(英文)行業(yè)資料RAND -Evaluation of Delaware's Opportunity Funding and Student Success Block Grant Programs -Third and Final Year_第1頁
(英文)行業(yè)資料RAND -Evaluation of Delaware's Opportunity Funding and Student Success Block Grant Programs -Third and Final Year_第2頁
(英文)行業(yè)資料RAND -Evaluation of Delaware's Opportunity Funding and Student Success Block Grant Programs -Third and Final Year_第3頁
(英文)行業(yè)資料RAND -Evaluation of Delaware's Opportunity Funding and Student Success Block Grant Programs -Third and Final Year_第4頁
(英文)行業(yè)資料RAND -Evaluation of Delaware's Opportunity Funding and Student Success Block Grant Programs -Third and Final Year_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩53頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

CORPORATION

KEYFINDINGS

nDelawarelocaleducationagencies(LEAs)havebeenallocatedover$100millioninOpportunityFundingandStudentSuccessBlock

Grant(SSBG)fundingandhaveexpendedroughly$86millionsince2019–2020.Althoughthesumislarge,thetwofundingstreamsstilltotalabout1to3percentofschools’totalexpenditureseachyear.

nGivenflexibilityaboutwhattoinvestin,LEAspersistentlyusedflex-ibleOpportunityFundingtohirestafftoprovideindividualizedaca-demicandsocialandemotionalsupportstostudentsexperiencingpoverty(SEPs)andmultilinguallearners(MLs).

nGapsinproficiencyratesbetweenstudentgroupstargetedbythe

OpportunityFundingandSSBGprogramshavenarrowedsince

2018–2019.ThegapinproficiencyratesbetweenSEPsandstudentswhoarenotexperiencingpovertynarrowedbyroughly5percentagepointsin2021–2022.GapsamongMLsandstudentswhoarenot

MLswerelargelysimilar,narrowingbylessthan1percentagepoint.

nHowever,wedidnotfindevidencethatthesegapsnarrowedspecifi-callybecauseofOpportunityFundingandSSBGfunding.WefoundthatacademicperformanceamongMLsdeclinedmoreinDelawarethanincomparisonstates,withmixedpatternsamongSEPs.More-over,wefoundnorelationshipbetweenproficiencyratesamong

SEPsandMLsandtheamountsofOpportunityFundingandSSBGthatschoolsexpendedin2021–2022.

ResearchReport

SYDOAN,JOHNENGBERG,SAMMORALES,HEATHERL.SCHWARTZ,LYNNA.KAROLY

EvaluationofDelaware’s

OpportunityFundingand

StudentSuccessBlock

GrantPrograms

ThirdandFinalYear

I

nthe2019–2020schoolyear,Delawareschooldistrictsandcharterschoolshadaccesstotwo

state-fundedweightedpupilfundinginitiatives—thenewlyexpandedOpportunityFundingpro-gramandtheStudentSuccessBlockGrant(SSBG)—designedtoimproveeducationaloutcomesforstudentsexperiencingpoverty(SEPs)andmultilinguallearners(MLs).1Bothprogramsdirect

additionalfundstopublicschoolsbasedonthenumberofSEPsandMLsthattheyenroll.

Thisisthethirdandfinal

reportinathree-yearindependentevaluationoftheOpportunity

FundingandSSBGprograms.

Becausethecoronavirusdisease

2019(COVID-19)pandemic

causedfirstthecancellationandthenseriousdisruptionofstate-widetestinginspring2020and

spring2021,thisreportisthefirsttimewehaveexaminedtherela-tionshipbetweenOpportunity

FundingandSSBGandstudentachievement.

ThisreportisintendedprimarilyfortheDelaware

2

DepartmentofEducation(DDOE)andtheDelawarestatelegislature.Itisalsointendedforpolicymakersinotherstatesandeducationresearcherswhostudyordesignschoolfinanceprograms.

