GRE寫作詞匯語法要點解讀雖然對于GRE寫作來說，評分標準往往更偏向于文章的規(guī)律思維和整體框架結(jié)構(gòu)，但一篇詞匯貧乏，語法單調(diào)的文章，很難給考官留下深刻的印象。下面我就和大家共享GRE寫作詞匯語法要點解讀，來觀賞一下吧。

GRE寫作詞匯語法要點解讀

首先是GRE寫作詞匯，寫作詞匯并不是那些看過臉熟記住意思就行的詞匯，而是需要通過實際使用把握了正確用法的詞匯。GRE對于詞匯在不同題型中有著不同的要求。數(shù)學詞匯只要能知道各個專用名詞的含義，能夠讀懂題目就算過關(guān)。而語文部分則要求考生具備肯定的辨析力量，即深度理解。至于作文詞匯的要求則是最高的，也就是正確而合理的使用。

除了學會使用以外，考生對于GRE寫作詞匯，還需要學會替換。詞匯量不足最直接的表現(xiàn)之一就是一個詞匯的反復(fù)使用，特殊是一些形容詞。用來用去都是同一個詞很簡單讓人覺得厭煩。因此，對于常用詞匯多預(yù)備一些可以替換的詞就顯得很重要了，由于這樣做可以使得使得文章語言多樣化。而預(yù)備替換詞，平日積累是必不行少的。積累的最好方法就是閱讀。而且要留意避開用詞過于簡潔和通俗，尤其要避開口頭語和俚語的使用，相應(yīng)地增加正式用語，尤其是在規(guī)律論證中，可以適當使用較為學術(shù)的詞匯。

GRE寫作應(yīng)避開語法問題

GRE寫作中的語法問題同樣是困擾很多考生的一大難題。大量使用簡潔句明顯不行，但一些簡單的結(jié)構(gòu)自己又沒有把握寫對寫好，那么語法應(yīng)當如何提升呢?大家不妨從GRE考試的其他題型中進行借鑒。比如GRE語文部分的填空和等價題就可以關(guān)心考生學會有用、簡潔、能夠清晰地表達自己的意思的詞匯和短語用法。而GRE閱讀也可以讓大家從中學習一些長難句，并學習立論和證明論點的過程，學習其中的過渡段落等等。當然，GRE寫作考試的備考復(fù)習中，考生在充分利用閱讀、規(guī)律、填空題目進行英語思維轉(zhuǎn)換之后，還要多閱讀一些范文，學習別人行文的方法，使之轉(zhuǎn)化成自己的資源，并且多加練習，久而久之寫作就不是一件難事了。

GRE寫作高分范文：政治領(lǐng)袖

Unlikegreatthinkersandgreatartists,themosteffectivepoliticalleadersmustoftenyieldtopublicopinionandabandonprincipleforthesakeofpromise.

不同于宏大的思想家和藝術(shù)家，最杰出的政治領(lǐng)袖通常都必需為了妥協(xié)而屈從于大眾的意見并且放棄原則。

GRE寫作范文：

Withtherespectofhistory,today’sdemocraticstructureofpoliticrootsdeeplyinancientGreekphilosophers’advocationfortherespectofpublicandindividualbeings,theiradmirationoftheegalitarian,andtheeagernessforjusticeaswellastheelectoralsystemspeciallydevisedtosurpvisethoseinpower.TheRenaissancetakingplaceinEuropeandthedemocraticRevolutionbootedupbyNapoleoninFrancebothhaveproducedgreatthinkerswhodemandtherestrictionofthepoliticians’powerandauthority,labelingtheendofanerainwhichpoliticianscouldlaytheirhandsonalmosteveryobjectsofdemand.Drivenbythistrend,thecontemporarypoliticiansostensiblydeprivedofcertainfreedomenjoyedbymostartistsandscientistscouldnolongerbehaveinthewaytheywouldliketo.Thesepeople,takingtheresponsibilityofthedemocraticgovernment,arerestrainedfromseveralaspects.Theserestrictionmainlyesfromthepublic’sdesireanddifferentgroups’attitudes.

Althoughbeingneglectedsometimes,theartistsandthescientistsstilladheretotheirownresponsibilities,appearundisturbedanddisplayastonishingindifferencetothepublic.Suchrightisdeservedastoartistsandscientists,sincetheirinsightfulthoughtsandplicatedfeelingaboutlifefargobeyondwhatnormalpeoplemayachieve.Frustratedanddeterredbythesemaestros,publicsturntotheotherextreme―ignoringthesegreatthinkersandevencursingthemashereticsthatdestroythecurrentharmony.Again,scientistsandartistsenjoythefreedomtoobliteratetheinfluencelaidonthembythemundaneworldsincetheirinterestsarejustfocusedontheexplorationofthepurityofthetruthandreciprocatingtheperfectmemoryofthepastorwonderfulvisionsaboutfuture,ratherthancaringforthepublic’sbenefits.

Duringsuchprocess,theyjustjumpoutoftheworldandobjectivelydescribeit,anyscornsorrestrictionsaretreatedaspartoftheobjecttheyareproceeding,andthisisjustthehitsoftheirsuccesses.Sometimes,certainbehaviorthatevenforcethemunitymembersawayfrommunicatingwiththeseelitesaretakenasprideinthatartistsandscientistscouldemploytheirfreetimetocontinuetheirinterest.

