版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI
AnAILiteracyFrameworkforPrimaryandSecondaryEducation
European
commission
像》OECD
WithSupportFrom
需
REVIEWDRAFT(May2025)
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
Welcome!
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI:AnAILiteracyFramework
forPrimaryandSecondaryEducation(AILitFramework)isajoint
initiativeoftheEuropeanCommissionandtheOrganizationfor
EconomicCooperationandDevelopment(OECD).Candleadinginternationalexpertssupportitsdevelopment.TheAILitFramework
contributestothePISA2029Media&ArtificialIntelligenceLiteracyassessment.
ThisdraftframeworkalsoalignswiththebroaderEuropeanCommissioneffortstopromotequalityeducationandskillsprovisionforthedigital
transformationinthecontextoftheDigitalEducationActionPlan
2021-2027.Inparticular,theframeworkrespondstothe2023CouncilRecommendationsondigitaleducationandskills.Itcomplementsthe2022Ethicalguidelinesontheuseofartificialintelligence(AI)anddatainteachingandlearningforeducatorsandDigComp2.2:TheDigital
CompetenceFrameworkforCitizens.Morebroadly,theEUAIAct,thefirstcomprehensivelegislationonAIintheworld,promotesahuman-centeredandrisk-basedapproachtotheadoptionofAIsystems.In
particular,Article4oftheActrequiresbothprovidersanddeployersofAIsystemstoensurethattheirstaff,andanyoneusingthesystemsontheirbehalf,haveanadequatelevelofAIliteracy.
Thisdraftisintendedtoelicitfeedbackfromeducatorsand
stakeholders.WehopeitsparksadialogueaboutwhatAIliteracymeansandhowteachingandlearningmustevolveinanageofAI.Wealsolookforwardtoengagingwithstakeholdersoverthenextseveralmonthsandinviteyoutoprovidefeedbackatin-personandvirtualeventshosted
bytheEuropeanCommission,OECD,C,andournetworkof
internationalexpertsandorganizations.YourinputplaysacrucialroleinshapingthefutureofAIliteracy.
European
commission
像》OECD
WithSupportfrom
需
OpenforusewithintherestrictionsgrantedbyCreativeCommonsAttribution-ShareAlike4.0(CCBY-SA4.0):
/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Copyright2025OECD.Allrightsreserved.
ThisdocumentwasproducedwiththefinancialassistanceoftheEuropeanUnion.TheviewsexpressedhereincaninnowaybetakentoreflecttheofficialopinionoftheEuropeanUnion.
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
ExpertGroup
Aninternationalteamofexpertsinformedthedevelopmentofthisdraft.Theirinsightensuresthattheframeworkalignswithresearchandpracticeattheintersectionsofeducation,technology,andlearningdesign.
CathyAdams,ProfessorofEducationalComputing,FacultyofEducation,UniversityofAlberta,Edmonton,Canada
RominaCachia,ScientificTeamLeader,JointResearchCentreoftheEuropeanCommission,Seville,SpainKariKivinen,EducationOutreachExpert,EuropeanIntellectualPropertyObservatory,Alicante,Spain
VictorKoleszar,PedagogicalCoordinatorforComputationalThinkingandArtificialIntelligence,Ceibal,Montevideo,Uruguay
LidijaKralj,IndependentExpertinAIandDataEducation,VelikiBukovec,Croatia
VictorR.Lee,AssociateProfessorofLearningSciencesandTechnologyDesign,StanfordUniversity,Stanford,California,USA
TaraNattrass,ManagingDirectorofInnovationStrategy,ISTE+ASCD,Arlington,Virginia,USA(participateduntilMarch2025)
FlorianRampelt,ProgramDirector,FutureSkills&AI;ManagingDirectoroftheAICampus,Stifterverband,Berlin,Germany
PatiRuiz,SeniorDirector,EdtechandEmergingTechnologies,DigitalPromise,RedwoodCity,California,USAJosephSouth,ChiefInnovationOfficer,ISTE+ASCD,Arlington,Virginia,USA
ThierryViéville,SeniorResearcherinComputationalNeurosciences,NationalResearchInstituteinComputerScienceandControlTheory(INRIA),Bordeaux,France
DevelopmentTeam
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI:AnAILiteracyFrameworkforPrimaryandSecondaryEducationisajointinitiativeoftheEuropeanCommissionandtheOrganizationforEconomicCooperationand
Development(OECD).Candleadinginternationalexpertssupportitsdevelopment.TheEuropeanCommissionco-fundedtheframeworkandassistedwithexpertisebuiltonpreviousworkattheEUlevel.Thedevelopmentteamwasresponsibleforoverallprojectmanagement,hostingfocusgroups,conductingresearch,draftingversionsoftheframeworkforreview,processingfeedback,anddesigningthedraft
documentandwebsite.