Inthisreport,wefirstdescribehowDelaware’s

42schooldistrictsandcharterschools(alsoknownaslocaleducationagencies[LEAs])spenttheirOppor-tunityFundingandSSBGdollars,whatportionof

theirallocationstheyspent,andwhatLEAleadersdeemedtheirmosteffectiveinvestmentswiththose

dollars.Wethenexaminewhetherboththealloca-

tionofthefundsandtheactualexpenditureswereassociatedwithimprovedperformanceonspring

2022mathandreadingtests.Thepandemicforcesustoplaceseriouscaveatsonourachievementanalyses,asweexplainlaterinthereport.

OverviewofOpportunity

FundingandtheSSBGFundingPrograms

AsshowninFigure1,SEPsandMLshavebeenaslightlydecliningorsteadyportionofDelaware’spublicschoolstudentsoverthepastfiveyears,makingup29and11percent,respectively,oftheoverallDelawarepublicschoolpopulationinthemostrecentcompletedschoolyear,whichwas2021–2022.2

However,statefundingthatLEAsreceiveforthesestudentgroupshasgrownsubstantially,asshowninFigure2.ThegrowthisduetotheOcto-

Abbreviations

COVID-19DDOE

ELA

ESSER

FY

LEA

ML

SBAC

SEP

SSBG

coronavirusdisease2019

DelawareDepartmentofEducationEnglishlanguagearts

ElementaryandSecondarySchoolEmergencyRelief

fiscalyear

localeducationagency

multilinguallearner

SmarterBalancedAssessment

Consortium

studentexperiencingpovertyStudentSuccessBlockGrant

ber2020legalsettlementbetweenGovernorJohn

Carney,DelawareansforEducationalOpportunity,

andtheDelawareNAACPtomakeOpportunity

Fundingpermanentandtoincreasetheamountthatthestateallocateseachyear.TableA.1inAppendixAprovidesthestateappropriationsforeachprogramfrominception.

Below,wesummarizehowtheOpportunity

FundingandSSBGfundingprogramsallocated

fundsasofthe2021–2022schoolyear;TableA.1andouryear1report(Doanetal.,2021)detailhowtheseprogramshavechangedsincetheirinception.

?Thefirstoftwostreamsiscalledflexible

OpportunityFunding,whichprovidesLEAsanextra$524.25perSEPand$600perML

duringthe2021–2022schoolyear,withtotalallocationssummingto$30million,substan-tialincreasesfromper-pupilallocationsin

priorfiscalyears(FYs).TheDDOEderives

thenumberofSEPsandMLsservedbyDela-wareLEAsinagivenyear.3ThetotalflexibleOpportunityFundingallocation($30millionduringthe2021–2022schoolyear)isthen

dividedproportionallyamongLEAsaccord-ingtotheirtotalenrollmentofSEPsandMLs.LEAsmustannuallysubmitspendingplanstotheDDOEthatspecifytheintendedusesofthesefunds.TheLEAscanusethefunds

topayforstaff,curriculum,orotherservicesthattheLEAsidentifyasbeingmostneededtoservetheirSEPsandMLs,subjecttostateapprovalbasedonawrittenplan.

?Thesecondstream,calledmentalhealthandreadingsupportOpportunityFunding,pro-videsschool-basedgrantsformentalhealth

servicesand/oradditionalreadingsupportsin

ANoteAboutTerms

WecollectivelyrefertoDelaware’s16traditionalschooldistricts,threevocational-technicaldis-

tricts,and23charterschoolnetworksasLEAs

throughoutthisreport.AndwerefertoFYs,whichrunfromJulytoJuneinDelaware,throughout

thisreport.Forexample,FY2022correspondstoJuly1,2021–June30,2022.

3

PercentageofK–12enrollment

TotalK–12enrollment

Totalallocatedfunds($millions)

100

90

80

70

60

50

SEPs

Totalenrollment

146.684

MLs

149,571

147,557

146,684

OpportunityFunding(flexible+mentalhealthandreading)

SSBGreading

2525

6

3.573.973.503.63

1

146,168

FIGURE1

SEPsandMLsasaShareofTotalPublicSchoolEnrolleesinDelaware

145,589

40

30

20

10

0

35.6

33.5

31.3

28.8

28.3

9.910.010.410.010.8

20182019202020212022

Year

152,000

150,000

148,000

146,000

144,000

142,000

140,000

SOURCE:FeaturesinformationfromDelawareOpenData,2021.

