版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
CORPORATION
KEYFINDINGS
nDelawarelocaleducationagencies(LEAs)havebeenallocatedover$100millioninOpportunityFundingandStudentSuccessBlock
Grant(SSBG)fundingandhaveexpendedroughly$86millionsince2019–2020.Althoughthesumislarge,thetwofundingstreamsstilltotalabout1to3percentofschools’totalexpenditureseachyear.
nGivenflexibilityaboutwhattoinvestin,LEAspersistentlyusedflex-ibleOpportunityFundingtohirestafftoprovideindividualizedaca-demicandsocialandemotionalsupportstostudentsexperiencingpoverty(SEPs)andmultilinguallearners(MLs).
nGapsinproficiencyratesbetweenstudentgroupstargetedbythe
OpportunityFundingandSSBGprogramshavenarrowedsince
2018–2019.ThegapinproficiencyratesbetweenSEPsandstudentswhoarenotexperiencingpovertynarrowedbyroughly5percentagepointsin2021–2022.GapsamongMLsandstudentswhoarenot
MLswerelargelysimilar,narrowingbylessthan1percentagepoint.
nHowever,wedidnotfindevidencethatthesegapsnarrowedspecifi-callybecauseofOpportunityFundingandSSBGfunding.WefoundthatacademicperformanceamongMLsdeclinedmoreinDelawarethanincomparisonstates,withmixedpatternsamongSEPs.More-over,wefoundnorelationshipbetweenproficiencyratesamong
SEPsandMLsandtheamountsofOpportunityFundingandSSBGthatschoolsexpendedin2021–2022.
ResearchReport
SYDOAN,JOHNENGBERG,SAMMORALES,HEATHERL.SCHWARTZ,LYNNA.KAROLY
EvaluationofDelaware’s
OpportunityFundingand
StudentSuccessBlock
GrantPrograms
ThirdandFinalYear
I
nthe2019–2020schoolyear,Delawareschooldistrictsandcharterschoolshadaccesstotwo
state-fundedweightedpupilfundinginitiatives—thenewlyexpandedOpportunityFundingpro-gramandtheStudentSuccessBlockGrant(SSBG)—designedtoimproveeducationaloutcomesforstudentsexperiencingpoverty(SEPs)andmultilinguallearners(MLs).1Bothprogramsdirect
additionalfundstopublicschoolsbasedonthenumberofSEPsandMLsthattheyenroll.
Thisisthethirdandfinal
reportinathree-yearindependentevaluationoftheOpportunity
FundingandSSBGprograms.
Becausethecoronavirusdisease
2019(COVID-19)pandemic
causedfirstthecancellationandthenseriousdisruptionofstate-widetestinginspring2020and
spring2021,thisreportisthefirsttimewehaveexaminedtherela-tionshipbetweenOpportunity
FundingandSSBGandstudentachievement.
ThisreportisintendedprimarilyfortheDelaware
2
DepartmentofEducation(DDOE)andtheDelawarestatelegislature.Itisalsointendedforpolicymakersinotherstatesandeducationresearcherswhostudyordesignschoolfinanceprograms.
Inthisreport,wefirstdescribehowDelaware’s
42schooldistrictsandcharterschools(alsoknownaslocaleducationagencies[LEAs])spenttheirOppor-tunityFundingandSSBGdollars,whatportionof
theirallocationstheyspent,andwhatLEAleadersdeemedtheirmosteffectiveinvestmentswiththose
dollars.Wethenexaminewhetherboththealloca-
tionofthefundsandtheactualexpenditureswereassociatedwithimprovedperformanceonspring
2022mathandreadingtests.Thepandemicforcesustoplaceseriouscaveatsonourachievementanalyses,asweexplainlaterinthereport.
