歐洲央行-歐元區(qū)和美國的地緣政治和貿(mào)易:降低進口供應(yīng)的風險?Geopolitics and trade in the euro area and the United States de-risking of import supplies_第1頁
歐洲央行-歐元區(qū)和美國的地緣政治和貿(mào)易:降低進口供應(yīng)的風險?Geopolitics and trade in the euro area and the United States de-risking of import supplies_第2頁
歐洲央行-歐元區(qū)和美國的地緣政治和貿(mào)易:降低進口供應(yīng)的風險?Geopolitics and trade in the euro area and the United States de-risking of import supplies_第3頁
歐洲央行-歐元區(qū)和美國的地緣政治和貿(mào)易:降低進口供應(yīng)的風險?Geopolitics and trade in the euro area and the United States de-risking of import supplies_第4頁
歐洲央行-歐元區(qū)和美國的地緣政治和貿(mào)易:降低進口供應(yīng)的風險?Geopolitics and trade in the euro area and the United States de-risking of import supplies_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩58頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

EUROPEANCENTRALBANK

EUROSYSTEM

OccasionalPaperSeries

IvelinaIlkova,LauraLebastard,RobertaSerafiniGeopoliticsandtradeintheeuro

areaandtheUnitedStates:

de-riskingofimportsupplies?

No359

Disclaimer:ThispublicationshouldnotbereportedasrepresentingtheviewsoftheEuropeanCentralBank(ECB).TheviewsexpressedarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflectthoseoftheECB.

ECBOccasionalPaperSeriesNo3591

Contents

Abstract2

Non-technicalsummary3

1Introduction4

1.1Contributionofthispaperandkeyfindings4

1.2Anoverviewoftheliterature6

2Evidenceoftradediversificationandrebalancing8

2.1Geopoliticaldimensionofdiversification8

Box1.Identifyingstrategicdependencies:adaptingtheEUapproachto

theUScontext9

Box2.Databaseandeventstudyspecifications13

2.2Limitedrebalancing:persistentrelianceongeopoliticallydistant

sourcingcountries15

Box3.Comparisonofthesourcesofstrategicgoodsimportedbythe

euroareaandtheUnitedStates17

3Currentandpotentialeffectsonprices21

3.1Thecostofdiversificationandrebalancing21

3.2Priceimplicationsofshiftingtowardsgeopoliticallyclose

sourcingcountries23

4Conclusions26

References28

Annex30

Acknowledgements36

ECBOccasionalPaperSeriesNo3592

Abstract

Basedongranulardataattheproductlevel,thispaperlooksatwhetherandhowtheeuroareaandtheUnitedStateshavemodifiedtheirimportsourcingstrategiessince2016,theroleplayedbygeopoliticaltensionsandthepotentialimpactonimport

prices.Itconsiderstwodifferent,butnotmutuallyexclusive,changestosourcing

strategiesforagivenproduct:(i)increasingthenumberofsourcingcountriesand

(ii)reducingtheimportmarketshareofthemainsuppliercountry.Datasuggestthatbothregionshave,onaverage,increasedthenumberofsourcingcountries,

particularlyforproductsthataremostlyimportedfrom“geopoliticallydistant”

countries(basedonUNGeneralAssemblyvotingrecords).Broadeningthenumberofsuppliercountrieshascomeatacost;however,ithasaffectedonlyasmallshareoftotalimports,withmodestimplicationsforinflationandthetermsoftrade.Atthe

sametime,evidenceofareductionintheimportshareofthemainsuppliercountry

ismoremixedandisgenerallyassociatedwithashifttowardscheaper–butnot

necessarilygeopoliticallycloser–countries,suggestingthatcostconsiderationstakeprecedenceoversupplychainresilienceandnationalsecurityconcerns.

Keywords:fragmentation,geopolitics,diversification,rebalancingJELcodes:F14,F51,F62

ECBOccasionalPaperSeriesNo3593

Non-technicalsummary

Tradetensions,theCOVID-19pandemicandthewarinUkrainehavehighlightedvulnerabilitiesinforeignsourcingofintermediateandfinalgoods,heightening

appreciationofgeopoliticalrisks.Thisoccasionalpaperlooksathowthatisaffectingtradepatterns.Itusesdetailedproduct-levelinformationinordertounderstandhowUSandeuroareafirms’sourcingstrategieshavechangedsince2016andascertainthepotentialcostsofthosechanges.Itfocusesontwonon-mutuallyexclusive

strategiesaimedatloweringrisksofsupplychaindisruptionforagivenproduct:

(i)diversificationofsourcingcountries(extensivemargin)and(ii)rebalancingby

reducingthemarketshareofthemainsuppliercountry(intensivemargin).Wethenassesswhetherthoseshiftshaveageopoliticaldimension.