Acknowledgements
TheTeachAIcommunityprovidedvaluableinsightstoinformthedevelopmentofthisdraftframework.Illustrations:AbiyasaAdiguna
SuggestedCitation:OECD(2025).EmpoweringlearnersfortheageofAI:AnAIliteracyframeworkforprimaryandsecondaryeducation(Reviewdraft).OECD.Paris.
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
Contents
01Introductionp.6-9
WhyAILiteracy?
WhatisAI?
YoungPeopleareExperimentingwithAIandNeedGuidance
AILiteracyisanEducationalPriority
IntendedAudiencefortheFramework
ProvideFeedbackonthisDraft
02FoundationsoftheAILitFrameworkp.10-14
BuildingonExistingFrameworks
ResearchProcessandThemes
TheAILitFrameworkDevelopmentPrinciples
TheRoleofEducators
LearnerPersonas:WhatDoesAILiteracyLookLikeinAction?
03FrameworkStructurep.15-17
TheFourDomainsofAILiteracy
Knowledge,Skills,andAttitudes
EthicsintheFramework
RelationshiptoOtherTopicsandDisciplines
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
04Knowledge,Skills,andAttitudesp.18-23
Knowledge
Skills
Attitudes
p.24-38
05Competences
TheAnatomyofaCompetenc
e
EngagingwithAI
CreatingwithAI
ManagingAI
DesigningAI
06What’sComingNext?p.39
UseAItoExploretheFramework
07Referencesp.40-42
01
Introduction
WhyAILiteracy?
Asartificialintelligence(AI)increasinglyinfluenceshowweaccessinformation,communicate,andmake
decisions,AIliteracybecomesessentialfornavigatingdailylife,creatingwithpurpose,andpreparingfor
thefutureoflearningandwork.AIliteracyequipslearnersandeducatorstounderstandboththerisksandopportunitiesthatAIpresents,andtomakemeaningfulandethicaldecisionsaboutitsuse.IthelpslearnerscriticallyevaluateAI’simpactontheirlives,education,andcommunitieswhilepreparingthemtoshapethefuture.However,tofullyrealizethepotentialofAIliteracytoshapelearning,keybarrierstoimplementationmustbeaddressed,including:
?AlackofasharedunderstandingofwhatAIliteracyisandhowtoteachit.
?UncertaintyabouthowAIfitsintovarioussubjectareas.
Thispublicationservesasastartingpointforteachers,educationleaders,educationpolicymakers,andlearningdesignerstounderstandAIliteracyanddecidehowitfitstheirneeds.EstablishingacommonlanguageaboutAIliteracyisinstrumentalforconsistencyacrossdiverseeducationalsettings.
DefinitionofAILiteracy
AIliteracyrepresentsthetechnicalknowledge,durableskills,andfuture-readyattitudesrequiredtothriveinaworldinfluencedbyAI.Itenables
learnerstoengage,createwith,manage,anddesignAI,whilecriticallyevaluatingitsbenefits,risks,andethicalimplications.
ThisdraftdefinitionbuildsonexistingdefinitionsfromtheEUAIAct,OECD,UNESCO,andotherorganizations.
WhatisAI?
ArtificialIntelligence(AI)isa“machine-basedsystemthat,forexplicitorimplicitobjectives,infers,fromtheinputitreceives,howtogenerateoutputssuchaspredictions,content,recommendations,ordecisionsthatcaninfluencephysicalorvirtualenvironments”(OECD,2024).AsdefinedintheEUAIAct,andinalignmentwiththeOECDdefinition,“AIsystemmeansamachine-basedsystemthatisdesignedtooperatewith
varyinglevelsofautonomyandthatmayexhibitadaptivenessafterdeployment,andthat,forexplicitor
implicitobjectives,infers,fromtheinputitreceives,howtogenerateoutputssuchaspredictions,content,recommendations,ordecisionsthatcaninfluencephysicalorvirtualenvironments”(EUAIAct,2024).