OverviewofOpportunity
FundingandtheSSBGFundingPrograms
AsshowninFigure1,SEPsandMLshavebeenaslightlydecliningorsteadyportionofDelaware’spublicschoolstudentsoverthepastfiveyears,makingup29and11percent,respectively,oftheoverallDelawarepublicschoolpopulationinthemostrecentcompletedschoolyear,whichwas2021–2022.2
However,statefundingthatLEAsreceiveforthesestudentgroupshasgrownsubstantially,asshowninFigure2.ThegrowthisduetotheOcto-
Abbreviations
COVID-19DDOE
ELA
ESSER
FY
LEA
ML
SBAC
SEP
SSBG
coronavirusdisease2019
DelawareDepartmentofEducationEnglishlanguagearts
ElementaryandSecondarySchoolEmergencyRelief
fiscalyear
localeducationagency
multilinguallearner
SmarterBalancedAssessment
Consortium
studentexperiencingpovertyStudentSuccessBlockGrant
ber2020legalsettlementbetweenGovernorJohn
Carney,DelawareansforEducationalOpportunity,
andtheDelawareNAACPtomakeOpportunity
Fundingpermanentandtoincreasetheamountthatthestateallocateseachyear.TableA.1inAppendixAprovidesthestateappropriationsforeachprogramfrominception.
Below,wesummarizehowtheOpportunity
FundingandSSBGfundingprogramsallocated
fundsasofthe2021–2022schoolyear;TableA.1andouryear1report(Doanetal.,2021)detailhowtheseprogramshavechangedsincetheirinception.
?Thefirstoftwostreamsiscalledflexible
OpportunityFunding,whichprovidesLEAsanextra$524.25perSEPand$600perML
duringthe2021–2022schoolyear,withtotalallocationssummingto$30million,substan-tialincreasesfromper-pupilallocationsin
priorfiscalyears(FYs).TheDDOEderives
thenumberofSEPsandMLsservedbyDela-wareLEAsinagivenyear.3ThetotalflexibleOpportunityFundingallocation($30millionduringthe2021–2022schoolyear)isthen
dividedproportionallyamongLEAsaccord-ingtotheirtotalenrollmentofSEPsandMLs.LEAsmustannuallysubmitspendingplanstotheDDOEthatspecifytheintendedusesofthesefunds.TheLEAscanusethefunds
topayforstaff,curriculum,orotherservicesthattheLEAsidentifyasbeingmostneededtoservetheirSEPsandMLs,subjecttostateapprovalbasedonawrittenplan.
?Thesecondstream,calledmentalhealthandreadingsupportOpportunityFunding,pro-videsschool-basedgrantsformentalhealth
servicesand/oradditionalreadingsupportsin
ANoteAboutTerms
WecollectivelyrefertoDelaware’s16traditionalschooldistricts,threevocational-technicaldis-
tricts,and23charterschoolnetworksasLEAs
throughoutthisreport.AndwerefertoFYs,whichrunfromJulytoJuneinDelaware,throughout
thisreport.Forexample,FY2022correspondstoJuly1,2021–June30,2022.
3
PercentageofK–12enrollment
TotalK–12enrollment
Totalallocatedfunds($millions)
100
90
80
70
60
50
SEPs
Totalenrollment
146.684
MLs
149,571
147,557
146,684
OpportunityFunding(flexible+mentalhealthandreading)
SSBGreading
2525
6
3.573.973.503.63
1
146,168
FIGURE1
SEPsandMLsasaShareofTotalPublicSchoolEnrolleesinDelaware
145,589
40
30
20
10
0
35.6
33.5
31.3
28.8
28.3
9.910.010.410.010.8
20182019202020212022
Year
152,000
150,000
148,000
146,000
144,000
142,000
140,000
SOURCE:FeaturesinformationfromDelawareOpenData,2021.
NOTE:ThisfigureplotsthetotalK–12enrollmentinDelawarepublicschools(gray)andthepercentageofthatenrollmentthatisclassifiedasanML(blue)oranSEP(orange).
FIGURE2
GrowthinOpportunityFundingandSSBG
100
90
80
70
60
60
50
50
38
38
40
30
20
10
0
20182019202020212022202320242025
(projected)(projected)(projected)
Year
NOTE:OpportunityFundingcombinestheflexibleandmentalhealthandreadingsupportfunds,whileSSBGshowsfundingforreading
interventionists.InOctober2020,GovernorJohnCarney,DelawareansforEducationalOpportunity,andtheDelawareNAACPreachedalegalsettlementtomakeOpportunityFundingpermanentandtoincreasetheamountthatthestateallocateseachyearuntilitreaches$60millionbyFY2025.
