跨文化交際集體主義vs個(gè)人主義_第1頁(yè)
跨文化交際集體主義vs個(gè)人主義_第2頁(yè)
跨文化交際集體主義vs個(gè)人主義_第3頁(yè)
跨文化交際集體主義vs個(gè)人主義_第4頁(yè)
跨文化交際集體主義vs個(gè)人主義_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩26頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

MainPoints1)Individualism-collectivism2)Individual-OrientedSocieties3)Collectivism-OrientedSocieties4)HowtomakethetwoworktogetherIndividualism-collectivism

Allculturesmustaskandanswerthefollowingquestion:Towhatextentshouldpeoplepursuetheirownindividualactivitiesandagendasratherthancontributingtothesuccessandwell-beingofthelargergroup,suchafamily,neighborhood,clan,team,orcompany?Individualism—beingdifferentCollectivism—howmuchyoucandoforthegroupyouareinSomecountries,suchastheUnitedStates,Canada,GreatBritain,andtheNetherlands,placeahighvalueonindividualism.Thereculturesemphasizetheworthanddignityoftheindividualoverthegroup,independenceratherthaninterdependence,andrelativelyfewsocialobligations.Everybodyistryingtobedifferentfromtheothersintheteamorclan;Personalgoalsareoverthegroupgoals;Peopleplacetheworthanddignityoftheindividualoverthegroup.Othercultures,suchasJapanandChina,tendtoemphasizethelargergroup.Theseculturesencouragepeopletoputtheinterestofthegroupabovetheirown,maintainstrongtiesandobligationstogroupmembers,andvaluelong-termsocialrelationshipsaboveshort-termaccomplishments.

Individualisticculturebelievesthatpeoplearesupposedtotakecareofthemselvesandremainemotionallyindependentofgroups,organizations,orothercollectivities.Self-emphasisisimportant,eveninbuildingfriendships.1.Individual-OrientedSocietiesIndividualscandowhatevertheywant,andtheir“freedom”andtheir“rights”arenecessaryvalues.Theybuildcontractstoprotecttheirrightsfromothersandtoprotecttheirdignity.Theirhighlevelofself-respectdoesnotkeepthemfromenjoyingagoodtimeandanoccasionaladventure,eveniftheymightfeelguiltylater.Whentheyarefriendly,theyareveryverbalandopen,buttheycanbeverycriticaltowardenemies.Individualsliketodebateissuesbutwillwithdrawandbecomedefensivewithsomebodytheydon’ttrust.Whentheyareinterested,theycanbeloudwithlotsofquestionsbuttheyarelikelytolookawaywhentheygetbored.(1)Other’sbehaviorisexplainedbypersonaltraits.(2)One’ssuccessisattributedtohisownability.(3)Selfisdefinedasindividualentity.(4)Oneknowsmoreaboutselfthanothers.(5)Achievementismadeforone’sownsake.(6)Personalgoalsareovergroupgoals.(7)Self-assurednessisvalued.(8)Autonomyandindependenceisvalued.(9)dependenceonothersisavoided.(10)Onebearscasualconnectionstomanygroups.(11)Taskcompletionisimportant.(12)Onehasfewobligationstoothers.(13)Confrontationisacceptable.Thecharacteristicsofindividuals2.Collectivism-OrientedSocieties

Collectivistcultureemphasizestheingroup,suchastheorganizationortheextendedfamily.Collectivistsvalueharmonyandavoiddirectconfrontation.Theyemphasizebuildingrelationshipswithotherthroughritualsandpoliteness,andtaskaccomplishmentbecomesanindirectorsecondarygoal.