NOTE:ThisfigureplotsthetotalK–12enrollmentinDelawarepublicschools(gray)andthepercentageofthatenrollmentthatisclassifiedasanML(blue)oranSEP(orange).

FIGURE2

GrowthinOpportunityFundingandSSBG

100

90

80

70

60

60

50

50

38

38

40

30

20

10

0

20182019202020212022202320242025

(projected)(projected)(projected)

Year

NOTE:OpportunityFundingcombinestheflexibleandmentalhealthandreadingsupportfunds,whileSSBGshowsfundingforreading

interventionists.InOctober2020,GovernorJohnCarney,DelawareansforEducationalOpportunity,andtheDelawareNAACPreachedalegalsettlementtomakeOpportunityFundingpermanentandtoincreasetheamountthatthestateallocateseachyearuntilitreaches$60millionbyFY2025.

4

high-needelementaryschools.Forthe2021–2022schoolyear,elementaryschoolswithat

least30percentSEPsand/oratleast10percentMLsqualifyforthesefunds;87schoolswereeligibleforthesefundsduringthe2021–2022schoolyear.Amongqualifyingschools,the

DDOEproratesthetotalallocation($8mil-lionin2021–2022)basedontheelementaryschool’senrollmentofSEPsandMLsasa

shareoftotalstate-wideenrollmentofSEPs

andMLs.Theseschool-basedgrantscancoverschoolcounselors,socialworkersorlicensedclinicalsocialworkers,psychologists,and/oradditionalreadingsupportsforgradesK–5.

?Asofthe2021–2022schoolyear,theSSBG

programallocatesfundsthroughonepro-

gram,theSSBGreadinginterventionistpro-gram.4TheSSBGreadinginterventionistpro-gramfundsonereadinginterventionistperschool(attherateof$82,537)forelementaryschoolswhoseenrollmentsareeitheratleast

60percentSEPsor20percentMLs.Atotal

of44schoolswereeligibleforSSBGreadinginterventionistsduringthe2021–2022schoolyear.

BoththeOpportunityFundingandSSBGpro-

gramsfundprovidevaluablesupportforneeded

investmentsinDelawareschools,particularlyintheformofstaffingtosupportstudentmentalhealth

andthestate’sMLpopulation.However,thesefundscollectivelyprovideforarelativelysmallproportionofoverallLEAspending(Figure3).Ofthe$2.9bil-lionexpendedbyDelaware’sLEAsduringFY2022,only1percentoftotalexpenditureswascomposedoffundsallocatedthroughtheOpportunityFundingorSSBGprograms.Bycomparison,federalCOVID-19relieffundsaccountedforroughlyfivetimesasmuchspendingfromDelawareLEAs.

RAND’sEvaluationofOpportunity

FundingandSSBG

TheDDOEcontractedwiththeRANDCorporationtoconductanindependentevaluationoverthree

yearstounderstandhowLEAsuseOpportunity

FundingandSSBGandwhetherthetwoinitiatives

arehavingtheirintendedpositiveeffectsonSEPsandMLs.Thisreportisthelastofthreeannualreports,

asshowninTable1.Asacompaniontothisreport,

wearealsopublishingabestpracticeguideintendedforDelawaredistrictandschoolleadersabouttheuse

ofOpportunityFunding(Lawrenceetal.,2023).

Inthesectionsthatfollow,weaddresseachofthequestionsshowninTable1forthefinal,third-yearevaluation.Todoso,wedrawonDDOEfiscaland

administrativedataaboutOpportunityFundingandSSBGimplementation,aswellasLEAs’midyearcon-ferencereportsregardingprogresswithOpportunityFundingandSSBGimplementationsubmittedtotheDDOE.(WeprovidemoredetailsaboutourmethodsinAppendixB.)Wherepossible,wecomparepat-

ternsacrossthethreeyearsofthisevaluationinthetextbelow.Weofferourconclusionsandadiscussionoftheimplicationsoftheresultsinthefinalsection.

