真題里面上半部分是下答案解析2010考研路上的幸福哥_第1頁
真題里面上半部分是下答案解析2010考研路上的幸福哥_第2頁
真題里面上半部分是下答案解析2010考研路上的幸福哥_第3頁
真題里面上半部分是下答案解析2010考研路上的幸福哥_第4頁
真題里面上半部分是下答案解析2010考研路上的幸福哥_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩50頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

付費下載

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

入學統(tǒng)一考試英語試題Section UseofReadthefollowingtext.Choosethebestword(s)foreachnumberedblankandmark[A],[C]or[D]onANSWERSHEET1.(10In1924America'sNationalResearchCouncilsenttwoengineerstosuperviseaseriesofindustrialexperimentsatalargeephone-partsfactorycalledtheHawthornentnearChicago.Ithopedtheywouldlearnhowstop-floorlighting1workers'productivity.Instead,thestudiesended2givingtheirnametothe"Hawthorneeffect",theextremelyinfluentialideathatthevery3tobeingexperimenteduponchangedsubjects'behavior.Theideaarosebecauseofthe4 behaviorofthewomenintheHawthornent.Accordingto5oftheexperiments,theirhourlyoutputrosewhenlightingwasincreased,butalsowhenitwasdimmed.Itdidnot whatwasdoneintheexperiment;somethingwaschanged,productivityrose.A(n)8thattheywerebeingexperimenteduponseemedtobe9toalterworkers'behavior10itself.Afterseveraldecades,thesamedatawere11 toeconometrictheysis.Hawthorneexperimentshasanothersurprisestore12thedescriptionsonrecord,nosystematic13wasfoundthatlevelsofproductivitywererelatedtochangesinItturnsoutthatpeculiarwayofconductingtheexperimentsmaybehavelet interpretationofwhathappened.15,lightingwasalwayschangedonaSunday.WhenstartedstartedagainonMonday, rosecomparedwiththepreviousSaturday toriseforthenextcoupleofdays. ,acomparisonwithdataforweekswhentherewasnoexperimentationshowedthatoutputalwayswentuponMonday, tobediligentforthefirstfewdaysoftheweekinanycase,before teauandthenslackeningoff.Thissuggeststhatthealleged"Hawthorneeffect"ishardtopindown.1.[A]affected [B]achieved [C]extracted 2.[A]at [B]up [C]with [D]off3.[A]truth [B]sight [C]act [D]proof4.[A]controversial[B]perplexing [C]mischievous[D]ambiguous5.[A]requirements[B]exnations [C]accounts [D]assessments6.[A] [B]matter [C]indicate [D]work7.[A]asfar[B]forfear[C]incase[D]solong8.[A][B][C][D]9.[A][B][C][D]10.[A][B][C][D]11.[A][B][C][D]12.[A]Contrary [B]Consistentwith[C]Parallelwith[D]Peculiar13.[A][B][C][D]14.[A][B][C][D]15.[A]Incontrast [B]Forexample [C]Inconsequence[D]Asusual16.[A]duly [B]accidentally [C]unpredictably [D]suddenly17.[A]failed [B]ceased [C]started 18.[A]Therefore [B]Furthermore [C]However 19.[A]attempted [B]tended [C]chose [D]intended20.[A]breaking [B]climbing [C]surpassing [D]hittingSection ReadingPartAReadthefollowingfourtexts.Answerthequestionsbeloweachtextbychoosing[A],[B],[C]or[D].MarkyouranswersonANSWERSHEET1.(40points)OfOfallthechangesthathavetakenceinEnglish-languagenewspapersduringthepastquarter-century,perhapsthemostfar-reachinghasbeentheinexorabledeclineinthescopeandseriousnessoftheirartscoverage.Itisdifficulttothepointofimpossibilityfortheaveragereaderundertheageoffortytoimagineatimewhenhigh-qualityartscriticismcouldbefoundinmostbig-citynewspapers.Yetaconsiderablenumberofthemostsignificantcollectionsofcriticismpublishedinthe20thcenturyconsistedinlargepartofnewspaperreviews.Toreadsuchbookstodayistomarvelatthefactthattheirlearnedcontentswereoncedeemedsuitableforpublicationingeneral-circulationWeareevenfartherremovedfromtheunfocusednewspaperreviewspublishedinEnglandbetweentheturnofthe20thcenturyandtheeveofWorldWarII,atatimewhennewsprintwasdirt-cheapandstylishartscriticismwasconsideredanornamenttothepublicationsinwhichitappeared.Inthosefar-offdays,itwastakenforgrantedthatthecriticsofmajorpaperswouldwriteindetailandatlengthabouttheeventstheycovered.Theirswasaseriousbusiness,andeventhosereviewerswhoworetheirlearninglightly,likeGeorgeBernardShawandErnest,couldbetrustedtoknowwhattheywereabout.Thesemenbelievedinjournalismasacalling,andwereproudtobepublishedinthedailypress.“Sofewauthorshavebrainsenoughorlirygiftenoughtokeeptheirownendupinjournalism,” wrote,“thatIamtemptedtodefine‘journalism’as‘a(chǎn)termofcontemptappliedbywriterswhoarenotreadtowriterswhoare.’”Unfortunay,thesecriticsarevirtuallyforgotten.NevilleCardus,whowrotefortheManchesterGuardianfrom1917untilshortlybeforehisdeathin1975,isnowknownsolelyasawriterofessaysonthegameofcricket.Duringhislifetime,though,hewasalsooneofEngland’sforemostclassical-musiccritics,astylistsowidelyadmiredthathisAutobiography(1947)becameabest-seller.Hewasknightedin1967,thefirstmusiccritictobesohonored.Yetonlyoneofhisbooksisnowinprint,andhisvastbodyofwritingsonmusicisunknownsavetospecialists.IsthereanychancethatCardus’scriticismwillenjoyarevival?Theprospectseemsremote.Journalistictasteshadchangedlongbeforehisdeath,andpostmodernreadershavelittleusefortherichlyupholsteredVicwardianproseinwhichhespecialized.Moreover,theamateurtraditioninmusiccriticismhasbeeninheadlongretreat.ItisindicatedinParagraphs1and2thatartscriticismhasdisappearedfrombig-cityEnglish-languagenewspapersusedtocarrymoreartshigh-qualitynewspapersretainalargebodyofyoungreadersdoubtthesuitabilityofcriticismonNewspaperreviewsinEnglandbeforeWorldWarIIwerecharacterizedbycasualradicalWhichofthefollowingwouldShaw mostprobablyagreeItiswriters’dutytofulfilljournalisticItiscontemptibleforwriterstobeWritersarelikelytobetemptedintoNotallwritersarecapableofjournalisticWhatcanbelearnedaboutCardusaccordingtothelasttwoHismusiccriticismmaynotappealtoreadersHisreputationasamusiccritichaslongbeeninHisstylecaterslargelytomodernHiswritingsfailtofollowtheamateurWhatwouldbethebesttitlefortheNewspapersoftheGoodOldTheLostHorizoninMournfulDeclineofProminentCriticsinOverthepastdecade,thousandsofpatentshavebeengrantedforwhatarecalledbusinessmethods.receivedoneforits"one-click"onlinepaymentsystem.MerrillLynchgotlegalprotectionforanassetallocationstrategy.OneinventorpatentedatechniqueforliftingaNowthenation'stoppatentcourtappearscompleyreadytoscalebackonbusiness-methodpatents,whichhavebeencontroversialeversincetheywerefirstauthorized10yearsago.Inamovethathasinlectual-propertylawyersabuzztheU.S.courtofAppealsforthefederalcircuitsaiditwoulduseaparticularcasetoconductabroadreviewofbusiness-methodpatents.InreBilski,asthecaseisknown,is"averybigdeal",saysDennisD.CrouchoftheUniversityofMissouriSchooloflaw.It"hasthepotentialtoeliminateanentireclassofpatents."Curbsonbusiness-methodclaimswouldbeadramaticabout-face,becauseitwasthefederalcircuititselfthatintroducedsuchpatentswithis1998decisionintheso-calledstateStreetBankcase,approvingapatentonawayofpoolingmutual-fundassets.Thatrulingproducedanexplosioninbusiness-methodpatentfilings,initiallybyemerginginternetcompaniestryingtostakeoutexclusiverightstospecifictypesofonlinetransactions.Later,moveestablishedcompaniesracedtoaddsuchpatentstotheirfiles,ifonlyasadefensivemoveagainstrivalsthatmightbeatthemtothepunch.In2005,IBMnotedinacourtfilingthatithadbeenissuedmorethan300business-methodpatentsdespitethefactthatitquestionedthelegalbasisforgrantingthem.Similarly,someWallStreetinvestmentfi armedthemselveswithpatentsforfinancialproducts,evenastheytookpositionsincourtcasesopposingthepractice.TheBilskicaseinvolvesaclaimedpatentonamethodforhedgingriskintheenergymarket.TheFederalcircuitissuedanunusualorderstatingthatthecasewouldbeheardbyall12ofthecourt'sjudges,ratherthanatypicalpanelofthree,andthatoneissueitwantstoevaluateiswhetheritshould"reconsider"itsstatestreetBankruling.TheFederalCircuit'sactioncomesinthewakeofaseriesofrecentdecisionsbythesupremeCourtthathasnarrowedthescopeofprotectionsforpatentholders.LastApril,forexamplethejusticessignaledthattoomanypatentswerebeingupheldfor"inventions"thatareobvious.ThejudgesontheFederalcircuitare"reactingtotheanti-patenttrendattheSupremeCourt",saysHaroldC.Wegner,apatentattorneyandprofessoratGeorgeWashingtonUniversityLawBusiness-methodpatentshaverecentlyarousedconcernbecauseoftheirlimitedvaluetotheirconnectionwithassetthepossiblerestrictionontheirthecontroversyoverWhichofthefollowingistrueoftheBilskiItsrulingcomplieswiththecourtItinvolvesaverybigbusinessIthasbeendismissedbytheFederalItmaychangethelegalpracticesintheTheword“about-face”(Line1,Para3)mostprobablymeanslossofgoodincreaseofchangeofenhancementofWelearnfromthelasttwoparagraphsthatbusiness-methodareimmunetolegalareoftenunnecessarilylowertheesteemforpatentincreasetheincidenceofWhichofthefollowingwouldbethesubjectoftheAloomingthreattobusiness-methodProtectionforbusiness-methodpatentAlegalcaseregardingbusiness-methodAprevailingtrendagainstbusiness-methodInhisbookTheTipPoint,MalcolmGladwellarguesthatsocialepidemicsaredriveninlargepartbytheactingofatinyminorityofspecialindividuals,oftencalledinfluentials,whoareunusuallyinformed,persuasive,orwell-connected.Theideaisintuitivelycompelling,butitdoesn'texinhowideasactuallyspread.Thesupposedimportanceofinfluentialsderivesfromausiblesoundingbutlargelyuntestedtheorycalledthe"twostepflowofcommunication":Informationflowsfromthemediatotheinfluentialsandfromthemtoeveryoneelse.Marketershaveembracedthetwo-stepflowbecauseitsuggeststhatiftheycanjustfindandinfluencetheinfluentials,thoseselectedpeoplewilldomostoftheworkforthem.Thetheoryalsoseemstoexinthesuddenandunexpectedpopularityofcertainlooks,brands,orneighborhoods.Inmanysuchcases,acursorysearchforcausesfindsthatsomesmallgroupofpeoplewaswearing,promoting,ordevelowhateveritisbeforeanyoneelsepaidattention.AnecdotalevidenceofthiskindfitsnicelywiththeideathatonlycertainspecialpeoplecandriveIntheirrecentwork,however,someresearchershavecomeupwiththefindingthatinfluentialshavefarlessimpactonsocialepidemicsthanisgenerallysupposed.Infact,theydon'tseemtoberequiredofall.Theresearchers'argumentstemsfromasimpleobservingaboutsocialinfluence,withtheexceptionofafewcelebritieslikeOprahWinfrey—whoseoutsizepresenceisprimarilyafunctionofmedia,notinter al,influence—eventhemostinfluentialmembersofapopulationsimplydon'tinctwiththatmanyothers.Yetitispreciselythesenon-celebrityinfluentialswho,accordingtothetwo-step-flowtheory,aresupposedtodrivesocialepidemicsbyinfluencingtheirfriendsandcolleaguesdirectly.Forasocialepidemictooccur,however,each soaffected,musttheninfluencehisorherownacquaintances,whomustinturninfluencetheirs,andsoon;andjusthowmanyotherspayattentiontoeachofthesepeoplehaslittletodowiththeinitialinfluential.Ifpeopleinthenetworkjusttwodegreesremovedfromtheinitialinfluentialproveresistant,forexamplefromtheinitialinfluentialproveresistant,forexamplethecascadeofchangewon'tpropagateveryfaroraffectmanypeople.Buildingonthebasictruthaboutinter alinfluence,theresearchersstudiedthedynamicsofpopulationsbyconductingthousandsofcomputersimulationsofpopulations,manipulatinganumberofvariablesrelatingtopeople’sabilitytoinfluenceothersandtheirtendencytobeinfluenced.Theyfoundthattheprincipalrequirementforwhatiscalled“globalcascades”—thewidespreadpropagationofinfluencethroughnetworks—isthepresencenotofafewinfluentialsbut,rather,ofacriticalmassofeasilyinfluencedBycitingthebookTheTipPoint,theauthorintendsto[A]yzetheconsequencesofsocialepidemics[B]discussinfluentials’functioninspreadingideas[C]exemplifypeople’sintuitiveresponsetosocialepidemics[D]describetheessentialcharacteristicsofinfluentialsTheauthorsuggeststhatthe“two-step-flowtheory”servesasasolutiontomarketingproblems[B]hashelpedexincertainprevalenttrends[C]haswonsupportfrominfluentials[D]requiressolidevidenceforitsvalidityWhattheresearchershaveobservedrecentlyshowsthatthepowerofinfluencegoeswithsocialin allinkscanbeenhancedthroughtheinfluentialshavemorechannelstoreachthemostcelebritiesenjoywidemediaTheunderlinedphrase“thesepeople”inParagraph4referstotheoneswhostayoutsidethenetworkofsocialhavelittlecontactwiththesourceofareinfluencedandtheninfluenceareinfluencedbytheinitialWhatistheessentialelementinthedynamicsofsocialTheeagernesstobeTheimpulsetoinfluenceothers.[C]Thereadinesstobeinfluenced.[D]Theinclinationtorelyonothers.Bankershavebeenblamingthemselvesfortheirtroublesinpublic.Behindthescenes,theyhavebeentakingaimatsomeoneelse:theaccountingstandard-setters.Theirrules,moanthebanks,havedthemtoreportenormouslosses,andit'sjustnotfair.Theserulessaytheymustvaluesomeassetsatthepriceathirdpartywouldpay,notthepricemanagersandregulatorswouldlikethemtofetch.Unfortunay,banks'lobbyingnowseemstobeworking.Thedetailsmaybeunknowable,buttheindependenceofstandard-setters,essentialtotheproperfunctioningofcapitalmarkets,isbeingcompromised.And,unlessbankscarrytoxicassetsatpricesthatattractbuyers,revivingthebankingsystemwillbedifficult.AfterabruisingencounterwithCongress,America'sFinancialAccountingStandardsBoard(FASB)rushedthroughrulechanges.Thesegavebanksmoredomtousemodelstovalueilliquidassetsandmoreflexibilityinrecognizinglossesonlong-termassetsintheir