財務(wù)管理ch06資本預(yù)算-課件_第1頁
財務(wù)管理ch06資本預(yù)算-課件_第2頁
財務(wù)管理ch06資本預(yù)算-課件_第3頁
財務(wù)管理ch06資本預(yù)算-課件_第4頁
財務(wù)管理ch06資本預(yù)算-課件_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩85頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

Chapter06CapitalBudgetingTechniques資本預(yù)算方法Chapter06CapitalBudgetingTeProjectEvaluation:AlternativeMethods

PaybackPeriod(PBP投資回收期)InternalRateofReturn(IRR內(nèi)含報酬率)NetPresentValue(NPV凈現(xiàn)值)ProfitabilityIndex(PI獲利指數(shù))ProjectEvaluation:AlternatiProposedProjectDataJulieMillerisevaluatinganewprojectforherfirm,BasketWonders(BW).Shehasdeterminedthattheafter-taxcashflowsfortheprojectwillbe$10,000;$12,000;$15,000;$10,000;and$7,000,respectively,foreachoftheYears1through5.Theinitialcashoutlaywillbe$40,000.ProposedProjectDataJulieMilIndependentProjectIndependent

--Aprojectwhoseacceptance(orrejection)doesnotpreventtheacceptanceofotherprojectsunderconsideration.Forthisproject,assumethatitisindependent

ofanyotherpotentialprojectsthatBasketWondersmayundertake.IndependentProjectIndependentPaybackPeriod(PBP)PBP

istheperiodoftimerequiredforthecumulativeexpectedcashflowsfromaninvestmentprojecttoequaltheinitialcashoutflow.012345

-40K10K12K15K10K7KPaybackPeriod(PBP)PBPisthe(c)10K22K37K47K54KPaybackSolution(#1)PBP =a+(b

-c)/d =3+(40-37)/10 =3+(3)/10 =3.3Years012345

-40K10K12K15K10K7KCumulativeInflows(a)(-b)(d)(c)10K22KPaybackSolution(#2)PBP =3+(3K)/10K

=3.3YearsNote:Takeabsolutevalueoflastnegativecumulativecashflowvalue.CumulativeCashFlows

-40K10K12K15K

10K7K012345-40K-30K-18K-3K7K14KPaybackSolution(#2)PBP =3PBPAcceptanceCriterionYes!Thefirmwillreceivebacktheinitialcashoutlayinlessthan3.5years.[3.3Years<3.5YearMax.]ThemanagementofBasketWondershassetamaximumPBPof3.5yearsforprojectsofthistype.Shouldthisprojectbeaccepted?PBPAcceptanceCriterionYes!PBPStrengths

andWeaknessesStrengths:Easytouseand understand Canbeusedasa measureof liquidityWeaknesses:Doesnotaccount forTVM Doesnotconsider cashflowsbeyond thePBP

PBPStrengths

andWeaknesseInternalRateofReturn(IRR)IRRisthediscountratethatequatesthepresentvalueofthefuturenetcashflowsfromaninvestmentprojectwiththeproject’sinitialcashoutflow.CF1CF2CFn

(1+IRR)1(1+IRR)2(1+IRR)n+...++ICO=InternalRateofReturn(IRR)I$15,000$10,000$7,000

IRRSolution$10,000$12,000(1+IRR)1

(1+IRR)2Findtheinterestrate(IRR)thatcausesthediscountedcashflowstoequal$40,000.++++$40,000=(1+IRR)3

(1+IRR)4

(1+IRR)5$15,000$10,000$7IRRSolution(Try10%)$40,000= $10,000(PVIF10%,1)+$12,000(PVIF10%,2)+ $15,000(PVIF10%,3)+$10,000(PVIF10%,4)+ $7,000(PVIF10%,5)= $10,000(.909)+$12,000(.826)+ $15,000(.751)+$10,000(.683)+ $7,000(.621)= $9,090+$9,912+$11,265+ $6,830+$4,347 = $41,444 [Rateistoolow!!]IRRSolution(Try10%)$40,000IRRSolution(Try15%)$40,000= $10,000(PVIF15%,1)+$12,000(PVIF15%,2)+ $15,000(PVIF15%,3)+$10,000(PVIF15%,4)+ $7,000(PVIF15%,5)

