英文科技論文寫(xiě)作與學(xué)術(shù)報(bào)告慕課答案云堂在線PAGE英文科技論文寫(xiě)作與學(xué)術(shù)報(bào)告答案是紅色字體第一章1.WhichoneisNOTincludedin“l(fā)ogicsinwritingpaper”?DGoodtheoreticalanalysis2.WhichistheCORRECTstatementinthefollowing?BIfthereaderwanttointuitivelyknowthekeyideasbehindthepaper,theyshouldreadtheintroduction.3.WhichofthefollowingpracticeweshouldfollowwhenwritingscientificpaperinEnglish?CWeshouldconfidentlyshowthecontributionsofourresearch.4.Whatdoes“delivery”meansinthecontextofwritinganEnglighscientificpaper?DThe“responsibilityofdelivery”isonthewriterratherthanonthereader.5.WhichoneistheCORRECTexpressionof“博士后流動(dòng)站”?APostdoctoralprogram.6.Whichofthefollowingtranslationisauthentic?A注意安全takecare.7.Whatshouldwedoinwritingascientificpaper?DWeshouldpresentfacts,theories,proofs,experiments,testingresultsobjectively.8.WhichofthefollowingisWRONGaboutthetitleofscientificpaper?DItisbettertouseacompletesentence.9.WhichofthefollowingisWRONGabouttheabstractofscientificpaper?BItisbettertouseabbreviationtomaketheabstractshorter.10.WhichisNOTadvisedintheintroductionsection?DUsingmathematicalfunctionstoexplainourmodel.11.WhichofthefollowingisRIGHTregardingtheliteraturereview?BItisbettertocommentontheexistingworkobjectively.12.WhichofthefollowingisRIGHTaboutthereferencesofintroductionofscientificpaper?DRecentreferencesshouldbecited13.Whatmaythereviewerthinksifyoucitetoomanyyourownpublications?BOtherresearchersarenotinterestedinthesubject.14.Iftheareferencehas5authors,howmanyauthorsshouldyouincludeinthereferencelist?DAllfiveauthors.15.Whatshouldyoudointhe“Problemdescriptionandformulation”?CUsuallyyoushoulddescribeyoursystemconfiguration,environmentandsoon.16.WhichofthefollowingstatementisNOTcorrect?DIntheconclusionremarkortheconclusion,youcanjustrepeatyourconclusionremarkastheabstract.17.Whatyoucandoifyouwanttoshowacknowledgment?BYoucanputaseparatesectionofacknowledgmentinyourpaper.18.WhichisCORRECTwhenyoulistthereferences?CEveryreferenceyoulistmustbereferredinthemaintext.19.Whatdoes“proofreading”mean?B校對(duì).20.WhatisTRUEifattheproceduretosubmitapaper?AUsuallywesubmittheentiremanuscripttoaconferenceorjournal.21.Ifthepublishersendstheprooftoyou,whenshouldyougiveareply?AInabout2days.22.Whichofthefollowingmaynotbethereasontorejectascientificpaper?BTherearemanysimplesentencesinthepaper.23.WhichofthefollowingisTRUE?CFontsizeshouldkeepconsistencyintheentirepaper.24.WhichofthefollowingisTRUEaboutuseofmathematicalequations?DItisbettertohaveabalanceduseofequations.25.WhichstatementisNOTtrue?DYoushouldnotusesynonymsinordertokeepconsistence.26.WhatisNOTnecessarywhenyouwanttobetterwriteyourpaper?DUsemanyhardandcomplicatedsentencestopolishyourexpressions.27.WhichofthefollowingauthornamesmayNOTbetherightformatofthereference?DGuanXiaohong,Zhang,S.,S.Li,W.Wang28.WhichisNOTthegeneralstyleofthereviewers?DImplicit29.Ifthereviewergivesalotofcriticalcommentsandrequestsformodification,whatarethecorrectattitudesweshouldhave?CWeshouldmodifyourpaperaccordingtothereviewers’commentstogetourpaperpublished.30.WhichoneisNOTthegoodadvicesonrespondingtoreviewers?CWeonlyneedtoaddressthecommentsthattheyarecorrectaswebelieve.31.Inordertohelpthereviewerssavetime,weshouldAListouroriginalreviewsandtheresponsesidebyside.32.WhichistheWRONGresponsetoreviewersifwedon’tagreewiththeircomments?DIgnorethosecommentsorexplainwhatweoriginallymeant.33.Whichoneisthegoodactioninrespondingtoreviewers?AWeexplaintothereviewswhatwehaverevisedtoaddressedtheircomments.34.WhichdescriptionofthereviewsystemisCORRECT?BTheauthorsdonotknowthereviewer,butthereviewerknowstheauthors.