4
high-needelementaryschools.Forthe2021–2022schoolyear,elementaryschoolswithat
least30percentSEPsand/oratleast10percentMLsqualifyforthesefunds;87schoolswereeligibleforthesefundsduringthe2021–2022schoolyear.Amongqualifyingschools,the
DDOEproratesthetotalallocation($8mil-lionin2021–2022)basedontheelementaryschool’senrollmentofSEPsandMLsasa
shareoftotalstate-wideenrollmentofSEPs
andMLs.Theseschool-basedgrantscancoverschoolcounselors,socialworkersorlicensedclinicalsocialworkers,psychologists,and/oradditionalreadingsupportsforgradesK–5.
?Asofthe2021–2022schoolyear,theSSBG
programallocatesfundsthroughonepro-
gram,theSSBGreadinginterventionistpro-gram.4TheSSBGreadinginterventionistpro-gramfundsonereadinginterventionistperschool(attherateof$82,537)forelementaryschoolswhoseenrollmentsareeitheratleast
60percentSEPsor20percentMLs.Atotal
of44schoolswereeligibleforSSBGreadinginterventionistsduringthe2021–2022schoolyear.
BoththeOpportunityFundingandSSBGpro-
gramsfundprovidevaluablesupportforneeded
investmentsinDelawareschools,particularlyintheformofstaffingtosupportstudentmentalhealth
andthestate’sMLpopulation.However,thesefundscollectivelyprovideforarelativelysmallproportionofoverallLEAspending(Figure3).Ofthe$2.9bil-lionexpendedbyDelaware’sLEAsduringFY2022,only1percentoftotalexpenditureswascomposedoffundsallocatedthroughtheOpportunityFundingorSSBGprograms.Bycomparison,federalCOVID-19relieffundsaccountedforroughlyfivetimesasmuchspendingfromDelawareLEAs.
RAND’sEvaluationofOpportunity
FundingandSSBG
TheDDOEcontractedwiththeRANDCorporationtoconductanindependentevaluationoverthree
yearstounderstandhowLEAsuseOpportunity
FundingandSSBGandwhetherthetwoinitiatives
arehavingtheirintendedpositiveeffectsonSEPsandMLs.Thisreportisthelastofthreeannualreports,
asshowninTable1.Asacompaniontothisreport,
wearealsopublishingabestpracticeguideintendedforDelawaredistrictandschoolleadersabouttheuse
ofOpportunityFunding(Lawrenceetal.,2023).
Inthesectionsthatfollow,weaddresseachofthequestionsshowninTable1forthefinal,third-yearevaluation.Todoso,wedrawonDDOEfiscaland
administrativedataaboutOpportunityFundingandSSBGimplementation,aswellasLEAs’midyearcon-ferencereportsregardingprogresswithOpportunityFundingandSSBGimplementationsubmittedtotheDDOE.(WeprovidemoredetailsaboutourmethodsinAppendixB.)Wherepossible,wecomparepat-
ternsacrossthethreeyearsofthisevaluationinthetextbelow.Weofferourconclusionsandadiscussionoftheimplicationsoftheresultsinthefinalsection.
LimitationsofThisReport
Ofourthreeannualreports,thisistheonlyonethatanalyzestherelationshipsbetweenOpportunity
FundingandSSBGandstudentachievement.Thisisbecausethe2021–2022schoolyearistheonlyschoolyearduringourthree-yearevaluationperiodin
whichstudentparticipationinthestate’sstandard-
izedtest,theSmarterBalancedAssessmentConsor-tium(SBAC)assessment,wasabove95percent.SBACtestingdidnottakeplaceduringthe2019–2020
schoolyearbecauseoftheCOVID-19pandemic,andtestingparticipationwaslimitedtoonly60percentofeligiblestudentsduringthe2020–2021schoolyear.