LimitationsofThisReport

Ofourthreeannualreports,thisistheonlyonethatanalyzestherelationshipsbetweenOpportunity

FundingandSSBGandstudentachievement.Thisisbecausethe2021–2022schoolyearistheonlyschoolyearduringourthree-yearevaluationperiodin

whichstudentparticipationinthestate’sstandard-

izedtest,theSmarterBalancedAssessmentConsor-tium(SBAC)assessment,wasabove95percent.SBACtestingdidnottakeplaceduringthe2019–2020

schoolyearbecauseoftheCOVID-19pandemic,andtestingparticipationwaslimitedtoonly60percentofeligiblestudentsduringthe2020–2021schoolyear.

Evenwithcomprehensivestudentachievementdatafromspring2022,thedisruptionstoschool-

ingandlearningduringtheCOVID-19pandemic

complicatedourevaluationoftheseprogramsin

severalways.First,theexpansionoftheOpportunityFundingprogramcoincidedwithCOVID-19duringthe2019–2020schoolyear,likelyconfoundinganypotentialpositiveeffectofthesefundswiththedet-rimentaleffectsthatCOVID-19hashadonstudent

learningandwell-being.Remoteinstructionfollow-ingtheCOVID-19pandemicwasfoundtobeapri-marydriverofthewideningofachievementgapsintheUnitedStates,especiallyformathachievementsinmiddle-andhigher-povertyschools(Goldhaber

5

40%

36%

FIGURE3

FY22SharesofTotalSchoolExpendituresinDelaware’sLEAs

5%

1%

Federalstimulus(CARES,ARP)

Opportunityfunding/SSBGreadingOtherfundingsources

Localdiscretionaryfunds

Stateunitfunding

18%

NOTE:ThisfigureshowstheallocationsourcesofthetotalDelawareLEAexpendituresinFY2022.StateunitfundingincludesallDivisionI(personnel),DivisionII(otherandenergy),andDivisionIII(equalization)spending.Thelocal

discretionaryfundscategoryincludesallfundsallocatedunderappropriationcode98000.OpportunityFunding/SSBGreadingincludesallexpendituresfromfundsallocatedtoflexibleOpportunityFunding,mentalhealthandreading

supportOpportunityFunding,andSSBGreadinginterventionistfunds.The“Otherfundingsources”categoryincludesanysourcesoflocal,state,orfederalfundsnotexplicitlylistedinthefigure.ARP=AmericanRescuePlanActof2021;CARES=CoronavirusAid,Relief,andEconomicSecurityAct.

TABLE1

OverviewoftheQuestionsThatEachRANDReportAnswers

Questions

Year1Report

(Doanetal.,

2021)

Year2Report

(Doanetal.,

2022)

Year3Report

(thisreport)

BestPractice

Guide

(Lawrenceetal.,

2023)

WhatdoesresearchsayarethemosteffectiveinvestmentsforSEPsandMLs?

X

HowmuchhaveLEAsspentoftheirtotalOpportunityFundingandSSBGallocations?

X

X

X

WhatinvestmentsdidLEAsandschoolsmakewiththeirOpportunityFundingandSSBG?

X

X

X

WhatbarrierstoimplementationdidLEAsencounter?

X

X

X

WhatbestpracticesdidLEAsidentifyforSEPsandMLs?

X

X

X

HowhaveLEAsadaptedtheiruseofOpportunityFundingandSSBGtoCOVID-19?

X

X

WhichaspectsofOpportunityFundingandSSBGdoLEAswishcouldchange?

X

X

X

Whatdidimplementationlooklikeinpractice?

X

X

X

IstheexpenditureofOpportunityFundingandSSBG

correlatedwithimprovedperformanceamongSEPsandMLs?

X

WhatarerecommendedwaysthatLEAsshoulduseOpportunityFunding?

X

NOTE:Theyear1report(Doanetal.,2021)examined2019–2020.Theyear2report(Doanetal.,2022)examined2020–2021.Thisyear3reportexaminesdatafromthe2019–2020to2021–2022schoolyears.