Theterm“AI”inthispublicationreferstoabroadrangeofAIsystems.Whenwarranted,specifictermssuchas“generativeAI”or“machinelearning”areused.
6
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
YoungPeopleareExperimentingwithAIandNeedGuidance
AsyoungpeoplebeginusingAIinmoreaspectsoftheirlives,
theyneedguidancetounderstandwhatitmeans,howitworks,andhowtouseitresponsibly.Themajorityofyoungpeople
arealreadyusingAI,experimentingandpracticingwithAIin
bothstructuredandunstructuredwaysintheirpersonaland
49%of17-to27-year-oldsstrugglewithcriticallyevaluatingand
identifyingAI’sshortfalls,suchaswhetherAIsystemscaninventfacts.
Source:Merriman&SanzSáiz,2024
professionallives(Merriman&SanzSáiz,2024).Butasthey
useAI,learnersmayencounterdisinformation,misinformation,andbias,raisingconcernsoverprivacyandfairness.AImay
alsocreateskillsandachievementgapsamongpeersand
highlightadisconnectbetweenwhatlearnersseeasessentialtotheirfutureandwhatschoolscurrentlyprovide(VodafoneFoundation,2024).
AIliteracyprovidesaclearunderstandingofhowAI
technologiesworkandwhattheirresponsibleuseentails,so
thatlearnerscanmakesafeandinformeddecisions.Learners
canalsobenefitfromtheopportunitiesAIbringstotheirlives,work,andstudies.AIliteracymustbegroundedintrusted
information,afocusonethics,andacommitmenttosocialgood.
HowDoesGenZLearnAboutAI?
55%
SocialMedia
35%
15%
Educators
News/Media
12%
Employers/Colleagues
Source:HowcanweupskillGenZasfastaswetrainAI?(Merriman&SanzSáiz,2024)
(5,218respondentsdistributedglobally)
7
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
TheAISkillsGap
A2024studyof12-to17-year-oldsacrossEuropereportedthat:
●
74%
BelievethatAIwillplayasignificantroleintheirprofessionallives.
44%
PerceivetheirteachersaswellpreparedtoworkwithAIapplications.
46%
ThinktheirschoolsadequatelypreparethemforAI.
49%
WorrythatAIcouldwidengapsinacademicsuccessamongpeers.
Source:AIinEuropeanSchools:AEuropeanreportcomparingsevencountries(VodafoneFoundation,2024)
(7,000studentsacrossGermany,Greece,Portugal,Romania,Spain,Türkiye,andtheUK)
AILiteracyisanEducationalPriority
ThisframeworkcentersontheroleofAIliteracyinteachingandlearning,asAI’semergingpresencein
educationaffectshowlearnersresearch,write,andcollaborate,aswellashoweducatorsplanlessonsand
providefeedback.AfoundationalunderstandingofAIsupportseducatorsinmakingtheirowndecisionsaboutwhenandhowtouseAIbasedonthestudentsandcontenttheyknowbest.Withoutthissupport,learners
mayuncriticallyacceptAI-generatedcontent,adopthabitsthatcompromiseacademicintegrity,orneglectskillslikecriticalthinkingandempatheticjudgment.TheymayalsooverlooktheopportunitiesAIofferstoenhancetheirownlearningexperiencesandintroducenewskills.MakingAIliteracyaneducationalpriorityensuresthatstudentsknowhowtoevaluate,question,andapplyAIresponsiblyintheiracademiclives,andthriveincontextsbeyondtheclassroom.
IntegratingAIliteracyisasharedresponsibilityacrosstheeducationecosystem,ratherthanthedutyof
anyindividualeducator.EducatorsareencouragedtoembedAIliteracywhenandwhereitalignswiththeirsubjectandcontext.Thecompetencesoutlinedinthisframeworkareintendedtobedevelopedacross
alearner’sprimaryandsecondaryeducationexperience,informalandinformallearningenvironments,includingschools,homes,andcommunitysettings.
8
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
IntendedAudiencefortheFramework
Thisframeworkisdesignedforteachers,educationleaders,educationpolicymakers,andlearningdesigners.Itoutlinescompetencesandlearningscenariostoinformlearningmaterials,standards,school-wideinitiatives,andresponsibleAIpoliciesforprimaryandsecondaryeducationsettings.
