雅思真題訓(xùn)練_第1頁
雅思真題訓(xùn)練_第2頁
雅思真題訓(xùn)練_第3頁
雅思真題訓(xùn)練_第4頁
雅思真題訓(xùn)練_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩2頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

付費(fèi)下載

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、精品文檔閱讀題 (共 1題,共 5.0 分)1Questions 29-33READING PASSAGE 3Reading Passage 3 has seven paragraphsA-G.Choose the most suitable headings for paragraphsC-G from the list ofheadings below.Write the appropriate numbersi-xin boxes 29-33 on your answer sheet.THE SCIENTIFIC METHODA Hypotheses, said Medawar in 1

2、964,are imaginative andinspirationalin character ; they are adventuresof the mind.He was arguing in favour of the position taken by Karl Popper inThe Logic of Scientific Discovery (1972, 3rd edition) that thenatureof scientificmethod is hypothetico-deductiveand not,asis generally believed, inductive

3、.B Itis essentialthatyou, as an intendingresearcher,understandthe differencebetween these two interpretationsof the researchprocess so that you do not become discouraged or begin to suffer.精品文檔from a feeling of cheating or not going about it the right way.C The myth of scientificmethod isthatitis in

4、ductive:thattheformulationofscientifictheorystartswiththebasic,rawevidenceofthesenses-simple,unbiased,unprejudicedobservation. Out ofthese sensory data- commonly referred toasfacts -generalisations will form. The myth is that from a disorderly array of factual information an orderly, relevanttheoryw

5、illsomehow emerge.However,thestartingpointofinduction is an impossible one.D There is no such thing as an unbiased observation. Every act of observation we make is a function of what we have seen or otherwise experienced in the past. All scientific work of anexperimental or exploratory nature starts

6、 with some expectation about the outcome. This expectation is a hypothesis. Hypothesesprovide the initiative and incentive for the inquiry and influence the method. It is in the light of an expectation that some observations are held to be relevant and some irrelevant, thatone methodology is chosen

7、and others discarded, that some experiments are conducted and others are not. Where is your naive, pure and objective researcher now?.精品文檔E Hypotheses arise by guesswork, or by inspiration, but havingbeen formulated theycan and must be testedrigorously,usingtheappropriate methodology. If thepredicti

8、onsyou make as a resultof deducing certain consequences from your hypothesis are notshown to be correct then you discard or modify your hypothesis.If the predictions turn out to be correct then your hypothesishas been supported and may be retained until such time as somefurther test shows it not to

9、be correct. Once you have arrivedat your hypothesis, which is a product of your imagination, youthen proceed to a strictly logical and rigorous process, basedupondeductiveargument-hencethetermhypothetico - deductive .F So dont worry ifyou have some idea of what your resultswilltell you before you ev

10、en begin to collect data; there are noscientists in existence who really wait until they have all theevidence in frontof them before they tryto work out what itmightpossibly mean. The closest we ever get to this situation is when something happens by accident; but even then the researcher has to for

11、mulate a hypothesis to be tested before being sure that,for example, a mould might prove to be a successful antidote to bacterial infection.精品文檔G The myth of scientific method is not only that it is inductive(whichwehaveseenisincorrect)butalsothatthehypothetico-deductivemethodproceedsinastep-by-step

12、,inevitable fashion. The hypothetico-deductive method describesthe logicalapproach to much research work, but it doesnotdescribe the psychological behaviour that brings it about. Thisis muchmoreholistic-involvingguesses,reworkings,corrections,blindalleysandaboveallinspiration,inthedeductiveas well a

13、s thehypotheticcomponent -thanisimmediatelyapparent from readingthe finalthesisor publishedpapers.Thesehave been,quiteproperly, organisedintoa more serial,logicalordersothattheworthoftheoutputmaybeevaluatedindependentlyofthebehaviouralprocessesbywhichitwasobtained.Itisthedifference,forexample betwee

14、ntheacademicpaperswith which Crickand Watson demonstrated thestructureofthe DNAmoleculeand thefascinatingbook The Double HelixinwhichWatson (1968)describedhow theydidit.From thispointofview,scientific method may more usefully be thought of as a wayof writing up research rather than as a way of carry

15、ing it out.精品文檔List of Headingsi The Crick and Watson approach toresearchAntidotes to bacterial infectionThe testing of hypothesesExplaining the inductive methodAnticipating results before data is collectedviHow research isdone and , how itisreportedThe role of hypotheses in scientific researchDeducing the consequences of hypothesesKarl Popper s claim that the s

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論