6

etal.,2022).Datafromthe2022NationalAssessmentofEducationalProgress(NAEP),whichprovides

acommonassessmentacrossstates,suggestthat

COVID-19–induceddecreasesinacademicachieve-

mentmayhavebeenmoreprominentinDelaware

thaninotherstates.Forexample,in2019,39percentofDelawarefourthgradersscoredproficientoraboveontheNAEPmathassessment,1percentagepoint

behindthenationalaverageof40percent.In2022,only26percentofDelawarefourthgradersscoredproficientontheNAEPmathassessment,aratethatwasnow9percentagepointsbehindthenational

average(35percent).

Thesemajorchangesininstructionalmethodsfromin-persontoremoteandhybridlearningledtosignificantchangesinparticipationratesthroughoutSBAC.ParticipationratesforEnglishlanguagearts(ELA)testingwithinSBACstatesfellanaverageof

6.4percentfrom2019to2021,withparticipation

formathassessmentsfallingevenfurther,withan

11.1percentaveragedecrease(McRae,2022).Along

withsetbacksinclassroominstructionandtestingforhigher-povertyschoolsanddistricts,somestatesalsoidentifiedachievementgapsbetweenMLsandnon-

MLs,giventhatMLswerenotabletodeveloptheirlanguagedevelopmentthroughconversationalinter-actionswithinstructorsandpeerswhileinremoteorhybridlearningmodels(Lazarin,2022).

Second,federalElementaryandSecondary

SchoolEmergencyRelief(ESSER)fundsinresponsetoCOVID-19infusedmassiveamountsoffund-

ingforpublicschoolsnationallythroughoutthe

2020–2021and2021–2022schoolyears.Theco-

occurrenceofboththeOpportunityFundingand

SSBGprogramsandfederalESSERfunds—inaddi-tiontothefactthatfederalstimulusfundsaccountedforroughlyfivetimestheamountofspendingthattheOpportunityandSSBGfundsdidinFY2022

(Figure3)—makesithardforustodisentanglethespecificeffectsofOpportunityFundingandSSBGoverandabovethefederalstimulusfunds.

InlightofthechallengesposedbyCOVID-19,weadoptedmultipleapproachestoassessingthe

impactsofOpportunityFundingandSSBGon

studentachievement.Specifically,weconducted

twoseparatecomparisonsofstudentachievement:

(1)Wecomparedaggregatedachievementdataacross

states(Delaware,Connecticut,andWashington),

studentgroups(SEPs,MLs,andstudentsnotidenti-fiedasSEPsnorMLs),andtime(2018–2019versus

2021–2022),and(2)wecomparedschoolsthatdid

anddidnotexpendOpportunityandSSBGfunds

during2021–2022.Wediscussthestrengthsand

drawbacksofeachapproachinsubsequentsectionsofthisreport.Weencouragereaderstolookforpat-ternsacrossthetwoanalysesratherthanplaceundueweightonanyoneanalysis,givenhowtheCOVID-19pandemiccloudsthepicture.

LEAs’UseofOpportunity

FundingandSSBG

Inthissection,wedescribehowDelawareLEAsspentfundsfromthreefundingstreamsduringFY2022:

(1)flexibleOpportunityFunding,(2)mentalhealthandreadingsupportOpportunityFunding,and

(3)SSBGfundsforreadinginterventionists.

HowWereOpportunityandSSBG

FundsAllocated,andWhatProportionofAvailableFundsDidLEAsSpend?

InFY2022,thestateofDelawareallocatedatotalof$30milliontoflexibleOpportunityFunding,$8mil-liontomentalhealthandreadingsupportOppor-

tunityFunding,and$3.6milliontoSSBGfundsforreadinginterventionists.BothOpportunityFundingallocationsrepresentsizableincreasesfromFY2021:a$10millionincreaseintheflexiblefundallocation

anda$3millionincreaseforthementalhealthandreadinginterventionistallocation.Theincreased

allocationforflexibleOpportunityFundingmeantgreaterper-pupilallocationsforSEPsandMLs,andtheincreasedallocationforthementalhealthand

readinginterventionistfundingstreamcorrespondstoexpandedeligibilitycriteriaforthesefunds.InFY2022,theDDOEloweredtheeligibilitythresholdforthisfundfrom60percentSEPsdownto30percentandfrom20percentMLsdownto10percent.Thisexpandedeligibilitycriteriameantthatatotalof87gradeK–4servingschoolswereeligibleinFY2022toreceiveOpportunityFundingformentalhealth

andreadinginterventionists,whichisdoublethe43

7

Percentageofavailablefundsspent

97

76

66

70

65

50

40

30

20

10

0

schoolsthatqualifiedduringFY2021.Meanwhile,theeligibilitycriteriaforSSBGdidnotchange.

