免費？宅在家學(xué)英語？怎么報名？最牛英語口語培訓(xùn)模式：躺在家里練口語，全程外教一對一，三個月暢談無阻！洛基英語，免費體驗全部在線一對一課程：/ielts/xd.html（報名網(wǎng)址）四、六級寫作分類范文（一）對立觀點型1.IsaTestofSpokenEnglishNecessary?AtestofspokenEnglishwillbeincludedasanoptionalcomponentofCollegeEnglishTest(CET).SomepeoplearguethatitisabsolutelynecessarytoholdatestofspokenEnglishinChinabecausewehavebeeninformedfrequentlythataChinesestudentwhohasbeenlearningEnglishforovertenyearscannotevencommunicatewithanativespeaker.AtestofspokenEnglishwillbringthecollegestudentsanawarenessoftheimportanceoforalEnglish,andwillthushelpthemwiththeircommunicatingskills.Ontheotherhand,someothersstillmaintainthatagoodcommandofreadingandwritingskillswillbeenoughfortheEnglishlearners.Tosomeextenttheiropinionderivesfromthefactthatstudentsarealreadyunderconsiderablepressurefromtheircoursework.Anotherrequiredtestwillonlyaddtotheirburden.Inmyopinion,atestofspokenEnglishwilldomoregoodthanharm.SinceChinawillcontinueitspolicyofopeningandreform,theabilitytospeakEnglishfluentlyisamustforanyonewhowantstosurpassothersinahighlycompetitivesociety.WhetherItakethetestornot,IshallsparenoeffortstopracticeoralEnglishintheremainingyearsofmycollegestudy.2.Do“LuckyNumbers”ReallyBringGoodLuck?Therearepeoplewhobelievethatsomenumbersbringgoodluck,whileothersbringbadluck.Forinstance,inChinathenumbereightisthoughttobelucky.TurningourattentiontotheWest,wefindthatthenumbersevenisconsideredlucky,butthenumber13isavoidedliketheplague.Inspiteofalltheseclaims,mostpeoplewouldagreethatthereislittleevidencethatnumbershaveanyinfluenceonourlives.Infact,theysay,thereverseseemstobethecase.Foronething,wemightexpectcalculatorstobreakdowneverytimetheynotethenumber13,andforanother,althougheveryweekhassevendaysweknowthatnoteveryweekisluckyforus.Weighingtheprosandconsofthesearguments,Iaminclinedtoagreewiththelatterpointofview.Itisobviousthatthereisnoscientificbasisforthebeliefthatthereisaconnectionbetweenluckandnumbers.Allinall,itseemstometobesuperstition.3.MyViewonJob-HoppingJob-hopping,orfrequentchangeofjobs,isbecomingincreasinglycommoninChinatoday.Astheeconomygrows,moreopportunitiesforemploymentareappearingthanbefore.Theresultisthatpeople,especiallyyoungpeople,aretemptedtochangejobsfrequently,seekinghighersalariesormoreinterestingpositions.Nevertheless,manypeopleprefertostayintheiroldjobs.Thisispartlybecausetheyfeelloyaltotheirworkunits,andpartlybecausetheydisliketheideaofhavingtospendmuchtimetrainingforanewjob.Inaddition,althoughanewjobmayofferhigherpayormoreopportunitiesforpromotion,itmaybelocatedfarfromhomeandbeinconvenienttoreach.Ithinkitisagoodthingfortheworkforcetobeflexible,sothatnewdemandsforpersonnelcanbesatisfiedquickly.However,ifapersonchangesjobstoooften,heorshewillcauselossestotheemployingunits.Moreover,frequentjob-hoppingpreventsapersonfromgainingvaluablejobexperienceanddevelopinggoodworkhabits.4．WhyITakeCollegeEnglishTestBand6(a)SomepeopleconsiderthatitisunnecessarytotakeCollegeEnglishTestBand6(CET-6).OnereasontheyciteisthatmostschoolssetCET-4asthemainrequirement.AnotherreasonisthattheythinkthatCET-6issimplytoodifficultforthem.I,however,havedecidedtoacceptthechallengeofCET-6.ThepreparationforthistestwillforcemetoraisethelevelofmyEnglishability.Besides,IregardCET-6asastepping-stonetofurtherqualificationsinEnglishwhichwillhelpmeinmyfuturecareer.Allinall,takingCET-6isadvantageousforbothastudent’sstudiesandhispersonaldevelopment.ThefirstadvantageisthathewillimprovehisEnglishskillsinanall-roundway.ThesecondisthathewillstrengthenhischaracterbycontinuinghisEnglishstudieswhenotherpeoplehavebeenlazyandstopped.