四級(jí)模考講解閱讀01安心考研_第1頁(yè)
四級(jí)??贾v解閱讀01安心考研_第2頁(yè)
四級(jí)模考講解閱讀01安心考研_第3頁(yè)
四級(jí)??贾v解閱讀01安心考研_第4頁(yè)
四級(jí)模考講解閱讀01安心考研_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩106頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

@@ 網(wǎng)易有道簽約譯者、英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)八級(jí)、 大學(xué)英四級(jí)閱 每日一背obesity/???bi?s?timeet/mi?t

nv

lack/l?k/ n./v.缺乏clarity?kl?r?tin清晰adversely/??dv??sli/adv.不利地 opposed/??p??zd/adj.

老師 (閱讀:40-1235STEP20-25min 正確答案= 彩+同義替 WhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutWhatisthepopularviewofWhyaresomepeopleopposedtolabellingobesityasaWhatdoesDr.RichardPilethinkofthedictionarydefinitionofWhatisDr.RichardPile’sconcernaboutclassifyingobesityasaWhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutWhatisthepopularviewofWhyaresomepeopleopposedto asaWhatdoesDr.RichardPilethinkofthedictionarydefinitionWhatisDr.RichardPile’sconcernabout aspopularProfessorpopularProfessorJohnWhatis

argueaboutobesity?ofobesity?aresomepeopleopposedtolabellingobesityasaWhatdoesWhatisDr.

thinkofthedictionarydefinitionDr.RichardRichardPile’sconcernaboutclassifyingobesityDr.Richardt46: ProfessorJohnt50:WhatisDr.RichardPile’st46: ProfessorJohnt47t4849.WhatdoesDr.Richardt50:WhatisDr.RichardPile’sWhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutobesity?Itsimpactonsocietyisexpectedtorise.Itisnowtoowidespreadtobeneglected.Itshouldberegardedasageneticdisease.Itsdictionarydefinitionshouldbeupdated.P1Withobesitynowaffecting29%ofthepopulationinEngland,andexpectedtoriseto35%by2030,shouldwenowrecogniseitasadisease?Obesity,inwhichexcessbodyfathasaccumulatedtosuchanextentthathealth maybeadverselyaffected,meetsthedictionarydefinitionofdisease,argues Professor JohnWilding.Hepointsoutthatmorethan200genesinfluenceweight.“Thusbodyweightisstronglyinfluencedbybiology—itisnot anindividual’sfaultiftheydevelopobesity.”Yetthewidespreadviewisthatobesityisself-inducedandthatitisentirelytheindividual’sresponsibilitytodosomethingaboutit.Recognisingobesityasachronicdiseasewithseverecomplicationsratherthanalifestylechoice“shouldhelpreducethestigma( )anddiscriminationexperiencedbymanypeoplewithobesity,”headds.46.WhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutobesity?P1Withobesitynowaffecting29%ofthepopulationinEngland,andexpectedtoriseto35%by2030,shouldwenowrecogniseitasadisease?Obesity,inwhichexcessbodyfathasaccumulatedtosuchanextentthathealth maybeadverselyaffected,meetsthedictionarydefinitionofdisease,argues Professor JohnWilding.Hepointsoutthatmorethan200genesinfluenceweight.“Thusbodyweightisstronglyinfluencedbybiology—itisnot anindividual’sfaultiftheydevelopobesity.”Yetthewidespreadviewisthatobesityisself-inducedandthatitisentirelytheindividual’sresponsibilitytodosomethingaboutit.Recognisingobesityasachronicdiseasewithseverecomplicationsratherthanalifestylechoice“shouldhelpreducethestigma( )anddiscriminationexperiencedbymanypeoplewithobesity,”headds.46.WhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutobesity?P1Withobesitynowaffecting29%ofthepopulationinEngland,andexpectedtoriseto35%by2030,shouldwenowrecogniseitasadisease?Obesity,inwhichexcessbodyfathasaccumulatedtosuchanextentthathealth maybeadverselyaffected,meetsthedictionarydefinitionofdisease,argues Professor JohnWilding.Hepointsoutthatmorethan200genesinfluenceweight.“Thusbodyweightisstronglyinfluencedbybiology—itisnot anindividual’sfaultiftheydevelopobesity.”Yetthewidespreaviewisthatobesityisself-inducedandthatitisentirelythindividual’sresponsibilitytodosomethingaboutit.Recognisingobesityasachronicdiseasewithseverecomplicationsratherthanalifestylechoice“shouldhelpreducethestigma()anddiscriminationexperiencedbymanypeoplewithobesity,”headds.46.WhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutobesity?P1Withobesitynowaffecting29%ofthepopulationinEngland,andexpectedtoriseto35%by2030,shouldwenowrecogniseitasadisease?Obesity,inwhichexcessbodyfathasaccumulatedtosuchanextentthathealth maybeadverselyaffected,meetsthedictionarydefinitionofdisease,argues Professor JohnWilding.Hepointsoutthatmorethan200genesinfluenceweight.“Thusbodyweightisstronglyinfluencedbybiology—itisnot anindividual’sfaultiftheydevelopobesity.”Yetthewidespreadviewisthatobesityisself-inducedandthatitisentirelytheindividual’sresponsibilitytodosomethingaboutit.Recognisingobesityasachronicdiseasewithseverecomplicationsratherthanalifestylechoice“shouldhelpreducethestigma()anddiscriminationexperiencedbymanypeoplewithobesity,”headds.46.WhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutobesity?Withobesitynowaffecting29%ofthepopulationinEngland,andexpectedtoriseto35%by2030,shouldwenowrecogniseitasadisease?Obesity,inwhichexcessbodyfathasaccumulatedtosuchanextentthathealthmaybeadverselyaffected,meetsthedictionarydefinitionofdisease,arguesProfessorJohnWilding.Hepointsoutthatmorethan200genesinfluenceweight.“Thusbodyweightisstronglyinfluencedbybiology—itisnot anindividual’sfaultiftheydevelopobesity.”46.Whatdoe