estatement.BobHerz,theFASB'schairman,criedoutagainstthosewho"questionourmotives."Yetbanksharesroseandthechangesenhancewhatonelobbygrouppoliycalls"theuseofjudgmentbymanagement."EuropeanministersinstantlydemandedthattheInternationalAccountingStandardsBoard(IASB)dolikewise.TheIASBsaysitdoesnotwanttoactwithoutoverallnning,butthepressuretofoldwhenitcompletesitreconstructionofruleslaterthisyearisstrong.McCreevy,aEuropeancommissioner,warnedtheIASBthatitdid"notliveinapoliticalvacuum"but"intherealword"andthatEuropecouldyetdevelopdifferentrules.Itwasbanksthatwereonthewrongnet,withaccountsthatvastlyovervaluedassets.Todaytheyarguethatmarketpricesoverstatelosses,becausetheylargelyreflectthetemporaryilliquidityofmarkets,notthelikelyextentofbaddebts.Thetruthwillnotbeknownforyears.Butbank'ssharestradebelowtheirbookvalue,suggestingthatinvestorsareskeptical.Anddeadmarketspartlyreflecttheparalysisofbankswhichwillnotsellassetsforfearofbookinglosses,yetarereluctanttobuyallthosesupposedbargains.Togetthesystemworkingagain,lossesmustberecognizedanddealtwith.America'snewntobuyuptoxicassetswillnotworkunlessbanksmarkassetstolevelswhichbuyersfindattractive.Successfulmarketsrequireindependentandevencombativestandard-setters.TheFASBandIASBhavebeenexactlythat,cleaninguprulesonstockoptionsandpensions,forexample,againsthostilityfromspecialinterests.ButbygivingintocriticsnowtheyareinvitingpressuretomakemoreBankers inedthatthey dtofollowunfavorableassetevaluationrules[B]collectpaymentsfromthirdparties[C]cooperatewiththepricemanagers[D]reevaluatesomeoftheirassetsAccordingtotheauthor,therulechangesoftheFASBmayresultinthediminishingroleofmanagement[B]therevivalofthebankingsystem[C]thebanks’long-termassetlosses[D]theweakeningofitsindependenceAccordingtoParagraph4,McCreevyobjectstotheIASB’sattempttokeepawayfrompoliticalinfluences[B]evadethepressurefromtheirpeers[C]actontheirowninrule-setting[D]takegradualmeasuresinreformTheauthorthinksthebankswere“onthewrongnet”inthattheymisinterpretedmarketpriceindicators[B]exaggeratedtherealvalueoftheirassets[C]neglectedthelikelyexistenceofbaddebts[D]deniedbookinglossesintheirsaleofassetsTheauthor’sattitudetowardsstandard-settersisoneofPartForQuestions41-45,choosethemostsuitableparagraphsfromthelistA-Gandfillthemintothenumberedboxestoformacoherenttext.ParagraphEhasbeencorrectlyced.Thereisoneparagraphwhichdoesnotfitinwiththetext.MarkyouranswersonANSWERSHEET1.(10points)Thefirstandmoreimportantistheconsumer'sgrowingpreferenceforeatingout;theconsumptionoffoodanddrinkincesotherthanhomeshasrisenfromabout32percentoftotalconsumptionin1995to35percentin2000andisexpectedtoapproach38percentby2005.Thisdevelopmentisboostingwholesaledemandfromthefoodservicesegmentby4to5percentayearacrossEurope,comparedwithgrowthinretaildemandof1to2percent.Meanwhile,astherecessioneatingathomearealisticalternative.RetailsalesoffoodanddrinkinEurope'slargestmarketsareatastandstill,leavingEuropeangroceryretailershungryforopportunitiestogrow.Mostleadingretailershavealreadytriede-commerce,withlimitedsuccess,andexpansionabroad.Butalmostallhaveignoredthebig,profitableopportunityintheirownbackyard:thewholesalefoodanddrinktrade,whichappearstobejustthekindofmarketretailersneed.Willsuchvariationsbringaboutachangeintheoverallstructureofthefoodanddrinkmarket?Definiynot.Thefunctioningofthemarketisbasedonflexibletrendsdominatedbypotentialbuyers.Inotherwords,itisuptothebuyer,ratherthantheseller,todecidewhattobuy.Atanyrate,thischangewillultimaybeacclaimedbyanever-growingnumberofbothdomesticandinternationalconsumers,regardlessofhowlongthecurrentconsumerpatternwilltakehold.Allinall,thisclearlyseemstobeamarketinwhichbigretailerscouldprofitablyapplytheirscale,existinginfrastructureandprovenskillsinthemanagementofproductranges,logistics,andmarketinginligence.RetailersthatmastertheintricaciesofwholesalinginEuropemaywellexpecttorakeinsubstantialprofitsthereby.Atleast,thatishowitlooksasawhole.Closerinspectionrevealsimportantdifferencesamongthebiggestnationalmarkets,especiallyintheircustomersegmentsandwholesalestructures,aswellasthecompetitivedynamicsofindividualfoodanddrinkcategories.BigretailersmustunderstandthesedifferencesbeforetheycanidentifythesegmentsofEuropeanwholesalinginwhichtheirparticularabilitiesmightunseatsmallerbutentrenchedcompetitors.Newskillsandunfamiliarbusinessmodelsareneededtoo.Despitevariationsindetail,wholesalemarketsinthecountriesthathavebeencloselyexamined—France,Germany,Italy,andSpain—aremadeoutofthesamebuildingblocks.Demandcomesmainlyfromtwosources:independentmom-and-popgrocerystoreswhich,unlikelargeretailchains,aretwosmalltobuystraightfromproducers,andfoodserviceoperatorsthatcatertoconsumerswhentheydon'teatathome.Suchfoodserviceoperatorsrangefromsnackmachinestolargeinstitutionalcateringventures,butmostofthesebusinessesareknowninthetradeas"horeca":hos,restaurants,andcafes.Overall,Europe'swholesalemarketforfoodanddrinkisgrowingatthesamesluggishpaceastheretailmarket,butthefigures,whenaddedtogether,masktwoopposingtrends.Forexample,wholesalefoodanddrinksalescometo$268billioninFrance,Germany,Italy,Spain,andtheUnitedKingdomin2000—morethan40percentofretailsales.Moreover,averageoverallmarginsarehigherinwholesalethaninretail;wholesaledemandfromthefoodservicesectorisgrowingquicklyasmoreEuropeanseatoutmoreoften;andchangesinthecompetitivedynamicsofthisfragmentedindustryareatlastmakingitfeasibleforwholesalerstoconsolidate.However,noneoftheserequirementsshoulddeterlargeretailers(andevensomelargegoodproducersandexistingwholesalers)fromtryingtheirhand,forthosethatmastertheintricaciesofwholesalinginEuropestandtoreapconsiderablegains.PartCReadReadthefollowingtextcarefullyandthentranslatetheunderlinedsegmentstranslationshouldbewrittencarefullyonANSWERSHEET2.(10.Onebasicweaknessinaconservationsystembasedwhollyoneconomicmotivesisthatmostmembersofthelandcommunityhavenoeconomicvalue.Yetthesecreaturesaremembersofthebioticcommunityand,ifitsstabilitydependsonitsintegrity,theyareentitledtocontinuance.Whenoneofthesenoneconomiccategoriesisthreatenedand,ifwehappentoloveit.Weexcusestogiveiteconomicimportance.Atthebeginningofcenturysongbirdsweresupposedtobedisappearing.