北海大陸架案件_第1頁
北海大陸架案件_第2頁
北海大陸架案件_第3頁
全文預覽已結束

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1、北海大陸架案件The Court delivered judgment, by 11 votes to 6, in the North Sea Continental Shelf cases. 國際司法機關法院11票6票得出了北海大陸架案件的判決。The dispute, which was submitted to the Court on 20 February 1967, related to the delimitatio n of the continental shelf between the Federal Republic of Germany and Denmark on

2、the one hand, and between the Federal Republic of Germany and Netherlands on the other.1967年2月20日,德意志聯(lián)邦國對丹麥之間和德意志聯(lián)邦國對荷蘭之間提交到國際法院關于大陸架劃界 的問題The parties asked the Court to state the principles and rules of international law applicable, an d undertook thereafter to carry out the delimitations on that b

3、asis.當事人向司法機關法院提問可以適用的國際法原則和規(guī)則,和保證此后都以上面的原則進行劃界。The Court rejected the contention of Denmark and the Netherlands to the effect that the delimi tations in question had to be carried out in accordance with the principle of equidistance as de fined in Article 6 of the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Cont

4、inental Shelf, holding:國際法院拒絕了丹麥和荷蘭通過在1958年的日內瓦城的大陸架公約第6條所規(guī)定的等距離原則的劃 界問題,裁定:That the Federal Republic, which had not ratified the Convention, was not legally boun d by the previsions of Article 6德意志聯(lián)邦國沒有在大陸架公約批準,所以不受第6條規(guī)定的等距離原則That the equidistance principle was not a necessary consequence of the ge

5、neral conce pt of continental shelf rights, and was not a rule of customary international law.(?,也不是國際習慣法的規(guī)則。)The Court also rejected the contentions of the Federal Republic in so far as these sought acc eptance of the principle of an apportionment of the continental shelf into just and equitable sh

6、a res.國際法院也拒絕了德意志聯(lián)邦國的(?)土地分配大陸架的爭論。It held that each Party had an original right to these areas of the continental shelf which const ituted the natural prolongation of its land territory into and under the sea. It was not a questio n of apportioning or sharing out those areas, but of delimiting them

7、.每個當事國擁有原始權利陸地延長到海中和海底。這不是分配或分享陸地區(qū)域的問題,而對大陸架劃界 的問題。The Court found that the boundary lines in question were to be drawn by agreement between the Part ies and in accordance with equitable principle , and it indicated certain factors to be taken into conside ration for that purpose. It was now for the

8、 Parties to negotiate on the basis of such principles, as they have agreed to do.國際法院找出方法,該分界線的問題根據(jù)每個當事國的協(xié)議,并且按照公平的原則劃定,并且國際法院 表明了應該考慮的一些因素。這是現(xiàn)在應該個當事國按照自己同意的原則進行談判。The proceedings, relating to the delimitation as between the parties of the areas of the North Sea continental shelf appertaining to eac

9、h of them, were instituted on 20 February 1967 by the communication to the Registry of the Court of two Special Agreements, between Denmark and the Federal Republic and the Federal Republic and the Netherlands respectively. By an Order of 26 April 1968, the Court joined the proceedings in the two ca

10、ses.這個事件,聯(lián)系起來當事國劃分北海大陸架各方的區(qū)域是通過國際法院書記部分別告訴丹麥和德意志 聯(lián)邦國之間的和德意志聯(lián)邦國和荷蘭之間的兩份特別協(xié)定在1967年2月20日開始的。國際法院發(fā)布命令, 把這兩個案子的訴訟合并起來.The Court decided the two cases in a single judgment, which it adopted by eleven votes t o six. Amongst the Members of the Court concurring in the judgment, judge sir Muhammad Zafrulla kh

11、an appended appended a declaration; and president Bustamante t Rivero and judges Jessup, Padilla Nervo and Ammoun appended separate opinions. In the case og the non-concurring judges, a declaration of his dissent was appended by judge Tanaka, Morelli and lachs, and judge ad hoc Sorensen, appended dissenting opinions.國際法院以11票對6票通過對這兩個案件做出的一格判決。在法官中贊成該判決的,法官()了聲明; ()院長以及法官杰賽普,()和安蒙附了分別意見,在不贊成該判決的法官中,本格宗法官附了反對 的聲明;()副園長與法官田中,莫雷利和拉克斯,以及專案法倫附了反對意見。In its judgment, the Court examined in the con

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論