ProfessorJohnWilding

argueaboutobesity?Itsimpactonsocietyisexpectedtorise.Itisnowtoowidespreadtobeneglected.Itshouldberegardedasageneticdisease.Itsdictionarydefinitionshouldbeupdated.Withobesitynowaffecting29%ofthepopulationinEngland,andexpectedtoriseto35%by2030,shouldwenowrecogniseitasadisease?Obesity,inwhichexcessbodyfathasaccumulatedtosuchanextentthathealthmaybeadverselyaffected,meetsthedictionarydefinitionofdisease,arguesProfessorJohnWilding.Hepointsoutthatmorethan200genesinfluenceweight.“Thusbodyweightisstronglyinfluencedbybiology—itisnot anindividual’sfaultiftheydevelopobesity.”WhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutobesity?ItsimpactonsocietyisexpectedtoItisnowtoowidespreadtobeneglected.Itshouldberegardedasageneticdisease.Itsdictionarydefinitionshouldbeupdated.Withobesitynowaffecting29%ofthepopulationinEngland,andexpectedtoriseto35%by2030,shouldwenowrecogniseitasadisease?Obesity,(inwhichexcessbodyfathasaccumulatedtosuchanextentthathealthmaybeadverselyaffected),meetsthedictionarydefinitionofdisease,arguesProfessorJohnWilding.Hepointsoutthatmorethan200genesinfluenceweight.“Thusbodyweightisstronglyinfluencedbybiology—itisnotanindividual’sfaultiftheydevelopobesity.”WhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutobesity?ItsimpactonsocietyisexpectedtoItisnowtoowidespreadtobeneglected.Itshouldberegardedasageneticdisease.Itsdictionarydefinitionshouldbeupdated.Withobesitynowaffecting29%ofthepopulationinEngland,andexpectedtoriseto35%by2030,shouldwenowrecogniseitasadisease?Obesity,(inwhichexcessbodyfathasaccumulatedtosuchanextentthathealthmaybeadverselyaffected),meetsthedictionarydefinitionofdisease,arguesProfessorJohnWilding.Hepointsoutthatmorethan200genesinfluenceweight.“Thusbodyweightisstronglyinfluencedbybiology—itisnotanindividual’sfaultiftheydevelopobesity.”WhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutobesity?ItsimpactonsocietyisexpectedtoItisnowtoowidespreadtobeneglected.Itshouldberegardedasageneticdisease.Itsdictionarydefinitionshouldbeupdated.Withobesitynowaffecting29%ofthepopulationinEngland,andexpectedtoriseto35%by2030,shouldwenowrecogniseitasadisease?Obesity,(inwhichexcessbodyfathasaccumulatedtosuchanextentthathealthmaybeadverselyaffected),meetsthedictionarydefinitionofdisease,arguesProfessorJohnWilding.Hepointsoutthatmorethan200genesinfluenceweight.“Thusbodyweightisstronglyinfluencedbybiology—itisnotanindividual’sfaultiftheydevelopobesity.”WhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutobesity?ItsimpactonsocietyisexpectedtoItisnowtoowidespreadtobeneglected.Itshouldberegardedasageneticdisease.Itsdictionarydefinitionshouldbeupdated.Withobesitynowaffecting29%ofthepopulationinEngland,andexpectedtoriseto35%by2030,shouldwenowrecogniseitasadise Obesitymeetsthedictionarydefinitionofdisease,arguesProfessorJohnWilding.Hepointsoutthatmorethan200genesinfluenceweight.“Thusbodyweightisstronglyinfluencedbybiology—itisnotanindividual’sfaultiftheydevelopobesity.”WhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutobesity? ItsimpactonsocietyisexpectedtoItisnowtoowidespreadtobeneglected.ItsdictionarydefinitionshouldbeWithobesitynowaffecting29%ofthepopulationinEngland,andexpectedtoriseto35%by2030,shouldwenowrecogniseitasadise ObesityWhatdoesProfessorJohnWildingargueaboutobesity? ItsimpactonsocietyisexpectedtoItisnowtoowidespreadtobeneglected.ItsdictionarydefinitionshouldbepopularviewWhatistpopularviewItisdifficulttodefine.Itisamoderndisease.