Ontheotherhand,neverwouldthepoliticianownsuchparativelybroadfreedom.Asforapolitician,thekeytosuccessinpoliticsistogainandmaintainpoliticalpower.Suchpoweresfromcertainidentificationofthepublicmoralitywiththepolitician’sprivateoneandthebalanceofdifferentgroups’benefitsanddemands.Consequently,thepolitician’sattitudes,behaviorandeventhelifestylearetightlyrestrictedforfearthatanydiversionfrompublic’stastemayconducetolosingauthoritywhichisarealtragedyforapolitician.Tobeaneffectivepoliticalleaderexcludestheopportunitythatapoliticianmaytastethefreedomofthesamemeritsasthatenjoyedbyartistsandscientists,thefreedomcharacterdbyconsciouslyseperatingoneselffrommentaryandneglectingthedemandsmadebymajority.Thesuccessfulleadershipcouldbeachievedbysubmergingoneselfintothepublicandbeingsufficientlypreparedforsacrificingsomefreedomforthemajority’sbenefits.

Itisalwaysfunnytoimaginewhatwillhappentoaspecialpoliticianwhocouldshareascientistoranartist’sfreedom.Whenthispoliticianisboredatthelegitimatemeetingthatisbeingbroadcastbymediaagencies,heescapetohaveachesswithhischild.Subsequently,criticsbegintoaccumulatethedissatisfactionofthepublictoattackthisleader’slackingresponsibilityofthepublicaffairs.Moreover,hemayagainutilizethefreedomtoisolatehimselffromthepublicpressurebyflyingouttohaveasummerholiday.Then,onlyonethingcanbeassured,ourspecialpoliticianisdeprivedoftherighttoinitiatehispowerwhichisasymboloftheendofhispoliticallife.

Thedevelopmentoftechnologyandrecognitionofoursocietyrequirebothpoliticiansandinsightfulthinkers.However,thedemocraticsystemofourcontemporaryworldfixestwodistinctsetsoffreedomthatcouldenjoyedbythem.Whileweagreethatartistsandscientistsenjoytheparativelybroadone,wecannotexpectthepoliticalleaderstohaveopportunitytotasteit.

GRE寫作高分范文：新創(chuàng)意

GRE寫作題目：

Trulyinnovativeideasdonotarisefromgroupsofpeople,butfromindividuals.Whengroupstrytobecreative,themembersforceeachothertopromiseand,asaresult,creativeideastendtobeweakenedandmademoreconventional.Mostoriginalideasarisefromindividualsworkingalone.

真正有創(chuàng)意的想法并非來自于群體而是來自于個人。當群體試圖創(chuàng)新的時候，它的成員之間會被迫相互妥協(xié)，結(jié)果就是新想法趨于弱化而更接近于傳統(tǒng)。大部分新想法都是來自于獨立工作的個人。

GRE寫作正文：

Iagreewiththespeakeronthattrulyinnovativeideasarisefromindividuals.Nevertheless,itisunfairtoclaimunilaterallythatthegroupstendtoweakencreativeideaswithoutthinkingoftheirpositiveeffectsontheideas;itisequallyimportantforgroupstoexamine,modify,orevenrejecttheideas.

Firstofall,trulyinnovativeideasaredestinedtoarisefromindividualsinthatinter-personalthinkingprocessissofarimpossible.Thisistosay,whenwesitstillandhaveaclusterofphenomena,theories,statisticsandsoforthofacertainissueinourmind,wearethinkingitoveryetwithnoassistanceatall.Afterallitisimpossibleforonetointrudeintoothersmind.Followingthisprinciple,innovativeideassparkoffduringtheprocessofmeditation,andtheyaretheproducedbyonesowneffort.Itisequallypossible,however,forpeopletobeinspiredbyeachother,yetthisisbynomeansassistanceinthinking.Clues,hints,inspirationsaretoremindpeopleofthingsignoredortakenforgranted,buthavenothingtodowiththeprocessofthinking,thatis,tosortoutthewholevisionanddrawconclusion.Inoneword,innovativeideasarisefrommeditation,whichissolelylimitedwithinonebody,onebrain.Thereforeinnovativeideasarealwaystheproductofindividualswork.

Nevertheless,itdoesnotsuggestthatinnovativeideasthenhavenothingtodowithgroupwork,andactuallyitisjusttheopposite.Whenanovelthoughtisbroughtup,itisofgreatimportancetofullyevaluateitsvalidity,feasibility,andconsequencesifcarriedout.Thispointneednofurtherillustrationifwethinkofafatherwhoresolutelystopshis6-year-oldsonfromplayingmatches.Thekidmighthaveintendedtotrysomethingnew,drivenbyaninnovativeidea,yetthewholehousemighthavecaughtfirealsosincetheboyisincapableofdealingwithaccidents.Thisisthesamecaseinacademicfields.Inachemistrylabforexample,anovelroutedesignofsynthesizinganewpoundisnevercarriedoutwithoutfurtherevaluation.Practicalconditionssuchasequipments,reagents,andeconomicefficiency,namelyyieldpercost,arealwaystakenintoconsiderationandsometimesrestricttheapplicationofthoseideas.

Thisistosay,innovationisusuallygoodbutnotalwayspracticable.Thisclaimisfullydemonstratedinthepoliticalfield.Governorsofalllevelsmusttakeholisticviewsofthesituationandmakebalanceddecisioninordertoavoidmistakes;innovativeideasalonecannotjustifytheirpracticabilityandgoodwilltoothers.Forinstance,whenwelookback,thedevelopmentofplasticindustryhasresultedingreatlossintheglobalecosystem.Thusweseethedisastrousconsequencesofcarryingoutsuchinnovativeyetprematureideas.

Hence,itisnecessaryforthegroupstoassess,remedy,andconcludethevalueanduseofinnovativeideas.Allinnovativeideasshouldbebroughttodiscussions