Accordingly,atotalof44schoolswereeligibletoreceiveSSBGreadinginterventionistfundinginFY2022,whichwasnearlyidenticaltothenumberofschools(43)eligibleforthesefundsinFY2021.TheStateofDelawareallocatedatotalof$41million

acrossallthreefundingcomponentsinFY2022.

Withsubstantialincreasesinallocations,expen-dituresacrossbothOpportunityFundingprogramswereaccordinglyhigher:LEAsspentatotalof

$24millioninOpportunityFundinginFY2022,

comparedwiththeapproximately$15millionspentinpriorFYs.Likewise,expendituresofmentalhealthandreadingsupportOpportunityFundingtotaled$5.9million,anincreasefrom$3.9millionand

$3.5millioninFY2021andFY2020,respectively.

AsshowninFigure4,theproportionofavail-

ablefundsthatLEAsspent—whichincludesboth

allocationsfromFY2022plusunspentrolloverfundsfromprioryears—remainedsteadyinFY2022acrossallthreefundingprogramsdespitesizableincreasesinthetotalamountofexpendedfunds.Including

unspentrolloverfundsfromprioryears,Delaware

LEAshadroughly$51millioninavailablefunds

tospendacrossthesefundingstreamsduringFY

2022.Oftheseavailablefunds,DelawareLEAsspentapproximately$33million,or65percentoftotal

availablefunds.LEAsspentslightlyover60percentofthefundsavailabletothemthroughtheflexibleOpportunityFundingprogram(63percentofavail-ablefundsspent)andthementalhealthandreadingsupportOpportunityFundingprogram(62percent).LEAsspent86percentoftheiravailableSSBGread-inginterventionistfunds,comparabletopercentagesspentinprioryears(85percentinFY2021,97per-

centinFY2020).

ThereareseveralreasonswhyDelawareLEAsdonotspendalloftheirallocatedfunds,includinglackofstaffcapacitytoprocurenewservicesandsecurenewpersonnel,uncertaintyaboutfunding,delaysinprocurementandapprovals,andtheaddedlayerofCOVID-19–relatedstaffingshortagesandchangesinschoolschedulesandservices.SomeLEAshaveindi-catedthatcarryingfundsoverforcontractualsalarypaymentspasttheJune30fundingcyclecanbedif-

FIGURE4

ThePercentageofOpportunityFundingandSSBGFundsThatLEAsSpent

100

90

86

_________________________________85

80

70

63

60

62

--OpportunityFunding,flexible

--OpportunityFunding,mentalhealthandreadingsupport--SSBG,readinginterventionists

2021

2022

2020

Year

NOTE:ThisfigureshowsthepercentageofavailablefundsexpendedbyDelawareLEAsinFY2020,2021,and2022offlexibleOpportunity

Funding;mentalhealthandreadingsupportOpportunityFunding;andSSBGfundsforreadinginterventionists.InFY2021andFY2020,

“availablefunds”includedbothallocationsinthatFYandrolloverfundsunspentfrompriorFYs.SpecificallocationandexpenditureamountsarereportedinTableA.1.

8

Percentageofschools

45

ficultgivenuncertaintyaboutthespecificamountoffundingtobeallocatedinthefollowingacademicyear.Finally,LEAsreceivedanunprecedented

amountofstimulusfunds,whicharetimelimitedandrequiresignificantcapacitytodrawdown.

WhatTypesofSchoolsWereMost

LikelytoExpendFlexibleOpportunityFunding?