(b)WhenitcomestoCollegeEnglishTestBand6(CET-6),opinionsdifferfrompersontoperson.Someholdthepositiveview.TheybelievethattakingCET-6isadvantageousforbothastudent’sstudiesandhispersonaldevelopment.ThefirstadvantageisthathewillimprovehisEnglishskillsinanall-roundway.ThesecondisthathewillstrengthenhischaracterbycontinuinghisEnglishstudieswhenotherpeoplehavebeenlazyandstopped.Others,however,holdtheoppositeview.TheymaintainthatitisunnecessarytotakeCollegeEnglishTestBand6(CET-6).OnereasontheyciteisthatmostschoolssetCET-4asthemainrequirement.AnotherreasonisthattheythinkthatCET-6issimplytoodifficultforthem.Personally,IhavedecidedtoacceptthechallengeofCET-6.ThepreparationforthistestwillforcemetoraisethelevelofmyEnglishability.Besides,IregardCET-6asastepping-stonetofurtherqualificationsinEnglishwhichwillhelpmeinmyfuturecareer.5.ShouldFirecrackersBeBanned?(a)Somepeoplethinkthatsettingofffirecrackersisagoodthing.TheysaythatitisanancientChinesecustomwhichshouldbepreserved.Theyalsoclaimthatfirecrackersmakefestivalsandholidayoccasionsmorecolorfulandentertainingforbothadultsandchildren.Ontheotherhand,therearemanypeoplewhosaythatfirecrackersshouldbebanned.Theypointoutthatfirecrackersareresponsibleforfireswhichdestroyproperty,andforinjuriessufferedbothbythepeoplewhosetthemoffandbyinnocentbystanders.Theyalsosaythatfirecrackersareawasteofmoneyandresources.Myownpointofviewisthatweshouldpreservetheoldcustomoflettingofffirecrackers,whileatthesametimemakingthemharmless.Wecandothisbybanningfirecrackersfrompublicplaces.Inaddition,weshouldrestrictthesettingoffoffirecrackerstofestivaldays.(b)ThereisnodenyingthefactthatsettingofffirecrackershasbeenahotlydebatedtopicinChina.People’sopinionsdiffersharplyonthisissue.Someholdthepositiveview.TheysaythatitisanancientChinesecustomwhichshouldbepreserved.Theyalsoclaimthatfirecrackersmakefestivalsandholidayoccasionsmorecolorfulandentertainingforbothadultsandchildren.Withoutfirecrackers,festivalswouldbecomedullandcheerless.Others,however,holdtheoppositeview.Theymaintainthatfirecrackersshouldbebanned.Theypointoutthatfirecrackersareresponsibleforfires,whichdestroy,property,andforinjuriessufferedbothbythepeoplewhosetthemoffandbyinnocentbystanders.Theyalsoarguethatfirecrackersareawasteofmoneyandresources.Personally,Ibelievethatweshouldnotgotoextremes.Ontheonehand,weshouldpreservetheoldcustomoflettingofffirecrackers;ontheotherhand,weshouldmakeitharmless.Thiscanbedonebybanningfirecrackersfrompublicplaces.Inaddition,thesettingoffoffirecrackersshouldberestrictedtofestivaldays.(c)Therehasbeenmuchcontroversyoversettingofffirecrackersinthepastyears,witheachpartyowningconvincingevidences.ThosewhoareinfavorofsettingfirecrackersclaimthatitisanancientChinesecustomthatshouldbepreserved.Theyalsoarguethatfirecrackersmakefestivalsandholidayoccasionsmorecolorfulandentertainingforbothadultsandchildren.Withoutfirecrackers,festivalswouldbecomecoldandcheerless.Ontheotherhand,therearemanypeoplewhoareoftheopinionthatfirecrackersshouldbebanned.Theypointoutthatfirecrackersareresponsibleforfireswhichdestroyproperty,andforinjuriessufferedbothbythepeoplewhosetthemoffandbyinnocentbystanders.Besides,theymaintainthatfirecrackersleadtoawasteofmoneyandresources.Personally,Ithinkthatbothsideshavesomethingright.Actually,firecrackersshouldbeviewedasatwo-edgedsword,whichpresentsuswithbothbenefitsandtroubles.Butweshouldnotgiveupeatingforfearofchoking.Thebestpolicy,asIseeit,istomaximizetheiradvantagesandminimizetheirunhealthyinfluence,