Wefindthatbothregionshavediversified,increasingthenumberofsourcing

countriesonaverageforeachproduct.Thathasacceleratedsincethepandemic,

especiallyintheeuroarea.Geopoliticalriskshaveplayedarolehere:diversificationhasbeenstrongerforproductswheretheeuroareaandtheUnitedStatesusedtorelyparticularlyheavilyonimportsfromgeopoliticallydistantcountries(e.g.China,RussiaandIran).Diversificationhascomeatacost,asthenewsourcingcountriesare,onaverage,moreexpensivethantheprevioussuppliers.However,theimpactonaggregatepriceshasbeensmall:overtheperiod2016-23,productsfromnew

countriesaccountedforaverysmallshareoftotalimports(0.2-0.3%),implyingmodesteffectsoninflationandthetermsoftrade.

Furthermore,whiletherehavebeenstrongdeclinesinChina’sshareoftotalUSimportssince2018andinRussia’sshareoftotaleuroareaimportssince2022,evidenceofrebalancingawayfromothergeopoliticallydistantcountries(i.e.

reductionsinthemarketsharesofsuchsuppliercountries)islessclear.Ingeneral,

geopoliticallydistantcountries’sharesoftotaleuroareaandUSimportsremainhigh.

Indeed,China’sshareoftotaleuroareaimportshasincreasedby3percentage

points(ariseof15%)since2016.ForthoseproductswheretheUnitedStatesandtheeuroareahavereducedtheirrelianceonamainsupplier,rebalancingseemstohaveprimarilyreflectedcostconcerns–i.e.adesiretoshifttowardscheaper

sourcingcountries–ratherthansupplychainresilienceornationalsecurity

considerations.Indeed,evidencesuggeststhatrebalancingtowardsgeopoliticallyclosecountriesiscostly,implyingashifttowardsimportsthatare20-40%more

expensiveonaverage.

ECBOccasionalPaperSeriesNo3594

1Introduction

Inrecentyears,aseriesofadverseshocks–US-Chinatradetensions,the

pandemicandthewarinUkraine–havehighlightedvulnerabilitiesrelatedto

foreignsourcingofintermediateandfinalgoodsandintensifiedtheriskof

geoeconomicfragmentation(i.e.thecreationofeconomicblocsalonggeopoliticallines).Beingmoreoutward-orientedthantheUnitedStatesandChina,theeuroareamaybeparticularlyexposedtosuchfragmentationrisks(Babaetal.,2023).

Understandinghowsourcingischangingmattersbecause,assurveysshow,firmscanadoptdifferentstrategiestoaddressfragmentationrisks,with

differenteconomicoutcomes.Firmscanusethreebroadstrategiestoadjusttheirsourcing.First,theycandiversifysourcingacrossmorecountries.Second,theycanrebalancetheirforeignexposure(i.e.reducetheirdependenceononeortwomain

countries,reducingthosecountries’sharesoftotalimports),possiblyshiftingtowardscountriesthataregeographicallycloser(near-shoring)orgeopoliticallycloser

(friend-shoring).Andthird,theycanswitchtodomesticsuppliers,leadingtoarelocationofproductioninthehomecountry(re-shoring).1

Differentde-riskingstrategiescanhavedifferentimplicationsforglobalandeuroareatrade.2Insomecases,theycouldleadtofurtherglobalisationora

reconfigurationofsourcingpatterns(potentiallyresultinginmorelocalisedor

regionallyfocusedsupplynetworks).Alternatively,theycouldresultindeglobalisationifeconomiesbecomemoreinward-looking.Domesticandforeignproductionand

investmentcouldbesignificantlyaffected,andpricingdynamicscouldbealtered.Obtainingpromptinsightsintoongoingdevelopmentsisthereforeusefulinordertoanticipatepotentialimplications.