“
IneedtoknowhowAIcanhelpmystudents
Teacher
learnandhowIcanintegrateAIliteracyintomycurriculumduringmyfullschoolday.
“
EducationLeader
IwanttodevelopAIliteracyinitiativesformyschoolorprofessionalorganizationandam
lookingforeasy-to-followguidance.
“
Education
Policymaker
IhelpshapeAIliteracyinitiativestoensurelearnersandeducatorsarereadyfortheageofAI,andIwantpractical,research-backedadvicetoguidepolicies.
LearningDesigner
“
Idesigninstructionalcontentand
trainteachers,andIwanttoincludeAIliteracyasakeyfeatureinmyresources.
ProvideFeedbackonthisDraft
Overthenextfewmonths,stakeholdersfrom
aroundtheworldareencouragedtosharetheirfeedbackandinsights.Thefinalversionofthe
frameworkwillbereleasedin2026,accompaniedbylimitedexemplarsofAIliteracyincurriculum,assessment,andprofessionallearning.
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
Weinviteyoutocontributetotheseeffortsviathefollowinglink:
/ailiteracy/review
9
02
FoundationsoftheAILitFramework
BuildingonExistingFrameworks
TheAILitFrameworkbuildsonideasandpracticesfrompreviousdigitalcompetenceandAIliteracy
frameworks.Collectively,theseframeworksensuredthattheAILitFrameworkisinternationallyinformed,relevanttoeducators,andgroundedintheethical,technical,andsocialdimensionsofAIliteracy.
TheEuropeanCommission’sDigitalCompetenceFrameworkforCitizens
(DigComp)competencecategorizationandemphasisonlearneragencyinits
knowledge,skills,andattitudesinfluencedthecontentoftheAILitFramework,whileitsrealisticemploymentandlearningusecasesinformedtheframework’sstructure.
UNESCO’sAICompetenciesforStudentsandAICompetenciesforTeachers
influencedAILitFramework’sfocusonglobalrelevanceandimplementation.
UNESCO’sworkalsopromptedconsiderationforcleardistinctionsbetween
learner-specificAIliteracyoutcomesandwaysthateducatorscansupporttheseexperiencesintheclassroom.
TheDigitalPromiseAILiteracyFramework’sinterconnectedModesof
Engagement,withcross-cuttingAILiteracyPracticesandenumeratedTypesofUse,providedafoundationforhowtheAILitFrameworkdefinescompetencesandframeslearners’specificinteractionswithemergingtechnologies.
TheAI4K125BigIdeasinAIinformedthetechnicalaspectsoftheframework,includingthenatureofAIandroleofdataintheAItrainingprocess.
TheAILitFrameworkbuildsontheseefforts,emphasizingadurablefoundation,interdisciplinaryintegration,practicalapplication,andinsightsfromaglobalcommunityofexperts.Itoutlinesessentialknowledge,skills,attitudes,andcompetencesthatwillremainrelevantasAIcontinuestoevolve,withafocusonconceptsthattranscendspecifictoolsortrends.TheframeworkalsosupportsinterdisciplinaryconnectionsacrosssubjectsandempowerslearnerstoengagewithAIcritically,ethically,andcreatively.
TheAILitFramework’sprimaryandsecondaryeducationscenariosillustratehowAIliteracycanbe
practicallyimplementedinclassrooms,andinsomecaseswithouttheneedforAItechnologies.Developed
incollaborationwithinternationalexpertsineducationandlearningsciences,theframeworkisdesignedtobefoundational,adaptable,andgloballyapplicable.Itsimplementationissupportedbyadiversenetworkofpartnersincurriculumdevelopment,research,assessment,andpolicy.Thefinalversionoftheframeworkwillbeaccompaniedbyclassroom-readyexemplarsandinformthedevelopmentoftheinnovativedomainofthePISA2029assessment.
10
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
ResearchProcessandThemes
Thisdraftisinformedbyresearchthatincludedthereviewofexistingframeworksondigitalcompetence,
medialiteracy,andAIliteracy,andtheanalysisofcurriculaincomputerscience,datascience,socialsciences,andcareereducation.Italsoincorporatesmultipleresearchmethodssuchasliteraturereviews,expert
interviews,andfocusgroupswithpotentialusers.Threekeythemesemergedfromthisprocess:technicalknowledge,thehumanskillsneededtocollaborateeffectivelywithAI,andethicalconsiderations.