Evenwithcomprehensivestudentachievementdatafromspring2022,thedisruptionstoschool-
ingandlearningduringtheCOVID-19pandemic
complicatedourevaluationoftheseprogramsin
severalways.First,theexpansionoftheOpportunityFundingprogramcoincidedwithCOVID-19duringthe2019–2020schoolyear,likelyconfoundinganypotentialpositiveeffectofthesefundswiththedet-rimentaleffectsthatCOVID-19hashadonstudent
learningandwell-being.Remoteinstructionfollow-ingtheCOVID-19pandemicwasfoundtobeapri-marydriverofthewideningofachievementgapsintheUnitedStates,especiallyformathachievementsinmiddle-andhigher-povertyschools(Goldhaber
5
40%
36%
FIGURE3
FY22SharesofTotalSchoolExpendituresinDelaware’sLEAs
5%
1%
Federalstimulus(CARES,ARP)
Opportunityfunding/SSBGreadingOtherfundingsources
Localdiscretionaryfunds
Stateunitfunding
18%
NOTE:ThisfigureshowstheallocationsourcesofthetotalDelawareLEAexpendituresinFY2022.StateunitfundingincludesallDivisionI(personnel),DivisionII(otherandenergy),andDivisionIII(equalization)spending.Thelocal
discretionaryfundscategoryincludesallfundsallocatedunderappropriationcode98000.OpportunityFunding/SSBGreadingincludesallexpendituresfromfundsallocatedtoflexibleOpportunityFunding,mentalhealthandreading
supportOpportunityFunding,andSSBGreadinginterventionistfunds.The“Otherfundingsources”categoryincludesanysourcesoflocal,state,orfederalfundsnotexplicitlylistedinthefigure.ARP=AmericanRescuePlanActof2021;CARES=CoronavirusAid,Relief,andEconomicSecurityAct.
TABLE1
OverviewoftheQuestionsThatEachRANDReportAnswers
Questions
Year1Report
(Doanetal.,
2021)
Year2Report
(Doanetal.,
2022)
Year3Report
(thisreport)
BestPractice
Guide
(Lawrenceetal.,
2023)
WhatdoesresearchsayarethemosteffectiveinvestmentsforSEPsandMLs?
X
HowmuchhaveLEAsspentoftheirtotalOpportunityFundingandSSBGallocations?
X
X
X
WhatinvestmentsdidLEAsandschoolsmakewiththeirOpportunityFundingandSSBG?
X
X
X
WhatbarrierstoimplementationdidLEAsencounter?
X
X
X
WhatbestpracticesdidLEAsidentifyforSEPsandMLs?
X
X
X
HowhaveLEAsadaptedtheiruseofOpportunityFundingandSSBGtoCOVID-19?
X
X
WhichaspectsofOpportunityFundingandSSBGdoLEAswishcouldchange?
X
X
X
Whatdidimplementationlooklikeinpractice?
X
X
X
IstheexpenditureofOpportunityFundingandSSBG
correlatedwithimprovedperformanceamongSEPsandMLs?
X
WhatarerecommendedwaysthatLEAsshoulduseOpportunityFunding?
X
NOTE:Theyear1report(Doanetal.,2021)examined2019–2020.Theyear2report(Doanetal.,2022)examined2020–2021.Thisyear3reportexaminesdatafromthe2019–2020to2021–2022schoolyears.
6
etal.,2022).Datafromthe2022NationalAssessmentofEducationalProgress(NAEP),whichprovides
acommonassessmentacrossstates,suggestthat
COVID-19–induceddecreasesinacademicachieve-
mentmayhavebeenmoreprominentinDelaware
thaninotherstates.Forexample,in2019,39percentofDelawarefourthgradersscoredproficientoraboveontheNAEPmathassessment,1percentagepoint
behindthenationalaverageof40percent.In2022,only26percentofDelawarefourthgradersscoredproficientontheNAEPmathassessment,aratethatwasnow9percentagepointsbehindthenational
average(35percent).
Thesemajorchangesininstructionalmethodsfromin-persontoremoteandhybridlearningledtosignificantchangesinparticipationratesthroughoutSBAC.ParticipationratesforEnglishlanguagearts(ELA)testingwithinSBACstatesfellanaverageof
6.4percentfrom2019to2021,withparticipation
formathassessmentsfallingevenfurther,withan
11.1percentaveragedecrease(McRae,2022).Along
withsetbacksinclassroominstructionandtestingforhigher-povertyschoolsanddistricts,somestatesalsoidentifiedachievementgapsbetweenMLsandnon-
MLs,giventhatMLswerenotabletodeveloptheirlanguagedevelopmentthroughconversationalinter-actionswithinstructorsandpeerswhileinremoteorhybridlearningmodels(Lazarin,2022).
