GRE寫(xiě)作評(píng)分及常見(jiàn)問(wèn)題解讀GRE寫(xiě)作評(píng)分及常見(jiàn)問(wèn)題解讀,我們一起來(lái)看看吧，下面我就和大家共享，來(lái)觀賞一下吧。

GRE寫(xiě)作評(píng)分及常見(jiàn)問(wèn)題解讀

GRE作文包括issue和argument兩部分，總分為6分，以下是GRE作文評(píng)分的一些標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，盼望能給廣闊GRE考生帶來(lái)一些關(guān)心。

(1)plexity:事物的兩面性(同一事物有優(yōu)點(diǎn)就有缺點(diǎn)，相比較的事物有各自的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn))，從多角度分析事物(分析不同領(lǐng)域中，不憐憫況下)。論點(diǎn)一邊倒的文章論述得再好也只能得5分。

(2)insightfulposition：在有全面深刻理解的基礎(chǔ)上，觀點(diǎn)最好新奇獨(dú)到(對(duì)ets來(lái)說(shuō))，但必需保證能自圓其說(shuō)。

(3)conveysmeaningskillfully:可用于論證的一切技巧(估量老美自己用起來(lái)也得費(fèi)點(diǎn)心思)。比如文章的行文方向，起承轉(zhuǎn)合不用明顯的標(biāo)志詞(first,second,however,ontheotherhand,thesecondexampleillustratingmypoint)，而是依靠論述的內(nèi)在脈絡(luò)(只可意會(huì)不行言傳)自然而然的引到下一塊內(nèi)容。

(4)pellingreasons(reason就已經(jīng)夠令人頭疼的了，有加了個(gè)pelling)：這是最重要的一個(gè)得分點(diǎn)。

(5)persuasiveexamples：用來(lái)支持reason的，使抽象的reason更詳細(xì)，更易被讀者理解，從而產(chǎn)生共鳴，或使其更可信，更有說(shuō)服力。可用的例子有自己的經(jīng)受，引言。

(6)well-focused:簡(jiǎn)潔說(shuō)就是不跑題。中心論點(diǎn)明確，全文不跑題;各段主題句明確，圍繞主題句論述。

(7)well-organized：文章采納的論述結(jié)構(gòu)，分幾個(gè)部分論述，每部分有幾段，各部分、各段間的關(guān)系是什么。

(8)connectingideaslogically：usingtransitionalphrases起承轉(zhuǎn)合詞，過(guò)渡句，或有此種作用的句子，總之起到helporganizetheideasandmovetheargumentforward。

(9)跟著感覺(jué)走沒(méi)錯(cuò)。

(10)不要羅嗦，表達(dá)簡(jiǎn)潔。但假如以上幾點(diǎn)做得好，這缺點(diǎn)可以忽視不計(jì)。

(11)基本上挺難，但不影響大局，為避開(kāi)重復(fù)大膽的用你想用的詞，閱卷人能理解。

(12)sentencevariety：最好長(zhǎng)短句結(jié)合，ets藐視總用短句的人：Sincemostofthesentencesareshortandchoppy,theideastheytrytomunicatearealsochoppy.

(13)還有語(yǔ)法錯(cuò)誤等等，小毛病，先把上面的問(wèn)題解決好在理它吧。

GREissue寫(xiě)作優(yōu)秀實(shí)例：權(quán)威問(wèn)題

題目：

Muchoftheinformationthatpeopleassumeisfactualactuallyturnsouttobeinaccurate.Thus,anypieceofinformationreferredtoasafactshouldbemistrustedsinceitmaywellbeprovenfalseinthefuture.

大多數(shù)人們認(rèn)為是事實(shí)的信息結(jié)果實(shí)際上都是不精確?????的。因此，任何據(jù)稱是事實(shí)的信息都應(yīng)當(dāng)被質(zhì)疑，由于它在將來(lái)很可能會(huì)被證明為是錯(cuò)誤的。

正文：

Shouldwebedoubtfultoalltheinformationathandsbecausetherightnessofwhichisuncertain?Thespeakerclaimsso,Iconcedethatpeopleoftenmitvariousfallaciesinthecourseofcognizingthings,howeverIfundamentallytakeexceptionofthearguersassertiontomistrusteveryfactwemightencounter.AndIwillsubstantiallydiscussmyviewsthereinafter.

Tobeginwith,thespeakerseemstoimplicatethatafactwouldbeprovenfalseinthefutureundernumerouscircumstance.NeverthelessIprefertoarguerthatfactsneverchange.NomatterhowdidtheMedievalChurchandInquisitionpersecuteBruno,thefactneverchangesthattheearthisfarfrombeingthecenteroftheuniverseasthereligioussovereignshadassumedorhopedfor,whilejustaminorparticleinit.Equally,nomatterhowEdisonhadtriedtoincitethepublicfearanddistrusttothealternativecurrentelectricity,thefactneverchangesthatTealselectricalsystemisvastlysuperiortohisdirectcurrentelectricalone,andwouldbeacceptedandappliedinlargerrange.