= $10,000(.870)+$12,000(.756)+ $15,000(.658)+$10,000(.572)+ $7,000(.497)

= $8,700+$9,072+$9,870+ $5,720+$3,479 = $36,841 [Rateistoohigh!!]IRRSolution(Try15%)$40,000

.10 $41,444 .05 IRR $40,000 $4,603 .15 $36,841 ($1,444)(0.05) $4,603

IRRSolution(Interpolate)$1,444XX=X=.0157IRR=.10+.0157=.1157or11.57%X/.05=1444/4603 .10 $41,444IRRSolution(IIRRAcceptanceCriterion

No!Thefirmwillreceive11.57%foreachdollarinvestedinthisprojectatacostof13%.[IRR

<HurdleRate]

ThemanagementofBasketWondershasdeterminedthatthehurdlerateis13%forprojectsofthistype.Shouldthisprojectbeaccepted?IRRAcceptanceCriterionNo!IRRStrengths

andWeaknesses

Strengths:Accountsfor TVMConsidersall cashflowsLess subjectivityWeaknesses:Assumesallcash flowsreinvestedat theIRR Difficultieswith projectrankingsand MultipleIRRsIRRStrengths

andWeaknesseNetPresentValue(NPV)

NPVisthepresentvalueofaninvestmentproject’snetcashflowsminustheproject’sinitialcashoutflow.CF1

CF2

CFn

(1+k)1(1+k)2(1+k)n+...++-

ICONPV=NetPresentValue(NPV)NPViBasketWondershasdeterminedthattheappropriatediscountrate(k)forthisprojectis13%.$10,000

$7,000

NPVSolution$10,000

$12,000

$15,000

(1.13)1

(1.13)2

(1.13)3

+++-$40,000(1.13)4

(1.13)5NPV

=+BasketWondershasdeterminedNPVSolutionNPV= $10,000(PVIF13%,1)+$12,000(PVIF13%,2)+ $15,000(PVIF13%,3)+$10,000(PVIF13%,4)+ $7,000(PVIF13%,5)-$40,000NPV= $10,000(.885)+$12,000(.783)+ $15,000(.693)+$10,000(.613)+ $7,000(.543)-$40,000NPV= $8,850+$9,396+$10,395+ $6,130+$3,801-$40,000

= -$1,428NPVSolutionNPV= $10,000(PVINPVAcceptanceCriterion

No!TheNPVisnegative.Thismeansthattheprojectisreducingshareholderwealth.[RejectasNPV

<0]ThemanagementofBasketWondershasdeterminedthattherequiredrateis13%forprojectsofthistype.Shouldthisprojectbeaccepted?NPVAcceptanceCriterionNo!NPVStrengths

andWeaknesses

Strengths:Cashflows assumedtobe reinvestedatthe hurdlerate.AccountsforTVM.Considersall cashflows.Weaknesses:Maynotinclude managerial optionsembedded intheproject.See Chapter14.NPVStrengths

andWeaknesseNetPresentValueProfileDiscountRate(%)03691215IRRNPV13%SumofCF’sPlotNPVforeachdiscountrate.Threeofthesepointsareeasynow!NetPresentValue$000s151050-4NetPresentValueProfileDiscoProfitabilityIndex(PI)

PIistheratioofthepresentvalueofaproject’sfuturenetcashflowstotheproject’sinitialcashoutflow.CF1

CF2

CFn

(1+k)1(1+k)2(1+k)n+...++ICOPI=PI=1+[NPV/ICO

]<<OR>>Method#2:Method#1:ProfitabilityIndex(PI)PIi

PIAcceptanceCriterion

No!ThePIislessthan1.00.This meansthattheprojectisnotprofitable.[RejectasPI

<1.00]

PI =$38,572/$40,000 =.9643(Method#1,13-34)Shouldthisprojectbeaccepted?PIAcceptanceCriterionNPIStrengths

andWeaknesses

Strengths:

SameasNPVAllows comparisonof differentscale projectsWeaknesses:

SameasNPVProvidesonly relativeprofitabilityPotentialRanking ProblemsPIStrengths

andWeaknesseEvaluationSummaryBasketWondersIndependentProjectEvaluationSummaryBasketWondeOtherProjectRelationshipsMutuallyExclusive

--Aprojectwhoseacceptanceprecludestheacceptanceofoneormorealternativeprojects.Dependent--Aprojectwhoseacceptancedependsontheacceptanceofoneormoreotherprojects.OtherProjectRelationshipsMutPotentialProblems

UnderMutualExclusivityA.ScaleofInvestmentB.Cash-flowPatternC.ProjectLife

Rankingofprojectproposalsmaycreatecontradictoryresults.PotentialProblems

UnderMutA.ScaleDifferences

Compareasmall(S)andalarge(L)project.NETCASHFLOWSProjectSProjectLENDOFYEAR

0-$100-$100,000

100

2$400$156,250A.ScaleDifferencesComparScaleDifferencesCalculatethePBP,IRR,NPV10%,andPI10%.Whichprojectispreferred?Why?Project

IRR

NPV

PI

S100%$2313.31L25%$29,1321.29ScaleDifferencesCalculatetheB.CashFlowPatternLetuscompareadecreasingcash-flow(D)projectandanincreasingcash-flow(I)project.NETCASHFLOWSProjectD

ProjectIENDOFYEAR

0-$1,200-$1,200

11,000100

2500600

31001,080B.CashFlowPatternLetusco

D

23%

$1981.17

I17%

$1981.17CashFlowPattern

CalculatetheIRR,NPV10%, andPI10%.Whichprojectispreferred?Project

IRR

NPV

PI?D23%$1ExamineNPVProfilesDiscountRate(%)0510152025-2000200400600IRRNPV10%PlotNPVforeachprojectatvariousdiscountrates.NetPresentValue($)ProjectIProjectDExamineNPVProfilesDiscountRFisher’sRateofIntersectionDiscountRate($)0510152025-2000200400600NetPresentValue($)Atk<10%,Iisbest!Fisher’sRateofIntersectionAtk>10%,Disbest!Fisher’sRateofIntersectionDC.ProjectLifeDifferences

Letuscomparealonglife(X)project andashortlife(Y)project.NETCASHFLOWSProjectXProjectYENDOFYEAR

0-$1,000-$1,000

10

2,000

200

33,3750C.ProjectLifeDifferences

X50%$1,5362.54Y100%$8181.82ProjectLifeDifferencesCalculatethePBP,IRR,NPV10%,andPI10%.Whichprojectispreferred?Why?

Project

IRR

NPV

PI?XAnotherWaytoLookatThings1. Adjustcashflowstoacommonterminal yearifproject“Y”willNOTbereplaced. CompoundProjectY,Year110%for2years.Year0123CF-$1,000$0$0$2,420 Results: IRR*=34.26% NPV=$818*LowerIRRfromadjustedcash-flowstream.XisstillBest.AnotherWaytoLookatThings1ReplacingProjects withIdenticalProjects2. UseReplacementChainApproach(AppendixB)whenproject“Y”willbereplaced.0123-$1,000$2,000

-1,000$2,000

-1,000$2,000-$1,000$1,000$1,000$2,000Results: IRR=100%

NPV*

=

$2,238.17*HigherNPV,butthesameIRR.

YisBest.ReplacingProjects withIdeCapitalRationing(資本配給)CapitalRationingoccurswhenaconstraint(orbudgetceiling)isplacedonthetotalsizeofcapitalexpendituresduringaparticularperiod.(對總支出有限制)Example:JulieMillermustdeterminewhatinvestmentopportunitiestoundertakeforBasketWonders(BW).Sheislimitedtoamaximumexpenditureof$32,500onlyforthiscapitalbudgetingperiod.CapitalRationing(資本配給)CapitalAvailableProjectsforBW

ProjectICOIRRNPVPI A$

50018% $501.10 B 5,000 25 6,5002.30 C 5,000 37 5,5002.10 D 7,500 20 5,0001.67 E 12,500 26 5001.04 F 15,000 28

21,0002.40 G 17,500 19 7,5001.43 H 25,000 15 6,0001.24AvailableProjectsforBWProjChoosingbyIRRsforBW

