1、1,社會資本的評估與有關計劃的檢討,石丹理 香港中文大學社會工作學系教授 香港社會服務聯(lián)會社會發(fā)展委員會主席,2,定量評估及檢討(Quantitative Assessment and Evaluation),原則一：界定社會資本的範圍 (Clear and Delimited Conceptualization) 原則二：選擇適合的研究設計 (Appropriate Research Design) 實驗性設計 (Experimental Designs) 單一系統(tǒng)設計 (Single Systems Design B/AB) 原則三：選擇適合的指標 (Appropriate Indicat

2、ors) 本土工具相對西方工具 心理測量特性(信度、效度、標準化) 原則四：選擇適合的統(tǒng)計分析 (Appropriate Statistical Tests to Assess Change) 原則五：了解限制，作出適切的結論 (Drawing Appropriate Conclusions),3,定質(zhì)評估及檢討(Qualitative Assessment and Evaluation),原則一：確立定質(zhì)評估的理據(jù) (Clear Justifications and Rationales) 次選？容易做？ 原則二：定質(zhì)研究的取向 (Philosophical Orientation) 原則三

3、：選擇適合的資料收集方法 (Appropriate Data Collection Methods) 深入訪談：How deep is in-depth? 原則四：有系統(tǒng)及完整的資料處理 (Systematic and Complete Documentation) 原則五：明白自己的誤差、先入為主的信念 (Understanding Biases and Preoccupation) 原則六：了解限制，作出適當?shù)慕Y論 (Drawing Appropriate Conclusions) 天真的現(xiàn)實主義 (Nave Realism)?,4,References,Borgida, E., Sull

4、ivan, J.L., Oxendine, A., Jackson, M.S. & Riedel, E. (2002). Civic culture meets the digital divide: The role of community electronic networks. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 125-141. (Quantitative & Qualitative.) Cattell, V. (2001). Poor people, poor places, and poor health: The mediating role of so

5、cial networks and social capital. Social Science and Medicine, 52, 1501-1516. (Qualitative.) Kahne, J., & Kim, B. (1999). The role of social capital in youth development: The case of “I have a dream” programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 321-343. (Quantitative & Qualitative.) Morrow, V. (2001). Using qualitative methods to elicit young peoples perspectives on their environments: Some ideas for community health initiatives. Health Education Research, 16, 255-268. (Qualitative.) Robinson, R.V., & Jackson, E.F. (2001). Is trust in others declining in A