1.1Contributionofthispaperandkeyfindings

ThispaperlooksathowtheeuroareaandtheUnitedStateshaveadjusted

theirsourcingstrategiessince2016andassessesthepotentialcostsofthoseshifts.First,itassesseswhethersourcingpatternshavebeenadjustedandinwhichdirection–i.e.itlooksatwhethercountrieshavediversifiedtheirimports(increasingtherangeofcountriestheyimportfrom)and/orrebalancedtheirimports(reducing

themarketshareofthemainsuppliercountry).3Second,itassesseswhethersuch

1Inthesamewayassourcing,productionactivitycanalsobeshiftedtogeographicallyorgeopoliticallyclosercountries,movedclosertoacountry’smainsalesmarketsorevenshiftedtothehomemarket.

Furthermore,firmsmaydecidetoadjustbusinessprocesses,bymovingfroma“justintime”toa“justincase”modelandholdinglargerinventories.Whiletheseaspectsarepotentiallyrelevant,theycannotbeinvestigatedusingtradedata,sotheyliebeyondthescopeofouranalysishere.

2Inaddition,thesestrategiesalsodiffersignificantlyintermsofthecostsandtimerequired(CroweandRawdanowicz,2023).

3Withourdata,itisnotpossibletotellwhethergoodscomefromanindependentsupplierorabranch(i.e.whetheritisthesourceortheplaceofproductionthathaschanged).

ECBOccasionalPaperSeriesNo3595

shiftsintradepatternshaveageopoliticaldimension.Finally,thepaperquantifiestheimpactthatsuchreorganisationofsupplychainsmayhaveonimportprices.

Theassessmentfocusesontwopossiblestrategies:diversificationand

rebalancing.Throughouttheanalysis,itshouldalwaysbeborneinmindthat

diversificationandrebalancingmayoccureitherseparatelyoratthesametime.

Chart1

providesavisualexampleofhowthetwoconceptsrelatetoeachother,withthestartingpointbeingascenariowhereacountryimportsagivenproductfrom

countriesAandB(thelatterbeingthemainsupplier).Sourcingcanbecomemore

diversified,movingfromtwotofoursourcingcountries,withoutchangingthemarketshareofthemainsupplier(panela);inthesamevein,rebalancingcanoccurwithoutincreasingthenumberofsuppliers(panelb).4

Chart1

Diversificationvsrebalancing–avisualexample

(percentagesoftotalimports)

A40%

B60%

a.diversificationb.rebalancingc.diversification&rebalancing

C1%

B60%

C1%

D1%

D1%

B51%

A49%

A38%

B51%

A47%

Source:ECB.

Thisassessmentfocusesondevelopmentssince2016usingdetailed

product-leveldata.Wefocusondevelopmentssince2016becausethisappearstobethepointatwhichgeopoliticalconsiderationsbegantoplayastrongerrolein

traderelations,withtheelectionofDonaldTrumpandthebeginningoftrade

tensionsbetweentheUnitedStatesandChina.Theanalysisisbasedonproduct

dataatthesix-digitleveloftheWorldCustomsOrganization’sHarmonisedSystem(HS)classification,correspondingtoverydetailedproductcharacteristics.5Thishighlevelofgranularityallowsustotrackthenumberofcountriesfromwhicheconomiesimporteachproductandthepricescharged.Anotheradvantageofusing

4Thispaperdoesnotseektoquantifythepotentialbenefitsofsuchde-riskingstrategies.Suchbenefitsarelikelytocomeintheformofenhancedresilienceandlowerwelfarecostsintheeventoffuture

geopoliticalshocks.Benefitscanalsostemfromareducedriskofthehomecountrybeingblackmailedbyageopoliticallypowerfulsourcingcountry.Reducingstrategicdependenceonpotentiallyunfriendlyautocraticstatesisaninsurancepolicythatenhanceswelfareifdoneefficiently,asitreducesthe

expectedcostsofgeopoliticalshocks.

5TheHS6classificationallowscross-countrycomparisonatahighlygranularlevel.Forinstance,

code040110correspondsto“dairyproduce;milkandcream,notconcentrated,notcontainingaddedsugarorothersweeteningmatter,ofafatcontentnotexceeding1%(byweight)”.