ProjectICOIRRNPVPI C$5,000 37%

$5,5002.10 F 15,000 28

21,0002.40 E 12,500 26

5001.04 B 5,000 25 6,5002.30ProjectsC,F,andEhavethe threelargestIRRs.Theresultingincrease

inshareholderwealthis$27,000witha$32,500outlay.ChoosingbyIRRsforBWProjecChoosingbyNPVsforBW

ProjectICOIRRNPVPI F$15,000 28% $21,0002.40 G 17,500 19 7,5001.43 B 5,000 25 6,5002.30 ProjectsFandGhavethe twolargestNPVs.Theresultingincrease

inshareholderwealthis$28,500witha$32,500outlay.ChoosingbyNPVsforBWProjecChoosingbyPIsforBW

ProjectICOIRRNPVPI F $15,000 28% $21,000

2.40 B 5,000 25 6,500

2.30 C 5,000 37 5,500

2.10 D 7,500 20 5,000

1.67 G 17,500 19 7,5001.43ProjectsF,B,C,andDhavethefourlargestPIs.Theresultingincrease

inshareholderwealthis$38,000witha$32,500outlay.ChoosingbyPIsforBWProjSummaryofComparison

Method

ProjectsAccepted

ValueAddedPI F,B,C,andD$38,000NPV FandG$28,500IRR C,F,andE$27,000PIgeneratesthegreatest

increase

inshareholderwealthwhenalimitedcapitalbudgetexistsforasingleperiod.SummaryofComparisonMethod謝謝謝謝45Chapter06CapitalBudgetingTechniques資本預(yù)算方法Chapter06CapitalBudgetingTeProjectEvaluation:AlternativeMethods

PaybackPeriod(PBP投資回收期)InternalRateofReturn(IRR內(nèi)含報酬率)NetPresentValue(NPV凈現(xiàn)值)ProfitabilityIndex(PI獲利指數(shù))ProjectEvaluation:AlternatiProposedProjectDataJulieMillerisevaluatinganewprojectforherfirm,BasketWonders(BW).Shehasdeterminedthattheafter-taxcashflowsfortheprojectwillbe$10,000;$12,000;$15,000;$10,000;and$7,000,respectively,foreachoftheYears1through5.Theinitialcashoutlaywillbe$40,000.ProposedProjectDataJulieMilIndependentProjectIndependent

--Aprojectwhoseacceptance(orrejection)doesnotpreventtheacceptanceofotherprojectsunderconsideration.Forthisproject,assumethatitisindependent

ofanyotherpotentialprojectsthatBasketWondersmayundertake.IndependentProjectIndependentPaybackPeriod(PBP)PBP

istheperiodoftimerequiredforthecumulativeexpectedcashflowsfromaninvestmentprojecttoequaltheinitialcashoutflow.012345

-40K10K12K15K10K7KPaybackPeriod(PBP)PBPisthe(c)10K22K37K47K54KPaybackSolution(#1)PBP =a+(b

-c)/d =3+(40-37)/10 =3+(3)/10 =3.3Years012345

-40K10K12K15K10K7KCumulativeInflows(a)(-b)(d)(c)10K22KPaybackSolution(#2)PBP =3+(3K)/10K

=3.3YearsNote:Takeabsolutevalueoflastnegativecumulativecashflowvalue.CumulativeCashFlows

-40K10K12K15K

10K7K012345-40K-30K-18K-3K7K14KPaybackSolution(#2)PBP =3PBPAcceptanceCriterionYes!Thefirmwillreceivebacktheinitialcashoutlayinlessthan3.5years.[3.3Years<3.5YearMax.]ThemanagementofBasketWondershassetamaximumPBPof3.5yearsforprojectsofthistype.Shouldthisprojectbeaccepted?PBPAcceptanceCriterionYes!PBPStrengths

andWeaknessesStrengths:Easytouseand understand Canbeusedasa measureof liquidityWeaknesses:Doesnotaccount forTVM Doesnotconsider cashflowsbeyond thePBP

PBPStrengths

andWeaknesseInternalRateofReturn(IRR)IRRisthediscountratethatequatesthepresentvalueofthefuturenetcashflowsfromaninvestmentprojectwiththeproject’sinitialcashoutflow.CF1CF2CFn

