第1題WhichofthefollowingisakeyprincipleoftheUnjustEnrichmentDoctrine?AApartyshouldnotbeallowedtobenefitattheexpenseofanotherpartywithoutjustification.BApartyshouldonlybeheldliableifthereisacontractualagreementinplace.CApartyshouldbeentitledtoanybenefitstheyreceive,regardlessofthecircumstances.DApartycanbeenrichedunjustlyaslongastheycompensatetheotherpartyinthefuture.第2題Inordertoestablishaclaimofunjustenrichment,whichofthefollowingelementsmustbeproven?AThedefendantreceivedabenefit.BTheplaintiffsufferedaloss.CThedefendant’sactionswereintentional.DTheplaintiffhadapre-existinglegaldutytoprovidethebenefit.第3題Whichofthefollowingisanexampleofunjustenrichment?AAcontractorcompletesarenovationprojectandchargesthehomeownertwicetheagreed-uponprice.BAcustomeraccidentallyreceivesanextraitemwhenorderingonlineanddecidestokeepitwithoutpayingforit.CAlandlorddeductsexcessivefeesfromatenant’ssecuritydepositwithoutprovidingavalidreason.DAbusinesssellsadefectiveproducttoacustomerandrefusestoprovidearefundorreplacement.第4題WhatistheprimarypurposeoftheUnjustEnrichmentDoctrine?AToensurepartiesarecompensatedforanylossestheysuffer.BTopreventpartiesfrombenefitingunfairlyattheexpenseofothers.CToencouragepartiestoenterintocontractualagreements.DToestablishclearguidelinesfordetermininglegaldutiesandobligations.第5題WhichlegalprincipleiscloselyrelatedtotheUnjustEnrichmentDoctrine?ACaveatemptor(buyerbeware)BResipsaloquitur(thethingspeaksforitself)CPromissoryestoppel(relianceonpromises)DContributorynegligence(sharedresponsibilityforharm)第6題InFibrosaSpolkaAkcyjnav.FairbairnLawsonCombeBarbourLtd(1943),thecourtheldthatacontractbecomesvoidif:AItisnotinwritingBItisnotsignedbybothpartiesCItisimpossibletoperformduetounforeseencircumstancesDItcontainsambiguousterms第7題WhatwasthemainissueinFibrosaSpolkaAkcyjnav.FairbairnLawsonCombeBarbourLtd(1943)?ABreachofcontractBFraudulentmisrepresentationCUnilateralmistakeDFrustrationofcontract第8題ThecourtinFibrosaSpolkaAkcyjnav.FairbairnLawsonCombeBarbourLtd(1943)ruledthatthecontractwasfrustratedbecause:AThedefendantfailedtoperformtheirobligationsBTheplaintiffbreachedthetermsofthecontractCBothpartieswereunabletoperformduetounforeseeneventsDThecontractwasnotproperlyexecuted第9題AccordingtoFibrosaSpolkaAkcyjnav.FairbairnLawsonCombeBarbourLtd(1943),frustrationofcontractoccurswhen:AOnepartyintentionallybreachesthecontractBBothpartiesagreetoterminatethecontractCTheperformancebecomesimpossibleorradicallydifferentDThecontractisnotproperlyexecuted第10題InFibrosaSpolkaAkcyjnav.FairbairnLawsonCombeBarbourLtd(1943),thecourtdeterminedthatwhenacontractisfrustrated:ATheinnocentpartyisentitledtodamagesBThecontractremainsvalidandenforceableCBothpartiesarereleasedfromtheirobligationsDThecontractisautomaticallyterminated.第1題WhichofthefollowingbestdescribestheDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTree?AAlegalprinciplethatallowsevidenceobtainedunlawfullytobeadmissibleincourt.BAlegalprinciplethatexcludesevidencederivedfromillegallyobtainedevidence.CAlegalprinciplethatallowslawenforcementtouseanymeansnecessarytoobtainevidence.DAlegalprinciplethatgrantsimmunitytodefendantswhoprovideinformationaboutothersinvolvedinacrime.第2題AccordingtotheDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTree,evidencederivedfromillegallyobtainedevidenceisconsidered:AAdmissibleincourt.BInadmissibleincourt.CSubjecttofurtherinvestigation.DOnlyadmissibleifitleadstoaconviction.第3題WhichofthefollowingscenarioswouldlikelybeconsideredaviolationoftheDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTree?AApoliceofficerobtainsasearchwarrantbasedoncredibleevidenceandfindsillegaldrugsinasuspect’shome.BApoliceofficercoercesaconfessionoutofasuspectwithoutreadingthemtheirMirandarights,leadingtothediscoveryofadditionalevidence.CApoliceofficerconductsaroutinetrafficstopandfindsaweaponinthesuspect’svehiclewithoutanyprobablecause.DApoliceofficerobtainsavalidsearchwarrantbutmistakenlysearchesthewrongaddress,findingevidencerelatedtoadifferentcrime.第4題TheDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTreeprimarilyaimsto:AProtecttherightsoflawenforcementofficers.BEnsurethatallevidenceisadmissibleincourt.CDeterlawenforcementfromusingillegalmethodstoobtainevidence.DGrantimmunitytothosewhoprovidevaluableinformationincriminalinvestigations.第5題WhichofthefollowingstatementsisconsistentwiththeDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTree?AEvidenceobtainedillegallycanbeusedincourtifitleadstoaconviction.BIllegallyobtainedevidenceisalwaysadmissibleincourt.CIfevidenceisderivedfromillegallyobtainedevidence,itisalsoconsideredtaintedandinadmissible.DTheDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTreeonlyappliestocriminalcases,notcivilcases.第6題InSilverthorneLumberCo.v.UnitedStates(1920),theUnitedStatesSupremeCourtruledthat:AThegovernmenthastheauthoritytoseizeevidencewithoutawarrant.BThegovernmenthastheauthoritytoseizeevidencewithoutawarrant.CThegovernmenthastheauthoritytoseizeevidencewithoutawarrant.DTheexclusionaryruledoesnotapplytocasesinvolvingillegalsearchandseizure.第7題TheprimaryissueinSilverthorneLumberCo.v.UnitedStates(1920)was:AWhetherabusinesscanbeheldliablefortheactionsofitsemployees.BWhetherabusinesscanbeheldliablefortheactionsofitsemployees.CWhetherabusinesscanbeheldliablefortheactionsofitsemployees.DWhethertheFourthAmendmentappliestobusinesses.第8題InSilverthorneLumberCo.v.UnitedStates(1920),theCourtheldthatthegovernment’sseizureofdocumentsfromthecompanywas:ALawfulandadmissibleasevidence.BLawfulandadmissibleasevidence.CLawfulandadmissibleasevidence.DUnlawfulbutadmissibleasevidence.第9題TheSilverthorneLumberCo.v.UnitedStates(1920)caseestablishedtheprinciplethat:ATheexclusionaryruleappliestoallcasesinvolvingillegalsearchandseizure.BTheexclusionaryruleappliestoallcasesinvolvingillegalsearchandseizure.CTheexclusionaryruleappliestoallcasesinvolvingillegalsearchandseizure.DTheFourthAmendmentdoesnotprotectbusinessesfromunreasonablesearchesandseizures.第10題TherulinginSilverthorneLumberCo.v.UnitedStates(1920)hadsignificantimplicationsfor:ATherightsofbusinessesinrelationtogovernmentsearchesandseizures.BTherightsofbusinessesinrelationtogovernmentsearchesandseizures.CTherightsofbusinessesinrelationtogovernmentsearchesandseizures.DTheauthorityofthegovernmenttoseizedocumentswithoutawarrant.Test3第1題Therescuedoctrineisalegalprinciplethatallowsapersontorecoverdamagesifthey:AVoluntarilyassistinsavingsomeone’slifeorpropertyBAccidentallycauseharmwhiletryingtorescuesomeoneCRefusetoassistinarescueoperationDAreinjuredwhileattemptingtorescuesomeone第2題Undertherescuedoctrine,apersoncanrecoverdamagesiftheiractionswere:ANegligentBIntentionalCRecklessDReasonableandnecessary第3題Therescuedoctrineisbasedontheprinciplethat:AGoodSamaritansshouldberewardedfortheiractionsBThosewhocauseharmwhilerescuingothersshouldbeheldliableCPeoplehaveadutytoassistothersinemergencysituationsDRescuingsomeoneisalwaysalegallyprotectedactivity第4題Inordertosuccessfullyclaimdamagesundertherescuedoctrine,apersonmustprovethat:AThepersontheywererescuingwasastrangerBTheyactedwiththeintenttosavesomeone’slifeCTheyactedreasonablyunderthecircumstancesDTheyhadpriortraininginrescueoperations第5題Therescuedoctrineismostcommonlyappliedincasesinvolving:AMedicalemergenciesBNaturaldisastersCVehicleaccidentsDCriminalactivities第6題InWagnerv.InternationalRailwayCo.(1921),therescuedoctrinerefersto:AAlegalprinciplethatholdsindividualsresponsiblefortheirownsafetyBAlegalprinciplethatholdsemployersliableforaccidentsthatoccurduringrescueattemptsCAlegalprinciplethatallowsfortherecoveryofdamagesforinjuriessustainedwhilerescuingothersDAlegalprinciplethatlimitsliabilityforinjuriessustainedduringrescueattempts第7題TherescuedoctrineinWagnerv.InternationalRailwayCo.(1921)wasappliedtodetermine:ATheextentofdamagesthatcouldbeawardedtotheinjuredpartyBWhetherthedefendanthadadutytorescuetheplaintiffCWhethertheplaintiffactednegligentlyduringtherescueattemptD)Whethertheplaintiffwasentitledtoworkers’compensationbenefits第8題TherescuedoctrineinWagnerv.InternationalRailwayCo.(1921)wasbasedontheprincipleof:AComparativenegligenceBAssumptionofriskCVicariousliabilityDThedutytorescue第9題Thecourt’sdecisioninWagnerv.InternationalRailwayCo.(1921)regardingtherescuedoctrinehadimplicationsfor:AWorkplacesafetyregulationsBPersonalinjuryliabilityCCriminallawDIntellectualpropertyrights第10題TherescuedoctrineinWagnerv.InternationalRailwayCo.(1921)wasappliedtodeterminewhether:ATheplaintiff’sinjurieswerecausedbythedefendant’snegligenceBTheplaintiff’srescueattemptwasareasonableandforeseeableactionCThedefendanthadadutytowarntheplaintiffofpotentialdangersDTheplaintiff’sinjurieswerearesultoftheirownnegligenceTest4第1題Thedoctrineofassumptionofriskrefersto:AAlegalprinciplethatholdsindividualsresponsiblefortheirownsafetyB)AlegalprinciplethatallowsindividualstowaivetheirrighttosuefordamagesCAlegalprinciplethatlimitsliabilityforinjuriessustainedduringinherentlydangerousactivitiesDAlegalprinciplethatrequiresindividualstotakereasonableprecautionstoavoidinjury第2題Inthecontextofassumptionofrisk,theburdenofprooflieswith:ATheplaintiff,toprovethatthedefendantwasnegligentBThedefendant,toprovethattheplaintiffknowinglyassumedtherisksinvolvedCThecourt,todeterminetheextentofdamagesthatshouldbeawardedDThejury,todecidewhethertheplaintiff’sactionswerereasonable第3題Thedoctrineofassumptionofriskmaynotapplyif:ATheplaintiffwasunawareoftherisksinvolvedintheactivityBThedefendantfailedtoprovideproperwarningorinstructionregardingtherisksCTheplaintiffsignedawaiverreleasingthedefendantfromliabilityDTheplaintiffvoluntarilyparticipatedintheactivitydespitebeingawareoftherisks第4題Thedoctrineofassumptionofriskisoftenappliedincasesinvolving:AWorkplaceaccidentsBMedicalmalpracticeCProductliabilityDRecreationalactivities第5題Whenthedoctrineofassumptionofriskissuccessfullyinvoked,theplaintiff:AIsnotentitledtoanycompensationfortheirinjuriesBCanstillrecoverdamagesifthedefendant’sconductwasgrosslynegligentCIsheldpartiallyliablefortheirinjuriesandthedamagesarereducedaccordinglyDMustprovethatthedefendantintentionallycausedtheirinjuries第6題IntheKnightv.Jewettcase,theCaliforniaSupremeCourtruledthatthedoctrineofassumptionofrisk:ACouldnolongerbeusedasadefenseinpersonalinjurycasesBOnlyappliedtocasesinvolvingrecreationalactivitiesCAppliedtocasesinvolvingbothrecreationalandnon-recreationalactivitiesDWasonlyapplicableincasesinvolvingprofessionalathletes第7題TheKnightv.Jewettdecisionclarifiedthatthedoctrineofassumptionofriskrequires:ATheplaintifftohaveexplicitknowledgeofthespecificrisksinvolvedBThedefendanttohaveprovidedawrittenwaiverofliabilitytotheplaintiffCThedefendanttohaveintentionallycausedharmtotheplaintiffDTheplaintifftohavevoluntarilyparticipatedintheactivitydespitetheknownrisks第8題TheKnightv.Jewettdecisionemphasizedthatthedoctrineofassumptionofriskisbasedon:AThedefendant’sdutytoprovideasafeenvironmentfortheplaintiffBTheplaintiff’sdutytoexercisereasonablecaretoavoidinjuryCThedefendant’sdutytowarntheplaintiffofallpotentialrisksDTheplaintiff’sdutytoprovethatthedefendantwasnegligent第9題FollowingtheKnightv.Jewettdecision,thedoctrineofassumptionofriskmaystillapplyif:ATheplaintiffsignedageneralwaiverofliabilitybeforeparticipatingintheactivityBThedefendantfailedtoprovideanywarningorinstructionregardingtherisksinvolvedCTheplaintiffwasnotawareofthespecificrisksassociatedwiththeactivityDThedefendant’sconductwasfoundtobegrosslynegligentorintentional第10題TheKnightv.Jewettdecisionhighlightedtheimportanceof:AAllowingplaintiffstorecoverdamagesregardlessoftheirownnegligenceBHoldingdefendantsstrictlyliableforanyinjuriessustainedbytheplaintiffCBalancingtherightsandresponsibilitiesofboththeplaintiffandthedefendantDEliminatingthedoctrineofassumptionofriskentirelyfromthelegalsystem.Test5第1題Accordingtothedoctrineofstaredecisis,whichofthefollowingstatementsistrue?ACourtsareboundtofollowtheirownpreviousdecisions.BCourtsarenotboundtofollowtheirownpreviousdecisions.CCourtsareboundtofollowdecisionsmadebylowercourts.DCourtsarenotboundtofollowdecisionsmadebylowercourts.第2題StaredecisisisaLatintermthatmeans:A“Letthedecisionstand.”B“Changethedecision.”C“Ignorethedecision.”D“Overturnthedecision.”第3題Thedoctrineofstaredecisispromotes:AFlexibilityandadaptabilityinthelegalsystem.BConsistencyandpredictabilityinthelegalsystem.CDiscretionandsubjectivityinthelegalsystem.DInstabilityanduncertaintyinthelegalsystem.第4題Whichofthefollowingisanexceptiontothedoctrineofstaredecisis?AOverrulingapreviousdecision.BFollowingapreviousdecisionmadebyadifferentcourt.CIgnoringapreviousdecisionmadebyahighercourt.DAdheringtoapreviousdecisionmadebyalowercourt.第5題Theprimarypurposeofthedoctrineofstaredecisisisto:AEnsurethatallcourtdecisionsareunanimous.BEncouragejudicialactivismandinnovation.CPreservestabilityandconsistencyinthelegalsystem.DDisregardtheimportanceofprecedentinlegalcases.第6題InthecaseofHAUMSCHILDv.CONTINENTALCAS.CO.,theSupremeCourtofWisconsin:AOverturnedapreviousdecision.BEstablishedanewprecedent.CFollowedapreviousdecision.第7題ThedoctrineofstaredecisisrequirestheSupremeCourtofWisconsinto:AAlwaysfollowitsownpreviousdecisions.BNeverfollowitsownpreviousdecisions.COnlyfollowdecisionsmadebylowercourts.第8題TheHAUMSCHILDv.CONTINENTALCAS.CO.decisionisconsideredbindingprecedentin:AAllfutureWisconsincases.BAllfutureU.S.federalcases.CAllfutureinsurance-relatedcases第9題Thedoctrineofstaredecisispromotesconsistencyinthelegalsystemby:AAllowingcourtstochangetheirdecisionsasneeded.BEncouragingcourtstoignorepreviousdecisions.CEnsuringthatcourtsfollowestablishedprecedents.