Theme1:HowAIandMachineLearningWork
UnderstandingAIhelpslearnersdispelmisconceptionsaboutthetechnologyandenablesamore
informedevaluationofitsimplications.AIisn’tmagicorall-knowing:Itprocessesdatausingstatistical
inferencesandlogictoproduceoutputs(Allen&Kendeou,2023;Touretzky&Gardner-McCune,2022).Ithasbeentrainedbydatathatcomesfrompubliclyavailableinformation,user-generatedcontent,
databases,andreal-timeinteractionscollectedthroughsensorsanddigitalsystems(AI4K12,2022;
aiEDU,2024).AImodels“l(fā)earn”notthroughauthenticunderstanding,butbyadjustingstatistical
weightsbasedonthesedatasets(Touretzky&Gardner-McCune,2022).Thisproducessophisticated
outputsbutmakesAIvulnerabletoreplicatingtheharmfulandstatisticalbiasesembeddedinitstrainingdataorintroducedduringdevelopment(AI4K12,2022;aiEDU,2024;Sparksetal.,2024).TheAILit
FrameworkemphasizesthatlearnersmustdevelopastrongunderstandingofAI’stechnicalfoundations,includingitsrelianceondata,probabilities,andinputs.Bydemystifyingthesetechnicalunderpinnings,
learnersdevelopacomprehensiveunderstandingofbothAI’scapabilitiesandlimitations.Ultimately,theydrawconnectionsbetweenhowAIworksandthewaysitmightimpactthemselvesorothers.
Theme2:HumanSkillstoEmphasizeforSuccessfulCollaborationwithAITools
TheAILitFrameworkemphasizesseveralskillsandattitudesthatsupportlearners’successfulcollaborationwithAI.Traditionallearningcompetencessuchas
metacognitionandcriticalthinkingremainhighlyrelevanttointeractionswithAI.
Communication,questioning,andperspective-takingskillsassumenewimportanceininteractionswithAIandinbroaderdiscussionsaboutitsimplementation(Thoman&Jollis,2008;Kafaietal.,2019;aiEDU,2024).Traditionalcomputationalthinking
skills,suchasabstraction,decomposition,andproblemformulation,assume
additionalrelevancebeyondthecomputerscienceclassroom,asstudentsencountertechnologicalchallengesintheirdiverseeverydaycontexts(Allen&Kendeou,2023;Dasgupta&Hill,2021).Thisframeworkdeliberatelycentershumancapabilities
withinAI-specificcompetences,ensuringlearnerscaneffectivelyleverageAItoolswhilemaintainingqualitiesthattechnologycannotreplicate.
11
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
Theme3:AI’sEffectsonIndividuals,Society,andtheEnvironment
LearnersmustthinkcriticallyabouthowAIalreadyaffectsthemandhowitwillcontinuetoshapetheirfutures.Ratherthantreatingethicsasasupplementtotechnicalconcepts,thisframeworkemphasizesthatvalues,context,andaccountabilityareinseparablefromlearningwithandaboutAI.Thisapproachalignswithinternationalresearchandexistingpolicyrecommendationsandinitiatives(European
Commission2020,2022;Miaoetal.,2024;Vuorikarietal.,2022).LearnersmustunderstandthatAI
existswithinsocialandpoliticalsystemsandthatalgorithmicoutputscanreinforceexistingpatterns
ofunfairnessifnotcriticallyexamined.Thisalsoincludesconsiderationsabouttheethicsofhow
trainingdatawascollectedandclassified(Buolamwini&Gebru,2018;Noble,2018;TeachAI,2024).
ThroughouttheirinteractionswithAI,learnersmustreflectonitsreal-worldimplications:whocan
benefitorbeharmedbyAIsystems;whatperspectivesarerepresentedandexcludedinbothtrainingdataandAI-generatedoutputs;and,howAIsystemsinfluencepersonalautonomy,ownership,and
accesstoinformation(White&Scott,2024;Miaoetal.,2024).TheAILitframeworkreinforcesethicalconsiderationthroughpracticalcompetences,mirroringcallstotreatethicalevaluationasacoreskillinone’sdigitallife.CultivatingAIliteracyhelpslearnersnavigateaworldwheretechnologicaldecisionsaredeeplyintertwinedwithpower,equity,andaccountability.ItequipsthemtoasknotonlywhatAI
cando,butalsowhatitshoulddoandwhomitserves.