(1+IRR)1(1+IRR)2(1+IRR)n+...++ICO=InternalRateofReturn(IRR)I$15,000$10,000$7,000

IRRSolution$10,000$12,000(1+IRR)1

(1+IRR)2Findtheinterestrate(IRR)thatcausesthediscountedcashflowstoequal$40,000.++++$40,000=(1+IRR)3

(1+IRR)4

(1+IRR)5$15,000$10,000$7IRRSolution(Try10%)$40,000= $10,000(PVIF10%,1)+$12,000(PVIF10%,2)+ $15,000(PVIF10%,3)+$10,000(PVIF10%,4)+ $7,000(PVIF10%,5)= $10,000(.909)+$12,000(.826)+ $15,000(.751)+$10,000(.683)+ $7,000(.621)= $9,090+$9,912+$11,265+ $6,830+$4,347 = $41,444 [Rateistoolow!!]IRRSolution(Try10%)$40,000IRRSolution(Try15%)$40,000= $10,000(PVIF15%,1)+$12,000(PVIF15%,2)+ $15,000(PVIF15%,3)+$10,000(PVIF15%,4)+ $7,000(PVIF15%,5)

= $10,000(.870)+$12,000(.756)+ $15,000(.658)+$10,000(.572)+ $7,000(.497)

= $8,700+$9,072+$9,870+ $5,720+$3,479 = $36,841 [Rateistoohigh!!]IRRSolution(Try15%)$40,000

.10 $41,444 .05 IRR $40,000 $4,603 .15 $36,841 ($1,444)(0.05) $4,603

IRRSolution(Interpolate)$1,444XX=X=.0157IRR=.10+.0157=.1157or11.57%X/.05=1444/4603 .10 $41,444IRRSolution(IIRRAcceptanceCriterion

No!Thefirmwillreceive11.57%foreachdollarinvestedinthisprojectatacostof13%.[IRR

<HurdleRate]

ThemanagementofBasketWondershasdeterminedthatthehurdlerateis13%forprojectsofthistype.Shouldthisprojectbeaccepted?IRRAcceptanceCriterionNo!IRRStrengths

andWeaknesses

Strengths:Accountsfor TVMConsidersall cashflowsLess subjectivityWeaknesses:Assumesallcash flowsreinvestedat theIRR Difficultieswith projectrankingsand MultipleIRRsIRRStrengths

andWeaknesseNetPresentValue(NPV)

NPVisthepresentvalueofaninvestmentproject’snetcashflowsminustheproject’sinitialcashoutflow.CF1

CF2

CFn

(1+k)1(1+k)2(1+k)n+...++-

ICONPV=NetPresentValue(NPV)NPViBasketWondershasdeterminedthattheappropriatediscountrate(k)forthisprojectis13%.$10,000

$7,000

NPVSolution$10,000

$12,000

$15,000

(1.13)1

(1.13)2

(1.13)3

+++-$40,000(1.13)4

(1.13)5NPV

=+BasketWondershasdeterminedNPVSolutionNPV= $10,000(PVIF13%,1)+$12,000(PVIF13%,2)+ $15,000(PVIF13%,3)+$10,000(PVIF13%,4)+ $7,000(PVIF13%,5)-$40,000NPV= $10,000(.885)+$12,000(.783)+ $15,000(.693)+$10,000(.613)+ $7,000(.543)-$40,000NPV= $8,850+$9,396+$10,395+ $6,130+$3,801-$40,000

= -$1,428NPVSolutionNPV= $10,000(PVINPVAcceptanceCriterion

No!TheNPVisnegative.Thismeansthattheprojectisreducingshareholderwealth.[RejectasNPV

<0]ThemanagementofBasketWondershasdeterminedthattherequiredrateis13%forprojectsofthistype.Shouldthisprojectbeaccepted?NPVAcceptanceCriterionNo!NPVStrengths

andWeaknesses

Strengths:Cashflows assumedtobe reinvestedatthe hurdlerate.AccountsforTVM.Considersall cashflows.Weaknesses:Maynotinclude managerial optionsembedded intheproject.See Chapter14.NPVStrengths

andWeaknesseNetPresentValueProfileDiscountRate(%)03691215IRRNPV13%SumofCF’sPlotNPVforeachdiscountrate.Threeofthesepointsareeasynow!NetPresentValue$000s151050-4NetPresentValueProfileDiscoProfitabilityIndex(PI)