(46)Scientistsjumpedtotherescuewithsomedistinctlyshakyevidencetotheeffectthatinsectswouldeatusupifbirdsfailedtocontrolthem.theevidencehadtobeeconomicinordertobevalid.Itispainfultoreadtheseroundaboutaccountstoday.Wehavenolandethicyet,(47)butwehaveatleastdrawnnearthepointofadmittingthatbirdsshouldcontinueasamatterofintrinsicright,regardlessofthepresenceorabsenceofeconomicadvantagetous.Aparallelsituationexistsinrespectofpredatorymlsandfish-eatingbirds.(48)Timewaswhenbiologistssomewhatoverwordedtheevidencethatthesecreaturespreservethehealthofgamebykillingthephysicallyweak,orthattheypreyonlyon"worthless"species.Somespeciesoftreehavebeenreadoutofthepartybyeconomics-mindedersbecausetheygrowtooslowly,orhavetoolowasalevaletopayastimbercrops.(49)InEurope,whereryisecologicallymoreadvanced, mercialtreespeciesarerecognizedasmembersofcommunity,tobe assuch,within(50)Ittendstoignore,andthuseventuallytoeliminate,manyelementsinthelandcommunitythatlackcommercialvalue,butthatareessentialtoitshealthyfunctioning.Itassumes,falsely,Ithink,thattheeconomicpartsofthebioticclockwillfunctionwithouttheuneconomicparts.SectionⅢPartYouaresupposedtowriteforthepostgraduateassociationanoticetorecruitvolunteersforaninternationalconferenceonglobalization,youshouldconcludethebasicqualificationofapplicantandtheotherinformationyouthinkrelative.Youshouldwriteabout100words.Donotsignyourownnameattheendoftheletter.Use"postgraduateassociation"instead.PartWriteanessayof160-200wordsbasedonthefollowingdrawing.Inyouressay,you initsintended initsintendedmeaning,andgiveyourYoushouldwriteneatlyonANSHWERSHEET2.(202010年招生考試英語(一)答案詳SectionIUseof

一、文章題材結構分析霍桑工廠所做的產(chǎn)業(yè)實驗,并實驗以一個名叫“霍桑效應”的結論而告終。所記載的描述相反的結論。第四段分析了造成錯誤結論的原因,并在最后“所謂的‘霍桑效應’二、試題解析extractedrestored【答案【考點】上下文語義銜接+動詞辨(end)up最終成為/(endwith【答案】經(jīng)過一個漫長的過程)”。填入空白處后,句子的意思為:這些研究最終以得到一個被冠之以“霍桑效應”的結論而告終。故本題選B。truthproof;證【答案】【考點】上下文語義銜接+名詞辨其同位語;idea后的thatideathevery3changedsubject’sbehavior;ofbeingexperimentedupon作本題所填詞的定語。根據(jù)上下文的語義可知,C為本題正確答案。本題所在的部分大意為:這個十分具有的結論認為,僅僅是被試驗這一行為就足以使實驗客體的表現(xiàn)發(fā)生變化。其它三項,從語法上都能與ofbeingexperimentedupon連用,但放入空中語義不通,故C為正確答案。【考點】上下文語義銜接+形容詞辨B。exnations解釋;說accountsassessments評定;估【答案】【考點】上下文語義銜接+名詞辨析含義固然重要,但只要抓住了theirhourlyoutputrosewhen…butalsowhen…這句話所暗含的“兩種情況的對比”,也有助于用排除法辨別出干擾項。故正確答案為C。concludeindicate【答案】【考點】句間邏輯關系+固定結構Itdidn’tmatterItdoesn’tdidn’tmatter意為“……”it為形式主語,真正的主指代的對象,故排除這兩項。Dwork意為“起作用”時,為不及物動詞,但填入后不符合上下文語義,故也排除。所以本題的正確答案為B。forfearthat;害incasethatsolongas【答案【考點】上下文語義銜接+固定短率就會提高”。solongas表示“只要”,常用于引導條件狀語從句,表明主句發(fā)生的動作以從句談論達somethingwaschanged和productivityrose之間的邏輯關系即可。其它三個短語都能引導狀語從句。C項incasethat中的that可以省略,該短語有兩種用法:1)用作連詞,表示條件,其意為“如果,萬一”;2)用作連詞表示目的,其意為“以防,免得”。B項其后所接的從句多為虛擬語氣,如Sheputsablanketoverthebabyforfearthatheshouldcatchcold.A項asfar但是放在空中,語義都不通順,故D為正確答案?!敬鸢浮究键c】復雜句子成分+名詞辨說明。由此看出,只有A項awareness“意識”符合上下文語義和語境。該句表達的意思是,只要人們suitable適當?shù)?;相配excessive過分abundant【答案】【考點】上下文語義銜接+固定搭配【解析】C。enough本身雖為簡單詞匯,但短語beenoughtodosth.“足夠做某事”卻是??冀Y構。加上其它三個選項所形成的搭配或近義干擾,本題則需準確理解上下文意思才能作答。Asuitablebe…todo的結構,形成搭配干擾,但填入該項后,上下文語義不銜接。Bexcessive“過分的,極度的”填入后句意不通。Dabundant“充裕的;豐富的”形成近義干擾,但該詞不用于be…todo結構,abundant大多數(shù)情況下是指某一地區(qū)的資源的豐富程度的,放在本空中,明顯不合適。