Additionally,theAILitFrameworkcompelslearnerstoweightheenvironmentalcostofusingAI
systemswithAI’srelevancetospecifictasks.Atthetimeofpublication,AIsystemsrequiresignificantamountsofenergy,materials,andwater,whilecontributingtoglobalcarbonemissions(Zewe,2025;Bashiret.al.,2024).OngoingeffortstoimprovesustainabilityincomputingfocusonAI’spotentialtoincreaseenergyefficiencyoraddressuniqueclimate-relatedproblemsthatothertechnologiescannot(Bashiret.al.,2024).WhileAI’slong-termeffectsonnaturalresourceshaveyettobefullyrealized,
thisrepresentsanopportunityforlearnerstothinkmorebroadlyabouttherelationshipbetweenthedigitalandphysicalworld.
TheAILitFrameworkDevelopmentPrinciples
Interdisciplinary
IntegrateAIliteracyintoawiderangeofsubjectsandeducationalsettings.
Global
Incorporateinsightsfrom
educators,researchers,andAIexpertsworldwide.
Foundational
DefineacoresetofcompetencesneededtodemonstrateproficiencyinAIliteracy.
Practical
MakeAIliteracymanageableandattainableinvariousclassroomcontexts.
Illustrative
IncludescenariosandexemplarsthatbringAIliteracytolife.
Durable
IdentifyknowledgeandskillsthatwillremainrelevantasAIevolves.
12
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
TheRoleofTeachersandEducators
Teachersandeducatorsplayakeyroleindevelopinglearners’AIliteracybyintegratingAIconceptsinto
concreteclassroompractice.Theyhelplearnersconnectabstractideastospecificsubjectmatter,guide
inquiryintohowAIsystemsfunction,andcreateasupportivespacefordiscussionsaboutfairness,bias,
andreal-worldimpacts(Allen&Kendeou,2023;Chiuet.al.,2021).Theprimaryandsecondaryeducation
scenariosthataccompanyeachcompetenceintheframeworkhighlightwaysthatstudentscandevelopanddemonstrateAIliteracyineducationalsettings.However,itisuptoeducatorstodecidewhentointroduce
AItools,howtoscaffoldunderstanding,andwhatitmeanstoassessstudentlearninginarapidly-changing
technologicallandscape(Allen&Kendeou,2023;Chiu&Chai,2020;EuropeanCommission,2022;Miao&
Cukurova,2024).Evenmore,theypromotetheresponsibleuseofAIbasedonavailableguidelinesfromtheireducationsystem,andusetheirexpertisetomakeage-appropriatedecisionsaboutitsuse(Miao&Cukurova,2024).Thesedecisionsstemfromaneducator’suniquerelationshipwiththeirstudentsandtheircontent
expertise.
EducatorsneedtargetedsupporttobuildtheirownAIcompetencesandtodevelopeffectivepedagogies
forguidingstudentsthroughthislearningjourney.TheAILitFrameworkoffersdifferentwaysforeducatorstointroduceAIliteracytotheirlearningenvironments.Itsknowledgestatementsemphasizeaclear
understandingofAI’stechnicalfoundations,equippingeducatorstoapproachAIliteracywithconfidenceandaccuracy.Theaccompanyingskillsandattitudes,groundedinlearningtheory,metacognition,andrecognitionofuniquelyhumancapacities,ensurethatAIliteracycanbemeaningfullyintegratedintoexistingclassroompractices.Learner-centeredcompetencesandeducationscenarioshelpteachersidentifyandprioritize
relevantAIliteracyoutcomesthatcantakeplaceintheirclassrooms.Tofurthersupportimplementation,thefinalversionoftheAILitFrameworkwillalsoincludealimitednumberofteachingandlearningexemplars.
Ultimately,educators’long-termsuccessinteachingAIliteracydependsonintegratingnewlearninggoalswithexistingprioritiesandhavingaccesstohigh-qualityinitialteachertrainingandcontinuousprofessionaldevelopmentthatbuildsAI-informedpedagogy.
