心，思考，做一個兼收并蓄的人。NormanConquest，PetertheGreat，F(xiàn)itzgeraldThereisalwaysa“however”.Eachsituationhasitsbenefitsanddrawbacks.Inthefieldofmarketfinance,wefindacompellingexamplethatsupportsthisAlthoughitisgoodtostandoutandmakeone’sowndecision,sometimesitisbeneficialtotaketheadviceofothers.WecanseethroughthedemiseofKingLearthatheshouldnothaveignoredKent’swarningtonotdisownCordelia.TheignominiousloseofSwedenintheGreatNorthernWaralsodemonstratethatothersshouldlistentohisadvisers.點明自己的觀點。因為SAT考官判卷的時間每篇不超過2分鐘，因此，讓考官一開始說到這里，上面的兩種方式哪種會更好點呢?從議的來說，觀點的客觀性是不能忽用在SAT開頭段寫法。仔細的分析下SAT寫作，一般來說我們會把題目分為十大類分別是失敗成功、權把2015年11月7日的一道拿出來剖析一下，這樣對于例子的積累相對來說就會沒那FritzFritzHaber,NobelChemistPrizelaureate,whodidnotfollowtheopinionofthecrowdsnorthegeneralopinion.FritzHaber,tookpartinmanufacturingchemicalweaponsuchastoxicgasesduringtheWorldWarI.NobelChemistPrizelaureate化學獎得Hedidnotfollowtheopinionofthecrowdsnorthegeneral這句話讓我們知道當選擇時他并沒有從眾，如果大家對FritzHaber有了解的話，應該也都知道他的選擇也讓他妻子而亡。那FritzHaber例子的這一部分又可以適用于個人選擇、。FritzHaber,tookpartinmanufacturingchemicalweaponsuchastoxicgasesduringtheworldwarI.2015117SATFollowingtheCrowdDopeopleneedtocomparethemselveswithothersinordertoappreciatewhattheyhave?Arewidelyheldviewsoftenwrong,oraresuchviewsmorelikelytobeIsthereanyvalueforpeopletobelongonlytoagrouporgroupswithwhichtheyhavesomethingincommon?Isitalwaysbesttodetermineone'sownviewsofrightandwrong,orcanwebenefitfromfollowingthecrowd?IsitmorevaluableforpeopletofitinthantobeuniqueandArepeoplemorelikelytobeproductiveandsuccessfulwhentheyignoretheopinionsofothers?FollowingAuthorityShouldwepaymoreattentiontopeoplewhoareolderandmoreexperiencedthanweare?Shouldsocietylimitpeople'sexposuretosomekindsofinformationorformsofCanagroupofpeoplefunctioneffectivelywithoutsomeonebeinginIsitimportanttoquestiontheideasanddecisionsofpeopleinpositionsofShouldsocietylimitpeople'sexposuretosomekindsofinformationorformsofIseducationprimarilytheresultofinfluencesotherthanShouldschoolshelpstudentsunderstandmoralchoicesandsocialSelf-DeterminationandSuccessisidentitysomethingpeoplearebornwithorgiven,orisitsomethingpeoplecreateforthemselves?Isitbestforpeopletoacceptwhotheyareandwhattheyhave,orshouldpeoplealwaysstrivetobetterthemselves?Dosuccessandhappinessdependonthechoicespeoplemakeratherthanonfactorsbeyondtheircontrol?ArepeoplemorelikelytobehappyiftheyfocusongoalsotherthantheirownIsitmoreimportanttodoworkthatonefindsfulfillingorworkthatpaysSelf-ExpectationandSuccessDohighly plishedpeopleachievemorethanothersmainlybecausetheyexpectmoreofthemselves?CanpeopleachievesuccessonlyiftheyaimtobeIsitbesttohavelowexpectationsandtosetgoalswearesureofCollaborationandSuccessIsitnecessaryforpeopletocombinetheireffortswiththoseofothersinordertobemosteffective?Areorganizationsorgroupsmostsuccessfulwhentheirmemberspursueindividualwishesandgoals?DopeopleachievemoresuccessbycooperationthanbyEthicsandSuccessDoesfamebringhappiness,orarepeoplewhoarenotfamousmorelikelytobehappy?Arepeople'sactionsmotivatedprimarilybyadesireforpoweroverQualityortyandSuccessDopeopleachievegreatnessonlybyfindingoutwhattheyareespeciallygoodatanddevelothatattributeaboveallAreallimportantdiscoveriestheresultoffocusingononeTechnological“Progress”Doesastrongcommitmenttotechnologicalprogresscauseasocietytoneglectothervalues,suchaseducationandtheprotectionoftheenvironment?Aretherebenefitstobegainedfromavoidingtheuseofmoderntechnology,evenwhenusingitwouldmakelifeeasier?Hastoday'sabundanceofinformationonlymadeitmoredifficultforustounderstandtheworldaroundus?Isthemostimportantpurposeoftechnologytodaydifferentfromwhatitwasinthepast?Havemodernadvancementstrulyimprovedthequalityofpeople'sDonewspapers,magazines, evision,radio,movies,theInternet,andothermediadeterminewhatisimportanttomostpeople?ShouldmodernsocietybecriticizedforbeingHeroesDowebenefitfromlearningabouttheflawsofpeopleweadmireandShouldwelimitouruseoftheterm"courage"toactsinwhichpeoplerisktheirownwell-beingforthesakeofothersortoupholdavalue?ShouldweadmireheroesbutnotIsthereavalueincelebratingcer