2025年英語六級(jí)閱讀理解押題卷：真題匯編與解題技巧考試時(shí)間：______分鐘總分：______分姓名：______注意事項(xiàng)：1.請(qǐng)?jiān)诖痤}卡上按規(guī)定要求填涂答題信息。2.答題前，考生務(wù)必將自己的姓名、準(zhǔn)考證號(hào)填寫在答題卡上。3.回答選擇題時(shí)，選出每小題答案后，用鉛筆把答題卡上對(duì)應(yīng)題目的答案標(biāo)號(hào)涂黑。如需改動(dòng)，用橡皮擦干凈后，再選涂其他答案標(biāo)號(hào)?；卮鸱沁x擇題時(shí)，將答案寫在答題卡上。寫在本試卷上無效。4.考試結(jié)束后，將本試卷和答題卡一并交回。第一部分閱讀理解閱讀下面的文章，回答第1至5題。Theadventofartificialintelligence(AI)hasundeniablyrevolutionizednumerousaspectsofmodernlife,fromenhancingproductivityintheworkplacetopersonalizingentertainmentexperiences.However,thistechnologicalprogressionisnotwithoutitsethicalquandaries,particularlyconcerningtheincreasingphenomenonofAI-generatedmisinformation.Assophisticatedalgorithmscannowproducerealistictexts,images,andvideosatastonishingspeed,thelinesbetweenauthenticcontentanditsAI-madecounterpartsarebecomingincreasinglyblurred,posingsignificantchallengestosocietaltrustandinformationintegrity.OneoftheprimaryconcernssurroundingAI-generatedmisinformationisitspotentialtomanipulatepublicopinionanddestabilizesocialcohesion.Maliciousactors,includingstate-sponsoredgroupsandclandestineorganizations,canexploitthesetechnologiestodisseminatefalsenarratives,propaganda,ordeepfakesduringelections,crises,orperiodsofpoliticalunrest.Suchmanipulativecontent,oftenindistinguishablefromgenuinesources,canincitedivision,underminedemocraticprocesses,andevenprovokeviolence.Therapidspreadofsuchfalsehoods,amplifiedbysocialmediaalgorithmsdesignedforengagementratherthanaccuracy,exacerbatestheproblem,makingitincreasinglydifficultforindividualstodiscerncredibleinformation.Furthermore,theproliferationofAI-generatedcontentposesriskstopersonalprivacyandsecurity.Deepfakes,forinstance,canbeusedtocreatefakevideooraudiorecordingsofindividuals,facilitatingidentitytheft,fraud,orthespreadingofdamagingmisinformationaboutpersonalorpublicfigures.TheabilityofAItogeneratehighlyconvincingforgeriesraisesseriousquestionsaboutconsentandthepotentialformisuseinbothprofessionalandpersonalcontexts.Individualsmayfindtheirimagesorvoicesusedwithouttheirpermission,leadingtoreputationalharmorevenpsychologicaldistress.Addressingthiscomplexissuerequiresamultifacetedapproachinvolvingtechnological,legal,andeducationalstrategies.Onthetechnologicalfront,researchersaredevelopingmethodstodetectAI-generatedcontent,suchasdigitalwatermarks,metadataanalysis,andmachinelearningmodelstrainedtoidentifyanomaliesinsyntheticmedia.However,thesedetectiontoolsareoftenreactive,constantlyplayingcatch-upwiththeevolvingcapabilitiesofAIgenerators.Legalframeworksalsoneedtoadapttokeeppacewiththeseadvancements,establishingclearresponsibilitiesforthecreationanddistributionofdeceptiveAIcontentandimposingmeaningfulpenaltiesformisuse.Equallyimportantisfosteringmedialiteracyamongthepublic,equippingindividualswiththecriticalthinkingskillsnecessarytoevaluatethecredibilityofinformationinanincreasinglycomplexdigitalenvironment.Ultimately,whileAIoffersremarkablepotentialforsocietaladvancement,thechallengeofmisinformationmustbemetproactively.Itisimperativethatstakeholders—governments,techcompanies,educationalinstitutions,andindividuals—collaboratetomitigatetherisksassociatedwithAI-generatedcontent.Byimplementingrobustdetectionmechanisms,establishingresponsiblegovernance,andpromotingcriticalawareness,societycanstrivetoharnessthebenefitsofAIwhilesafeguardingagainstitspotentialharms,ensuringthattechnologyservestoenrichratherthanunderminehumantrustandwell-being.1.ThepassageprimarilydiscussestheimpactofAI-generatedmisinformationon2.Accordingtothepassage,whatmakesAI-generatedmisinformationparticularlydangerousduringelectionsorpoliticalcrises?3.TheauthormentionsthepotentialforAItocreatedeepfakesforidentitytheft,butimpliesthattherearebroaderconcernsrelatedtopersonalprivacy.Whatmightthesebroaderconcernsinvolvebeyondidentitytheft?4.WhatarethethreemaintypesofstrategiesmentionedinthepassagefortacklingtheproblemofAI-generatedmisinformation?5.Whatistheauthor'sconcludingperspectiveontherelationshipbetweenAIadvancementsandthechallengeofmisinformation?第二部分閱讀理解閱讀下面的文章，回答第6至10題。Theconceptof"quietquitting"hasrecentlygainedsignificanttractioninthediscoursesurroundingmodernemployment,thoughitsprecisedefinitionandimplicationsremainsubjectsofconsiderabledebate.Originatingfromonlineforumsandsocialmedia,thetermostensiblydescribesanemployee'sdecisiontoreducetheirworkloadandminimizeeffortbeyondwhatisstrictlyrequiredbytheirjobdescription.Proponentsofthisapproachoftenframeitasaformofpersonalboundarysetting,areactionagainstperceivedworkplaceexploitation,orastrategicchoicetoprioritizeone'sownwell-beingandlifeoutsideofwork.Theyarguethatitisarationalresponsetoenvironmentscharacterizedbyexcessivedemands,burnout,andalackofappreciationforemployees'contributions.Critics,however,viewquietquittingasadetrimentalmindsetthatunderminesproductivity,teamwork,andorganizationalmorale.Theyarguethatwhilesettinghealthyboundariesiscommendable,deliberatelyreducingeffortwithoutcommunicatingitclearlyorseekingalternativesolutionsconstitutesaformofdisengagementthatharmsboththeindividual'scareerprospectsandthecompany'soverallperformance.Fromthisperspective,theresponsibilitylieswiththeemployertocreatefairworkingconditionsandrecognizeemployeevalue,ratherthanwiththeemployeetoquietlycheckout.Criticsalso擔(dān)心thatthisapproachmightbeexploitedbymanagersseekingtojustifylowperformanceorjustifystaffreductions.Thephenomenonofquietquittingisnotentirelynew,asvariousformsofworkerdisengagementhaveexistedthroughouthistory.However,itscurrentvisibilityislikelyamplifiedbyseveralfactors.Theintensifying"greatresignation"followingtheCOVID-19pandemic,wheremillionsofworkerslefttheirjobsseekingbetteropportunitiesorwork-lifebalance,mayhavenormalizedtheideaofleavingapositionwithoutalengthynoticeperiodorseekingimmediatereplacement.Furthermore,theriseofthegigeconomyandtheincreasingprevalenceofremoteworkhavepotentiallydiminishedthesenseofloyaltybetweenemployersandemployees,makingiteasierforindividualstomentally"checkout"oftheirroles.Theaccessibilityofsocialmediahasalsoplayedaroleinpopularizingthetermandtheassociatednarrative,allowingdiscussionsandsharedexperiencestorapidlyspread.Ultimately,whetherquietquittingrepresentsavalidresponsetounsustainableworkdemandsoradetrimentalerosionofprofessionalcommitmentisnoteasilyanswered.Itreflectsbroadertensionswithinthemodernworkplaceconcerningworkload,employeewell-being,andthebalancebetweenindividualneedsandorganizationalexpectations.Thechallengeforbothemployersandemployeesliesinfindingamiddleground.Employersneedtofosterculturesthatvalueemployeewell-beingandprovidefaircompensationandopportunitiesforgrowth,whileemployeesmustdevelopeffectivecommunicationskillstoaddressconcernsabouttheirworkloadorjobsatisfactionratherthanresortingtopassivedisengagement.Theongoingdialoguesurroundingquietquittinghighlightstheneedforamoresustainableandmutuallyrespectfulapproachtowork.6.Whatisthemainideaofthepassageregardingtheterm"quietquitting"?7.Accordingtocritics,whatistheprimaryflawintheapproachdescribedas"quietquitting"?8.Thepassagesuggeststhatthecurrentvisibilityof"quietquitting"mightbeinfluencedbyseveralfactors.WhichofthefollowingisNOTmentionedasoneofthesefactors?9.Theauthorimpliesthattheriseofquietquittingmightreflectaconflictbetweenwhichtwomainideasinthemodernworkplace?10.Whatdoestheauthorsuggestasapotentialsolutiontothechallengeshighlightedbythephenomenonofquietquitting?第三部分閱讀理解閱讀下面的文章，回答第11至15題。Sustainableurbandevelopmenthasbecomeanimperativeinthe21stcentury,drivenbytheescalatingchallengesofurbanization,climatechange,andresourcedepletion.Traditionalurbanmodels,characterizedbysprawlingsuburbs,relianceonprivateautomobiles,andextensiveconsumption,areincreasinglyunsustainable.Consequently,thereisagrowingglobalemphasisontransitioningtowardscitiesthatareenvironmentallyresilient,sociallyequitable,andeconomicallyvibrant.Thisshiftnecessitatesaholisticapproachthatintegratesplanning,technology,andcommunityengagementtocreatemorelivableandsustainableurbanenvironments.Acornerstoneofsustainableurbandevelopmentisthepromotionofcompact,mixed-usecommunities.Suchneighborhoodsencouragewalking,cycling,andtheuseofpublictransportationbyreducingdistancesbetweenhomes,workplaces,andamenities.Thisnotonlylowerscarbonemissionsassociatedwithtransportationbutalsofosterssocialinteractionandreducestrafficcongestion.Integratingresidential,commercial,andrecreationalspaceswithinthesameareaenhancescommunitycohesionandreducestheneedforlongcommutes,contributingtoalowercarbonfootprintandahigherqualityoflifeforresidents.Energyefficiencyandtheadoptionofrenewableenergysourcesarecriticalcomponentsofsustainableurbanplanning.retrofittingexistingbuildingstoimproveenergyperformanceandconstructingnewdevelopmentsusingsustainablematerialsanddesignsareessentialsteps.Furthermore,integratingrenewableenergytechnologies,suchassolarpanelsandwindturbines,intourbaninfrastructurecansignificantlyreduceacity'srelianceonfossilfuels.Smartgridtechnologiescanoptimizeenergydistributionandconsumption,ensuringamorereliableandefficientenergysupplywhileminimizingwaste.Waterconservationandmanagementareequallyvitalforsustainablecities.Implementingefficientirrigationsystems,promotingwaterrecyclingandreuse,andconstructinggreeninfrastructurelikeraingardensandpermeablepavementscanhelpmanagestormwaterandreducerunoff.Protectinglocalwatersourcesandensuringaccesstocleandrinkingwaterforallresidentsarefundamentalaspectsofsustainableurbanliving.Additionally,reducingwaterpollutionthrougheffectivewastemanagementandtreatingwastewaterbeforedischargeareessentialformaintainingenvironmentalhealthandpublicsafety.Finally,sustainableurbandevelopmentmustaddresssocialequityandinclusivity.Ensuringaccesstoaffordablehousing,qualityeducation,healthcare,andgreenspacesforallresidents,regardlessoftheirsocioeconomicstatus,iscrucialforcreatingjustandresilientcities.Participatoryplanningprocessesthatinvolvelocalcommunitiesindecision-makingareessentialforidentifyingandaddressingthespecificneedsofdifferentneighborhoods.Fosteringsocialinclusionandprovidingopportunitiesforeconomicempowermentcanhelpmitigatethenegativeimpactsofurbanizationandcreatecitieswhereeveryonefeelsvaluedandhasastakeinthecommunity.11.Whatisthecentralthemeofthepassageconcerningsustainableurbandevelopment?12.Thepassagementions"compact,mixed-usecommunities"asakeyfeature.Whatisoneprimaryenvironmentalbenefitassociatedwiththistypeofurbanplanning?13.Accordingtothepassage,whattechnologicaladvancementsorstrategiesareimportantforimprovingenergyefficiencyincities?14.Inmanagingwaterresourceswithinasustainablecity,thepassagehighlightsseveralstrategies.WhichofthefollowingisNOTmentionedasoneofthesestrategies?15.Whataspectofsustainableurbandevelopmentdoesthepassageemphasizeasbeingcrucialforensuringa"justandresilientcity"?---試卷答案1.Thenegativeimpactsonsocietaltrust,informationintegrity,andpotentialformanipulation.2.Itsrealismandthedifficultyforthepublictodistinguishitfromauthenticcontent,allowingforthespreadoffalsenarrativesandpropaganda.3.Potentialmisuseforcreatingnon-consensualmedia,leadingtoreputationalorpsychologicalharm.4.Technologicalstrategies(e.g.,detectionmethods),legalstrategies(e.g.,frameworksandregulations),andeducationalstrategies(e.g.,medialiteracy).5.ThatwhileAIoffersbenefits,itspotentialharmsmustbeproactivelyaddressedthroughcollaborationandresponsiblepracticestoensuretechnologyenrichesratherthanunderminestrustandwell-being.6.Thatitdescribesaformofemployeedisengagementinvolvingreducedeffortbeyondjobrequirements,anditsdefinitionandimplicationsaredebated.7.Thatitconstitutesaformofdisengagementthatunderminesproductivityandteamwork,evenifframedasboundarysetting.8.Theaccessibilityofsocialmedia(whichismentionedasplayingaroleinpopularizingthetermandnarrative).9.Thebalancebetweenindividualneeds(well-being,boundaries)andorganizationalexpectations(productivity,commitment).10.Thatbothemployersandemployeesneedtotakeaction–employersbyfosteringsupportiveculturesandfairconditions,andemployeesbycommunicatingconcernseffectivelyratherthandisengagingpassively.解析思路1.解析思路：文章首段提出AI生成虛假信息是主要議題，隨后段落分別闡述了其對(duì)公共輿論、社會(huì)穩(wěn)定、個(gè)人隱私等方面的負(fù)面影響。綜合來看，文章核心是討論這種虛假信息的負(fù)面沖擊。定位到首段首句“...ethicalquandaries,particularlyconcerningtheincreasingphenomenonofAI-generatedmisinformation.”以及后文對(duì)其危害的詳細(xì)論述。2.解析思路：根據(jù)第二段，AI生成信息的危險(xiǎn)性在于其“realistic”和“indistinguishablefromgenuinesources”。這使得惡意行為者可以利用它散布虛假信息，操縱公眾輿論。定位到第二段第二句“Maliciousactors...canexploitthesetechnologiestodisseminatefalsenarratives...oftenindistinguishablefromgenuinesources...canincitedivision...underminedemocraticprocesses.”3.解析思路：文章在第三段討論了深度偽造（deepfakes）的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，明確提到了身份盜竊和欺詐。問題要求思考“更廣泛”的隱私問題。除了身份盜竊，深度偽造還可能被用來制作不實(shí)的個(gè)人影像或聲音，用于網(wǎng)絡(luò)騷擾、勒索、損害名譽(yù)，甚至制造虛假的個(gè)人言論或行為視頻，這些都屬于更廣泛的隱私侵犯和個(gè)人安全威脅。定位到第三段關(guān)于deepfakes的潛在用途分析。4.解析思路：第四段明確提出了應(yīng)對(duì)策略。首先提到“technologicalstrategies”如檢測(cè)方法；接著提到“l(fā)egalstrategies”如法律框架和處罰；最后提到“educationalstrategies”如媒體素養(yǎng)教育。定位到第四段“Addressingthiscomplexissuerequiresamultifacetedapproachinvolvingtechnological,legal,andeducationalstrategies.”5.解析思路：文章最后一段總結(jié)了AI的潛力與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，并強(qiáng)調(diào)了需要“proactivelyaddresstherisks”。作者認(rèn)為，雖然AI有益，但必須通過各方合作來管理其負(fù)面影響，目標(biāo)是讓技術(shù)服務(wù)于人類福祉，而非破壞信任。這體現(xiàn)了作者對(duì)AI發(fā)展與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)關(guān)系的審慎但積極的看法。定位到最后一段最后兩句“Ultimately,whileAIoffersremarkablepotential...Itisimperativethatstakeholders...collaboratetomitigatetherisks...ensuringthattechnologyservestoenrichratherunderminehumantrustandwell-being.”6.解析思路：第一段定義了“quietquitting”是減少超出工作描述的