13
EmpoweringLearnersfortheAgeofAI-ReviewDraft(May2025)
LearnerPersonas:WhatDoesAILiteracyLookLikeinAction?
ThesepersonasillustratewhatitlookslikewhenlearnersputAIliteracyskillsintoaction.TheyserveasstartingpointsforimagininganAI-literateworld,reflectingthemanywaystheseskillstakeshape.
Jun
13years
AIinAction!
Withhermother’sguidance,Sofiauses
generativeAItoexploredifferentplotsand
experimentwithdialogueforstoriesshewrites.
Shedescribesherownideasandpossible
themestotheAItool,thenreflectsonwhether
eachsuggestionfeelsrightforhercharacters
beforemakingchangestoherwork.Sofia
appreciatesthatAIintroducesnewideasto
consider,buttrustsherowncreativevision.
AIinAction!
Junhelpsorganizeaschoolvolunteeringevent
bycollectingavailability,schedulingtheday,
andmanaginglast-minutechanges.Heuses
AItodraftschedules,thenassignsvolunteers
himselfbasedonclassmates’personalities
andstrengths.AIautomateslogisticsfor
Jun,helpinghimfocusonbuildingeffective,
collaborativeteamsfortheevent.
So?a
10years
Anika
18Years
AIinAction!
OmarsetupanAIvoiceassistantforhis
parentstohelpthemwitheverydaytasks,such
ascreatingthefamily’sscheduleorgrocery
list.Whenhestartedseeingspecificproduct
recommendationsonhissocialmediafeeds,
Omarchangedhisaccountsettingstoprevent
thesystemfromusinghisfamily’sinformation
fortargetedadvertising.
AIinAction!
Aspartofherstudies,Anikaisexperimenting
withdesigningawellnessappthatusesanAI
modeltosuggestmentalhealthresources.
Whiletestingtheapp,shenoticesthatit
sometimesrecommendsoptionsthatreinforce
genderstereotypes.Beforegoingfurtherwith
theappshemakesapointtorefinethe
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 保健按摩師安全綜合強(qiáng)化考核試卷含答案
- 2024年大連工業(yè)大學(xué)輔導(dǎo)員考試真題
- 2025年阿勒泰地區(qū)吉木乃縣應(yīng)急管理局面向社會(huì)公開招聘政府專職消防員6人備考題庫及一套答案詳解
- 彩泥小鴨課件
- 久立集團(tuán)招聘面試題目及答案
- 古詩詞誦讀《燕歌行》教學(xué)課件2025-2026學(xué)年統(tǒng)編版高中語文選擇性必修中冊
- 福建(泉州)先進(jìn)制造技術(shù)研究院2026年校園招聘備考題庫及完整答案詳解一套
- 分級(jí)護(hù)理對(duì)精神科資源合理配置的意義
- 2025年云南大學(xué)附屬中學(xué)星耀學(xué)校招聘備考題庫完整答案詳解
- 新疆維吾爾自治區(qū)氣象局2026年度事業(yè)單位公開招聘應(yīng)屆畢業(yè)生備考題庫(第二批第1號(hào))參考答案詳解
- 中華聯(lián)合財(cái)產(chǎn)保險(xiǎn)股份有限公司2026年校園招聘備考題庫及一套完整答案詳解
- 詩經(jīng)中的愛情課件
- 2025年煙花爆竹經(jīng)營單位安全管理人員考試試題及答案
- 2025天津大學(xué)管理崗位集中招聘15人參考筆試試題及答案解析
- 2025廣東廣州黃埔區(qū)第二次招聘社區(qū)專職工作人員50人考試筆試備考題庫及答案解析
- 2025年云南省人民檢察院聘用制書記員招聘(22人)考試筆試參考題庫及答案解析
- 2026屆上海市青浦區(qū)高三一模數(shù)學(xué)試卷和答案
- 2026年重慶安全技術(shù)職業(yè)學(xué)院單招職業(yè)技能測試題庫附答案
- 環(huán)衛(wèi)設(shè)施設(shè)備采購項(xiàng)目投標(biāo)方案投標(biāo)文件(技術(shù)方案)
- 微創(chuàng)機(jī)器人手術(shù)基層普及路徑
- 24- 解析:吉林省長春市2024屆高三一模歷史試題(解析版)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論