ofobesity?Ithasmuchtodowithone’sgenesItresultsfromalackofself-control.Yetthewidespreadviewisthatobesityisself-inducedandthatitisentirelytheindividual’sresponsibilitytodosomethingaboutit.Recognisingobesityasachronicdiseasewithseverecomplicationsratherthanalifestylechoice“shouldhelpreducethestigma()anddiscriminationexperiencedbymanypeoplewithobesity,”headds.Whatisthepopularviewofobesity?Itisdifficulttodefine.Itisamoderndisease.Ithasmuchtodowithone’sgenes.Itresultsfromalackofself-control.Yetthewidespreadviewisthatobesityisself-inducedsomethingaboutit.Recognisingobesityasachronicdiseasewithseverecomplicationsratherthanalifestylechoice“shouldhelpreducethestigma()anddiscriminationexperiencedbymanypeoplewithobesity,”headds.Whatisthepopularviewofobesity?Itisdifficulttodefine.Itisamoderndisease.Ithasmuchtodowithone’sgenes.Itresultsfromalackofself-control.Yetthewidespreadviewisthatobesityisself-inducedsomethingaboutit.Recognisingobesityasachronicdiseasewithseverecomplicationsratherthanalifestylechoice“shouldhelpreducethestigma()anddiscriminationexperiencedbymanypeoplewithobesity,”headds.Whatisthepopularviewofobesity?Itisdifficulttodefine.Itisamoderndisease.Ithasmuchtodowithone’sgenes.Itresultsfromalackofself-control.Yetthewidespreadviewisthatobesityisself-inducedsomethingaboutit.Recognisingobesityasachronicdiseasewithseverecomplicationsratherthanalifestylechoice“shouldhelpreducethestigma()anddiscriminationexperiencedbymanypeoplewithobesity,”headds.Whatisthepopularviewofobesity? Itisdifficulttodefine.Itisamoderndisease.Ithasmuchtodowithone’sgenes.WWhdisease?

aresom peopleoppose tolabellingobesityasA)Obespeoplewouldnotfeelresponsibletotakeanyaction.B)Obespeoplewouldnotbeabletoaffordthemedicalcosts.C)Obespeoplewouldbeoverwhelmedwithanxiety.D)Obespeoplewouldbediscriminatedagainst.P2ProfessorWildingdisagreesthatlabellingahighproportionofthepopulationashavingadiseaseremovespersonalresponsibilityormayoverwhelmhealthservices,pointingoutthatothercommondiseases,suchashighbloodpressureanddiabetes,requirepeopletotakeactiontomanagetheircondition.Hesuggeststhatmostpeoplewithobesitywilleventuallydevelopcomplications.“Butunlessweacceptthatobesityisadisease,wearenotgoingtobeabletotackleit,”heconcludes.Whyaresomepeopleopposedtolabellingobesityasadisease?ofthepopulatioofthepopulationas havingadiseaslabellingahighproportion

remove personaresponsibilityormayoverwhelmhealthservices,pointingoutthatothercommondiseases,suchashighbloodpressureanddiabetes,requirepeopletotakeactiontomanagetheircondition.Hesuggeststhatmostpeoplewithobesitywilleventuallydevelopcomplications.“Butunlessweacceptthatobesityisadisease,wearenotgoingtobeabletotackleit,”heconcludes.48.Whyaresomepeopleopposedtolabellingobesityasadisease?P2ProfessorWildingdisagreesthatlabellingahighproportionofthepopulationashavingadiseaseremovespersonalresponsibilityormayoverwhelmhealthservices,pointingoutthatothercommondiseases,suchashighbloodpressureanddiabetes,requirepeopletotakeactiontomanagetheircondition.Hesuggeststhatmostpeoplewithobesitywilleventuallydevelopcomplications.“Butunlessweacceptthatobesityisadisease,wearenotgoingtobeabletotackleit,”heconcludes.Whyaresomepeopleopposedtolabellingobesityasadisease?Obesepeoplewouldnotfeelresponsibletotakeanyaction.B)Obespeoplewouldnotbeabletoaffordthemedicalcosts.C)Obespeoplewouldbeoverwhelmedwithanxiety.D)Obespeoplewouldbediscriminatedagainst.alalresponsibilitypopulationashavingadiseaslabellingahighproportionoftheP2ProfessorWildingdisagrees/thatmayoverwhelmhealthservices/,pointingoutthatothercommondiseases,suchashighbloodpressureanddiabetes,requirepeopletotakeactiontomanagetheircondition.Hesuggeststhatmostpeoplewithobesitywilleventuallydevelopcomplications.“Butunlessweacceptthatobesityisadisease,wearenotgoingtobeabletotackleit,”heconcludes.Whyaresomepeopleopposedtolabellingobesityasadisease?Obesepeoplewouldnotfeelresponsibletotakeanyaction.B)Obespeoplewouldnotbeabletoaffordthemedicalcosts.C)Obespeoplewouldbeoverwhelmedwithanxiety.D)Obespeoplewouldbediscriminatedagainst.alalresponsibilitypopulationashavingadiseaslabellingahighproportionoftheP2ProfessorWildingdisagrees/thatmayoverwhelmhealthservices/,pointingoutthatothercommondiseases,suchashighbloodpressureanddiabetes,requirepeopletotakeactiontomanagetheircondition.Hesuggeststhatmostpeoplewithobesitywilleventuallydevelopcomplications.“Butunlessweacceptthatobesityisadisease,wearenotgoingtobeabletotackleit,”heconcludes.Whyaresomepeopleopposedtolabellingobesityasadisease?B)Obespeoplewouldnotbeabletoaffordthemedicalcosts.C)Obespeoplewouldbeoverwhelmedwithanxiety.D)Obespeoplewouldbediscriminatedagainst.P1...