AlthoughtheDDOEallocatesflexibleOpportunityFundingdollarstoLEAsbasedontheirnumberof

SEPsandMLs,LEAsthenhavesomediscretionin

howtoallocatethosefundstotheirschools.(LEAs

needtospecifyinawrittenplan,thattheDDOE

mustapprove,howtheLEAwillusetheflexible

monies.)Weusedschool-levelexpendituredatafromthe2021–2022schoolyeartoexaminewhattypesofschoolsweremostlikelytoexpendflexibleOppor-tunityFundingtogaugewhetherflexiblefundsare,infact,flowingtoschoolswithhigherenrollments

ofSEPsandMLs.Figure5showsthat,asintended,schoolswithhigherpercentagesofSEPswere,infact,

morelikelytoexpendflexibleOpportunityFund-inginFY2022.Over80percentofschoolsserving

30percentormoreSEPsexpendedflexibleOppor-tunityFundinginFY2022,comparedwithonly

45percentofschoolsinwhichfewerthan20percentofstudentswereidentifiedasMLs.Wefoundsimilar

patternswhenexaminingpatternsofflexibleOppor-tunityFundingexpenditurebyschools’percentageofMLenrollment.Thatis,schoolsservinghigherpro-portionsofstudentstargetedbytheflexibleOppor-tunityFundingprogram(SEPsandMLs)weremorelikelytohaveexpendedthesefundsduringFY2022.

WhatInvestmentsDidLEAsMakewithOpportunityFunding?

SubjecttoapprovalfromtheDDOE,DelawareLEAswereabletouseflexibleOpportunityFundingtosup-portawiderangeofinvestments,rangingfromstaffmemberstoinstructionalmaterials.Wereviewed

LEAs’approvedspendingplansfor2021–2022flex-ibleOpportunityFundingandmidyearconferenceformsfrom42DelawareLEAs.Fromthesetwodata

sources,weidentifiedatotalof223listedinvestments

FIGURE5

PercentageofSchoolsExpendingFlexibleOpportunityFunding,byEnrollmentofSEPs

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

84

82

73

<20%20%to<30%30%to<40%40%+

PercentageenrollmentoflSEPs

NOTE:ThisfigureshowsthepercentageofDelawareschoolsthatexpendedflexibleOpportunityFundingduringFY2022.WecreatedcategoriesofschoolsbyenrollmentofSEPssothatapproximatelyone-quarterofDelawarepublicschoolsareineachofthefourcategoriesshown.

9

StaffwerethemostpopulartypeofinvestmentinFY2022(67percentofalltotalinvestments),followedbysuchprogrammingtypesas

professionaldevelopment(12percent)andcurriculum,assessments,andinterventionmaterials(11percent).

withtheFY2022flexibleOpportunityFunding.Onaverage,LEAslisted5.3investmentsintheirflexibleOpportunityFundingplans,withoneLEArequest-ing23investments.

UsingdefinitionsoutlinedinAppendixB,we

categorizedeachofthe223investmentsintocatego-riestoidentifypatterns.Ourcategorizationofthe

223investmentsisshowninTableA.3.LEAsnoted

thattwo-thirdsofflexibleOpportunityFunding

investmentsinFY2022werecontinuationsofinvest-

mentsinitiatedinprioryears.Accordingly,patternsofinvestmentinFY2022wereverysimilartoprioryears,withstaffcontinuingtobethemostpopulartypeofinvestment(67percentofalltotalinvest-

ments),followedbysuchprogrammingtypesaspro-fessionaldevelopment(12percent)andcurriculum,assessments,andinterventionmaterials(11percent).

WethenfurtherclassifiedthetypesofstaffthatLEAsemployed,whichisshowninTableA.4.Amongthe150flexibleOpportunityFundinginvestments

tofundstaffhires,themostcommontypeofstaff

hireinFY2022wasforstaffspecificallytosupportMLs(40percentofallstaffinvestments),followedbysocial,behavioral,ormentalhealthhires(23percent).StafftoprovideotherformsofacademicsupportnotspecifictoMLswere21percentofthestaffhires,and16percentweregeneral,cross-purposehires.

WhatBarrierstoImplementationDidLEAsEncounter?

ThemidyearconferenceformthatLEAleadersfilledoutinspring2022providedLEAleaderswithalist

of11potentialbarrierstoimplementationofOppor-tunityFundin

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論