Second,federalElementaryandSecondary
SchoolEmergencyRelief(ESSER)fundsinresponsetoCOVID-19infusedmassiveamountsoffund-
ingforpublicschoolsnationallythroughoutthe
2020–2021and2021–2022schoolyears.Theco-
occurrenceofboththeOpportunityFundingand
SSBGprogramsandfederalESSERfunds—inaddi-tiontothefactthatfederalstimulusfundsaccountedforroughlyfivetimestheamountofspendingthattheOpportunityandSSBGfundsdidinFY2022
(Figure3)—makesithardforustodisentanglethespecificeffectsofOpportunityFundingandSSBGoverandabovethefederalstimulusfunds.
InlightofthechallengesposedbyCOVID-19,weadoptedmultipleapproachestoassessingthe
impactsofOpportunityFundingandSSBGon
studentachievement.Specifically,weconducted
twoseparatecomparisonsofstudentachievement:
(1)Wecomparedaggregatedachievementdataacross
states(Delaware,Connecticut,andWashington),
studentgroups(SEPs,MLs,andstudentsnotidenti-fiedasSEPsnorMLs),andtime(2018–2019versus
2021–2022),and(2)wecomparedschoolsthatdid
anddidnotexpendOpportunityandSSBGfunds
during2021–2022.Wediscussthestrengthsand
drawbacksofeachapproachinsubsequentsectionsofthisreport.Weencouragereaderstolookforpat-ternsacrossthetwoanalysesratherthanplaceundueweightonanyoneanalysis,givenhowtheCOVID-19pandemiccloudsthepicture.
LEAs’UseofOpportunity
FundingandSSBG
Inthissection,wedescribehowDelawareLEAsspentfundsfromthreefundingstreamsduringFY2022:
(1)flexibleOpportunityFunding,(2)mentalhealthandreadingsupportOpportunityFunding,and
(3)SSBGfundsforreadinginterventionists.
HowWereOpportunityandSSBG
FundsAllocated,andWhatProportionofAvailableFundsDidLEAsSpend?
InFY2022,thestateofDelawareallocatedatotalof$30milliontoflexibleOpportunityFunding,$8mil-liontomentalhealthandreadingsupportOppor-
tunityFunding,and$3.6milliontoSSBGfundsforreadinginterventionists.BothOpportunityFundingallocationsrepresentsizableincreasesfromFY2021:a$10millionincreaseintheflexiblefundallocation
anda$3millionincreaseforthementalhealthandreadinginterventionistallocation.Theincreased
allocationforflexibleOpportunityFundingmeantgreaterper-pupilallocationsforSEPsandMLs,andtheincreasedallocationforthementalhealthand
readinginterventionistfundingstreamcorrespondstoexpandedeligibilitycriteriaforthesefunds.InFY2022,theDDOEloweredtheeligibilitythresholdforthisfundfrom60percentSEPsdownto30percentandfrom20percentMLsdownto10percent.Thisexpandedeligibilitycriteriameantthatatotalof87gradeK–4servingschoolswereeligibleinFY2022toreceiveOpportunityFundingformentalhealth
andreadinginterventionists,whichisdoublethe43
7
Percentageofavailablefundsspent
97
76
66
70
65
50
40
30
20
10
0
schoolsthatqualifiedduringFY2021.Meanwhile,theeligibilitycriteriaforSSBGdidnotchange.
Accordingly,atotalof44schoolswereeligibletoreceiveSSBGreadinginterventionistfundinginFY2022,whichwasnearlyidenticaltothenumberofschools(43)eligibleforthesefundsinFY2021.TheStateofDelawareallocatedatotalof$41million
acrossallthreefundingcomponentsinFY2022.
Withsubstantialincreasesinallocations,expen-dituresacrossbothOpportunityFundingprogramswereaccordinglyhigher:LEAsspentatotalof
$24millioninOpportunityFundinginFY2022,
comparedwiththeapproximately$15millionspentinpriorFYs.Likewise,expendituresofmentalhealthandreadingsupportOpportunityFundingtotaled$5.9million,anincreasefrom$3.9millionand
$3.5millioninFY2021andFY2020,respectively.