(最后一句)Recognisingobesityasachronicdiseasewithseverecomplicationsratherthanalifestylechoiceshouldhelpreducethestigma()anddiscriminationexperiencedbymanypeoplewithobesity,”headds.Whyaresomepeopleopposedtolabellingobesityasadisease?B)Obespeoplewouldnotbeabletoaffordthemedicalcosts.C)Obespeoplewouldbeoverwhelmedwithanxiety.D)Obespeoplewouldbediscriminatedagainst.P3ButDr.RichardPile,aphysicianwithaspecialinterestindiabetes,arguesthatadoptingthisapproach“couldactuallyresultinworseesforindividualsandsociety.”Hebelievesthatthedictionarydefinitionofdisease“issovaguethatwecanclassifyalmostanythingasadisease”andsaysthequestionisnotwhetherwecan,butwhetherweshould,andtowhatend.WhatdoesDr.RichardPilethinkofthedictionarydefinitionofdisease?Itisofnouseinunderstandingobesity.Itistooinclusiveandthuslacksclarity.Ithelpslittletosolvepatients’problems.Itmatterslittletothedebateoverobesity.P3ButDr.RichardPile,aphysicianwithaspecialinterestindiabetes,arguesthatadoptingthisapproach“couldactuallyresultinworseesforindividualsandsociety.” Hebelievesthatthedictionarydefinitionofdisease“issovaguethatwecanclassifyalmostanythingasadisease”andsaysthequestionisnotwhetherwecan,butwhetherweshould,andtowhatend.WhatdoesDr.RichardPilethinkofthedictionarydefinitionofdisease?Itisofnouseinunderstandingobesity.Itistooinclusiveandthuslacksclarity.Ithelpslittletosolvepatients’problems.Itmatterslittletothedebateoverobesity.P3ButDr.RichardPile,aphysicianwithaspecialinterestindiabetes,arguesthatadoptingthisapproach“couldactuallyresultinworseesforindividualsandsociety.” Hebelievesthatthedictionarydefinitionofdisease“issothatwecanclassifyalmostanythingasadisease”andsaythequestionisnotwhetherwecan,butwhetherweshould,antowhatend.WhatdoesDr.RichardPilethinkofthedictionarydefinitionofdisease?Itisofnouseinunderstandingobesity.Itistooinclusiveandthuslacksclarity.Ithelpslittletosolvepatients’problems.Itmatterslittletothedebateoverobesity.P3ButDr.RichardPile,aphysicianwithaspecialinterestindiabetes,arguesthatadoptingthisapproach“couldactuallyresultinworseesforindividualsandsociety.” Hebelievesthatthedictionarydefinitionofdisease“issothatwecanclassifyalmostanythingasadisease”andsaythequestionisnotwhetherwecan,butwhetherweshould,antowhatend.WhatdoesDr.RichardPilethinkofthedictionarydefinitionofdisease? Itisofnouseinunderstandingobesity.Itistooinclusiveandthuslacksclarity.Ithelpslittletosolvepatients’problems.Itmatterslittletothedebateoverobesity.P3ButDr.RichardPile,aphysicianwithaspecialinterestindiabetes,arguesthatadoptingthisapproach“couldactuallyresultinworseesforindividualsandsociety.” Hebelievesthatthedictionarydefinitionofdisease“issothatwecanclassifyalmostanythingasadisease”andsaythequestionisnotwhetherwecan,butwhetherweshould,antowhatend.WhatdoesDr.RichardPilethinkofthedictionarydefinitionofdisease? Itisofnouseinunderstandingobesity.Itistooinclusiveandthuslacksclarity.Ithelpslittletosolvepatients’problems.Itmatterslittletothedebateoverobesity.P3ButDr.RichardPile,aphysicianwithaspecialinterestindiabetes,arguesthatadoptingthisapproach“coulHeactuallyresultinwors esforindividualsandsociety.HeWhatdoesDr.RichardPilethinkofthedictionarydefinitionofdisease? Itisofnouseinunderstandingobesity.Itistooinclusiveandthuslacksclarity.Ithelpslittletosolvepatients’problems.Itmatterslittletothedebateoverobesity.P3ButDr.RichardPile,aphysicianwithaspecialinterestindiabetes,arguesthatadoptingthisapproach“coulHeactuallyresultinwors esforindividualsandsociety.HeWhatdoesDr.RichardPilethinkofthedictionarydefinitionofdisease? Itisofnouseinunderstandingobesity.Itistooinclusiveandthuslacksclarity.Ithelpslittletosolvepatients’problems.Itmatterslittletothedebateoverobesity.P4Iflabelling obesity as adiseasewas harmless then itwouldn’treallymatter,hewrites.But labellingobesityasadisease“risksreducingautonomy,disempoweringandrobbingpeople ofthe