第10題TheSupremeCourtofWisconsin’sdecisioninHAUMSCHILDv.ALowercourtsinWisconsinmustfollow.BLowercourtsinotherstatesmustfollow.CAllcourtsaroundtheworldmustfollow.Test6第1題Thedoctrineofresjudicataprevents:AThedefendantfromappealingacourt’sdecision.BTheplaintifffromfilingalawsuitagainstthesamedefendant.CTheplaintifffrompresentingnewevidenceinatrial.DThedefendantfrompresentingacounterclaiminalawsuit.第2題Resjudicataapplieswhen:AAcaseisdismissedwithoutprejudice.BAcaseisdismissedwithprejudice.CAcaseisappealedtoahighercourt.DAcaseissettledoutofcourt.第3題Thepurposeofthedoctrineofresjudicataisto:APreventmultiplelawsuitsoverthesameissue.BAllowpartiestore-litigatetheircaseindefinitely.CEncouragepartiestosettletheirdisputesoutsideofcourt.DGivethedefendantanopportunitytoappealanunfavorabledecision.第4題Resjudicatarequiresthatthefollowingconditionsaremet:AThesameparties,samecauseofaction,andafinaljudgment.BDifferentparties,samecauseofaction,andafinaljudgment.CThesameparties,differentcauseofaction,andafinaljudgment.DDifferentparties,differentcauseofaction,andafinaljudgment.第5題Theeffectofresjudicataisthat:AApartycannotbringthesameclaimagainstthesamepartyagain.BApartycanbringthesameclaimagainstthesamepartyagain.CApartycanbringadifferentclaimagainstthesameparty.DApartycanbringthesameclaimagainstadifferentparty.第6題InTaylorv.Sturgell(2008),theSupremeCourtaddressedtheissueof:APersonalinjuryclaims.BCopyrightinfringement.CResjudicatainthecontextofaviationaccidents.DResjudicatainthecontextofidentitytheft.第7題TheTaylorv.Sturgellcaseestablishedthatthedoctrineofresjudicatacanbeappliedto:AIndividualswhowerenotpartiestotheoriginallawsuit.BOnlytheoriginalpartiesinvolvedinthelawsuit.CCasesinvolvingintellectualpropertydisputes.DCriminalcases第8題TheTaylorv.Sturgellcaseclarifiedthatanonpartycanbeprecludedfromrelitigatingaclaimif:AThenonpartyhadasignificantinterestinthepreviouslawsuit.BThenonpartyisrelatedtooneoftheoriginalparties.CThenonpartyisaclosefriendofoneoftheoriginalparties.DThenonpartywasnotproperlyservedwiththeoriginallawsuit.第9題TheTaylorv.Sturgellcaseemphasizedtheimportanceof:AResolvinglegaldisputesthroughalternativedisputeresolutionmethods.BAllowingnonpartiestointerveneinongoinglawsuits.CEnsuringfairnessandconsistencyinthejudicialprocess.DEncouragingnonpartiestofileseparatelawsuitsonthesameissue.第10題TheTaylorv.Sturgellcaseultimatelyupheldthedoctrineofresjudicataasameansto:APreventthesamepartiesfromlitigatingthesameissuemultipletimes.BAllownonpartiestojoinongoinglawsuits.CEncouragethefilingofnewlawsuitsonthesameissue.DOverturnpreviousdecisionsinordertoachievejustice.Test7第1題Thedoctrineofrespondeatsuperiorisalegalprinciplethatholds:AEmployersliablefortheactionsoftheiremployees.BEmployeesliablefortheactionsoftheiremployers.CBothemployersandemployeesjointlyliableforanywrongdoing.DOnlytheindividualdirectlyresponsibleforthewrongdoing.第2題Respondeatsuperioriscommonlyappliedincasesinvolving:AMedicalmalpractice.BBreachofcontract.CProductliability.DVicariousliabilityintheemploymentcontext.第3題Underthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperior,anemployercanbeheldliablefortheactionsofanemployeeif:ATheemployeeactedwithinthescopeoftheiremployment.BTheemployerdirectlyinstructedtheemployeetocommitthewrongfulact.CTheemployerwasawareoftheemployee’smisconductbutfailedtotakeaction.DTheemployerandemployeearejointlyresponsibleregardlessofthecircumstances.