AsshowninFigure4,theproportionofavail-
ablefundsthatLEAsspent—whichincludesboth
allocationsfromFY2022plusunspentrolloverfundsfromprioryears—remainedsteadyinFY2022acrossallthreefundingprogramsdespitesizableincreasesinthetotalamountofexpendedfunds.Including
unspentrolloverfundsfromprioryears,Delaware
LEAshadroughly$51millioninavailablefunds
tospendacrossthesefundingstreamsduringFY
2022.Oftheseavailablefunds,DelawareLEAsspentapproximately$33million,or65percentoftotal
availablefunds.LEAsspentslightlyover60percentofthefundsavailabletothemthroughtheflexibleOpportunityFundingprogram(63percentofavail-ablefundsspent)andthementalhealthandreadingsupportOpportunityFundingprogram(62percent).LEAsspent86percentoftheiravailableSSBGread-inginterventionistfunds,comparabletopercentagesspentinprioryears(85percentinFY2021,97per-
centinFY2020).
ThereareseveralreasonswhyDelawareLEAsdonotspendalloftheirallocatedfunds,includinglackofstaffcapacitytoprocurenewservicesandsecurenewpersonnel,uncertaintyaboutfunding,delaysinprocurementandapprovals,andtheaddedlayerofCOVID-19–relatedstaffingshortagesandchangesinschoolschedulesandservices.SomeLEAshaveindi-catedthatcarryingfundsoverforcontractualsalarypaymentspasttheJune30fundingcyclecanbedif-
FIGURE4
ThePercentageofOpportunityFundingandSSBGFundsThatLEAsSpent
100
90
86
_________________________________85
80
70
63
60
62
--OpportunityFunding,flexible
--OpportunityFunding,mentalhealthandreadingsupport--SSBG,readinginterventionists
2021
2022
2020
Year
NOTE:ThisfigureshowsthepercentageofavailablefundsexpendedbyDelawareLEAsinFY2020,2021,and2022offlexibleOpportunity
Funding;mentalhealthandreadingsupportOpportunityFunding;andSSBGfundsforreadinginterventionists.InFY2021andFY2020,
“availablefunds”includedbothallocationsinthatFYandrolloverfundsunspentfrompriorFYs.SpecificallocationandexpenditureamountsarereportedinTableA.1.
8
Percentageofschools
45
ficultgivenuncertaintyaboutthespecificamountoffundingtobeallocatedinthefollowingacademicyear.Finally,LEAsreceivedanunprecedented
amountofstimulusfunds,whicharetimelimitedandrequiresignificantcapacitytodrawdown.
WhatTypesofSchoolsWereMost
LikelytoExpendFlexibleOpportunityFunding?
AlthoughtheDDOEallocatesflexibleOpportunityFundingdollarstoLEAsbasedontheirnumberof
SEPsandMLs,LEAsthenhavesomediscretionin
howtoallocatethosefundstotheirschools.(LEAs
needtospecifyinawrittenplan,thattheDDOE
mustapprove,howtheLEAwillusetheflexible
monies.)Weusedschool-levelexpendituredatafromthe2021–2022schoolyeartoexaminewhattypesofschoolsweremostlikelytoexpendflexibleOppor-tunityFundingtogaugewhetherflexiblefundsare,infact,flowingtoschoolswithhigherenrollments
ofSEPsandMLs.Figure5showsthat,asintended,schoolswithhigherpercentagesofSEPswere,infact,
morelikelytoexpendflexibleOpportunityFund-inginFY2022.Over80percentofschoolsserving
30percentormoreSEPsexpendedflexibleOppor-tunityFundinginFY2022,comparedwithonly
45percentofschoolsinwhichfewerthan20percentofstudentswereidentifiedasMLs.Wefoundsimilar
patternswhenexaminingpatternsofflexibleOppor-tunityFundingexpenditurebyschools’percentageofMLenrollment.Thatis,schoolsservinghigherpro-portionsofstudentstargetedbytheflexibleOppor-tunityFundingprogram(SEPsandMLs)weremorelikelytohaveexpendedthesefundsduringFY2022.
WhatInvestmentsDidLEAsMakewithOpportunityFunding?
