferencecreatedbythevotingrule.2.Ifallindividualsrankxbeforeythensoshouldthevotingrule.3.Socialpreferencebetweenxandyshoulddependonindividuals’preferencesbetweenxandyonly.DesirableVotingRulePropertiesKennethArrow’sImpossibilityTheorem:Theonlyvotingrulewithallofproperties1,2and3isdictatorial.DesirableVotingRulePropertiesKennethArrow’sImpossibilityTheorem:Theonlyvotingrulewithallofproperties1,2and3isdictatorial.Implicationisthatanondictatorialvotingrulerequiresgivingupatleastoneofproperties1,2or3.SocialWelfareFunctions1.Ifallindividuals’preferencesarecomplete,reflexiveandtransitive,thensoshouldbethesocialpreferencecreatedbythevotingrule.2.Ifallindividualsrankxbeforeythensoshouldthevotingrule.3.Socialpreferencebetweenxandyshoulddependonindividuals’preferencesbetweenxandyonly.SocialWelfareFunctions1.Ifallindividuals’preferencesarecomplete,reflexiveandtransitive,thensoshouldbethesocialpreferencecreatedbythevotingrule.2.Ifallindividualsrankxbeforeythensoshouldthevotingrule.3.Socialpreferencebetweenxandyshoulddependonindividuals’preferencesbetweenxandyonly.Giveupwhichoneofthese?SocialWelfareFunctions1.Ifallindividuals’preferencesarecomplete,reflexiveandtransitive,thensoshouldbethesocialpreferencecreatedbythevotingrule.2.Ifallindividualsrankxbeforeythensoshouldthevotingrule.3.Socialpreferencebetweenxandyshoulddependonindividuals’preferencesbetweenxandyonly.Giveupwhichoneofthese?SocialWelfareFunctions1.Ifallindividuals’preferencesarecomplete,reflexiveandtransitive,thensoshouldbethesocialpreferencecreatedbythevotingrule.2.Ifallindividualsrankxbeforeythensoshouldthevotingrule.Thereisavarietyofvotingprocedureswithbothproperties1and2.SocialWelfareFunctionsui(x)isindividuali’sutilityfromoverallallocationx.SocialWelfareFunctionsui(x)isindividuali’sutilityfromoverallallocationx.Utilitarian:SocialWelfareFunctionsui(x)isindividuali’sutilityfromoverallallocationx.Utilitarian:Weighted-sum:SocialWelfareFunctionsui(x)isindividuali’sutilityfromoverallallocationx.Utilitarian:Weighted-sum:Minimax:SocialWelfareFunctionsSupposesocialwelfaredependsonlyonindividuals’ownallocations,insteadofoverallallocations.I.e.individualutilityisui(xi),ratherthanui(x).Thensocialwelfareis

whereisanincreasingfunction.SocialOptima&EfficiencyAnysocialoptimalallocationmustbeParetooptimal.Why?SocialOptima&EfficiencyAnysocialoptimalallocationmustbeParetooptimal.Why?Ifnot,thensomebody’sutilitycanbeincreasedwithoutreducinganyoneelse’sutility;i.e.

socialsuboptimalityinefficiency.UtilityPossibilitiesOBOA00UtilityPossibilitiesOBOA00UtilityPossibilitiesOBOA00UtilityPossibilitiesOBOA00UtilityPossibilitiesOBOA00UtilityPossibilitiesOBOA00UtilityPossibilitiesOBOA00Utilitypossibilityfrontier(upf)UtilityPossibilitiesOBOA00Utilitypossibilityfrontier(upf)UtilitypossibilitysetSocialOptima&EfficiencyUpfisthesetofefficientutilitypairs.SocialOptima&EfficiencyUpfisthesetofefficientutilitypairs.SocialindifferencecurvesSocialOptima&EfficiencyUpfisthesetofefficientutilitypairs.SocialindifferencecurvesHighersocialwelfareSocialOptima&EfficiencyUpfisthesetofefficientutilitypairs.SocialindifferencecurvesHighersocialwelfareSocialOptima&EfficiencyUpfisthesetofefficientutilitypairs.SocialindifferencecurvesSocialoptimumSocialOptima&EfficiencyUpfisthesetofefficientutilitypairs.SocialindifferencecurvesSocialoptimumisefficient.FairAllocationsSomeParetoefficientallocationsare“unfair〞.E.g.oneconsumereatseverythingisefficient,but“unfair〞.Cancompetitivemarketsguaranteethata“fair〞allocationcanbeachieved?FairAllocationsIfagentAprefersagentB’sallocationtohisown,thenagentAenviesagentB.AnallocationisfairifitisParetoefficientenvyfree(equitable).FairAllocationsMustequalendowmentscreatefairallocations?FairAllocationsMustequalendowmentscreatefairallocations?No.Whynot?FairAllocations3agents,sameendowments.AgentsAandBhavethesamepreferences.AgentCdoesnot.AgentsBandCtradeagentBachievesamorepreferredbundle.ThereforeagentAmustenvyagentBunfairallocation.FairAllocations2agents,sameendowments.Nowtradeisconductedincompetitivemarkets.Mustthepost-tradeallocationbefair?FairAllocations2agents,sameendowments.Nowtradeisconductedincompetitivemarkets.Mustthepost-tradeallocationbefair?Yes.Why?FairAllocationsEndowmentofeachisPost-tradebundlesare

andFairAllocationsEndowmentofeachisPost-tradebundlesare

andThen

andFairAllocationsSupposeagentAenviesagentB.I.e.FairAllocationsSupposeagentAenviesagentB.I.e.

Then,foragentA,FairAllocationsSupposeagentAenviesagentB.I.e.

Then,foragentA,

Contradiction.

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論