故本題的正確選項C。foroneself為自己[Con【答案】【考點】上下文語義銜接+固定搭配【解析】本題考查的是“介詞+onesef”的用法。反身代詞與不同的介詞連用,可表達不同的意思。本題的關鍵是在于弄清iself所指代的對象。本題所在的句子是Anawarenesseeedtobeenoughtoalerworker’sbehavioritef.itef代指句子的主語awarenes。首先排除C項on,該詞不能與oneelf構成固定搭配;A、B兩項代入原文后,句子意思不通順,故也排除。結合前兩個題的分析,本句的大致意思是:僅憑意識本身,就足以改變工人們的行為了。故本題的正確答案是D(becomparedto)(beshownto)(【答案【考點】動詞辨【解析】空格所在的主語是thesamedata,介詞to后面的賓語為:economic 句意的只有C選項?!敬鸢浮究键c】上下文語義銜接+短語辨容應該是與記錄中的一些描述相悖,因此需要一個表示轉折的連接詞。只有A項Contraryto表示【答案【考點】上下文語義銜接+名詞辨find構成動賓搭配。只有A項evidence【答案【考點】上下文語義銜接+名詞辨上看,該項符合語境所要表達的意思,從后面的舉例中也可以看出。所以本題的正確答案為D。ForexampleInconsequenceAsusual【考點】上下文邏輯銜接+短語辨【解析】本題考查了句間邏輯關系。段落首句總說,接著后面的內容舉例子進行說明。顯然是括”到“具體”的關系。首先可排除D,asusual與后面的always。而A表示對比,C表明前后句為“因”與“果”的關系;均不符合題意。故正確答案為B選項?!敬鸢浮究键c】上下文邏輯銜接+副詞辨故A為正確選項。failedtodo)ceasedtodo)startedtodo)【答案】【考點】上下文語義銜接+動詞辨【解析】and同時根據(jù)前半句的dulyrose可知,該處需要的是與原文一致性的概念。而continue表示“繼續(xù)”,具有遞進的關系。因此,D為正確選項?!敬鸢浮究键c】句間邏輯關系+副詞辨有進行實驗時”得出的數(shù)據(jù)之間的對比就找到了本題的突破口。本句的意思為“當對沒有實驗的是C選項。choseto)【考點】上下文語義銜接+固定搭【解析】forthefirstfewdays和when可以看出,本題是在說明一種常規(guī)的事實,所以選B。tendtodosth在這里譯作“常?!?。填入后該部分的意思為“無論情況如何,工人們常常在【答案【考點】上下文語義銜接+動賓搭【解析】所填入的詞需與ateau構成動賓搭配。teau在此取其“穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)”之意。本題所在的句之前,隨后”,其后跟了兩個含先后順序的動名詞結構。既然有“接著松懈下來(thenslackingoff)”這一情況出現(xiàn),說明,在這之前有一個“緊張”的過程,由此可推測20ateau所要表達的含義。Aeau)強調的是“艱辛、費力的往上爬”或“(價格)上漲”,用在此也不合適。C項surpassing(ateau)“超過一種穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)”也不合適。而D選項填入空中后,意思是:“……隨后達到一種穩(wěn)定的狀態(tài),三、全文翻譯在1924年,國家研究(NRC)派出兩名工程師到位于芝加哥附近的一個大型機部件生SectionIIReadingPart一、文章題材結構分二、試題解【答案】【考點】地判斷出文章的中心:themostfar-reachinghasbeentheinexorabledeclineinthescopeandseriousnessof過于絕對,第一段中的“decline”,原文只是說“下降”,沒有說“”(disappear)。C項“高項,原文marvel意思是“大為驚訝(常含贊嘆之意)”,表明其實讀者是贊同:這些評論可以在報紙上登的。這里的doubt表示懷疑,所以與marvel意思相反。[A]自由【答案【考點】事實細【解析】根據(jù)題干中的時間提示詞:WorldWarII ”的解釋是unrestricted,所以兩個詞是文中的indetailandatlength“詳細的”,serious“嚴肅的”,calling“對做某項工作的強烈或責任但是“l(fā)ayout”(布局)無中生有,所以本題與原文不相符合。D項中“radical”是“激進的”,無中生[A]實現(xiàn)業(yè)的目標是作家的職責。[B]作家成為是值得鄙視的。【答案】【考點】【解析】首先,我們根據(jù)題干中的人名Shawand 定位到第三段結尾處。第三段末句了的觀點“Sofewauthorshavebrainsenoughorli rygiftenoughtokeeptheirownendupinjournalism,thatIamtemptedtodefine‘journalism’as‘a(chǎn)termofcontemptappliedbywriterswhoarenot可以把答案確定為D。A項中“journalisticgoals”(業(yè)的目標),無中生有。B項中“作家成為是值得鄙視的”與原文中的proud(自豪的)相反。C項中“作者容易被業(yè)吸引”,是不對的,因為原文說的是被define“journalism”as…所吸引,而不是被journalism所吸引?!敬鸢浮俊究键c】for相當于notappealto,同時本選項還有may,這個語氣委婉的詞,因為正確答案語氣委婉。干擾選項B,原文沒有提到他的名聲有爭議,所以無中生有。C項,“他的風格符合現(xiàn)在的專家”與本段最后一句相。D項移花接木,是利用最后一句話編造的選項?!敬鸢浮俊究键c】【解析】第一段說:過去這些年英語報紙上所發(fā)生的最有的變化可能是藝術評論在范圍和嚴肅性上的(decline),符合考研閱讀在第一段提出文章中心的特點。所以B項“報紙行業(yè)的消項“令人惋惜的業(yè)的”,本選項的錯誤類型和A項一樣。D項“中的杰出的評論家”,【補充】考研閱讀的文章中心通常在文章首段提出,最遲在第二段首句出現(xiàn)三、長難句分析“Sofewauthorshavebrainsenoughorli rygiftenoughtokeeptheirownendupinjournalism,”wrote,“thatIamtemptedtodefine‘journalism’as‘a(chǎn)termofcontemptappliedbywriterswhoarenotreadtowriterswho【解析sothat句型,表示“如此……以至于”,在句子中離得比較遠,在翻譯的arenotreadtowriterswhoarewhoarenotreadwritersread為形容詞有學問的,也就是說這些writers根本沒有學問,那么是對于說沒有學問呢?towriterswhoare。此處whoare的后面省略了read,就是說,對于有學問的作家

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論