SubjecttoapprovalfromtheDDOE,DelawareLEAswereabletouseflexibleOpportunityFundingtosup-portawiderangeofinvestments,rangingfromstaffmemberstoinstructionalmaterials.Wereviewed
LEAs’approvedspendingplansfor2021–2022flex-ibleOpportunityFundingandmidyearconferenceformsfrom42DelawareLEAs.Fromthesetwodata
sources,weidentifiedatotalof223listedinvestments
FIGURE5
PercentageofSchoolsExpendingFlexibleOpportunityFunding,byEnrollmentofSEPs
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
84
82
73
<20%20%to<30%30%to<40%40%+
PercentageenrollmentoflSEPs
NOTE:ThisfigureshowsthepercentageofDelawareschoolsthatexpendedflexibleOpportunityFundingduringFY2022.WecreatedcategoriesofschoolsbyenrollmentofSEPssothatapproximatelyone-quarterofDelawarepublicschoolsareineachofthefourcategoriesshown.
9
StaffwerethemostpopulartypeofinvestmentinFY2022(67percentofalltotalinvestments),followedbysuchprogrammingtypesas
professionaldevelopment(12percent)andcurriculum,assessments,andinterventionmaterials(11percent).
withtheFY2022flexibleOpportunityFunding.Onaverage,LEAslisted5.3investmentsintheirflexibleOpportunityFundingplans,withoneLEArequest-ing23investments.
UsingdefinitionsoutlinedinAppendixB,we
categorizedeachofthe223investmentsintocatego-riestoidentifypatterns.Ourcategorizationofthe
223investmentsisshowninTableA.3.LEAsnoted
thattwo-thirdsofflexibleOpportunityFunding
investmentsinFY2022werecontinuationsofinvest-
mentsinitiatedinprioryears.Accordingly,patternsofinvestmentinFY2022wereverysimilartoprioryears,withstaffcontinuingtobethemostpopulartypeofinvestment(67percentofalltotalinvest-
ments),followedbysuchprogrammingtypesaspro-fessionaldevelopment(12percent)andcurriculum,assessments,andinterventionmaterials(11percent).
WethenfurtherclassifiedthetypesofstaffthatLEAsemployed,whichisshowninTableA.4.Amongthe150flexibleOpportunityFundinginvestments
tofundstaffhires,themostcommontypeofstaff
hireinFY2022wasforstaffspecificallytosupportMLs(40percentofallstaffinvestments),followedbysocial,behavioral,ormentalhealthhires(23percent).StafftoprovideotherformsofacademicsupportnotspecifictoMLswere21percentofthestaffhires,and16percentweregeneral,cross-purposehires.
WhatBarrierstoImplementationDidLEAsEncounter?
ThemidyearconferenceformthatLEAleadersfilledoutinspring2022providedLEAleaderswithalist
of11potentialbarrierstoimplementationofOppor-tunityFundin
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 化學(xué)合成制藥工崗前決策判斷考核試卷含答案
- 烷基苯裝置操作工變革管理水平考核試卷含答案
- 擠壓模具工安全生產(chǎn)能力考核試卷含答案
- 化工結(jié)晶工操作安全測試考核試卷含答案
- 飛機裝配工安全實操能力考核試卷含答案
- 老年癡呆末期患者生活品質(zhì)提升方案
- 安全要求標準解讀講解
- 老年甲狀腺功能異常腎功能保護方案
- 2026上半年云南事業(yè)單位聯(lián)考曲靖市市屬遴選30人備考題庫參考答案詳解
- 基因與遺傳?。洪_放創(chuàng)新課件
- 系統(tǒng)性紅斑狼瘡的飲食護理
- 電氣試驗報告模板
- 重慶市沙坪壩小學(xué)小學(xué)語文五年級上冊期末試卷
- 陶瓷巖板應(yīng)用技術(shù)規(guī)程
- 中藥制劑技術(shù)中職PPT完整全套教學(xué)課件
- 龍虎山正一日誦早晚課
- WORD版A4橫版密封條打印模板(可編輯)
- 1比較思想政治教育
- 藝術(shù)課程標準(2022年版)
- JJF 1654-2017平板電泳儀校準規(guī)范
- 上海市工業(yè)用水技術(shù)中心-工業(yè)用水及廢水處理課件
評論
0/150
提交評論