However,whatdochangearethehumansobjectiveinterpretationstofacts.Onepellingargumenttothispointisthat,duetothelimitationofhumansknowledgeandprehensivecapability,theytendtomakeinsufficientorevenfalseunderstandingtothecertainfact.Anaptillustrationisthechangesofcognitiontodisease.Whileattheancienttime,ourprogenitorsbelievedtheamanbeingapatientforthereasonthathehadconductcrimesoroffendedsomeghostsorspirits,thecontemporarypeoplehavewellknowthatthevariesofpathogensarethebasiccausestoourdiseases,andthedefectsofourimmunesystemandsofortharealsothefactorsaswell.Anotherargumentforthechangeofprehensiontofactisthatdifferentpeoplealwaysobserveandinterpretfromdifferentperspectives.ThoughtheRelativitytheoryisnotwellpliablewiththeQuantummechanism,noonecallthegreatnessofbothEinsteinandBohr,becausetheirtheoriesarebasedondistinctviews,theformerfromthemacrocosmandthelaterfromthemicrocosm.

Notwithstandingtheforegoingreasonsforthathumantendtomakefallaciesduringthecauseofprehendingandcognizingfacts,thesereasonsshouldneverbetheexcusestodoubteveryconclusionwemightdrawfromfacts.Basedoncertainrationalinferenceandproperknowledgefundament,theconclusionswemakemightwellbejustifiable,ifnotpletelyright,tocertaindegree.Whatweneedtodoistopromotetheenterpriseofpursuingthebetteranswerandtrytousetheresultwehavegettoapplication,insteadofwastingourtimetounduedoubtandsuspicion.Thoughthemedicalscientistshavenotfullyunderstoodthemechanismofhowthedoestheimplantedorganinteractwiththewoundedbody,theyarenotrefrainfromusingtheimplantingskilltosavepatients,ofcoursethepreconditionorwhichisthatthistechnologyismuchwellestablishedthanthefundamentaltheory.

Tosumup,whileIadvocatethespeakersopinionthatitisinevitableforhumantoprehendfactsinaccurately,forthereasonofthelimitationoftheabilities,Iessentiallydisagreewithhisassertionthatfactswillcontinuallyalterthemselves,aswellashisremendationtodiscreditanypieceoffact.Inthefinalanalysis,Iwouldargueroncemorethatfactsneverchangeandalthoughthemisunderstandingtothemisinevitable,weshouldnotdeferourselvesfromthepursuittofullyprehendingthem.

GREissue寫(xiě)作優(yōu)秀實(shí)例：思想家

題目：

Mostsocietiesdonottaketheirgreatestthinkersseriously,evenwhentheyclaimtoadmirethem.

大多數(shù)社會(huì)都沒(méi)把最宏大的思想家產(chǎn)回事，雖然有時(shí)候這些社會(huì)自稱是求才若渴的。

正文：

Inthisbusy,packedanddullworld,people’smostimportantconcerningishowtomakealiving.Theyworkassiduouslytomakemoney,tosupporttheirfamily,topurchasehousesandcars.Hardlyonemonindividualknowswhotheirgreatestthinkersare，notmentiontotakethemseriously.Admittedly,insomecases,peopleclaimthattheyadmirethegreatestthinkers;however,theyactuallyknowlittleaboutwhatthegreatestthinkers’thoughtsare.Thefactis,inhistoryofhumancivilizations,mostsocietiesdonottaketheirgreatestthinkersseriously,evenwhenthegreatestthinkersareseemedtoberespected.

Generally,whateversocietiesthegreatestthinkersarein,theyhavesimilarcharacteristics,suchashighintelligence,eccentrictemperament,widerangeofknowledge,andthemostessentialone:thedeeplyandoftenpredictedthoughts,whichistheproductofrealwisdom.Ononehand,itisthethoughtsthatdistinguishthegreatestthinkersfromthemass.Ontheotherhand,itisalsothethoughts,howevercorrectandpredicted,whichcausetheseelitesoutofthemass’sightsandputthemintoanembarrassmentinwhichfewcanunderstandthemandtheirthoughts.AproperexampleisthepassionalGermanphilosopherandpoetNietzche.Nietzcheisapioneer,whoseprofoundexplorationinphilosophyinfluencedthedescendantsdeeply.Yethislifeismiserableandfulloftragedies.Withoutmoneyandjob,Nietzchelivedanimpoverishedlife,whichalongwithlonelinessdefeatedhimatlast:hebecameinsanewhen45,anddied10yearslater.Untilthattime,almostnooneknewhimorhisthoughts.Eventoday,manypeopleincludingsomescholarscallhimmadphilosopher.

Insomeworsecases,thegreatestthinkersareevenpersecutedbytheirsocietiessincethegreatestthinkersalwaystendtohaveskepticalandcriticalthoughts,whichthemanipulatorsfearmostlyandmanipulatedreluctanttoaccept.Thereasonisthatoncetheadvancedideas,whichareagainsttheoldones,areacceptedbymass,thedominationorthepresentsocialsystemwillinthedangerofcollapse.Andatthesametimes,mostpeoplearereluctanttoadmitthatwhattheybelieveinorcherish,however,alwaysprejudiceandrigidideassetinpeople’smindsbeforehand,arenotthetruthbutfalsehoodorillusions.AcaseinpointisthegreatastronomerCopernicus,whodevelopedthetheorythattheearthandotherplanetsrevolvearoundthesun.Althoughthetheorywasthemostadvancedastronomytheoryinthattime,ithadn’teoutofpressuntiltheyearbeforeCopernicus’deathbecauseofmassbeingstronglyagainstitespeciallythepowerfulchurches,whichwereafraidthatsuchatheorywouldshakeauthorityoftheology.

Insomespecificperiod,forpoliticalreasons,thinkerandintellectualsasawholeundergoruthlesstreatment,suchastheCultureRevolutionfrom1966to19