Groupsaremajorunitsofsocialperception.(2)Others’behaviorisexplainedbygroupnorms.(3)Successattributedtohelpofgroup.(4)Selfdefinedintermsofgroup.(5)Oneknowsmoreaboutothersthanself.(6)Achievementisforbenefitofgroup.(7)Ingroupgoalisoverpersonalgoal.(8)Modestyisvalued.(9)Interdependenceisvalued.(10)Ostracism(排斥)isfeared.(11)Onehasstrongconnectionstoafewgroups.(12)Onehasmanyobligationstoothers.(13)Harmonyisexpected.(14)Relationsareimportant.3.Impactuponindividual-orientedsocieties

Individualism,asdescribedabove,referstotheattitudeofvaluingourselvesasseparateindividualswithresponsibilityforourowndestiniesandourownactions.Proponents(支持者)ofindividualismbelievethatself-interestisanappropriategoal.Therefore,theindividual-collectivedimensionplaysoutintheindividual-orientedsocietiesinfollowingaspects.1)Theidealoftheindividualisdeeplyrootedinthesocial,political,andeconomicinstitutionsofsuchsocietiesastheUnitedStatesandEngland.Theindividualisthesourceofmoralpower,totallycompetenttoassesstheeffectsofhisorherownactions,andisexpectedtoberesponsibleforthoseactions.2)Familytiestendtoberelativelyunimportant.ThatisnottosaythatintheUnitedStatesthefamilyisunimportantinanyabsolutesense,forthefamilyremainstheprimarygrouptowhichmostAmericanshavetheirstrongestloyalties.Nevertheless,whencomparedwithothercultures,Americansdividetheirtimeandemotionalenergybetweenfamilyandawidervarietyofsocialgroupings,includingchurch,school,laborunion,workplace,andahostofvoluntaryorganizations.3)ThephysicallayoutofthetypicalAmericanhouse,designedtomaximizeindividualspace,clearlyreflectstheemphasisplacedonindividualismandpersonalprivacy.Therearedoorsonbathroomsandbedrooms,parentsareexpectedtoacknowledgetheprivatespaceandpossessionsoftheirchildren'srooms,andchildrenareusuallyrestrictedintheiruseofspacethatisconsideredthedomainoftheparents.4)TheconceptofindividualismisinstilledfromanearlyageintheUnitedStatesbyconstantencouragementofchildrentobecomeself-sufficient.e.g.Childrenaretaughttomaketheirowndecisions,clarifytheirownvalues,formtheirownopinions,andsolvetheirownproblems.Theyareencouragedtosearchoutanswersforthemselves,ratherthanrelyingontheteacheroradult.5)IntheUnitedStates,theBillofRights(人權(quán)法案)protectspeopleagainstinfringement(侵害)oftheirindividualrightsbythestate,thusallowingthemtoexpresstheirideasfreely,practicewhateverreligiontheychoose,assemblefreely,andgenerallycontroltheirownlivestoasgreatadegreeaspossible.4.Impactuponcollective-orientedsocietiesCollectivismemphasizescommoninterests,conformity,cooperation,andinterdependence.Itattemptstoseeagroupofindividualsashavingasingleidentitysimilartoaperson.Ithaspurpose,anditactstoachievegoals.Therefore,theindividual-collectivedimensionplaysoutinthecollective-orientedsocietiesinfollowingaspects.1)Peopletendtoidentifyordefinethemselvesprimarilyasmembersofagroupratherthanasindividuals.2)Property,suchaslandorlivestock,iscontrolledbythelargergroupratherthanbeingindividuallyowned.WhereasAmericansownproperty(totheextentthattheyhavetotalcontroloverit),peopleincollectivistsocietieshaveonlylimitedrightsandobligationstopropertythatisultimatelycontrolledbythelargergroup.3)Basiclifechoices,suchaswhoyouwillmarryorwhatprofessionyouwillfollow,arenotmadeexclusively,orevenprimarily,bytheindividual.Forexample,marriagesinsomepartsoftheworldarearrangedbyparentsandotherinfluentialmembersofthetwofamilygroupsinvolved.4)Collectivistsocietieshaveastrongsenseofresponsibilitytothegroup(e.g.country,family,company).InJapan,forexample,ifanindividualdoesnotgivehisorherbesteffort,itisseenaslettingdowntheentiregroup.Inotherwords,bothsuccessandfailureare"teamaffairs"inJapan.5)Thereisconsiderablylessprivacy.Children,eveninthosehomeswithampleroom,frequentlysharethesamesleepingareaswiththeirparentsandsiblingsuntilwellintoadolescence.Clearly,theydonotadheretotheAmericanvaluethatconsiderschildren“disadvantaged"iftheymustsharearoomwithasibling.5)Comparisonbetween

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論