ECBOccasionalPaperSeriesNo3596

product-leveldataistheirtimeliness.Forexample,product-leveldataareavailablewithathree-monthlag,whilefirm-leveldatatypicallyhaveatwo-yearlag.6

Ourpapercontributestothefast-growingbodyofempiricalliteraturethatis

usinggranularproduct-leveldatatoexplorewhetherseeminglystable

aggregatetrendsaremaskingaredirectionoftradeflowsbetweencountries,potentiallysignallinggeopoliticalfragmentation(AlfaroandChor,2023;and

Freundetal.,2023).Tothebestofourknowledge,ourpaperisoneofthefirstto

provideahighlydisaggregatedcomparativeanalysisoftheeuroareaandtheUnitedStateswithemphasisonthepriceimplicationsoffragmentation–anaspectthathasbeenrelativelyunderexploredinpreviousresearch.

Wefindevidenceofdiversification,whichhasincreasinglyhadageopoliticaldimension.TheeuroareaandtheUnitedStateshavebothdiversified,increasingthenumberofsourcingcountriesforeachproductonaverage.Geopoliticalrisks

haveplayedarolehere:diversificationhasbeenstrongerforproductswheretheeuroareaandtheUnitedStatesusedtorelyparticularlyheavilyonimportsfromgeopoliticallydistantcountries.Diversificationhascomeatacost,asthenew

sourcingcountriesare,onaverage,moreexpensivethantheprevioussuppliers.

Incontrast,evidenceofrebalancingismorelimited.AggregatedatashowstrongdeclinesinimportsfromChinatotheUnitedStatespost-2018andimportsfrom

Russiatotheeuroareapost-2022.However,evidenceofrebalancingawayfrom

othergeopoliticallydistantcountriesislessclear.ForthoseproductswheretheeuroareaandtheUnitedStateshaverebalanced,thisseemstohaveprimarilyreflectedcostconcerns–i.e.shiftstowardscheapersourcingcountries–ratherthansupplychainresilienceornationalsecurityconsiderations.

1.2Anoverviewoftheliterature

Geopoliticaltensionshavedominatednewspaperheadlinesandprompted

numerousadhocsurveys,indicatingthatfirms’sourcingstrategiesareindeedgraduallyshifting.Whenaskedaboutpotentialchangestotheirsourcing

strategies,halfofallfirmsrespondingtotheEIB’s2023InvestmentSurvey(bothEUandUSfirms)havechangedorareplanningtochangetheirsourcingstrategyby

increasingthenumberofcountriestheyimportfromandincreasingtheirinventories(EuropeanInvestmentBank,2023).ThetendencytowardsgreaterdiversificationofinputsourcingisalsoconfirmedbyarecentECBsurveyofleadingfirmsoperatingintheeuroarea,withdatashowingthatgeographicallyandgeopoliticallycloser

countriesarebeingfavoured(Attinasietal.,2023b).NationalsurveysongeopoliticalriskscoordinatedbytheBancad’Italia,theBancodeEspa?aandtheDeutsche

Bundesbankhavealsoincludedsmallfirms(Balteanuetal.,2024).ThesesurveysrevealthatasignificantpercentageofcompanieshavetakenstepstomitigatetheirsourcingriskfromChina–40%inGermany,30%inItalyand22%inSpain.

6However,thegranularproduct-leveldataonlygiveusabroadpictureanddonottelluswhetherparticulartypesoffirm–suchasmultinationalsorsmallandmedium-sizedenterprises–pursueparticularsourcingstrategies.

ECBOccasionalPaperSeriesNo3597

Additionally,between20%and27%offirmsinthesecountriesareconsideringtakingsimilaractionbytheendof2024.

Empiricalanalysis,however,yieldsmixedevidencedependingontheregion

thatisbeinglookedat.Availableempiricalliteratureonfragmentationmostly

focusesontheUSeconomy,lookingatthetraderestrictionsthatwereintroduced

duringtheTrumpadministration.Freundetal.(2023),forexample,findsignificant

reshapingofUSglobalsupplychainsowingtotariffsimposedonChineseimports

since2018,withdeclinesinChina’ssharesoftotalUSimportsforthesetofproductsthatweresubjecttotheadditionaltax.Instead,firmshaveincreasedtheirimports

fromlargedevelopingeconomieswhicharefirmlyembeddedinChinesesupply

chains,particularlyforstrategicgoods.CountriessuchasVietnam,Thailand,SouthKoreaandMexicohaveemergedasmajorwinnersinglobalexportmarkets,partlybyprovidingsubstitutesforproductssubjecttotheUS-Chinatariffs(Fajgelbaumetal.,2024;andAlfaroandChor,2023).