PIistheratioofthepresentvalueofaproject’sfuturenetcashflowstotheproject’sinitialcashoutflow.CF1

CF2

CFn

(1+k)1(1+k)2(1+k)n+...++ICOPI=PI=1+[NPV/ICO

]<<OR>>Method#2:Method#1:ProfitabilityIndex(PI)PIi

PIAcceptanceCriterion

No!ThePIislessthan1.00.This meansthattheprojectisnotprofitable.[RejectasPI

<1.00]

PI =$38,572/$40,000 =.9643(Method#1,13-34)Shouldthisprojectbeaccepted?PIAcceptanceCriterionNPIStrengths

andWeaknesses

Strengths:

SameasNPVAllows comparisonof differentscale projectsWeaknesses:

SameasNPVProvidesonly relativeprofitabilityPotentialRanking ProblemsPIStrengths

andWeaknesseEvaluationSummaryBasketWondersIndependentProjectEvaluationSummaryBasketWondeOtherProjectRelationshipsMutuallyExclusive

--Aprojectwhoseacceptanceprecludestheacceptanceofoneormorealternativeprojects.Dependent--Aprojectwhoseacceptancedependsontheacceptanceofoneormoreotherprojects.OtherProjectRelationshipsMutPotentialProblems

UnderMutualExclusivityA.ScaleofInvestmentB.Cash-flowPatternC.ProjectLife

Rankingofprojectproposalsmaycreatecontradictoryresults.PotentialProblems

UnderMutA.ScaleDifferences

Compareasmall(S)andalarge(L)project.NETCASHFLOWSProjectSProjectLENDOFYEAR

0-$100-$100,000

100

2$400$156,250A.ScaleDifferencesComparScaleDifferencesCalculatethePBP,IRR,NPV10%,andPI10%.Whichprojectispreferred?Why?Project

IRR

NPV

PI

S100%$2313.31L25%$29,1321.29ScaleDifferencesCalculatetheB.CashFlowPatternLetuscompareadecreasingcash-flow(D)projectandanincreasingcash-flow(I)project.NETCASHFLOWSProjectD

ProjectIENDOFYEAR

0-$1,200-$1,200

11,000100

2500600

31001,080B.CashFlowPatternLetusco

D

23%

$1981.17

I17%

$1981.17CashFlowPattern

CalculatetheIRR,NPV10%, andPI10%.Whichprojectispreferred?Project

IRR

NPV

PI?D23%$1ExamineNPVProfilesDiscountRate(%)0510152025-2000200400600IRRNPV10%PlotNPVforeachprojectatvariousdiscountrates.NetPresentValue($)ProjectIProjectDExamineNPVProfilesDiscountRFisher’sRateofIntersectionDiscountRate($)0510152025-2000200400600NetPresentValue($)Atk<10%,Iisbest!Fisher’sRateofIntersectionAtk>10%,Disbest!Fisher’sRateofIntersectionDC.ProjectLifeDifferences

Letuscomparealonglife(X)project andashortlife(Y)project.NETCASHFLOWSProjectXProjectYENDOFYEAR

0-$1,000-$1,000

10

2,000

200

33,3750C.ProjectLifeDifferences

X50%$1,5362.54Y100%$8181.82ProjectLifeDifferencesCalculatethePBP,IRR,NPV10%,andPI10%.Whichprojectispreferred?Why?

Project

IRR

NPV

PI?XAnotherWaytoLookatThings1. Adjustcashflowstoacommonterminal yearifproject“Y”willNOTbereplaced. CompoundProjectY,Year110%for2years.Year0123CF-$1,000$0$0$2,420 Results: IRR*=34.26% NPV=$818*LowerIRRfromadjustedcash-flowstream.XisstillBest.AnotherWaytoLookatThings1ReplacingProjects withIdenticalProjects2. UseReplacem

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論