intrinsic (內(nèi)在的)motivation that issuch animportantenablerofchange.”What’smore,makingobesityadisease“maynotbenefitpatients,butitwillbenefithealthcareprovidersandthepharmaceutical(制藥的)industrywhenhealthinsuranceandclinicalguidelinespromotetreatmentwithdrugsandsurgery,”hewarns.WhatisDr.RichardPile’sconcernaboutclassifyingobesityasadisease?Itmayaffectobesepeople’squalityofItmayacceleratethespreadofobesity.Itmaycauseashortageofdoctors.Itmaydolittlegoodtopatients.P4Iflabelling obesity as adiseasewas harmless then itwouldn’treallymatter,hewrites.But labellingobesityasadisease“risksreducingautonomy,disempoweringandrobbingpeople ofthe intrinsic (內(nèi)在的)motivation that issuch animportantenablerofchange.”What’smoremakingobesityadiseasemaynotbenefitpatients,butitwillbenefithealthcareprovidersandthepharmaceutical(制藥的)industrywhenhealthinsuranceandclinicalguidelinespromotetreatmentwithdrugsandsurgery,”hewarns.WhatisDr.RichardPile’sconcernaboutclassifyingobesityasadisease?Itmayaffectobesepeople’squalityofItmayacceleratethespreadofobesity.Itmaycauseashortageofdoctors.Itmaydolittlegoodtopatients.P4Iflabelling obesity as adiseasewas harmless then itwouldn’treallymatter,hewrites.But labellingobesityasadisease“risksreducingautonomy,disempoweringandrobbingpeople ofthe intrinsic (內(nèi)在的)motivation that issuch animportantenablerofchange.”What’smore,makingobesityadisease“maynotbenefitpatients,butitwillbenefithealthcareprovidersandthepharmaceutical(制藥的)industrywhenhealthinsuranceandclinicalguidelinespromotetreatmentwithdrugsandsurgery,”hewarns.WhatisDr.RichardPile’sconcernaboutclassifyingobesityasadisease?Itmayaffectobesepeople’squalityofItmayacceleratethespreadofobesity.Itmaycauseashortageofdoctors.Itmaydolittlegoodtopatients.P4Iflabelling obesit a adiseasewa harmles the itwouldn’treallymatter,hewrites.But labellingobesityasdi motivatio tdi motivatio tha ispeopleoftheintrinsic(內(nèi)在的 suchan(制idhlthimportantenablerofchange.”What’smore,makingobesityadisease“maynotbenefitpatients,but(制idhlthgsinsuranceandclinicalguidelinespandsurgery,”hewarns.gsWhatisDr.RichardPile’sconcernaboutclassifyingobesityasadisease?Itmayaffectobesepeople’squalityofItmayacceleratethespreadofobesity.Itmaycauseashortageofdoctors.Itmaydolittlegoodtopatients.P4Iflabelling obesit a adiseasewa harmles the itwouldn’treallymatter,hewrites.But labellingobesityasdi motivatio tdi motivatio tha ispeopleoftheintrinsic(內(nèi)在的 suchan(制idhlthimportantenablerofchange.”What’smore,makingobesityadisease“maynotbenefitpatients,but(制idhlthgsinsuranceandclinicalguidelinespandsurgery,”hewarns.gsWhatisDr.RichardPile’sconcernaboutclassifyingobesityasadisease? Itmayaffectobesepeople’squalityofItmayacceleratethespreadofobesity.Itmaycauseashortageofdoctors.Itmaydolittlegoodtopatients.TEXTWhatdowelearnfromthefirstparagraphaboutearlychildhoodeducationintheU.S.?WhatdoesMindiReich-Shapiroemphasizeinhercommentonchildhoodeducation?Whatdowelearnaboutmaleteachersfromtheirresponsesinthestudy?WhatisneededformentocommittoearlychildhoodWhatdotheauthorsofthestudymendtobridgethegendergapinearlychildhoodeducation?earlyearlyWhatdoesMindiReich-ShapiroemphasizeinhercommentchildhoodchildhoodWhatdowelearnaboutmaleteachersfromtheirresponsesinthestudy?WhatisneededformentocommittoearlychildhoodWhatdotheauthorsofthestudymendtobridgethegendergapinearlychildhoodeducation?childhoodMindiReich-malechildhoodMindiReich-malethefirstintheWhat?WhatisWhatdowelearnWhatis

earlyemphasizeinhercommentearlyfromtheirresponses

formentocommitto

childhoodWhatdotheauthorsofthestudymendtobridgethegendergapinearlychildhoodeducation?What dowe learn fromthefirstparagraph about childhoodeducationintheU.S.?Ithelpsraisechildren’sawarenessofgenderroles.Itexposeschildrentodifferentwaysofin ction.Itisnegativelyimpactedbyalackofmaleteachers.Itclearlyaimstoformchildren’sidentitythrough y.earlychildhoodP1P1Nationwide,onlyaboutthreepercentearlychildhoodteachersaremaleintheU.S.Expertssaythiscanhaveanimpactonyoungchildrenwhoseunderstandingofgenderrolesandidentityarerapidlyforming.Researchhasfoundthathavingaccesstodiverseteachersisbeneficialforchildren.Fortheyoungestlearners,itmeanstheyaremorelikelytogetexposedtodifferentvarietiesofyandcommunication.Italsohelpsthemdevelophealthyideasaroundgender.WhatdowelearnfromthefirstparagraphaboutchildhoodeducationintheU.S.?

earlyP1Nationwide,onlyaboutthreepercentofearlychildhoodteachersaremaleintheU.S.Expertssaythiscanhaveanimpactonyoungchildrenwhoseunderstandingofgenderrolesandidentityarerapidlyforming.Researchhasfoundthathavingaccesstodiverseteachersisbeneficialforchildren.Fortheyoungestlearners,itmeanstheyaremorelikelytogetexposedtodifferentvarietiesofyandcommunication.Italsohelpsthemdevelophealthyideasaroundgender.51.WhatdowelearnfromthefirstparagraphaboutchildhoodeducationintheU.S.?

earlyIthelpsraisechildren’sawarenessofgenderroles.Itexposeschildrentodifferentwaysofin ction.Itisnegativelyimpactedbyalackofmaleteachers.Itclearlyaimstoformchildren’sidentitythrough y.P1Nationwide,onlyaboutthreepercentofearlychildhoodteachersaremaleintheU.S.Expertssaythiscanhaveanimpactonyoungchildrenwhoseunderstandingofgenderrolesandidentityarerapidlyforming.Researchhasfoundthat havingaccess todiverseteachers isbeneficialforchildren.Fortheyoungestlearners,itmeanstheyaremorelikelytogetexposedtodifferentvarietiesof yandcommunication.Italsohelpsthemdevelophealthyideasaroundgender.51.WhatdowelearnfromthefirstparagraphaboutchildhoodeducationintheU.S.?

earlyIthelpsraisechildren’sawarenessofgenderroles.Itexposeschildrentodifferentwaysofin ction.Itisnegativelyimpactedbyalackofmaleteachers.Itclearlyaimstoformchildren’sidentitythrough y.P1Nationwide,onlyaboutthreepercentofearlychildhoodteachersaremaleintheU.S.Expertssaythiscanhaveanimpactonyoungchildrenwhoseunderstandingofgenderrolesandidentityarerapidlyforming.Researchhasfoundthat accesstodiverseteachersisbeneficialforchildren.Fortheyoungestlearners,itmeanstheyaremorelikelytogetexposedtodifferent

develophealthyideasaroundgender.51.WhatdowelearnfromthefirstparagraphaboutchildhoodeducationintheU.S.?

earlyIthelpsraisechildren’sawarenessofgenderroles.Itexposeschildrentodifferentwaysofin ction.Itisnegativelyimpactedbyalackofmaleteachers.Itclearlyaimstoformchildren’sidentitythrough y.P1Nationwide,onlyaboutthreepercentofearlychildhoodteachersaremaleintheU.S.Expertssaythiscanhaveanimpactonyoungchildrenwhoseunderstandingofgenderrolesandidentityarerapidlyforming.Researchhasfoundthat accesstodiverseteachersisbeneficialforchildren.Fortheyoungestlearners,itmeanstheyaremorelikelytogetexposedtodifferent

develophealthyideasaroundgender.WhatdowelearnfromthefirstparagraphaboutchildhoodeducationintheU.S.?

earlyIthelpsraisechildren’sawarenessofgenderroles.Itexposeschildrentodifferentwaysofin ction.Itisnegativelyim

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論