Ontheeuroareaside,tradedatahavenotyetshownanysignificant

deglobalisationofproductionchains.Aggregateindicatorsofglobalvaluechainssuggestthatnoreconfigurationoftheeuroareaproductionchainhasyettaken

place,asnonoticeableshiftinthesourcingofintermediategoodshasbeen

observed(DiSanoetal.,2023).Thisissupportedbyfirm-leveldata:DiStefanoetal.(2022)foundthatthepandemicdidnottriggersignificantreshoringamongItalian

multinationalfirms.Similarly,deLucioetal.(2023),usingarepresentativesampleofSpanishmanufacturersinvolvedinglobalvaluechains,foundnoevidenceofashifttowardssourcingfromcountriesthatweregeographicallyorgeopoliticallyclosertoSpain.

Anumberofstudiesestimatethepossibletradeandwelfareconsequencesoftheworldfragmentingintoblocs.WithafocusontheEU,Attinasietal.(2023a)

quantifytheeconomiccostsofhypotheticalfragmentationscenariosusingthe

multi-country,multi-sectormodeldevisedbyBaqaeeandFahri(2023).Theyfindthatadecouplingoftheglobaleconomyintoawesternblocandaneasternbloc(broadly

comprisingadvancedanddevelopingeconomiesrespectively)wouldreduceEU

outputandtrade,aswellasraisingprices,whilewelfarelosseswouldgenerallybemoremuted.Camposetal.(2023)estimatethattheworldfragmentingintothree

tradeblocs(western,easternandneutral)wouldhaveimportanteffectsontradebetweenthem,reducingtradeflowsby22-57%inthemostextremescenarios

(involvingthewithdrawaloftheeasternblocfromtheWorldTradeOrganization

(WTO)).Althoughsmallerthantradelosses,welfarelosseswouldstillbesizeable,withthelargestlossesseenintheeasternbloc.GoesandBekkers(2022)and

Felbermayretal.(2023)find,usinggeneralequilibriummodels,thattheglobaleconomydecouplingintotwoblocsresultsinsignificantwelfarelosses.

ECBOccasionalPaperSeriesNo3598

2Evidenceoftradediversificationandrebalancing

2.1Geopoliticaldimensionofdiversification

Theeuroareahasprogressivelydiversifiedimportsourcesoverthepasttwodecades,althoughthereisnosignthatthisprocesshasaccelerated

significantlyrelativetothepast.SincetheelectionofDonaldTrumpasUS

Presidentin2016,diversificationintheeuroareahascontinued,withagradual

increaseinthenumberofsourcingcountriesperproductandaslightacceleration

sincethepandemic

(Chart2)

;thisincreasecanalsobeobservedforgoodsof

strategicimportance.7,8However,thisrepresentsthecontinuationofaprocessthat

hasbeenongoingforsomeyearsnow.Incontrast,therehasbarelybeenany

diversificationintheUnitedStates.Interestingly,in2023theeuroareahad,on

average,two-thirdsmoresourcingcountriesperproductthantheUnitedStates,and20%moreforstrategicgoods.Asshownin

ChartA2,

diversificationappearstohaveincreasedmorestronglyintheeuroareathanintheUnitedStatessince2016,evenaftercontrollingfortheinitialnumberofsourcingcountriesperproduct.

7See

ChartA1

intheannex.StrategicgoodsareasdefinedinthelistinEuropeanCommission(2021).TheEuropeanCommissionidentifiedstrategicdependenciesrelatedtospecificimportedinputs“inthemostsensitiveecosystemswheretheEUcanbeconsideredhighlydependentonimportsfromthird

countries”,basedonthreeindicators:(i)concentration,asmeasuredbytheHerfindahl-Hirschman

Indexandthemarketshareofnon-EUsupplyingcountries;(ii)theimportanceofdemand,calculatedasextra-EUimports’shareoftotalEUimports;and(iii)substitutability,calculatedastheratioof

extra-EUimportstototalEUexports.FortheUnitedStates,weconstructasimilarsetofproducts,adaptingtheEuropeanCommission’smethodologytofitUSdata(seeBox1fordetails).More

descriptivestatisticsonstrategicgoods(geographicaldistributionandconcentrationbysourcingcountry)canbefoundinBox3forboththeeuroareaandtheUnitedStates.

8PolicyinitiativessuchastheCHIPSActandtheInflationReductionActintheUnitedStatesandtheEuropeanChipsAct,theNet-ZeroIndustryActandtheCriticalRawMaterialsActinEuropehaveacommongoalofreducingdependenceoncriticalproductsandinputs.