第4題Themainpurposeofthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperioristo:AEncourageemployerstotakeresponsibilityfortheactionsoftheiremployees.BShiftliabilityfromemployerstoemployees.CEnsurethatemployeesareheldpersonallyliableforanywrongdoing.DLimittheliabilityofemployersincasesofemployeemisconduct.第5題Thedoctrineofrespondeatsuperiorappliestowhichofthefollowingsituations?AAdeliverydrivercausinganaccidentwhileonduty.BAnindependentcontractorperformingworkforacompany.CAnemployeecommittingacrimeoutsideofworkhours.DAcustomerslippingandfallinginastore.第6題InFarwellv.Boston&WorcesterRailroadCorp.,thecourtheldthatthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperiorapplieswhen:ATheemployerexplicitlydirectedtheemployeetocommitawrongfulact.BTheemployeeactedwithinthescopeoftheiremployment.CTheemployerhadnoknowledgeoftheemployee’sactions.DTheemployeewasanindependentcontractor.第7題TheFarwellv.Boston&WorcesterRailroadCorp.caseestablishedthatemployerscanbeheldliableunderrespondeatsuperiorfor:ANegligenthiringofemployees.BIntentionaltortscommittedbyemployees.CActionscommittedbyindependentcontractors.DActionscommittedbyemployeesoutsideofworkhours.第8題Farwellv.Boston&WorcesterRailroadCorp.clarifiedthatthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperiorisbasedontheprincipleof:AVicariousliability.BStrictliability.CJointliability.DContributorynegligence.第9題AccordingtoFarwellv.Boston&WorcesterRailroadCorp.,employerscanbeheldliablefortheactionsoftheiremployeesevenif:ATheemployeeactedoutsidethescopeoftheiremployment.BTheemployeewasactinginself-defense.CTheemployeewasanindependentcontractor.DTheemployee’sactionswereunforeseeable.第10題TheFarwellv.Boston&WorcesterRailroadCorp.casecontributedtothedevelopmentofthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperiorby:AEstablishingacleardefinitionofwhatconstitutesanemployee.BLimitingtheliabilityofemployersincasesofemployeemisconduct.CExpandingthescopeofemployerliabilityforemployeeactions.DAbolishingthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperioraltogether.Test8第1題Thedoctrineofresipsaloquiturapplieswhen:AThereisclearevidenceofthedefendant’snegligence.BTheplaintiffispartiallyresponsiblefortheirowninjuries.CThedefendantisanemployeeoftheplaintiff.DThecauseoftheaccidentisunknown.第2題Resipsaloquiturallowstheplaintiffto:AAvoidtheburdenofprovingthedefendant’snegligence.BRecoverdamagesregardlessoftheirownnegligence.CShifttheburdenofprooftothedefendant.DDismissthecasewithoutfurtherinvestigation.第3題Inordertoestablishresipsaloquitur,theplaintiffmustshowthat:AThedefendantbreachedadutyofcare.BThedefendantactedintentionally.CThedefendant’sactionswereunforeseeable.DThedefendanthadnocontroloverthesituation.第4題Resipsaloquiturisoftenappliedincasesinvolving:AMedicalmalpractice.BProductliability.CSlipandfallaccidents.DBreachofcontract.第5題ThedoctrineofresipsaloquituroriginatedfromtheLatinphrase,whichmeans:A“Thethingspeaksforitself.”B“Innocentuntilprovenguilty.”C“Negligenceispresumed.”D“Beyondareasonabledoubt.”第6題InthecaseofByrnev.Boadle(1863),resipsaloquiturwasappliedto:AAmedicalmalpracticecase.BAproductliabilitycase.CAslipandfallaccidentcase.DAbreachofcontractcase.第7題Resipsaloquiturallowstheplaintiffto:AShifttheburdenofprooftothedefendant.BReceivecompensationwithoutprovingnegligence.CFilealawsuitwithoutanyevidence.DAvoidtheneedforexperttestimony.