第二章1.WhataretheCORRECTstatementsinthefollowing?DMakingpresentationsinEnglishisimportantformanycareers.2.WhichofthefollowingisWRONGaboutmakingpresentationsinEnglish?CItisonlynecessarywhenyouattendanacademicconference.3.WhichisNOTthecorrectstatementinthefollowing?AYoushouldoverestimatetheaudience'scapabilitytoshowsmarttheyare.4.WhichofthefollowingisWRONGaboutusingPowerpointtomakepresentations?BYoucannotmakethelastminutechangeunderanycondition.5.WhichstatementisNOTthecorrectoneinthefollowing?DItisbettertoputmanywordsintheslidetomakeyouraudiencegettheinformationclearly.6.WhichstatementaboutthefontsizeintheslideisNOTmentionedinthevideo?CVeryrarelytheminimalfontsizefortextcanbe12points.7.Whichisthemainfunctionofaroadmapinyourpresentation?CTotelltheaudiencewhereyourtalkis.8.WhichisNOTthecorrectstatementsinthefollowing?AItisOKtochangenotationshalfwaythroughatalkbycopyingthoseinanothertalktosaveefforts.9.WhichofthefollowingmayNOTbeanecessarypartofpresentingexperimentalresults?BProceduresdetailed.10.Fora30minutestalk,whatistheappropriatenumberofslides?ANomorethan15.11.Whatisagoodpresentation?CThesubjectofyourpresentationiswelcomedbytheaudience.12.WhichistheappropriatetimeofpreparingslidesaccordingtoProf.HoofHarvardUniversity?DAtleast15minutestomakeoneslideinpresentation.13.WhichisNOTthecorrectstatementsinthefollowing?CYoucannotsayIdon'tknowevenifyoudon’thaveananswer.14.WhichstatementisNOTcorrectaboutpreparingslidesforexpectedquestions?CItmaymaketheaudiencesdifficulttoraisenewquestions.15.Whatwouldmostprobablyhappenifyoureadtheslidesinyourpresentation?BItwillmaketheaudienceeasilytogetbored.16.Whenshouldyoumentionyourmaingoalinmakingpresentations?AMentionyourmaingoalearlytocaptureattentionoftheaudience.17.WhichisNOTthecorrectstatementsinthefollowing?theattentionofaudience.18.Whichofthefollowingexpressionisproperforthespeaker/audience?DItisreallyagoodquestion,thanksforyourasking.19.WhichistheCORRECTstatementinthefollowing?.CThespeakershouldlistencarefullybeforeansweringthequestion.第三章1.WhichstatementisWRONGaboutsharingcreditinwritingscientificpaper?CItisacceptabletowriteacoupleofparagraphsrephrasingotherpeople’swordsandprovideasimplenumberedreference.2.WhatshouldyoudoifyouwanttociteageneraltheoryofrelativityofAlbertEinstein?BPutquotationsontheoriginalwordsofthetheory.3.WhichofthefollowingisNOTappropriatewhenyouacknowledgeothersinyourpaper?BAscientistisnotrelatedtoyourpaper,butyouputhisnameinyourpaperbecauseheisveryfamousworldwide.4.Whichofthefollowingisunacceptableintermsofsharingcredit?DIclaiminmypaperthattheideaisjustfrommyselfandhasnothingtodootherdiscussantssothatallthecontributionsareowingtome.5.Whatdoes“takecredit”meansinthevideo?BClaimyourcontributions.6.WhatdotheIEEEjournalsrelyontodeterminetheorderofauthorship?AAuthors’contributions.7.Whatshouldyoudoifyoudon’tknowthereferenceformat?CFollowtheinstructionsoftheconferenceorthejournal.8.Whichformatforcitingreferencesisnotright?A[10]studiesthestrategicimplicationsofforwardcontractingincommoditymarketsthatexhibitanoligopolisticstructure.9.WhichstatementofthefollowingisNOTrightabouttheimportanceofattendingacademicconferences?AAcademicconferenceisveryimportantforprofessors,butitisunworthyforstudents.10.Whatactivitiescanyouchoosetoparticipateinduringanacademicconference?DAlltheabove.11.WhichstatementinanacademicconferenceisNOTcorrect?DPaperpresentationrequiresanauthorofthepapertopresentthepaperaslongasonelikes.12.What’sthepostersession?ATheauthorsofthepapermakeaposterinthespecifiedarea.13.WhatshouldyouNOTdoifyouwanttomeetthesessionchair?CChatwiththesessionchairduringothers’presentation.14.Whichoneisnotnecessaryfortheauthorsbeforemakingpresentations?CTakepartinothersessions.15.WhatshouldyouNOTdointhesessionofanacademicconference?CDonotshowupinthearrangedsessionandotherscancommunicatewithmebyE-mail.16.Whatmainbenefitsyouwillgetifyouvolunteertoservetheacademiccommunity?CBuildagoodrelationwiththecolleaguesinyourfield.17.WhichoneofthefollowingisNOTthereasonforascholartoprovideacademicservice?CAcademicserviceispaidmuch.18.Whatisthebenefitfromservingasareviewerforajournalorconference?DAlltheabove.19.WhichoneisNOTincludedinthereviewingtasks?CHelptheauthorstomodifythepaper.20.WhichstatementaboutreviewerisNOTtrue?DYouonlyneedtobespecificandconstructivetothebeginningauthors.21.Whichoneisnotessentialtobeagoodreviewer?CYouneedtohavetheexperienceofreviewingpapersfromallregions.22.Whatshouldyoudoifyouwanttobecomeanassociateeditor?BHaveareputationtoprovidegoodreviewsinatimelyfashion.23.WhichstatementaboutacceptingordecliningtohandlepapersisNOTtrue?DOnceyouacceptthepapertohandle,thefirsttaskistotelltheauthoraboutthis.24.WhichstatementaboutsecuringreviewersisNOTtrue?AUsuallyyoushouldassignthereviewtasktothereviewersfourtosixdaysahead.25.Inordertoavoidconflictofinterestandpreserveconfidentiality,whatshouldyoudo?BIfReviewerAhastotaldifferentviewtoAuthorB,youshouldnotaskReviewerAtoreviewAuthorB’spapertoavoidconflict.26.Whenyouhandlethepaperandfinditinteresting,whichbehavioriscorrect?CYoushouldcommunicatewiththeauthorasaresearchertorequesttosharesomeinformation.27.WhatshouldyouNOTdotopreparearecommendationordecisionletter?DIfyourecommendtorejectthepaper,youcansimplydoitwithoutexplanation.28.WhatisNOTallowedintherecommendationofanassociatededitor?DProvidetheinformationofallreviewers.29.WhichstatementabouthandlingtheresubmittedpaperisNOTtrue?CWeneedtoaskallthereviewerstohandletheconditionallyacceptedpapers.30.Asanassociateeditororeditor,whenyousuffersomedifficulties,whatshouldyoudo?AReportthedifficultiesearly.31.Whichoneistrueaccordingtothecommunicationprotocol?AOnceyoureceivearequestonpaperhandling,youneedtoresponseassoonaspossible.32.WhatshouldyouNOTdoasthesessionchair?DWhenyoufindthereareseveralauthorsnoshow,youshouldcombinethesessionwithsomebodyelse,whoisunsigned.33.WhichofthestatementisTRUEforaconferencesessionchair?CTostimulateQANDA,youshouldaskaquestionyourselffirst.第四章1.Whataretheconsiderationsonchoosingresearchtopics?DAlltheabove2.WhichofthefollowingisNOTtheformofinterdisciplinaryresearch?COnefromfieldBworksontheproblemoffieldB3.Ifyouencounteraprobleminadifferentfield,whichstatementisNOTtrue?DYoujustwasteyourtimesinceitisnotyourfield.4.WhichofthefollowingisNOTadvisedwhenyouarechoosingaresearchtopic?DRefusetoworkinanewareawithoutmanyreferencesorcontainingdifficultproblems5.WhichoneisNOTanexampleofinterdisciplinaryresearch?BThepresentationofrelativi