ECBOccasionalPaperSeriesNo3599

Chart2

Numberofsourcingcountriesperproduct

(averagesandmedians)

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Average–euroareaMedian–euroarea

Average–UnitedStatesMedian–UnitedStates

20022005200820112014201720202023

Source:TradeDataMonitor.

Notes:ProductsaredefinedatHS6level.Datafortheeuroarearefertoextra-euroareaimports.

Box1.Identifyingstrategicdependencies:adaptingtheEUapproachtotheUScontext

IvelinaIlkova

ThepandemicunderscoredthevulnerabilityoftheEUeconomytodisruptionsinthesupply

ofspecificproductsandinputs.Thisawarenessledtotheemergenceoftheconceptof“strategicgoods”–criticalforeigninputsessentialforEUproduction.Inresponse,theEuropeanCommissiondevelopedalistofstrategicgoods/dependencies,basedoncriteriasuchashighEUdemand,

relianceonconcentratedsourcesandlimitedsubstitutability.NosuchlistiscurrentlyavailablefortheUnitedStates.Thisboxexplainshowweaddressthisgap,outliningthemethodologyused,

discussingitslimitations,andproposingadaptationstosuitboththeUSandtheEUcontexts.

InthestaffworkingdocumentEuropeanCommission(2021),amethodologyforidentifyingstrategicdependenciesisdeveloped.Essentially,thatmethodologycombinesquantitativeand

qualitativeanalysiswiththeaimofcreatingalistofstrategicallyimportantproductswheretheEUisstronglydependentonforeignsuppliers.Themethodologycanbebroadlydividedintotwosteps.

First,thelistofHSproductsisfiltered,reducingitfrom5,000toroughly390goods.Thisisdonebycomputingthefollowingthreecoredependencyindicators(CDIs),withproductsselectedbasedoncriticalvaluesspecifictoeachCDI:

?CDI1capturestheconcentrationofEUimportscomingfromnon-EUcountries.Foreachproduct,itiscalculatedusingtheHerfindahl-HirschmanIndex,asdefinedbelow:

n

i=1

wheresiisthemarketshareofthenon-EUcountryandnisthetotalnumberofsourcecountries.Avalueof0.5meanstheproductissuppliedbytwocountries.Thehigherthevalue,thefewercountriessupplythisproducttotheEU.ThecriticalvalueabovewhichtheconcentrationisconsideredtoohighisCDI1>0.4.

ECBOccasionalPaperSeriesNo35910

?CDI2aimstomeasuretheimportanceofextra-EUimportsintotaldemand.Inotherwords,itidentifiesproductswhicharemainlysuppliedbyforeignsources,insteadof

locallythroughintra-EUtrade.Thecriticalvalueis0.5andtheformulausedtocalculateitisasfollows:

?CDI3isusedtomeasurethesubstitutabilityofextra-EUimportswithEU

production.ThisratioseekstomeasuretheextenttowhichEUproductioncancoverimportneedsintheeventofdisruption.EUexportsareusedasaproxyforEU

production,andthecriticalvalueis1:

CDI?=

Inasecondstep,thelistisnarroweddownfurtherbyselectinggoodsusedin“themost

sensitiveindustrialecosystems”,suchasdigital,health,aerospaceanddefence,andelectronicssectors.Thestaffworkingdocumentdoesnotprovideanexplicitlistofthesectorsthatare

consideredpartofthesesensitiveecosystems,makingitdifficulttofullyreplicatetheresults.

However,theEuropeanCommissionrecentlypublishedalistofCriticalTechnologyAreas,9whichweusedtobuildalistoftheHS2sectorsthatarepartofsensitiveecosystems(withtheexactHS2codesbeinginferred).

TheabovemethodologycannotbeappliedinfulltotheUnitedStates.Therearetworeasonsforthis.First,CDI2–whichmeasurestheimportanceofdemand–requiresdataonbothintra-and

extra-UStrade.Owingtotheunavailabilityofdataonintra-UStradeflows,CDI2cannotbe

calculatedfortheUnitedStatesunlessareasonableproxyfordomesticdemandattheHS6levelcanbefound.Second,theidentificationofsensitiveecosystemsintheEuropeanCommission’s

workingdocumentwasdonespecificallyfortheE

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論