動(dòng)物實(shí)驗(yàn)利與弊論點(diǎn)1：（正方）不人道Firstofall,themaindisadvantageofanimaltestingistheinhumanetreatmentofanimalsintestsduetothefactthatanesthesiaforthehelpofpainisoftennotused.Scientistssaythatusinganesthesiawillinterferewithtestresults.Todaytheterm“vivisection”isused.Vivisectionisdefinedas“cuttingwhilestillalive”butitismorecommonlyusedtodayasanyharmfulexperimentortestthatisperformedonananimal.Animalexperimentationinvolvestheincarcerationofanimalsandpoisoning,mutilation,diseaseandkillingofthoseindividuals.Itisarguablythemostbrutalandmostsevereformofviolenceinthemodernworld.Itissaidthatanestimated50,000animalsdieduetothetestingonthem.SomeoftheteststhatIAMSperformedwere:28femalecatshadtheirabdomens（腹部）cutopenandsolutioninjectedrepeatedlyintotheirbowels.24youngdogsweregivenkidneyfailurebytheremovalofonekidneyandthedamagingoftheother.Allthedogswerekilledafterbeingfedanexperimentaldietandtheirkidneysanalyzed.論點(diǎn)2：（正方）可有別的措施Manyalternativesalreadyexist,andtheremustbemanymorewhicharewaitingtobefound.Thedaywillsurelycomewhennotmoreexperimentsonanimalswillneedtobedoneforhumanmedicine.it'sharedtosaytherewillalwaysbealternativesforveterinaryresearch,Themostcommonalternativesthatareusedtodayare:in-vitrotests,computersoftware,andevenhuman“clinicaltests”.Theuseofanimalcells,organs,andtissueculturesarealsodeemedasalternatives,（反駁正方）howeveranimallivesarestillsacrificedfortheuseoftheirparts.Wecanonlytalkaboutbanningexperimentationwhenthealternativeshavebeenprovedtobeaccurate,andsafe.

→（反方反駁）Asamedicalstudent,I'verealizedthatartificialmeanscanneverreplacetheincrediblecomplexityoflivinganimals.Itmaynotbepossibletobanallanimaltestsquiteyet,butthereshouldbealotmoremoney,timeandeffortsgoingintofindingalternatives.新論點(diǎn)3：正方：動(dòng)物也有權(quán)利Couldanyonetellmewhyhumansaremoreimportantthananyotheranimals?Couldanyonepleasetellmethefundamentalreasonwhyhumansufferingis'absolutely'moreimportantthananimalsuffering,whytheintenseagonyexperiencedbyalaboratoryanimalisinconsequential（不重要的，微不足道的）whenviewagainstthesameorevenlesserdegreeofsufferingwithinbecausethenecessarytreatmenthadbeendevelopedusinglaboratoryanimals?

Ifyouanswered'Yes'toALLoftheabove,thenyouarefreefromhypocrisy（偽善，虛偽）inyourmoralstance(l立場(chǎng)姿態(tài)).

論點(diǎn)1：我們需要?jiǎng)游飳?shí)驗(yàn)Animalstestingisreallynecessary.分論點(diǎn)（1）患者的需要Firstofall,allthepatientsareintheneedofthetesting.Why?Couldyourealizethattheanimalsyoubelievearebeingharmed,havenotonlyimpactedyourlivesinsomeway,buthaveimpactedyourfamilies,friends,byprovidingpeoplewithvaccinesandantibiotics.Whenitcomesdowntoit,rightlyorwrongly,wewillallhappilysacrificeananimalinordertosavealovedone!Millionsoflivesaresavedeveryyearbecauseofoneanimal’s,resultstoeitheradrugornewformofsurgery.TellmethatWhichwouldyouprefertolive-anillchildorahealthybunny?Withrightscomeresponsibilities-whatresponsibilitiestoanimalshave?Howmanypeoplewhoadvocatebanninganimaltestinghaveacceptedmedicineswhichhavealmostsurelybeentestedonanimals.Amovetowardsanimalrightsmeansamoveawayfromhumanrights.分論點(diǎn)（2）科學(xué)研究的需要Thesecond,animaltestingisthemostpredominantformoftestingusedbyscientists.Animalresearchplaysavital,andirreplaceable,roleinsuchfieldsasdrugandcancerresearch.Thephaseofresearchonanimalsgaveusessentialdatawhichmoveduson.Theknowledgesogainedisbeingusedtoprovidemoreeffectivetreatmentforseriouslydisabledhumans.Theresultstheyyieldbringanewoutlookonlifeformillionsaroundtheworld.Ifanimaltestingisbanned,howwillmedicinesbedeveloped?Willcureshavetobetriedonlyonhumans?Willtherebeenoughvolunteers?Howaboutlawsuitsbyfamiliesofvictimsofimperfectlydesignedcures?Acompletebanonanimaltestingwillhaveveryseriousnegativeeffectsonmedicalresearch.Ibelievethatdevelopingbetter,moreeffectiveandsaferdrugsismoreimportantthansparingafewrats.(反駁正方觀點(diǎn))Alternativestoanimaltestingmustbedevelopedbuteventhesealternativeswillrequireanimaltestinginordertocompareresults.Willtheanimalrightsactivistsendorse（贊同）anyresponsibilityofthedisastrouseffectsoftheirrosycuddlythoughts?Idoubtit..分論點(diǎn)（3）安全性需要Thethird,Itisimperative（必要的）thatalldrugsreleasedontothemarketaresafeforhumanstouse.Ifeelthatanimaltestingisnecessaryforthecontinuationofbiologicalandsafetyresearch.Evenwithanimal&peopletesting,dangerousproductsstillgetonthemarket,imaginehowmanymorewillbeonthemarketifwebananimaltesting.

論點(diǎn)2：物競(jìng)天擇Animalrightsprotestersarejustabunchofcitydwellerswhodon'treallyunderstandhowlifeworks.Natureispredatory,thestrongestsurvive,andbytestingdrugsandmedicalresearchonanimalswhichcreatescuresforhumandiseases,thenthoseanimalsdiedtohelpussurvive.Asimpleextrapolationofthelawofnature.論點(diǎn)3：采取相應(yīng)的彌補(bǔ)措施：Whileweshouldneverhurtanimalsintheinterestofpaltry（無價(jià)值的）cosmetics,researchforlife-savingdrugsandtechniquesrequireslimiteduseofrealanimals.Iagreethatanimaltestingshouldbecontinued,butagreewithanimalrightsadvocatesthatweshouldnotbeallowedtoturnablindeyetoanysuffering.

總結(jié)：Eventhemostmilitantanimalrightsactivistwouldhavetoadmitonething:ifgod-forbidoneofthemhadachildwhobecameveryill,hewoulda