第8題TheprincipleestablishedinByrnev.Boadle(1863)statesthatresipsaloquiturapplieswhen:AThedefendanthassuperiorknowledgeorcontroloverthesituation.BTheplaintiff’sinjurieswerecausedbytheirownnegligence.CThedefendanthasahistoryofsimilaraccidents.DTheplaintiffisunabletoprovethespecificactofnegligence.第9題Resipsaloquiturisoftenusedwhen:ATheplaintiffanddefendanthaveapre-existingrelationship.BThecauseoftheaccidentisunknown.CTheplaintiff’sinjuriesareminororinsignificant.DThedefendantadmitstotheirnegligence.第10題Thedoctrineofresipsaloquitur,asappliedinByrnev.Boadle(1863),means:A“Thethingspeaksforitself.”B“Innocentuntilprovenguilty.”C“Negligenceispresumed.”D“Beyondareasonabledoubt.”Test9第1題TheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationsetsatimelimitfor:AFilingalawsuit.BCollectingevidence.CNegotiatingasettlement.DAppealingacourtdecision.第2題ThepurposeoftheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationisto:AEnsurethatcasesareresolvedquickly.BProtectdefendantsfromstaleclaims.CLimitthejurisdictionofthecourt.DEncourageout-of-courtsettlements第3題ThetimelimitimposedbytheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationvariesdependingon:ATheseverityoftheoffense.BThedefendant’sfinancialstatus.CThelocationoftheincident.DThetypeoflegalclaim.第4題IfaplaintifffailstofilealawsuitwithinthespecifiedtimelimitundertheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitation,theconsequenceisusually:AAutomaticdismissalofthecase.BExtensionofthetimelimit.CMandatorymediationorarbitration.DReduceddamagesawardedtotheplaintiff.第5題TheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationmaybetolledorsuspendedundercertaincircumstances,suchas:AThedefendant’sabsencefromthejurisdiction.BTheplaintiff’sfinancialhardship.CTheplaintiff’slackoflegalrepresentation.DThedefendant’sadmissionofguilt.第6題ThepurposeoftheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationistostrikeabalancebetween:AProtectingtherightsoftheplaintiffandthedefendant.BEnsuringaccesstojusticeandpreventingunduedelayCEncouraginglitigationandavoidingovercrowdedcourts.DExpeditingthelegalprocessandpreservingevidence.第7題ThetimelimitundertheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationtypicallybeginstorunfromthe:ADatethelawsuitisfiled.BDateoftheincidentorinjury.CDatetheplaintiffdiscoverstheharmsuffered.DDatethedefendantisnotifiedoftheclaim.第8題TheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationmaybeextendedincasesinvolving:AFraudorconcealmentbythedefendant.BMultipledefendants.CInternationaldisputes.DGovernmententitiesasdefendants.Test10第1題AccordingtotheDoctrineofUncleanHands,whichofthefollowingstatementsistrue?AApartywithacleanrecordisalwaysentitledtolegalremedies.BApartywhohasengagedinwrongfulconductcannotseekequitablerelief.CTheDoctrineofUncleanHandsonlyappliestocriminalcases.DTheDoctrineofUncleanHandsisnotrecognizedinanylegaljurisdiction.第2題Inlegalterms,whatdoestheDoctrineofUncleanHandsreferto?AApartyfailingtowashtheirhandsbeforeenteringacourtroom.BApartyengaginginunethicalorwrongfulbehaviorrelatedtothecase.CApartybeingphysicallyunabletopresenttheircaseduetouncleanhands.DApartynothavingsufficientevidencetosupporttheirclaims.第3題HowdoestheDoctrineofUncleanHandsaffectapartyseekingequitablerelief?AItcompletelybarsthepartyfromseekinganyformofrelief.BItallow