1、2、柱狀圖（靜態(tài)圖）柱狀圖（靜態(tài)圖）light railcommuter railbusheavy railDemand response靜態(tài)圖的文字信息靜態(tài)圖的文字信息一般是：1. 最高值2. 數(shù)字的比較 （比較級/倍數(shù)/while）3. 相同特征數(shù)字的歸納 （similar to, at a similar level）第1步：審題1. 確定圖形類別：靜態(tài)圖（2002）2. 確定描述對象：5個描述對象3. 分段：4. 確定時態(tài)：5. 確定重要信息分兩段過去時最高值：demand-response交通方式產(chǎn)生的事故最多總體趨勢：在五種交通方式中，incidents發(fā)生的次數(shù)都比injurie

2、s多Rail一大類發(fā)生incidents和injures的情況較少Communter rail發(fā)生事故的情況最少開頭段commuter raillight railbusheavy railDemand response The bar chart compares the number of incidents and injuries for every 100 million passenger miles travelled on fivedifferent means of public transport in 2002.第一段：最高值Demand-response A total

3、 of 225 incidents and 173 injures, per 100 million passenger miles travelled, took place on demand-responsetransport muter raillight railbusheavy railDemand response第一段：第二高值bus These figures were nearly three times as high as those for thesecond highest category, bus service. There were 7

4、6 incidents and 66 people were injured on muter raillight railbusheavy railDemand response第二段：第三高值light rail Relatively, rail services experienced few problems. The number of incidents on light rail train equaled the figure recorded for buses, but there were significantly fewer injures, at

5、only 39.light railcommuter railbusheavy railDemand response第二段：第四高值heavy rail/最低值commuterHeavy rail services saw lower numbers of such events than light rail services,but commuter rail passengers were even less likely to experience problems. In fact,only 20 incidents and 17 injures occurred on commuter muter raillight railbusheavy railDemand response結(jié)尾段 Overall, the most incidents and injuries took place on demand- response vehicles. By contrast, commuter rail service